Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


£70m Malawi aid 'could give better value for money'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 30 October 2009
THE UK government's £70 million-a-year-aid package to Malawi could be improved to provide better value for money, a financial watchdog suggested yesterday.
The National Audit Office (NAO) said there was no doubt UK efforts were helping improve conditions in Malawi but said targets were not being met and the effectiveness of the aid was not scrutinised thoroughly enough.

Between 2003 and 2008, the Dep
artment for International Development gave £312m to the African state, which is one of the poorest countries in the world.

The programme helped reduce poverty, improve health, boost harvests and encourage more effective governance, the report by the NAO said.

"However, only 61 per cent of the June 2008 targets that DFID set for its programmes were achieved on time, with a further 14 per cent of these within the subsequent year," it said.

The report added that aid programmes had "weak" measures of value for money.

The NAO said that the DFID's programmes to improve health have been well designed and had improved the health of Malawians.

Aids patients had been supplied with increasing amounts of anti-retrovirals. Child mortality had declined and maternal mortality has fallen substantially from its peak in 2000.

But it added that better value for money would be achieved if more effort was made to direct health workers to the most needy areas and drug distribution was improved.

Edward Leigh, the Tory MP who chairs the Commons public accounts committee, said "real progress" had been made in tackling Malawi's problems but expressed concern at the management.

"What is unsatisfactory is that the department's own measures of whether programmes are delivering value for money are weak," he said.

"Despite the department setting its own targets for programmes … two-fifths were not achieved on time."

Helping the people of Malawi is also a key ambition of the SNP government, which is building on work started by the former First Minister Jack McConnell.

The Scottish Government funds its own projects and the £3m given to Malawi last year amounted to three-quarters of its international aid budget.

Peter West of the Scotland Malawi Partnership said: "Projects funded by the Scottish Government are specifically requested by the Malawian government, with all impacts externally monitored and evaluated."

A DFID spokesman said: "Our programmes in Malawi are having a positive impact. DFID's health programme has helped ensure 15,000 fewer children and 1,000 fewer mothers die each year.

"430,000 schoolchildren benefit from over 4,100 classrooms built since 1996 and 18 million textbooks have been provided since 2006.

"The NAO rightly acknowledges that our aid has contributed to building a better health service, to getting more children in school and to reducing hunger. We will continue to ensure every pound of aid delivers value for money."





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 29 October 2009 9:25 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Malawi
 
1

fife runner,

30/10/2009 06:48:00
is it not high time Africa stood on its own feet. All the countries on that Continent should be able to look after themselves now.
2

common sense voice,

30/10/2009 07:14:42
why do we bother..... it's all a scam! yes some money goes to help but everyone knows a lot goes missing ..
3

Tynietiger,

30/10/2009 08:22:26
How about the £40,000 wasted paying for Jack McConnell's foreign trips as a compensation for not getting the Malawi job so as to avoid a by election in Motherwell.

And Stalin's Granny Helen Liddell is being replaced as Australian Viceroy by another Labour politician Lady Amos.

These positions were meant to be non political.
4

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 30/10/2009 08:50:02
This is symptomatic of Nu Labour's inability to manage anything other than to fill in their expense forms incorrectly. Now Broon proposes to get rid of £1bn which we don't have and will have to pay back with interest at some point to get a headline and disburse it to largely undeserving nations in the name of assisting them with the effects of global warming. I think this used to be known as treason for which he should suffer the appropriate penalty.
5

westcider,

Isle of Lewis 30/10/2009 10:37:31
That consignment of new merc's are going WHERE?
6

sam the god,

30/10/2009 10:48:21
time to spend the money in the uk not africa they wanted to run thier own countries so let them get on with it not our problem anymore
7

Allan(handofgod137),

30/10/2009 12:56:37
Yes, it could be better spent in Britain, perhaps on a new no frills maximum security jail to house public servants who've stolen the taxpayers cash!
8

Jo Public,

30/10/2009 13:49:20
Malawi? Is that not wee Jokey McNumty's pals?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.