Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 23rd November 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Sir Kenneth Calman to head review into Scottish Parliament powers



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 25 March 2008
A BODY which will look at the powers of the Scottish Parliament is to be led by a senior academic, it was announced today.
Glasgow University chancellor Sir Kenneth Calman, the government's former chief medical officer both in Scotland and England, will lead the commission which will review the Scotland Act ten years on from the start of devolution.

The move was discussed and approved today by the Cabinet, said Prime Minister Gordon Brown.

"I am delighted that Professor Sir Kenneth Calman has agreed to chair this body and that it has the support of both the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats," said Mr Brown.

"Together we are determined to review the provisions of the Scotland Act in the light of ten years experience while securing Scotland's place with the UK.

Today's announcement saw a concession from Gordon Brown who referred to the new body as a "commission" rather than a review, his previously preferred terminology.

At a press conference in Edinburgh Sir Kenneth denied that the commission's work would be flawed by the fact that it will consider devolution but not independence.

And he denied that Gordon Brown was effectively in the driving seat in deciding the future of devolution.

"I would not have accepted this if I felt this was something being driven from elsewhere," said Sir Kenneth.

Sir Kenneth will not be paid for his work in chairing the commission, which hopes to produce an interim report in November.

Sir Kenneth was flanked by Labour leader Wendy Alexander, Lib Dem leader Nicol Stephen, and Tory leader Annabel Goldie for his debut appearance today.

Other members of the commission have yet to be named.

The commission is officially described as an "independent review", supported by both the Scottish Parliament and the Government in London, and its recommendations will be considered by both.

Its terms of reference, in line with a resolution passed by Holyrood, are to review the workings of the Scotland Act and recommend changes that would enable the Parliament to better serve the people and improve financial accountability, while continuing to secure the position of Scotland within the UK.

The Westminster Government will "fully consider" its recommendations.
And as part of the overall process, Chancellor Alistair Darling will later this year produce a "factual paper" on the funding of Britain's devolved administrations.

The first meeting of the commission will take place in April.
Sir Kenneth denied that the commission's terms of reference were hamstrung by not including the issue of independence.

He also said he had never been a member of a political party.

He said the remit had been set in line with the terms of the Holyrood decision and added: "Seventy-seven per cent of the Scottish public don't think independence is the right way forward.

"All of the work over the last few years makes it pretty clear that's not an issue right now.

"Certainly for this commission it will not be an issue we will be discussing.

"There are plenty of other issues that are relevant to Scotland and its institutions and its Parliament which will give us plenty to look at," said Sir Kenneth.

He also told the press conference: "Like the majority of the Scottish people, I very much see myself as part of the UK, but a Scot within that."

The full article contains 561 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 25 March 2008 2:26 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: The Scottish Parliament
 
1

,

25/03/2008 13:06:16
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

Calum Crubag,

25/03/2008 13:17:58
Calman means 'dove' or 'pigeon' in Gaelic. Could this be significant?
3

The Strategist,

25/03/2008 13:36:22
It's irrelevant. Neither the Tories, LibDems or Labour can do anything about its conclusions unless they are voted back into power and the chances of that happening are zilch.
4

Andrew Ireland,

Blackrock 25/03/2008 13:55:20
The fact that the UK Prime Minister thinks he can set up an "independent" review of the Scottish Parliament without the support or involvement of the Scottish Government and the party which won the most votes at the last election illustrates quite beautifully how corrupt the process is.
5

subrosa,

25/03/2008 14:11:28
#3 and #4

Well said. An expensive talking shop to con their unhappy voters into believing they want change for the better for Scotland.

What narks me is that I have to pay towards this tea party and my own party isn't invited.
6

A Clamper,

Edinburgh 25/03/2008 14:24:27
~1 Imagine being an idiot - forever.
7

iain,

edinburgh 25/03/2008 14:34:31
Who cares what the commission says.I am a unionist but it will make nae difference tae aw.
8

Royster,

25/03/2008 14:50:07
#1 Well said. Let's wind up Holyrood now!
9

Royster,

25/03/2008 14:56:04
For all you Nationalists out there, Alex Salmond's favourite country, Iceland, has had to stick up its interest rates by 1.25 percentage points to 15% to stop its currency going down the pan. The currency has now gone the other way piling on more misery. This is the super-successful small country with the ultra-low corporation tax. It is now in the economic fruit cake category.
10

stmonan,

London 25/03/2008 15:03:43
What a waste of time. No doubt forests of trees and other time and effort will be consumed following which a lengthy report will be produced with some tweaks here and there, everyone will like some bits of it and loathe others. Nothing of any great consequence will happen as a result.

And while I'm sure the eminent Professor Sir...is a talented and hugely clever guy, why is he any more qualified to opine on devolution than anyone else?

