Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Quarter of shops break law by selling cigarettes to children

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 09 January 2009
TRADING standards officials are preparing a crackdown on shops selling cigarettes to children, as new figures show about one quarter are breaking the law.
More than 800 shops have been subject to "test purchasing" stings by trading standards teams across the country since October 2007, when the minimum cigarettes sales age was increased from 16 to 18.

The Scotsman has found that 24 per cent of those targeted sold cigarettes to youngsters. The children used in the stings were as young as 14 – four years below the minimum age for sales.

Several councils are planning to launch fresh operations this year, and shopkeepers who flout the law face on-the-spot fines and being barred from selling cigarettes under proposed new legislation to be launched this spring.

Shopkeepers were most willing to sell cigarettes to children in Renfrewshire, where two-thirds of shops failed the test.

A 15-year-old girl used for test purchasing told The Scotsman she was stunned by how easy it was for her to buy cigarettes.

"It got me thinking that if I could get cigarettes, then I could definitely buy drink as well," she said. "I would always have been scared in the past to try to buy alcohol but I wouldn't be frightened now.

"That's a really bad thing for young people to realise. Selling one age-restricted product opens the door to selling all the others.

" It was shocking because I was buying things that it was obvious that only a really young person would get. I was buying a 10p bag of Haribo and then being sold a packet of ten Mayfair."

Several councils said they were ready to launch new test purchasing schemes – a number of them for the first time – after the Scottish Government allocated £1.5 million to tackle illicit sales of tobacco and the enforcement of tobacco sale law.

A spokesman for East Ayrshire Council said: "We're launching our cigarette test purchasing programme in January. We've got seven prospective volunteers ranging from 15 to 16."

David Thompson, chairman of the Society of Chief Officers of Trading Standards in Scotland, described the test purchasing results from some local authorities as "worrying" and he feared some councils and retailers would "let up on the message".

He went on: "Where there are sustained efforts within the council over proof-of-age schemes and test purchasing, you see the trend (of shops selling cigarettes to children] coming down. But there are still a large number of local authorities in Scotland just starting out on this. It is worrying that some of the rates are still so high."

Sheila Duffy, chief executive of the anti-smoking group Ash Scotland, said the figures showed the need for a crackdown on rogue shopkeepers.

The Smoking Bill includes proposals to fine shopkeepers who sell cigarettes to children, along with a registration scheme that would see the worst culprits being "struck off" a list of shops allowed to sell tobacco.

Ms Duffy said: "Tobacco industry-funded retailers groups tell us no change of the law is needed. But we know from government statistics eight out of ten 15-year-old smokers say they buy their cigarettes from shops."


Tobacco industry prepares to battle crackdown

THE tobacco industry is mounting a massive campaign to fight the Scottish Government's proposed crackdown on smoking.

The Tobacco Retailers Alliance, a pressure group which has 2,700 members in Scotland and is funded by cigarette manufacturers, has written to every MSP urging them to reject the SNP's plan to ban displays in shops.

The group also wants shopkeepers to bombard their MSP with complaints about the ban, which they say could drive hundreds of smaller shops out of business.

The battleground is being prepared ahead of the publication of a new Smoking Bill in March.

Shona Robison, the health minister, wants to ban the display of tobacco in shops and to get tough on retailers who flout the law. A registration scheme for shops is proposed. The Tobacco Retailers Alliance was formed 25 years ago and has 25,000 members across the UK. But it has greatly increased its lobbying activities over the past 18 months.

Last year, it launched a new arm, called Responsible Retailers, to coincide with the raising of the minimum age for cigarette sales to 18.

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 08 January 2009 9:53 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Tobacco
 
1

Jock Tamson,

Scotland, Caledonia, Alba 09/01/2009 00:59:53
I bought cigarettes from shops before I was 16.

However, I accept the modern ethos/propaganda as I am aware of the effects on my body of years of smoking.

Nowadays I try not to be a role model to my younger son in that respect.

BUT. The rebel in me refuses to give up, so I still go on fag run holidays to ensure that Broon gets nothing in duty from me for one of my lifestyle simple pleasure.

