Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


T in the Park

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

'Nazis' jibe as factory for the blind and disabled faces closure



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 29 February 2008
THE ruling administration of Aberdeen City Council was yesterday accused of acting like "Nazis" following the decision to axe vital funding for a factory which employs blind and disabled workers.
The management of the Glencraft factory claimed they had been left with no choice but to close the plant with the loss of 56 jobs following the council's "cruel" decision to withdraw the £650,000 funding as part of a series of budget cuts.

Some
38 of the workers are blind or disabled.

Anthony Pratt, the acting general manager of the charity – established as the Royal Aberdeen Workshops for the Blind in 1843 – said he had been given no warning of the council's decision.

He said he had learned that the funds had been axed only through a chance phone call between a member of the council and a disabled employee.

"The naivety of believing that actions more appropriate to Nazi Germany in the 1930s are acceptable in 21st-century Britain is beyond belief," Mr Pratt said.

"It is an absolutely appalling way to treat 38 disabled people. This is an act of political vandalism perpetrated by an administration that lacks integrity, experience, compassion and skill.

"It has come as huge shock," he said. "It is absolutely appalling. It is a very, very cruel thing to have done. The whole process is totally inept."

Mr Pratt said: "The employment costs of the workers, including their wages and pension contributions, are met by the appropriate council. The withdrawal of the grant means that the workshops will have to close and the closure programme will have to be completed in a matter of a few months.

"I am not issuing redundancy notices today. However, all employees, both able-bodied and disabled, will become redundant unless the council changes its mind within the next two or three weeks."

Andy Laing, a partially sighted employee who has worked at Glencraft for 25 years, is one of the workers who faces losing his job.

He said: "I am devastated about what is going to happen, not only for myself but for another 50 odd workers in here.

"About 40 of them are disabled workers, and it's going to have a massive effect on their way of life," he said.

Glencraft is understood to have been losing money year on year at its plant in Wellington Road and had been looking to move to smaller premises which would be cheaper to run and more efficient. The management had been due to hold talks with the council about the move.

Councillor Kevin Stewart, the deputy leader of the city council, yesterday defended the controversial decision.

He said the council had judged that moving to smaller premises, in order to render Glencraft more financially stable and sustainable, was a very high-risk strategy.

"A decision has therefore been taken to withdraw the £650,000 core funding and instead offer a one-off £300,000 to the business – and consider what can be done to support the staff group who would not manage to sustain mainstream employment," he said.





The full article contains 521 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 28 February 2008 10:02 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

truthsleuth,

29/02/2008 00:36:11
UK governments think nothing of giving India, Nigeria etc £millions to enable them to compete with us. They will give nothing for our own people.
2

John Blackley,

Winter Garden, FL 29/02/2008 01:42:20
Mr. Pratt - who seems almost prophetically well-named - would do well to re-read his 1930's history of Germany.
3

Pilrig.,

Livingston 29/02/2008 06:32:38
Budget cuts ? Is this the same cooncil that employed some joker to write a report about banning decorations next to gravestones ?
4

tomfrom66,

Thornton Cleveleys 29/02/2008 07:23:50
#2 Morality and ethics are not statistical.
5

Edith,

Aberdeen 29/02/2008 08:00:35
What a shame. I have used their services several times and always been delighted with their work and prices. My only problem was the position of the shop, at the far away industrial estate at Altens, with the heavy traffic all around. I do not like driving there
6

Edith,

Aberdeen 29/02/2008 08:02:49
I wonder if any philanhropist (do they still exist?) might come to the rescue? I would do it if I had the money.
7

sam the god,

29/02/2008 08:16:10
I bet this is just a money saving venture by the councillors so they can use the saved money for junkets, expenses and jobs for the family’s well that is my view on why the project was axed
8

Nikostratos,

29/02/2008 08:41:39
Money from the well off in Scotland could have been used to support these citizens.The snp chose instead to have a council tax freeze and so money from the poor the blind or disabled. went into the pockets of the rich people who could afford to contribute more to Scottish society.

well done snp the party of two Scotland's..the haves and the have not........
9

Duncan in Edinburgh,

29/02/2008 09:03:01
Another inexperienced Lib Dem /SNP coalition, another disastrous set of policies. Can't these people get anything right?