And it's easy for Gordon Brown and his bag-carriers to deny seeking to exercise hidden influence over someone who most probably agrees with them on every big issue in the first place.
11

Joe M.,

Edinburgh 25/03/2008 15:11:58
The unionists have shown that they cannot be trusted in any review of the parliaments powers as they have already indicated that they would like to take some inconvenient powers back. Not exactly democratic or showing much faith in the Scottish people but why change the habits of a lifetime even if the polls show your party in freefall!

The Brits also fiddled the voting system in Wales when they re-opened the Welsh act.

If we want to guarantee more powers for our parliament forever then we have it in our own hands.

If Gordon Brown is running this talking shop he should also be paying for it. If it's an attempt to seriously rival the national conversation it's already failed because while the conversation is willing to discuss other options short of independence (as the SNP are confident their option is the best) the review is not allowed to even consider independence.

As such it's hands are tied to a union which is no longer fit for purpose and any conclusions it comes to are irrelevant.
12

The west awake,

Argyll 25/03/2008 15:12:44
"Seventy-seven per cent of the Scottish public don't think independence is the right way forward.
All of the work over the last few years makes it pretty clear that's not an issue right now."

What % of us want what Labour are offering? Or the Tories? More than the 23% they are claiming support Independence? If not then surely they are also "not an issue right now" too.

Labour position - as little as they can get away with and ensure Westminster claws back planning laws to boot.
What % of us want that?

Tories - Manipulating Holyrood to maximise Tory advantage at Westminster while stifling nationalism.
Any offers on that?

Lib-Dems - Who knows, given their choice of bed-fellows?

The 3 amigos above could not agree whether bears $hit in the woods, far less come to a agreed policy on Scotlands destiny.
13

Miss H,

25/03/2008 15:32:49
I can't see why the SNP would object poster 1. They are encouraging the unionist parties to set out their position so that people can make an informed choice. The fact that Labour needs to get permission to do so from London is neither here nor there - they are unionists so of course they have to do that. We take it as read.
14

David MacVicar,

web 25/03/2008 15:38:24
Headline: Brown appoints Cancer Doctor to remove Scottish malignant malinoma growth.

'Chancellor Alistair Darling will later this year produce a "factual paper" on the funding of Britain's devolved administrations.'

That will be a first!
15

Jock MacTamson 2,

Highlands 25/03/2008 15:38:39
I have never seen the three unionist parties working so closely together as they do now.

They must be worried. Really worried
16

Duncan in Edinburgh,

25/03/2008 15:46:55
#15 It's reminiscent of the "Yes Yes" campaign isn't it, when three major parties worked together for a single goal to better Scotland. Only those parties were Labour, the Lib Dems and the SNP.

Were they "really worried" too then?
17

Calum10,

25/03/2008 15:47:52
re: "The move (to appoint Sir Kenneth Calman) was discussed and approved today by the Cabinet, said Prime Minister Gordon Brown."

Says is all. A Brown appointee, paid for by Holyrood, controlled by the Scotland Office, will report directly to No.10.

So what will Sir Kenneth Calman report on that has not already been agreed to by Gordon Brown?

Nothing!

Nobody will be fooled by this shameless Unionist propaganda exercise.
18

An Beal Bacht,

25/03/2008 15:48:52
Herr professor, Sir Kenneth Calman says:

"... I very much see myself as part of the UK ..."

That sums it up neatly.
19

An Beal Bacht,

25/03/2008 15:50:13
Any bets on which powers have been identified for clawing back to Westminster?
20

David MacVicar,

Web 25/03/2008 16:08:56
What is Iain McMillan, the director of CBI Scotland, saying about this 'Review' then?

Is he saying "Forget the 'Review' and get on with running the country" or is he just a disingenuous unionist lapdog?
21

Tris,

dundee 25/03/2008 16:13:10
#14 'Chancellor Alistair Darling will later this year produce a "factual paper" on the funding of Britain's devolved administrations.'


Will that be MORE factual than his inflation figures, which Mr Cameron pointed out yesterday were dodgy and then said he woundn't change if, or rather when, he becomes prime minister?

Like ANYONE, ANYWHERE would believe a word Darling Alistair said. What a laugh.

So this guy is a cancer expert, and apparently an expert on Mad Cows. (Is that why they chose him?) Where is his expertise in politics, or economics?

Ah.... nowhere.

22

Miss H,

25/03/2008 16:14:26
16 No it is not because the SNP pretty much ran the 'Yes Yes' campaign.

Possibly you are thinking of the SNP's non participation on the Constitutional Convention?
23

Miss H,

25/03/2008 16:16:50
16 Sorry mis-read your posts.

No we didn't work together on the ground Duncan.

In my constituency Labour did not deliver a single leaflet and did not do a knock up. The SNP did both.

