Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Parking gets easier as drivers steer clear of city

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 02 July 2009
TRAM work and a slowdown in consumer spending have contributed to a sharp decline in the amount of parking spaces being used in the city centre.
Latest figures show on-street parking bays were on average only in use for 43.4 per cent of chargeable periods in April – almost 6 per cent lower than at the same time last year.

The new findings come after a decline of nearly 10 per cent in usage in March and there have been year-on-year declines in parking usage in every month since last September.

A report on the economy by the council indicates that the decline since the summer may be down to "reductions in shopper expenditure resulting from the economic downturn, or to city centre disruptions".

Business leaders say tram construction work, rather than the economic downturn, has resulted in fewer people driving into the city centre.

Graham Bell, a spokesman for the Edinburgh Chamber of Commerce, said: "It is very difficult to say what proportion is down to the economic downturn because many parts of retail are holding up relatively well, such as food and drink and fashion.

"The problem we have here is the traffic management scheme, which seems to be working very well but it is working very well at forcing people not to drive into the city centre."

Despite the Chamber, through its Open for Business group, trying to encourage people still to use the city centre, Mr Bell said many are reluctant to drive in.

"We have to bear in mind that a very strong proportion of shoppers will want to travel by car," said Mr Bell. "People have a tendency to do what is easy. And if it is easier to go to an out-of-town shopping centre in their car then that is what people will do."

The council data showed that the average of 43.3 per cent of usage of parking bays during chargeable periods in April was slightly above the 40.4 per cent for March. However, it was 5.7 per cent lower than April 2008 and the March figure was 9.9 per cent lower than the same time last year.

However, the decline may be seen as good news for some motorists and the council report acknowledges that it is now "significantly easier" for visitors to find parking in the city centre.

Councillor Tom Buchanan, the city's economic development convenor, said: "Edinburgh's city centre is a world-class destination and offers a diverse range of attractions for residents and visitors alike. Yet there is little doubt that global economic conditions have impacted on shopper expenditure.

"These figures highlight that the council's ongoing efforts to support business are now more vital than ever."


The full article contains 466 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Council Insider,

Council HQ 02/07/2009 12:22:21
BORING!
2

Oh for the banter,

02/07/2009 12:23:06
Easy, check the performance of the outer lying shopping areas and see how they have performed. Why would you even bother going to princess street nowadays anyway?

Ocean terminal, the Gyle, New craighall, Livingston all have the same shops and free parking well apart from Livi now but it is still cheap.
3

AntiEdinburghWhingers,

02/07/2009 12:23:53
Nearly six percent lower?! Wow! Edinburgh is really grinding to a halt! Everybody panic! The trams are killing everybody in the world!

Maybe more people are being sensible and using public transport, or perhaps using these things dangling below the waist called 'legs' and walking?

Let people drive to the out of town shopping centres - it's what they were designed for. Soul-less wastelands for soul-less people who live in suburbia and have no appreciation for anything other than their lump of metal and their consumerist fix from a retail shed. Leave the city centre for those of us that appreciate it, and are sensible! Let's just accept that the New Town wasn't actually designed around the car... It was designed for PEOPLE!

Graham Bell seems to be absolutely clueless - rather than moan about a 5.7 decrease in usage of parking spaces he should be highlighting the fact that parking is easier than people think, and there is ample opportunity to use public transport as well.

Mr Bell states that the traffic management scheme is "working well at forcing people not to drive in to the city centre" - how exactly is a 5.7% decrease during the biggest recession in fifty years any evidence of the scheme "forcing" people out of the city centre? If it was "working well" at forcing people out, I'd expect a 50% drop at least... It seems the only thing Mr Bell is well-versed in is hyperbole.
4

Sally Longlegs,

edinburgh 02/07/2009 12:25:39
Do they really think that its only drivers who are staying away.

The centre of Edinburgh has been murdered.as has Leith Walk and Constitution Street.

