Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


A bigger rail network will keep Scotland on track to success

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 20 May 2008
MATCHING our transport infrastructure to people's need and desire to travel is hugely challenging. Getting passengers into public transport and freight off the roads would have benefits to individual and environmental health.
The arrival this week of the Stirling-Alloa link refocuses our attention on the massive contribution of rail and its future potential. Hundreds more people now have access to trains. There will be significant energy savings in delivering coal to Lon
gannet power station, and capacity on the Forth Bridge will be freed up which could double service frequency heading north. Over budget and late? Yes, but worth the wait and the investment.

Nationally we have witnessed growth of rail passenger traffic by 40 per cent in ten years (and nearly 50 per cent for freight). We have passenger numbers not seen since the peak of the mid-1950s. Worryingly it's being achieved on a network 40 per cent smaller than then.

Predictions show 30 per cent growth in the next ten years. Is that doable? A rejuvenated Waverley Station is adequate for present demand, not for that level of growth. With commuter trains from many directions running well over capacity attracting additional folks out of their cars is a tall order. The vast majority of freight needs final delivery by road – but could we get more distance journeys on to rail? The answer is yes, but not without additional capacity.

The network can't run full. There needs to be spare capacity to buffer occasional incidents and breakdowns. Capacity can be grown by improved signalling, but only within limits.

Welcome then other positive initiatives in the pipeline – the Airdrie-Bathgate link, not just a major capacity uplift east-west, but linking new destinations. More services to Edinburgh Park, but isn't it time the fast link stopped there? The Waverley Line offers dormitory support for the Capital by enabling commuters from the Borders. Discussion continues on further electrification (likely) and revitalising the "South Sub" (unlikely).

The sleeping giant of High Speed Rail is waking as a major opportunity for future distance connectivity. Edinburgh council is committed to Edinburgh-London in under three hours.

The principal objection to further investment in rail is cost. But the cost of failing to give us a transport infrastructure fit for purpose for the 21st century will be so much greater. Edinburgh's economy has been a fantastic success story of late. In the global economy connectivity is key to jobs, wealth creation, and keeping our city psychologically in the centre circle of that global marketplace.

Renewing the vitality of our rail network is the best improvement we could make to our economic circulatory system in the foreseeable future.

• Graham Bell is press & policy officer for Edinburgh Chamber of Commerce




Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 20 May 2008 8:18 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Transport policy , Transport
 
1

Vic,

Edinburgh 20/05/2008 12:17:55
"Edinburgh council is committed to Edinburgh-London in under three hours"

Wow. How will they fund that?
2

CRAGman,

20/05/2008 13:51:05
On the continent Alloa and the South Sub. would seem like small beer indeed - just look at Antwerp, Zurich, Berlin, Bilbao (and that's just for starters). Looking at more national level schemes, look at France, Spain, Germany, Italy, Turkey, Taiwan, South Korea and China. And, of course, it's not just the hardware provision you have to get right. Ticketing and timetable integration in Britain lags way behind best practice in Europe and the States.
3

gus1940,

Edinburgh 20/05/2008 15:23:26
One advantage of reopening The WAverley Line and extending it to Carlisle would be to use it for goods traffic from E.Scotland in conjunction with using the still open Kilmarnock, Dumfries line for W. Scotland freight.

FRom Carlisle south said freight could go down the underused Settle-Carlisle line.

This would tkae pressure off both E & W Coast Main Lines.
4

The Ghost of Sir William Arrol,

The Forthy Bridge 20/05/2008 19:09:48
Like it or not, global fuel supplies are starting their long decline and Scotland has no opt out or magic solution. Railways are by far the most efficient way of moving people and freight around, especially when electrified. Reliance on roads and air travel would be economic suicide as both modes will be increasingly expensive. Edinburgh will be lucky to have an airport still in operation in 20 years time. There just isn't the cheap fuel to support a mass aviation industry for much longer.
5

David Harrington,

Edinburgh 21/05/2008 12:20:00
Outside of the South East of England, Scotland has the most developing railway in the UK; thankfully this also extends to a sensible attitude towards electrification. However, given that the SNP administration have committed to a hugely expensive additional Forth road bridge despite repair of the existing one being possible, it is not clear how existing or indeed future projects will be funded.
6

Ian down under,

Kawerau 22/05/2008 02:14:42
Of course the rail link to the airport had to go. It is simply not needed. His Excellency Lord King Emperor Alex Salmond, the Honourable Member for Manhattan and the Trump Tower, didn't need it. He has his big Lexus fleet and the Donald has helicopters, therefore the transport needs of those important to Mr Salmond and the SNP have been met in full.
End of story ........... let them eat cake........off wi' there heads etc.
7

Andrew,

22/05/2008 17:31:01
Thank you Mr Bell for this excellent, informed comment!
8

Hello,

here 23/05/2008 22:40:45
If you want to improve the railways they need lots of money and a lot of political will. The powers that be should put their money where there mouth is.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.