Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Holyrood architect says the 'scars have healed' at last

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 30 June 2009
A LEADING figure in the creation of the £414m Scottish Parliament building today said the "scars had healed" over the reaction to the controversial project.
Brian Stewart, who headed the Edinburgh half of the architectural partnership with Barcelona-based Enric Miralles, helped bring the Holyrood building into being.

Tonight he will take part in a question-and-answer session along with former Culture
Minister Linda Fabiani, one of the MSPs charged with overseeing the project, which was ten times over budget and three years late when it finally opened in 2004.

The discussion will follow a special screening of a film about the project at the Filmhouse.

Mr Stewart said he didn't mind if tonight's event reignited the controversy over the project, whose problems dogged the early days of devolution.

He said there were legitimate issues about the way the Holyrood project evolved but added: "The scars are well healed. I never resented people having a go. What I didn't like was when it became a political thing.

"It became a very party political argument. That's fine for a while, but it carried on through the whole life of it – and fatigue with that set in. As far as the building is concerned, any time I'm there I see people moving around and enjoying it. I'm very happy with my involvement in it."

He added: "I don't mind being got at. I feel I ate, slept and drank it for seven years. There are still people who don't like the building and still people who didn't like the process – but it's done.

"Under enormous pressure, we really didn't dilute the original intention. We stuck pretty closely to the original ideas.

"There are some things being done that one doesn't particularly like – I hate the railings at the ponds – but the strength of the building is still there. When I see interviews being done in front of the steps or wherever, I still think that's just great."

Ms Fabiani, who served on the cross-party Holyrood progress group, said despite the controversy during construction people had grown to like the building.

She said: "There was understandable disquiet, but I think now people have got so used to the parliament being there it has become a landmark in Edinburgh and people have moved on from the debacle that was its commissioning."

The film being shown tonight, The Holyrood Files, is the big screen version of a TV documentary which was itself a cause of controversy. Kirsty Wark's production company, Wark Clements, persuaded the BBC to commission it at an original cost of £186,000, but the price tag soared to £980,000. The BBC coughed up £648,000 and there was £332,000 of lottery money from Scottish Screen and the Scottish Arts Council.

The BBC refused to release the tapes to Lord Fraser's inquiry into the Holyrood project before the programme was shown and once it had been broadcast, the production company – by now known as IWC – insisted it would not hand over 400 hours of untransmitted footage and locked the unedited material away in a vault instead.

Lord Fraser said he was "astonished" at the decision and the snub was branded an "absolute scandal" by Margo MacDonald.

The Holyrood Files is being screened at the Filmhouse at 6pm.





The full article contains 557 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 30 June 2009 10:36 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: The Scottish Parliament
 
1

connaughtboy,

stonehaven 30/06/2009 10:46:46
I'm glad his scars have healed, but mine certainly have not. The Holyrood parliament building is a grotesque manifestation of the unholy Dewar/Wark/Miralles alliance and a disaster of major proportions.
2

Queen D,

30/06/2009 11:05:53
Succinctly put, Connaughtboy!
3

alfonsa pedrosa,

embra 30/06/2009 12:10:00
Scars should never be healed,the whole affair from A-Z is a disgrace.
4

Unimpressed one,

30/06/2009 12:13:27
I'd have thought that's it's pretty much still an open wound.
5

Herman The German,

30/06/2009 12:14:05
Get over it,move on and get a life!
6

Anonymoose,

30/06/2009 12:15:48
Scars don't heal, wounds heal to leave scars.

Like the wound of the Scottish parliament building haemorrhaging money only to become infected with politicians. Now it has left a scar on the beautiful city.
7

Peter - very disappointed/concerned,

Edinburgh 30/06/2009 12:24:50
"The Holyrood Files is being screened at the Filmhouse at 6pm."

Are Fox Mulder (David Duchovny) and Dana Scully (Gillian Anderson)appearing by kind permission and by arrangement with Kirsty Wark?

This eyesore of a building is an over expensive architectural ulcer. You do wonder if the next Tory UK Government will have it demolished.