The Council need to look to our illustrious Labour Party who have just realised,or more likely avoided the fact that the electorate are pi**ed off that they are being ignored.

The trams,along with the extreme ammount of ongoing roadworks are our punishment for voting NO to the congestion charge.
David Begg and all his loney left wingers are winning.

The people of Edinburgh need to vote out the headcases
who are allegedly running this once great city.

The Highways Department need a thorough investigation for mismanagement and failure to act in the interest of the citizens.A clearout is long overdue.

5

Balliol II,

Dunbar 02/07/2009 12:27:09
It may seem boring to number 1 but as someone living about 25 miles out I can confirm I now visit much less often because of traffic and parking. Now I only come into Edinburgh for occasional meetings and to go to John Lewis or Lakeland. It is a pity JL did not build a new store at Fort Kinnaird or the Gyle.
6

vote them out,

02/07/2009 12:38:57


Yes the good leaders of Edinburgh have caused more traffic choas in edinburgh (population 290,000) than rush hour in cairo (population 20 million plus). Well done Edinburgh Council on the placing of roadworks and tramworks to create the optimum traffic choas! The cost of this chaos (trams etc) £650 million and rising, to be paid by the tax payer. The benefit is that the tram will replace a couple of bus services in the city whilst limiting the available road width to every other road user. Of course the odd pedestrian will get knocked over by the virtually silent tram this will lead to the tram staying in place while the police cinduct a 24 hour investigation of the site - traffic chaos you aint see nothin yet.






7

thehitmaster,

02/07/2009 12:39:22
What we do know is that the people who aren't parking certainly are not taking the bus given the changes that have been announced for the buses http://www.lothianbuses.com/news/?changes-to-your-buses-from-sunday-26-july-2009-66.html
8

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 02/07/2009 12:41:58
The reason for this is obvious to anyone who has been to the city centre recently and is not deaf, blind and stupid.

Who really wants to visit a city centre that looks like a compound at Guantanamo Bay? Scrap the trams now and lets start re-building our city.

In any case, because of this, we can expect to see the number of parking spaces being reduced, charges to increase and enforcement to be redoubled. After all, they can't loose out on their cash can they?
9

alfonsa pedrosa,

embra 02/07/2009 12:43:41
I must admit i do take my car to into the city and find it a bit easier to get parked.
10

Jams,

Edinburgh 02/07/2009 12:53:23
A quick vote on #3 - is he

a) Really that stupid
b) Working for TIE
c) A wind-up merchant
d) All of the above
11

reincarnated,

Edinburgh 02/07/2009 12:56:17
I think the writer has got parking zones disease.
12

FrankGallagher,

02/07/2009 12:57:15
What's going to happen to all the surplus wardens?
13

Chris,

Edinburgh 02/07/2009 12:57:48
So presumably that means 6% less parking charge revenue, and an even bigger drop in penalty charges?

#11 Jams: I vote d).
14

eDUCATIon,

02/07/2009 13:07:27
If I want a cheap kilt or a mobile phone contract upgraded i'll go into town.

Other than that, theres not much else.......
15

scotsol,

Edinburgh 02/07/2009 13:08:18
#8 - I didn't actually know that TIE were building a tramline at Guantanamo Bay, but thanks for the information.

Princes Street is so much pleasanter to walk down now, as is the whole New Town. Less parking spaces, increased charges and more enforcement? Excellent, bring it on! And the first thing they should do is start enforcing parking restrictions on Sundays.
16

Peedie Paws,

02/07/2009 13:10:33
#11 - I vote d) too.
17

roadstohell,

02/07/2009 13:19:28
What really worries me is the loss of revenue to CEC, from the parking fees and the associated fines, this is serious indeed.
18

A Friend of Fernando Poo,

02/07/2009 13:20:16
This is fantastic news! We were building trams to reduce congestion in Edinburgh. However it turns out that tram works alone reduce congestion. Let's just save a huge amount of money by keeping the tram works and not building the trams.
19

