Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Tuesday, 14th October 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Political mountains to climb if solutions to an inconvenient



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 31 May 2008
HE HAS never met the former US vice-president turned environmental campaigner Al Gore. But Professor Martin Price was one of an international team of scientists that shared the Nobel Peace Prize awarded to Gore for alerting the world to the importance of climate change.
Price, director of the centre for mountain studies at Perth College, was a member of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) that established the scientific evidence that underpins the film An Inconvenient Truth.

The Nobel Committee s
aid the prize was awarded to Gore and the IPCC: "for efforts to build up and disseminate greater knowledge about man-made climate change."

It is, acknowledges Price, a highly political subject. "Most science is political anyway – it is just that most scientists don't want to recognise it," he says.

The professor is now steering a £1.5m EU project to examine how mountain communities can adapt to climate change.

Since he first began working on the subject he has seen a transformation – from climate change being an issue for a small group of scientists – to an issue that governments, industry and individuals around the world can no longer ignore.

Price believes that Gore did a good job of summarising the scientific arguments. "I thought it was a very good film," he says. "The evidence he presented would be accepted by the majority of climate change scientists around the world but it was done at a level that most can understand.

"The Nobel Prize was awarded because if we understand issues seriously it is less likely to lead to global conflict."

Research into increasing levels of carbon dioxide in the earth's atmosphere began with Charles Keeling in 1957. Keeling's work found that a huge rise in was taking place in the atmosphere. Later, scientists, including Stephen Schneider, who Price worked with in the US, argued that the increased amounts of trapped in the atmosphere was partly due to pollution and were having a significant effect on global temperatures and weather conditions.



Price became interested in the subject, while doing his PhD in the US.

"My focus had always been mountains, but to fund my doctorate I had to find extra jobs," he explains. "The Denver Museum of Natural History planned an exhibition about climate change and they needed a scientific advisor. At that time I didn't know anything about climate change."

Price became fascinated by the subject – but political pressures made it difficult to find funding for research.

"When Reagan came in he wasn't interested, and all the funding dried up. Had Reagan not come to power when he did we would be further along now in our knowledge and understanding."

Later, he was invited to carry out a study for the US National Science Foundation about how climate change might affect people. He was one of the first to study what steps could be taken to adapt to changes in climate – which led to him becoming a part of the IPCC. The idea was to create a worldwide coalition of scientists to create an objective survey of climate change.

"For the second UN report I was invited to write a synthesis of our understanding of how climate change can affect people, tourism, agriculture and the economy," he says. "There are lots of people who like to do very detailed scientific research – but my interest has always been in how to pull all these things together."

This approach will be crucial to the professor's next project – to advise mountain communities in Scotland and Scandinavia on their response to global warming. The centre for mountain studies has just received an EU grant of £1.5m for the project that emphasises practical solutions.

"One example would be the Cairngorm mountains," Price explains. "Until last year they have been experiencing a decrease in the number of days of snow."

A possible way to extend tourism in the Cairngorms, he suggests, would be to use the funicular railway during the summer to transport tourists to a centre designed to illustrate climate change.

"You could use it as a focus for explaining why this is a fragile environment," he says.

Having spent most of his working life studying the effects of climate change the Professor is still optimistic about the potential for humans to adapt:

"I am not too worried about the average increases in temperature or changes in rain fall. I think the big risk and the big challenge will be more high winds, more floods and more hurricanes, as well as sea surges as you get the sea levels rising."

The professor has made changes to his own lifestyle, cycling to work whenever possible and offsetting his carbon use.

But he thinks there is more to be done: "I think among the scientific community there is a willingness to do things but no matter how many kilograms of reports we churn out, the crucial thing is to persuade politicians to make changes." When changes would make an impact on people's lifestyles – such as increasing petrol cost – Price says there is reluctance to act.

"We have to be more flexible, think outside the box. We need better co-operation between government agencies at all levels from local to national."

And as always, he believes there is a need to focus on the bigger picture: "Climate change is not the only driver of change in the world, you also have to look at globalisation, Europeanisation and the growth of consumerism. To focus only on climate change would be a mistake – you have to look at all these changes and try to understand how they link together."





The full article contains 942 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Harbinger,

Up in the clouds 31/05/2008 08:59:39
"an issue that governments, industry and individuals around the world can no longer ignore."

This is not surprising given the massive taxpayer funded propaganda devoted to the agenda.

The Al Gore film is a masterpiece of misinformation and disinformation and didn't even agree with the conclusions from the IPCC as shown by the court ruling on the showing of the film in schools. He was wrong about Kilimanjaro, Lake Chad, claims on increasing hurricane activity, disgracefully wrong in using New Orleans as an example of things to come and deliberately misrepresents the state of the Arctic and the status of the Polar Bear populations. Yet Professor Price thinks he produced a scientifically accurate film, that most climate scientists would not challenge. This says everything about Professor Price and the validity of his own computer games, which is all that the whole issue is based on.

The real world climate is not co-operating with the modellers and they have to become ever more resourceful to convince an increasingly sceptical public, not least of which is the use of "climate change" a natural ocurrence, to double up as a phrase for global warming. It now covers every climate event anywhere, hot or cold.

He mentions the lack of snow in the Cairngorms, "until last year". Exactly, the whole world had a significantly colder winter, ski resorts world wide were inundated with snow, a rare ocurrence for European and N. American resorts to be full of snow at the same time. Sea levels have not risen significantly anywhere other than in the computers of the climate modellers. In the Arctic, glacial rebound has meant falls in sea level because of rising land mass.

Still the grant money keeps rolling in and Professor Price gets a chance to justify his new project with a free plug from an article like this.
2

ThePeter,

Glasgae 31/05/2008 12:27:10
# 1 - totally agree
Also note a lot of companies now do not want to bill us by paper as it "saves the environment"
It saves them the cost is what they should be saying....
3

Neil,

Glasgow 31/05/2008 13:28:08
"The professor is now steering a £1.5m EU project to examine how mountain communities can adapt to climate change."

He would be more than an ordinary mortal if he were to turn round & say no catastrophic warming is taking place - take your EU & begone.

Of course if he were a sceptic & it was found he had got a few thousand from an oil company he would be denounced as a tool of Satan.
4

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 03/06/2008 16:12:41
Advice to mountain communities. "Look forward to extra company if my predictions about rising sea levels are correct - might include polar bears and baby seals with cute faces".

Global warming? Ha. I've had the heating on yesterday and today during the day as it's been bl@@dy freezing!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.