Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Wednesday, 9th July 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

'Frightening' future must be avoided to retain the integrity of planet we share



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 17 May 2008
NEARLY 200 national governments will say next week that they are unlikely to meet a target of slowing the rate of extinctions of living species by 2010, a failure which could threaten future food supplies.
Up to 5,000 delegates and some heads of state, including German chancellor Angela Merkel, will try to agree at the Convention of Biological Diversity in the German city of Bonn on ways to save plant and animal species.

UN experts say that the pla
net is facing the worst spate of extinction since the dinosaurs died out 65 million years ago and some say three species vanish every hour as a result, largely, of human activity causing pollution and loss of habitat.

"We hope to give a wake-up call to humanity. We need an unprecedented effort to meet the challenge of biodiversity loss," convention executive secretary Ahmed Djoghlaf said in an interview.

He said consumption had reached unsustainable levels and humans were destroying the foundation of life. Without a change in behaviour, feeding up to nine billion people would be difficult.

A surge in food prices, driven by booming demand in fast-growing economies such as China, has highlighted the problem and experts say the loss of plant species could be catastrophic for long-term food supplies.

Top of the agenda at the two-week meeting, which opens on on Monday, is an assessment of a UN goal set in 2002 to slow the rate of biodiversity loss by 2010. Most experts say that this target is nowhere near to being met.

Djoghlaf says the latest data, which show more species are being lost more than in the past, is "frightening".

About two million species are recorded but some experts believe that there could be tens of millions, an unknown statistic that complicates attempts to measure the rate of decline.

"It is a bit like the goal of world peace," said Norwegian Environment Minister Erik Solheim. "Even if we don't achieve it fully, it's important to have a target to strive for."

German Environment Minister Sigmar Gabriel will open the meeting and the political haggling will peak in the last three days of discussion when senior government officials from 191 countries, including Germany, represented by Merkel, will join the conference.

Delegates will try to make progress in talks on the establishment of rules by 2010 on access to genetic resources and sharing their benefits, important for developing countries and pharmaceutical and biotechnology firms keen to tap natural resources.

They will talk about ways to boost and co-ordinate designated "protected areas" to conserve natural habitats.

The convention has a goal to safeguard at least 10 per cent of the world's ecological regions in such areas.

The conservation of oceans, which has lagged behind terrestrial protection efforts, will be an important focus, as will protection for forests.

About 80 per cent of the world's biodiversity is found in tropical forests, yet every minute, 20 hectares (50 acres) of forest disappear, according toexperts.

Participants in the conference will address different ways of tackling "invasive alien species", creatures often inadvertently moved from their own natural habitat by global trade. Such invaders cause environmental damage and cost global economies hundreds of billions of dollars.

"For us, the most important element is to make sure we have the ingredients to give us, as a global community, confidence we are moving in the right direction," said Djoghlaf.

• www.cbd.int





The full article contains 584 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Unimpressed one,

17/05/2008 09:48:18
Another junket to 'save the planet'. The following claim:

"UN experts say that the planet is facing the worst spate of extinction since the dinosaurs died out 65 million years ago and some say three species vanish every hour as a result, largely, of human activity causing pollution and loss of habitat."

is pure fantasy and has been proven to be this many times over. However just like all the other crap swallowed and reguritated by the eco-loons at every opportunity, it never goes away.
2

Dr. Francis T. Manns,

Toronto, Canada 17/05/2008 13:02:11
Unimpressed one could not be more correct. In Canada, we've got a rising healthy polar bear population that has just gone on an endangered species list. The NGOs do not have a clue about science nor do they care about truth.

It's not about the bears. This is about abstract computer modeling being elevated to the level of real objective science and then being presented as if it were science.

In fact, modeling produces computer generated conclusions based upon input assumptions and processing. In order for models to be approximately predictive, the assumptions must be realistic and work backward as well as forward.

Government decisions, however, in democracies are not based upon science or first principles when a politically correct model gives the politicians an advantage to manipulate politically correct voters. It is extremely dangerous when politics operates on secondary causation instead of first principles.

Bear protection is all about a global mass movement that intends to destroy global prosperity by brave new world crowd control. NIMBY is the foremost philosophy of the enemies of our prosperity but by putting Polar bears on an endangered list when they are not endangered is ‘new speak’, mind-control, and secondary reasoning all wrapped up in one, and it intrusive into someone else’s (Nunavut’s) back yard to boot.

Science should not be secondary to modeling under any serious circumstances because there is too great a likelihood of missed assumptions and false conclusions rendering the conclusion dead wrong.

Where is Al Gore’s consensus going with this? There is not a scrap of objective science in the CO2 global warming scam. These subjective concerns about extiction included.
3

truthsleuth,

18/05/2008 02:37:50
All you deniers follow this link and see who your hero really is
http://environmentdebate.wordpress.com/2007/07/02/doctor-no-dr-fran-manns/

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.