8

Tartan Viking,

30/06/2009 12:26:26
#1. Well said connaughtboy.

The more I see this building the more grotesque it becomes. An architectural gem it is far from being.
9

FreddieIII,

30/06/2009 12:42:17
I disagree with all of the above. I have begun to like the Scottish Parliament building. It is a positive addition to Edinburgh's built history and it has certainly become a landmark. If the above know so much about architecture, then why no comments on the hideous 60's and 70's non-architecture buildings at the foot of the Royal Mile? Why no comments on Golf Land - or the former building known as? That part of Cannon Gait has seen a lot of bad architecture and buildings over the past 50 years, but the Scottish Parliament and associated buildings have been positive addition.

I also ask - people in glass houses should not throw stones - is your house or workplace a wonderful piece os architecure?
10

Bill MacD,

30/06/2009 12:42:31
Only the nutters would fail to sympathise with these guys. With such pig-headed politicised opposition, any building was always going to attract huge volumes of ignorant moaning from know-all morons.

The fact that it's won huge international praise from independent observers without the same thick-brained axe to grind says all that needs to be said. We can safely ignore the numpties and celebrate a wonderful space that's a real credit to our nation.

It's wonderful that in this case, for once, they've managed to create something that's both contemporary and creative, whilst resonating with local history and its context. The only other recent example I can think of is the new Museum of Scotland building.

It's significant that these high profile projects had so much public involvement, and so effectively bypassed the idiot bureaucrats who are intent on destroying our city. This makes a refreshing change from all the soul-less, characterless, anywhere-in-the-world monstrosities that our ghastly anti-heritage planning department is determined to dump on us, to destroy the history that their wannabe journals tell them to detest but the rest of us enjoy. Sack them all. Now. Before it's too late.
11

aleex,

Edinburgh 30/06/2009 12:43:51
The article doesn't say anything about Kirsty Wark being on the committee which decided on the final design! Must be a story on how that committee made decisions, then her company made the documentary (with public funds) and then witheld the tapes. Surely they're public property?
12

Jaco Pastorius,

30/06/2009 12:54:40
11. Spot on. Kirsty Wark should be in jail instead of being heralded as some sort of Scottish Broadcasting Icon. And she should have Very Hot Things thrust into her aural orifices.
13

Mince Pie Supper,

30/06/2009 12:58:45
Was the Parliament designed to make Dumbiedykes look good?
14

The Lone Haranguer,

30/06/2009 13:01:38
As well as being an ugly expensive midden, it is also one of the least green buildings, because of its high running and maintenance costs. So no, nothing has "healed". The Scottish Parliament is an open sore requiring lots of publicly-funded "ointment".

It should be burned to the ground and the smoking ruin left as an eternal monument to our politicians' stupidity.
15

Jaco Pastorius,

a/k/a "a/k/a" 30/06/2009 13:03:48
Publicly Funded Ointment is a great name for a band.
16

It's Leith for me!,

30/06/2009 13:07:06
describing it as a scar is about the best description of the 'parliament' - at least it was so badly built it'll no doubt fall down soon and we can get on with having a new one; which hopefully won't cost as much, or be such an eyesight
17

Mince Pie Supper,

30/06/2009 13:09:21
We should build a new Parliament in the middle of Princes Street. Then we can use this as an excuse for the city's roads being badly managed.
18

,

30/06/2009 13:34:02
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
19

,

30/06/2009 13:34:38
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
20

,

30/06/2009 13:34:48
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
21

The Lone Haranguer,

30/06/2009 13:39:53
#20
By the time the tram line is complete and all available taxes have been diverted to running it AND the parly, Edinburgh will pretty much resemble Harare.
22

Mince Pie Supper,

30/06/2009 13:41:53
Tesco are branching out into Tram networks and Parliament buildings but they are cheap, unreliable and don't taste very good.
23

Jams,

Edinburgh 30/06/2009 13:42:53
I am glad his scars have healed. Now if someone could just pick that ugly scab of the bottom of the Royal Mile we would be fine.
24

Big T,

30/06/2009 14:00:37
A National disgrace!