Note - MY LIFESTYLE.
2

Helen,

09/01/2009 05:41:33
These shopkeepers should lose their licence to sell tobacco products....mind you, I've always said I'd go out of my way to support any shops which didn't sell cigarettes!!!
3

Riverkidca,

Swan River 09/01/2009 05:45:52
I see health unter fuhrer McDuff is again setting the rules whereby your country is run.

We have the schweinhunds here too.
4

Eckyboo,

09/01/2009 06:38:55
#2 Helen, I agree with you but I would take it a step further and remove their trading licence altogether. The quicker traders who flout the law are driven out of business the better.
5

,

09/01/2009 08:41:38
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
6

jackhobbs,

glasgow 09/01/2009 09:27:15
There is a simple answer to this problem and I have discussed it many times with both police and local councillors who appear unimpressed. If the shopkeeper is caught selling tobacco products to underage people the local police commander can present proof in the local courts and obtain a conviction. There should be no appeal as there is at the moment (6 months stay to allow trading to continue)and the shopkeeper should lose his license. Not only should the shopkeeper lose his license but the premises should lose its license to sell tobacco products for 5 years thus preventing a relative applying for a license to allow trading to carry on. Only by targeting both the premises and the license holder can this be stopped. The problem is that both the politicians and police are too scared to propose and implement this necessary requirement. Small grocers will always get round the law while politicians postulate. Politicians generally lack moral fibre regarding this subject (votes) and yesterday was a prime example instead of doing something positive for Scotland they debated Gaza !!! need I say more.
7

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 09/01/2009 09:49:43
This so-called problem is compounded by the categorically stupid decision to raise the legal age for buying tobacco.

Anyway, when I was under 16, I could easily get hold of fags, and so could all my mates. It wasn't an issue then. Why the hell should it be an issue now?

Perhaps the nazis should be concentrating on more important issues like the fact that the UK is going bankrupt rather than worrying about who might or might not be smoking.

It's about time that all this insanity stopped.
8

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 09/01/2009 11:07:57


Well Said and ditto Fuel Head at #8,

And I can tell you something else!

All this secrecy, and hiding of cigarettes, will only lead our young to want them more, and inevitably obtain them.

9

MikeN,

Edinburgh 09/01/2009 11:10:19
#7 - Your 'simple solution' would create an unworkable, legal nightmare. I'm not surprised police and councillors were unimpressed.
10

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 09/01/2009 11:23:06


How much would it be for a single. (fag) these days?
About 30-40pence?, thats cheaper than most kids sweets, no wonder some smoke!
Anyone got a spare 'fag'?
If not a 'roll-up' will do. just fine!


11

DeniseX,

09/01/2009 11:30:01
Millions, maybe a billion or more has been spent by the Government on anti-smoking propaganda. Advertising, local NHS and anti-smoking groups. All this has done is make smoking more 'attractive'. The smoking rate had been coming down for decades before all this propagands. Think of where all that money could have been better spent.
12

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 09/01/2009 11:51:12
#12:

Actually, I'm quite pleased that the percentage of people who smoke is increasing. If it continues to do so then the anti-smoking nazis will be out-voted and their oppressive legislation will have to be scrapped.

Then, with freedom of choice restored, all the propaganda can cease and we can return to just making people aware of the possible risks again.

You are quite right. Drawing attention to smoking in the way they have done in the past 5 years or so has only highlighted smoking to youngsters who in times gone by wouldn't have given it a second thought.
13

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 09/01/2009 12:21:27


Yep!, Gotta agree with both the above comments,
And just like the campaigns the soo called, "Health Experts" had on sexual health matters for our young, all it did was, make STD's go to an all time high! As is teenage pregnancy!
Well done Indeed!,........NOT!!!!

14

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 09/01/2009 12:42:44
Here in Ontario the display of tobacco products is banned and all of those products are behind shuttered display walls and you have to ask for the tobacco product by specific name AND produce documented evidence that you are at least 25 years of age.

Most here have accepted these strictures and very few shops have gone out of business.

We do not consider we are a "Nazi-state" or "Nanny-state" and it is in the best interests of the health of young people that it is harder for them to purchase tobacco products - especially when a pack costs $10 CDN.