The Lib Dems did very little but that is usally the case.
24

kimba.,

25/03/2008 16:58:55
9
Royster,
25/03/2008 14:56:04
"For all you Nationalists out there, Alex Salmond's favourite country, Iceland, has had to stick up its interest rates by 1.25 percentage points to 15% to stop its currency going down the pan. The currency has now gone the other way piling on more misery. This is the super-successful small country with the ultra-low corporation tax. It is now in the economic fruit cake category."


What a lovely gloating sneering post LOL you are a fine example of unionist English arrogance I think u r grate well done keep it coming we have got the sweaties on the run FACT.
25

Nikostratos,

25/03/2008 17:04:43
Given this commission has the support of the majority of Holyrood msps and thereby the Majority of the Scottish electorate.

We will all be able to compare and contrast their findings with the minority snp Government who have the minority support of the Scottish electorate.

26

Duncan in Edinburgh,

25/03/2008 17:13:12
#24 And are you suggesting that the Tory activists are going to work on the ground with Labour and the Liberals?

If not - and of course not - then my point stands.

It's not important, just a rebuke to the dribbling knee-jerk idiocy of #15 which sought to misrepresent rather than engage. Such tactics irritate me.
27

Jock Tamson,

Scotland, Caledonia, Alba 25/03/2008 17:26:28
This is an enter stage left job if ever there was one one. Pantomime season began the day after the election.

The paranoid parties should not be shouting that everone is behind them - perhaps that is why they are rushing the stage.

Personally, I will wait and see the outcome of the panic attack and compare it with the outcome of the National Conversation, the latter being organised in Scotland on behalf of the Scottish people, the former being merely an exercise in Westminster dominance.

This little wheeze shows that Alexander, Steven and even Goldie will go running south for their instructions at the slightest danger of having to think for themselves.
28

David MacVicar,

web 25/03/2008 17:34:45
Wendys Power play from BBC:

# Consider devolving powers in areas such as welfare, work, transport and some aspects of VAT, while handing back powers, possibly in counter terrorism and contingency planning.

Welfare and Work - What exactly?
Transport - Isnt that already devolved?
Some aspects of VAT - What? The spelling?

If this is what they propose, then it is nobodys idea of devolution MAX and will be rejected out of hand by Scotlands voters.

# It is wrong to present the Union as one in which Scotland has only benefited and not given.

Does anybody in Scotland, even unionists, think this?
Who on earth is she trying to persuade here?

An incompetent leader championing a cause and policies that nobody, not even her possible supporters believe.
29

Nikostratos,

25/03/2008 17:36:00
#29

seeing as both the snps minority Government conversation and the Majority of msps commission has not yet come to any conclusion.

Why would you wish for a referendum on Independence when it is entirely possible the snp conversation concludes more devolved powers are all that is required.

Unless you are suggesting the snp conversation is a sham being performed on the Scottish peoples. With the outcome already decided for Independence.

#30 Jock

I am beginning to wonder if the choice is going to be between having a Donkey or an Ass
30

Jock Tamson,

Scotland, Caledonia, Alba 25/03/2008 18:27:39
32, Niko.

We have been waiting donkeys to assay, assay assay the situation.
31

OscarMacApfel,

Dumfries 25/03/2008 18:49:31
Why are the unionists debating Scotland’s future behind closed doors, surely they can't be afraid to put their proposals to the public not just for debate but for decision in a referendum?
32

morris,

edinburgh 25/03/2008 19:34:54
4
Absolutely

This is an insult to the Scottish electorate, and they infer that we are stupid enough to swallow this crap.
Its not independent,its chaired by a medic who has no more right to be there than you or I do.
3) It excludes parties of home rule so cannot be impartial or independent.
4)It has been set up by three Unionist parties who do what LONDON tells them
5) It assumes support for independence is of the order of 23% when it has never even been measured ,never mind known!
Its an imperialist con designed for cupid stunts who support the Union,irrespective of whether its because they can explain why or not,and most cannot because the economics are so one sided you can only be disingenuous or megathick to wish its retention.

Its garbage designed for Tories who want Westminster so they can have a Tory government in Scotland, and Numpties who vote Labour but have not got a clue why,and even if they did it would be based upon deceptions.
They will make all kinds of claims and the findings of the commisssion have already been declared before it even starts to pretend to do anything.
If you believe any of this Unionist bull,I would keep quiet about it or people will laugh at you.
33

Richardinho,

25/03/2008 19:43:23
it is true that recent opinion polls have shown a majority against independence.

However many polls have also shown that a large majority want more powers for the parliament.