£500m + for a scar on the landscape that will never heal!
25

Mince Pie Supper,

30/06/2009 14:03:53
Scrap the £414 Scottish Parliament Building now before it's too late!

"Pshtwsht wsh wsh wshht"

What, you're joking...
26

Anna Thema,

30/06/2009 14:15:30
"people had grown to like the building" - what people? Did they ever ask taxpayers whether they wanted it or ten new hospitals?

"it has become a landmark in Edinburgh" Eh? It's no Sydney Opera House or Sagrada Familia, that's for sure. The only positive is that it is mostly hidden at the bottom of The Royal Mile, where normal citizens rarely go, unlike the equally hideous St. James Centre.
27

It's Leith for me!,

30/06/2009 14:19:48
#23 - nice one Jams ;-)
28

roadstohell,

30/06/2009 14:24:12
MMmhhh naw !
It's still a bloody mess

I showed foreign visitors round Edinburgh recently, they well impressed with the Scots Parliament building - NOT !

To be honest it was embarrasing, they looked at in and laughed, I was actually asked , "when will it be finished ?" and I'm NOT joking
29

Glenda,

blah 30/06/2009 14:28:11
Brian Stewart obviously likes to delude himself. He's living on his own planet.

Does he think that just by saying something often enough, it's true?

Poll any normal 'non architect zombies' - the folks who actually live in this city, and you'll find that Holyrood is still just a big ugly, scab with a festering wound underneath.

The only people who love it are architectural organisations who set up awards schemes so they can pat each other on the back. Architectural Incest.

30

tomias,

Edinburgh 30/06/2009 14:33:12
It would make a lovely tram depot;
31

Peter - very disappointed/concerned,

Edinburgh 30/06/2009 15:28:29
I live pretty close to the Scottish Parliament and I can assure you all that it is very interesting to hear and see the reactions of overseas visitors to this abomination. While obviously some people like this erection, many more find it weird and express grave doubts as to the sanity of the Scottish people who paid so much for so little.

#9 FreddieIII,

"If the above know so much about architecture, then why no comments on the hideous 60's and 70's non-architecture buildings at the foot of the Royal Mile? Why no comments on Golf Land - or the former building known as?"

Freddie, are you referring to the ex-Council flats at what is known as Abbeymount, or the revamped houses at White Horse Close?

Both of these are very popular developments where properties are still sold at high values in spite of the recession. Equally, Golfers Land and the block of flats abov ethat on the way up the Royal Mile were the creation (I believe) of Basil Spence, again these are popular properties bringing high prices when sold. I think we can safely assume that people do not regard these as 'eyesores', unlike the ridiculous Scottish Parliament building which stll seems to be falling down and in constant need of maintenance in spite of its 'newness'.

32

leith keely,

edinburgh 30/06/2009 15:30:41
every time i pass that hideous building i cringe with embarrassment, what visitors to edinburgh must think, anybody connected with it`s design should be prosecuted.
33

leith keely,

edinburgh 30/06/2009 15:33:23
then shot.
34

leith keely,

edinburgh 30/06/2009 15:33:59
at dawn.
35

Mince Pie Supper,

30/06/2009 15:40:13
It was some Spanish dude wot did it - Enric Miralles.
36

,

30/06/2009 15:52:46
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
37

It's heading straight for us!,

Edinburgh 30/06/2009 16:30:52
I drive past this building several times a week, We've visited there with the family a few times too, visiting the cafe or just letting the kids splash in the water features outside.

A could not disagree more with the majority of 'predictable' comments here. This is an iconic building which (as one comment pointed out) is virtually alone in terms of recent Edinburgh architecture, yes it cost a bomb, yes it was terribly late but if you take off the 'broon' coloured specs for a minute and actually LOOK at the building rather dismiss it in typical Edinburgh, fur coat nae knickers, up tight presbetyrian stiff style then you might start to see something interesting.

no?

thought not - well off you go for your folded pizza suppers and brown sauce and a bottle of crabbies!
38

Tom Conway,

Ft Lauderdale, Florida 30/06/2009 16:46:15
I'm a registered architectwho who worked on the UN buildings and the Metropolitan Opera House in Lincoln Center in New York City. Therefore, I know of what I speak.
The Scottish Parliment building is a ghastly and grotesque blunder
The architects I worked for well trained, and esthetically versed in the design monumental buildings - that building at the foot of Leith Walk
should be used as a warehouse, and allowed to deteriorate into dust.
That tram line fiasco is along the same lines
39

El Franko,

30/06/2009 18:05:41
I agree with #1. The scars remain, mental, aesthetic, and physical since the entire building is a blot on the landscape.