Flair Gun,

02/07/2009 13:22:53
donuts anyone?
20

Flair Gun,

02/07/2009 13:24:21
this report is not the be-all-and-end-all ... but its a sign of the times ... and the times they are a changning: for the worse!!!
21

Flair Gun,

02/07/2009 13:28:28
its so ironic that the biggest thing the govt did to help the economy was to help the banks with obscene amounts of money, with seemingly no strings attached ... then the banks were too busy covering their own fat behinds to pass anything on - they froze (like their own bank accounts).
22

Mince Pie Supper,

02/07/2009 13:28:45
22

Don't be so negative Flair Gun. Once we have our jobs on the Trams we will be very happy.

Everything will turn black and white and we will all wear the same styles of clothes.

It will be the dream life we all desire.

Ah, the Scottish dream...
23

the dog,

here there and awwww where 02/07/2009 13:34:35
even that smooth talkin auld charmer david begg couldnae have achieved such reduced figures
24

Jackie Treehorn,

02/07/2009 13:52:54
City of Edinburgh Council have wanted this for years. Surely it would have been cheaper to just ban all traffic except buses from the city centre, but the council have had to waste millions of £s to achieve this.
25

Peter - very disappointed/concerned,

Edinburgh 02/07/2009 14:39:50
#16 scotsol,

"Princes Street is so much pleasanter to walk down now"

Evidently your guide-dog has managed to keep you out of all the holes then?
26

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 02/07/2009 14:59:19
#26:

He's probably talking about Princes Street, Havana.
27

Peter - very disappointed/concerned,

Edinburgh 02/07/2009 15:11:52
#27 Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Princes Street Havana will undoubtedly have fewer holes than 'oor wan' and has the added advantage of being (a) warmer and (b) doesn't have trams.

28

Statsman,

Edinburgh 02/07/2009 15:32:35
16 scotsol

Your views are part of the problem rather than the solution.
29

Incandescent,

02/07/2009 16:20:12
#16 scotsol

"The first thing they should do" is send you to sit a standard grade English exam.

"Princes Street is so much pleasanter..." Eh? What? There is no such word you crashing dolt. As for Princes St being *more pleasant*? Well, anyone who has actually walked there recently knows that statement is utter poppycock.

30

Incandescent,

02/07/2009 16:28:17
#18 roadstohell

So you're worried about reduced revenue from parking eh? Well boo hoo. Ever heard the expression "you can't have your cake and eat it too"? CEC has killed the goose that lays the golden eggs in the name of you and your fellow eco-mentalists, so you have a real cheek to dare complaining about the side effects.

31

Herman The German,

02/07/2009 17:40:34
#31.
You forgot to add "a bird in the hand gathers no moss"
32

Incandescent,

02/07/2009 17:47:12
#32
I didn't forget, just didn't have the time to work out how to fit it in (ooh matron!)
33

lydiateapot,

02/07/2009 20:42:53
'Its easier to push a tram through the a**hole of a councillor than enter the city of Edinburgh'.
34

Al Pacino,

02/07/2009 21:04:54
Post 2, Parking at Livingston IS free. Better than Edinburgh for shopping too. There's even a Greggs or two so people can get their Glasgow Salads.
35

Ian down under,

Musselburgh 02/07/2009 21:30:17
What a parochial bunch. The PO at Drem has free off road parking, how come nobody mentioned that.
36

Leila,

Edinburgh 03/07/2009 09:42:49
#16: "Princes Street is so much pleasanter to walk down now"

Princes Street at present is a disgrace and an embarrassment. It's unpleasant for everybody, and I'm ashamed that visitors to Edinburgh should see it in this condition; they must wonder why they bothered to come.
37

Tee Shirts Rule,

Christ your stupid... 03/07/2009 09:46:43
#4
Get off your soap box. Its precisley why you have trams because idiots like you voted against the congestion charge and now you have a whine about it? You cannot have it both ways dearie. A yes vote was a vote that would have stopped trams but shallow thinkers like you voted no so live with it and stew.
Its the liberals that have been running the council for years now along with their SNP lackeys. Bring back some sense and lets get rid of this shower of donkeys asap!
38