It would seem therefore that the favoured trend is towards 90% independence, rather than less of it.

so why is this commission considering taking powers back?
34

morris,

edinburgh 25/03/2008 19:52:52
39
They will be those powers which look to be insignificant in themselves,but they will be those which allow Holyrood to block nuclear power nuclear,TRIDENT,dumping waste etc in Scotland. You can have devolution as long as you remain subservient to London .However if you exercise your democratic right to oppose anything which has been devolved then it will no longer be devolved.If the people of Scotland allow this without daily demonstrations outside Holyrood then we deserve to be treated like numpties,because clearly we are!

ITS TIME TO DEMONSTRATE THAT WE WILL NOT BE TREATED LIKE SOME COLONY of Mother Westminster.
STAND UP SCOTLAND AND BE COUNTED.
35

Nikostratos,

25/03/2008 20:06:57
#33 Jock

I believe the joke goes like this......

A bloke is working on a building site and he hears the ganger keep calling someone donkey.

Donkey do this donkey do that.

Eventually he says to the guy why does he keep calling you donkey all the time.

To which the guy reply's I dunno but hee.haw hee haw hee always does that.

#40 morris

They did stand up and were counted at the last holyrood election...........the Majority chose representatives loyal to mother Westminster..........
36

Gdgy,

25/03/2008 20:08:29
unionist lackey - SNP stooge....
37

langtonian,

scotus 25/03/2008 20:32:26
#34 Jackie the priest.
Referendum, pointless excercise,just muddies the water's,as a tool to clarify anything a referendum would NOT,could NOT,give a decisive clear cut answer.

All parties can put their given position on constitutional matters along with other manifesto points of view.

The voting public will make their judgement at the next General Election.

Plebicite-A direct vote of the whole nation;an ascertainmant of general opinion on any matter.

A full blown General Election.
38

langtonian,

scotus 25/03/2008 20:47:56
#38 Morris
Ah-So!-You are the fount of all political nous,forgive me if I dissent from agreeing with yor expose why everyone else is WRONG and you are Right.

It's somewhat hackneyed expression,but most apposite for your point of view.

See, EVERYONE IS OUT OF STEP EXCEPT OO'R JOCK!
39

Scotsman in Dublin,

25/03/2008 21:06:30
So the new head of the "independent" commission kicks off by taking a swipe at independence, the stated aim of the goverment of the country. How long will the people of Scotland put up with this type of colonial goverment from Westminster? Not long.
40

langtonian,

scotus 25/03/2008 21:39:34
#46 Col.Blimp
Touche.

As in a building if the rule is false,
If a bent square gives verticles untrue,
And if the level is at all askew,
Then all must be defective and at fault,
Forward or backward leaning,lame and halt;
Some part already seems about to fall;
Then from those first mistakes,down tumbles all,
Thus any reasoning of your's on things
Must needs be false that from false senses springs

LUCRETIUS
Not quite in the same league as

See- They are awe oot of step except oo,r Jock.

However the basic sentiment applies.
41

Andrew BOD,

Aberdeen/shire 25/03/2008 22:13:47
McCalman: ""Seventy-seven per cent of the Scottish public don't think Independence is the right way forward."

I'm sorry. Did I just miss a referendum or is the leader of the 'independent' review quoting convenient opinion polls. Not quite so in independent, eh?

What percentage of people who voted, voted SNP at the last Holyrood election? Does anyone know? In any case, their views have been wholly disregarded by McCalman, even before the review begins. How democratic.
42

Gtj,

Dundee 25/03/2008 23:48:04
Anyone who thinks this review is INDEPENDENT probably also thinks Wendy Alexander is innocent.

This farce is in Gordon Browns pocket make no mistake.

As for this figure of 75% of people do not want independence, that is absolute horse manure.

No one has asked every person in Scotland what their opinion is, and until a referendum is held no one knows what the support for independence is.

All this propagand nonsense is fooling anyone.
43

Joe M.,

Edinburgh 25/03/2008 23:57:16
He's not independent and neither is this review, to pretend otherwise is completely ridiculous.

Labour and the Lib Dems did nothing while they were in power about asking for more powers for the Scottish parliament. They are only suggesting more powers now because the SNP won the election.

If the unionists think that by ignoring independence the Scottish public will follow suit they are in for a rude awakening.

Independence is normality. Most countries are independent and all would prefer to be independent rather than be controlled by other countries.
44

,

26/03/2008 00:29:43
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
45

,

26/03/2008 07:35:41
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
46

shivago8,

livingston 26/03/2008 09:26:44
Will he be able to put a plaster on ma cut finger,or is that no on his remit
47

Stephen Allinson,

London, England 05/04/2008 18:20:41
C'mon SNP - England's last best hope for freedom from Scottish Labour rule. Roll on an Independent Scotland!
48

Over the rainbow,

06/06/2008 21:43:16


There are benefits for all.

Afraid your going to get Cameron and Osbourne. LOL

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.