I imagine that as we descend into our greenie hell of massively reduced wealth, we shall in due course no longer be able afford the upkeep of this high-maintenance monstrosity. Furthermore, as well as impoverishing us, the greenies will so reduce our personal and political freedoms that few will see any point in the parliament anyway.

Still, at least the Warks made a lot of money out of it.
40

Suntoucher,

Exiled 30/06/2009 18:06:48
#38 - Tom, just a point of order here: Are you confusing the Scottish Executive Building in Leith with the Parliament?

Also, glad to see you are upholding (our) architects fine tradtition of very poor spelling and grammer!

p.s. - I actually don't mind the building and agree with Bill Mac above - it's unusual, and dares to break the mould away from the easy pastiche - yes ok, it has huge spatial and technical flaws but what the hey, we will al die one day, and this building will carry on.
41

It's me!,

30/06/2009 19:48:26
This is what happens when you let loose Weegies who think they have style. Kirsty Wark can't even dress herself with style. Kirsty Young - now that's another matter.
42

Alan B,

30/06/2009 20:08:20
It is sad labour felt they had to create a parliament so underwhelming and so poor just to undermine nationalism.

Scotland really should have parliament to be proud of. One that could act as a tourist attraction without us being embarrassed about it.

43

Alan B,

30/06/2009 20:10:19
#It's me

It is more like what happens when scotland vote labour no matter how bad they actually are/were. Atleast now scotland is starting to see the light and look elsewhere.
44

Snails dont like curry and chips,

Edinburgh 30/06/2009 20:26:49
The place is worse than Ikea flat pack gone wrong - it is a carbuncle and will continue to be so until it is demolished. Stewart is obviously a grovelling apologist for what he and his likes have inflicted on Edinburgh.
45

Tom Conway,

Florida, U.S. 30/06/2009 20:33:02
#40 I've always have problems with spelling, it should be 'parliament' not 'parliment'
Sorry old bean, please forgive me. I'll try harder next time
46

Tartan Viking,

30/06/2009 20:46:35
Anybody been inside the building? I have. The 'reception area' is dingy. There is an abundance of concrete. Highlights? The Debating Chamber is good, so I concede that. Erm.....not a lot else though.

However...the outside? See my earlier post.
47

donald,

glasgow 01/07/2009 07:09:22
Well said connaughtboy. To Hell and Holyrood.

Donald Dewar buried it in a gully as a British Nationalist Shibboleth, rather than have it, on a ready built building on Calton Hill for all to see.
48

Jams,

Edinburgh 01/07/2009 08:43:31
#37 obviously you are a multitasker - managing to be superior, condescending and patronising all at the same time.

I don't like folded pizza suppers, I don't know anyone who drinks Crabbie's on its own and unlike you I don't consider the people who comment on this page to be ignorant trolls.

I believe that on balance the parliament building is more hated than loved and it does not matter how many awards the "intelligensia" give it my opinion will not change. It is not iconic, it is not even ironic, it is just poor design topped off with shoddy workmanship and will drain money out of the country for many years to come.
49

Sally Longlegs,

edinburgh 01/07/2009 09:22:08
Just a point of interest.
Brian Stewart is not an Architect and could never call himself one.
He is a Civil Engineer.
50

Peter - very disappointed/concerned,

Edinburgh 01/07/2009 10:29:46
#37 It's heading straight for us!

What a great posting nom-de-plume and very apt for this subject. Yes indeed, it was without doubt "heading straight for us" and it ended up crash landing at Holyrood!!


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.