This same coalition of the unwilling is wreaking havoc in Edinburgh too. I feel for the people of Aberdeen.

Where are the SNP fanboys to defend this?
10

Logie Almond,

29/02/2008 09:45:15
Mr Pratt is very appropriately named to make such a silly comparison. Surely the idea of sheltered workshops for the blind is harking back to the 19th century. We should be looking at how technology can help blind people find jobs in the wider community.
11

Jimmy the Pie,

29/02/2008 10:19:08
#9 Nico

Are you a speech writer for Wendy & Nicol???
They talk utter drivel as well as you write utter drivel.
What a team.
Did you see FMQ's and Question Time yesterday?? Any thoughts on them???
12

Duncan in Edinburgh,

29/02/2008 10:20:03
#11 So you support making them all redundant do you?
13

Duncan in Edinburgh,

29/02/2008 10:24:06
#12 How about addressing the issue. An SNP-involved administration is making 38 disabled people redundant. Do you support this? Which part of the SNP manifesto had this commitment? Isn't it clear that the rush to freeze council tax is causing these issues to arise? Isn't it clear that the SNP in local government are utterly hopeless?
14

Roberta Burns,

29/02/2008 10:26:10
I still have a bed I bought at Glencraft many years ago. Fantastic workmanship. Shame on Aberdeen Council.
15

Jimmy the Pie,

29/02/2008 10:37:34
#14 Duncan
Seeing as the council is taking the decisions in this case, you need to ask yourself, who runs Aberdeen Council?? Oh it's the Libdums.
I think that money could and probably will be found too keep the project going. We had the same knee jerk reactions, about council workers being laid off, when the freeze was announced. Councils have to be more prudent with OUR money. As a fervent Unionist I can see why you're having a rant.
Did you see FMQ's and Question Time yesterday?? Any thoughts on them???
16

Nikostratos,

29/02/2008 11:09:01
#12 Jimmy the Pie

Dear Jimmy if money is limited surely targeting it's use
to where it is most needed is more equitable to one's fellow Scottish citisens.

As opposed to a council tax freeze which has the consequence of allowing individuals who can pay more paying less than they are able.

The logic behind the Tax freeze is the same as was used to justify the tory poll tax. a tax (freeze)levied equally on every adult in the community which shift's the tax burden from rich to poor,

Mr Salmond performances at FMQs the little i have seen are not of the calibre of a nation
leading statesman. He has not grown into the role since leaving Westminster. Were he was by common consent a poor performer and unable to command the house with his oratory. He on the other hand has found a smaller forum to which he is more suited just like a boxer who fighting above his weight finds He wins more bouts by moving down a weight division. Unfortunately Mr Salmond will be no world champion or world statesman.

And I wonder if as all the snp supporters repeatedly claim Wendy and the other party leaders are so mediocre. Why is it a triumph for Mr Salmond to seemingly best them
17

Duncan in Edinburgh,

29/02/2008 11:16:04
#16 No, it isn't a Lib Dem council! That's simply a lie. Aberdeen is run by a Lib Dem / SNP coalition, as I said in #10.

And you have completely failed to answer any of the points I raised.

FMQs has nothing whatsoever to do with this story. Stop deflecting. I'm talking about incompetence in a local administration in which the SNP is a partner.
18

joppa jock,

Huntingdon 29/02/2008 11:45:34
If Aberdeen council is anything like most other councils around the country, their biggest burden will be the salaries of their overpaid executives. The days of the poorly paid council employees are well and truly over with Chief Executives demanding, and getting, higher salaries than the Prime Minister. Cut backs in services are taking place in every corner of the country but the well paid council bosses will not suffer, only those who pay through the nose to keep them living in style will suffer. Services for disabled adults are particularly vulnerable as councils are now seeking ways to devolve themselves from responsibility by the closure of day centres and other such facilities. The gap between the rich and poor has never been greater and will get greater still while our political masters of all parties continue to look after themselves first and foremost.
19