Peter - very disappointed/concerned,

Edinburgh 03/07/2009 10:03:43
#34 lydiateapot,

Hi, less of the quotes from the Bible!!
39

Sally Longlegs,

edinburgh 03/07/2009 11:03:25
#38 I would like to smack you over the head with my soapbox.Might knock some sense into your stupid skull.
And dont call me dearie.
40

Tee Shirts Rule,

God your even dumber than I suspected.. 03/07/2009 11:20:59
#40
This is your best response to relevant points? You really are totally thick and positively ignorant. I will call you dearie and much more besides you ar$e. Try and think objectively instead of whinging on about David Begg and left wingers. There are no left wingers on the council and have not been for years you dipstick. Take some more of your medication dearie and think again.
41

Peter - very disappointed/concerned,

Edinburgh 03/07/2009 11:21:16
#38 Tee Shirts Rule

In the light of your response, do we assume then that the trams are merely the act of a frustrated and vengeful now ex-Labour controlled Council?

I used to support Labour, both nationally and locally and I was well impressed when Ewan Aitken & Co offered referenda on both congestion charges and the Housing Assoc ownership of Council housing. When both of these ideas were rejected by the local population, in fairness to Labour, they stuck to the results of these 'elections'. I for one can't imagine what possesed them to push through the trams without another consultation on a project which would involve huge expense and would have catastrophic effects on both local businesses and the population (Council Tax wise) if/when it all went wrong.

With the best will in the world, there is absolutely no point in villifying the SNP and Lib Dems on this one, although they should have jointly had the guts to have cancelled the contract. Only Labour can be fully blamed for the disaster which is now Edinburgh, be it parking, failed businesses, failed/failing services and eventually, probably huge Council and Business Tax increases.
42

,

03/07/2009 11:43:08
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
43

Tee Shirts Rule,

Yes it appears you really are thick and without an 03/07/2009 12:59:26
#43
In lieu of your complete stupidity and inability to respond intelligently I have reported your abusive post. Also as it seems your incapable of responding to any comments directed at you I shall simply ignore yours. Dummy.
44

Tee Shirts Rule,

Edinburgh 03/07/2009 13:05:08
#42
Assume as you wish. My insight though is that the trams are simply an alternative product due to congestion charging ( which made lots more sense to me) being rejected by small minded thinkers, like Sally here, unable to comprehend the big picture.
I cannot agree with your point that Labour are to be completely blamed, as I have said already we have had this useless Lib/SNP gang in power for years here now and backbone could have prevented the trams. Therefore the blame has to lie with the powers that currently are. No point in being endlessly historical over this one.
45

Sally Longlegs,

edinburgh 03/07/2009 14:05:23
#45 Yes just like the Russian lover turncoat Cardownie.
46

Davie Lad,

Edinburgh 03/07/2009 15:17:39
#46
Are you really that stupid as you come across, or do you just walk around all day with your head up your a$$?
47

Davie Lad,

Edinburgh 03/07/2009 15:24:33
#5
A good thing too. Your missed here about as much as a sudden epidemic. I mean really, Dunbar? A lot more than the 25 miles you say your from! Miles from no place and about as attractive as a ten day old corpse with the smell to match. Wise up hick.
48

Sally Longlegs,

edinburgh 04/07/2009 11:01:01
Davie Lad you are obviously are a bit lacking in the knowledge front.
Do you know who Cardownie is?
And bye the way I come across as I want to appear to people!It seems to work.Winding up cretins.
49

Davie Lad,

Edinburgh 04/07/2009 21:03:12
#49
So I was right then. You do walk about all day with your head up your a$$. It seems to me from this page lovey that everyone is winding you up. Try growing a brain before coming back here.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.