But the nicotine addicts will always find a way around these government measures and best of luck to their lungs and general health when they get older.
15

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 09/01/2009 13:22:32
Tim,

You may not consider these measures to be "nazi-state" or "nanny-atate". However, I wouldn't mind betting that there is a significant number of Canadians that do.

And I also wouldn't mind betting that these draconian, un-neccessary measures have a number of highly un-desirable side-effects. Not having been to Ontario I wouldn't be able to hazard a guess as to what these side effects might be but if I did visit, I'm sure it would become quite apparent fairly quickly.
16

McMicrogal,

09/01/2009 14:37:09
"Freedom of choice" is only a term that can be applied in this instance to those who choose to smoke. Where is my freedom of choice to NOT smoke? Smokers are free to exercise their legal right to smoke in their own homes, cars and in open air, I take it you would think it alright that those who choose not to smoke were excluded from all enclosed public spaces and places of work in order to avoid your habit? Under the terms of current legislation, you as individuals are not restricted in where you choose to go, only in where you choose to practice your habit. Changing things back would restrict many who do not smoke.

I doubt we will ever come to a truce on this issue, but please to remember that when you smoke it is a choice that you take not only for yourself, but for everyone breathing in your vicinity.
17

DeniseX,

09/01/2009 14:59:52
I do not drive a car, but although I don't like breathing in vehicle fumes, which are more deadly than cigarette fumes, I do not object because I believe in freedom to choose.
18

Navvy,

09/01/2009 16:30:49
More governmental hot air

they have been "cracking down" to years always ineffectually
19

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 09/01/2009 17:50:50
#17:

A few points...

1. Me having the freedom to smoke does not affect your freedom to chose not to smoke.

2. The notion of excluding non-smokers from where people choose to smoke is just plain ridiculous.

3. There are a great many non-smokers who couldn't care less about others smoking. Those who make a fuss about it are in a tiny minority. I have even been told by many non-smokers that they like the smell of my pipe when I light it up.

If I were you I would enjoy your santimonious bragging about the smoking laws whilst you can. If things carry on the way they are going then in a few years time, smokers are going to out-number non-smokers once again and all the daft legislation will be put in its rightful place---the bin.
20

Euan,

Edinburgh 09/01/2009 17:51:26
I don't know why these so-called 'fresh operations' are being carried out.

Whenever a shop keeper is found to be flaunting the law, what happens? - NOTHING.

Whether it involves the sale of fags or booze, nothing ever comes of these efforts. They are a complete waste of time and tax payers money.

If the police and the courts are not going to prosecute these people properly when they are caught red handed, then they may as well call a halt to their initiatives and put the resources onto something more worthwhile.


21

Mr A Roy,

09/01/2009 23:50:14
Seems quite easy to catch a shopkeeper. Now on the other hand the children we care so much about about can get a 'fix' anywhere anytime and any age, yet we dont give a damn about that, It's nice when you have an easy target, But wheres theres money to be had Nu_labour are there to collect
22

David from New Mills,

Fug free Pleasantville, U.K. 11/01/2009 14:38:50
#20, Petrol Bonce.
At his #1, PB is confused. My not smoking does not affect smokers. Their restricted smoking may well affect them, and certainly their previously unresticted smoking affected non smokers in their vicinity.
His #2-agreed, hence the need for legally enforceable smoking restrictions.
Re his #3, non-smokers who object to smokers lighting up as and where they please are more than a "tiny minority", whether or not PB chooses to recognise the fact. He is welcome to share his pipe smoke with aficionadas of that aroma where it belongs, namely outside. If PB believes that smokers are going to be in the majority "in a few years time", and that current legislation will be rescinded, then he is merely being hopelessly delusional.
Dream on boy, and don't forget to put your smoking detritus in its rightful place---the bin.
Notice he's still afflicted above with his "Nazi" mania.
23

Tag,

11/01/2009 20:13:02
Petrol Head
reducing the argument to Nazis by the 13th post is pretty pathetic. I suggest you read up on Godwin's Law and 'Reductio ad Hitlerum' - first one to mention Nazis loses the argument.

I see you don't criticise the shops that sell fags to kids - I take it you approve?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.