Allan(handofgod137),

29/02/2008 12:16:34
So how much are we spending on oversea's aid, not to mention housing and feeding illegal migrant's who've suddenly become assylum seekers when facing deportation?
20

Yonthing!,

29/02/2008 12:47:50
#17 - how does a tax freeze "shift the burden from the rich to the poor"

Everybody pays less tax, so the Council lose out equally on funding. But every single voter is better off in their pocket, which has been done purely to win votes.
21

Nikostratos,

29/02/2008 13:22:06
#22

Dont be a silly billy £1 to someone who has £5 is a lot £1 to some who has £1000 is not a lot comprende
22

Nikostratos,

29/02/2008 13:25:49
#22


yes dave of course..whatever you say
23

Nikostratos,

29/02/2008 13:27:12
23 for 21 the silly billy
24

Roberta Burns,

29/02/2008 13:36:05
Dave from Barra is absolutely correct. I know the unions have been involved with this for a couple of years along with the closure of Remploy - another facility that aids disabled people in the workplace.
25

Duncan in Edinburgh,

29/02/2008 13:39:16
#22 Dave, please! Firstly it was entirely the current council's decision to remove funding. Secondly, while the previous council started the review process, that council was a Lib Dem / Tory coalition!

How, precisely, to you manage to blame Labour for any of this?
26

Duncan in Edinburgh,

29/02/2008 13:40:55
#27 Eh? Dave from Barra is entirely incorrect in this instance. There hasn't been a Labour council in Aberdeen for many years. The previous council was Lib Dem/Tory!

You SNPites need to engage your brains before hitting the keyboards.
27

Duncan in Edinburgh,

29/02/2008 13:48:41
#33 For god's sake Dave you were wrong, have a bit of good grace about it instead of calling me names.

You SNP guys shout "Labour's fault" at everything bad and "SNP's triumph" at everything good and many people are sick to the back teeth of it. You clearly have no idea what has been going on here if you didn't even know who has been running Aberdeen council. The least you could do is apologise when you're proved wrong.
28

Duncan in Edinburgh,

29/02/2008 13:56:33
#30 That's all well and good, "regardless of political leanings", Dave, but the truth is that hard decisions have to be made when parties are in power, and right now the SNP are in power and have to carry part of the can for this. Every hard decision made by Labour when they were in power was criticised to the nth degree by the SNP in opposition. You cannot look backwards for everything. The SNP has to take responsibility for the decisions to which it is party.

Sadly in Edinburgh the SNP has singularly failed to do that, and it appears the same is happening in Aberdeen. They have to be held to account.
29

Nikostratos,

29/02/2008 14:08:24

Dave from Barra an example of how the snp supporter admits they got it wrong..big time
30

Duncan in Edinburgh,

29/02/2008 14:20:14
#36 When you move from mistaken to stubborn denial, you're in trouble Dave.

This is a local authority issue. The local authority in 2006 was run by a coalition of the Lib Dems and the Tories.

The local authority which just took the decision to remove funding and thereby make redundant 38 disabled workers is the current coalition of the Lib Dems and the SNP.

And you are telling me this is Labour's fault.
31

Liberal for life,

Dunblane 29/02/2008 15:48:16
As someone who had an uncle work at this factory for many years I really find this a disgraceful decision and intend raising it with the councillors involved. Perhaps its a reflection on the down side of the COSLA decision to sign up to John Swinneys bribe regarding council tax freeze but really this is a shameful decision and one we should rightly challenge.
32

Thomas Stanton,

29/02/2008 21:56:04
Err, This makes sense - the UK, if you look at it's books, is in deep economic (expletive) at the moment; seeing as that is the case the government must tighten the purse strings.

The UK is in massive debt - common sense, you cannot spend money you no longer have.

In fact if you look at the accounting books of the world - some African nations have more money than we do now. We have no more money our account is like minus billions.
33

Matt there,

somewhere 04/03/2008 03:14:56
The same problems happened elsewhere, too.

A Labour council, knowing it would be booted out at the next election, took many nasty decisions, though put delays on them so they'd only come to light when the new administration came into power.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.