Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 30th August 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Scotland must put more of its energy into renewables



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Creating generation at home will help to cut fuel bills, says Sarah Boyack.
LAST week saw the launch of the UK Government's Renewable Energy Strategy – with the aim of 15 per cent of our electricity coming from renewables by 2020.

In our first eight years in the Scottish Parliament, we managed to achieve our target of 2
0 per cent early. It was a major achievement.

There is a wide degree of consensus that we should now be pushing for 50 per cent of our electricity from renewables by 2020. However, Scotland is falling behind the rest of the UK in our slow progress on microgeneration for households.

It's an exciting agenda – with the potential to deliver secure, local green energy.

With domestic fuel prices continuing to rise, we need to help people make their houses more energy-efficient and to produce their own heat and electricity. We also need to reduce our CO2 emissions to tackle climate change, so there is a win-win here if we act.

There are success stories in Scotland. I've visited several projects in Edinburgh where the city council, local housing associations and householders have installed microgeneration devices. People are now experiencing lower bills – all year round.

People get excited by installing renewables – but we also need to tackle homes and buildings that are badly insulated. There has been progress. But I'd like to go even further and require every new house to benefit from renewables.

It's important, though, that we don't just focus on new housing. 80 per cent of the buildings that will be standing in 2050 have already been built.

The Community Household Renewables Initiative has been very successful in testing the technologies and giving householders grants to install them, but research shows it is not until we have tax breaks that we will see a mass market created.

That's why I'm continuing to campaign for the Scottish Government to support my Members Bill proposing that people putting in insulation or installing microgeneration are given a one-off rebate on their council tax. We're still waiting for the new SNP Government to deliver on cutting the red tape for individual householders who want to get on and install microgeneration.

It took a year for draft guidelines to appear, but they only give the green light to mini wind and heat pumps when houses are 100 metres apart, and the rules on solar panels are out of step with the most efficient products on the market.

Ministers have been lobbied by environmental campaigners and the renewables industry. In a recent debate, the Planning Minister recently told me that he was thinking of changing his approach. But we need to get a move on.

Sarah Boyack is a former Scottish Environment Minister and MSP for Edinburgh Central





The full article contains 473 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 03 July 2008 10:22 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Environment
 
1

Alan B,

03/07/2008 11:55:19
"There is a wide degree of consensus that we should now be pushing for 50 per cent of our electricity from renewables by 2020.

Sarah Boyack is a former Scottish Environment Minister "

Yet when in power their own target was 40% not 50%.

2

Unimpressed one,

03/07/2008 12:23:33
Another ignorant politician ranting about how we should be bled even more for power and have nothing to show for it. Trouble is these green dinosaurs and the rest of the loony left have not latched on to the fact that temperatures have been falling for over a decade so the theory of man-made global warming has been falsified. Let consumers have choice - to buy their energy from conventional suppliers at a cheap rate or to pay homage to Gaia by buying at premium rates from 'green' suppliers.
3

Environmental Terrorist,

Edinburgh 03/07/2008 13:13:49
#2

And what about the issue of global warming accelerating this natural warming further - leading in turn to increasing erratic and unnatural weather events? I for one would rather we tried to change the current practices on relying on fossil fuels to provide our energy and switch our energy generation from these sources to renewable ones. What is the risk of doing so!? Zero. What is the risk if we don't!? Unthinkable. I would rather we tried to do something now than look back in 50 years and say 'if only we had done things differently...'. And if the global warming "left wing loonies" are wrong then what have we lost - nothing.
4

Calvinist,

03/07/2008 13:40:11
#2 Not worth commenting on; you are scientifically illiterate.
5

Unimpressed one,

03/07/2008 16:17:04
"And if the global warming "left wing loonies" are wrong then what have we lost - nothing."

Except 3% of GDP - several hundred billion.
6

Unimpressed one,

03/07/2008 16:17:54
#4, But I base my opinions on fact, what do you base yours on? Idiot.
7

Calvinist,

03/07/2008 17:58:16
#6

Peer reviewed articles in "Nature". Where do you get your information from? The Beano?
8

nabodican,

Rural Scotland 03/07/2008 18:17:34
Another jumped up cooncillor with no idea what she is talking about.
#3 you are talking utter and complete nonsense.
I am not exactly sure what "Calvinist" is on but "Unimpressed one" is simply telling it like it is.
9

Dragonlord,

03/07/2008 18:19:18
Scotland is already selfsufficient in renewable energy.We also export electricity to Englandshire. Hydro plants in Scotland are running at reduced capacity to receive subsidies. Why do poloticians not read up on things, they are about to open their mouths about? The information is readily available. Poloticians don't need write articles that make them look stupid, we already know they are.
10

Jenny MacArthur,

04/07/2008 12:11:19
Thr ostrich-head-in-sand climate change deniers are not just stupid but incredibly irresponsible. So what makes these utter idiots think they know better than 95% of the world's scientists... than most big business leaders (except self-interested companies like Exxon)... than most politicians of all parties... etc. etc. It's been obvious to anyone willing to read the science for decades, and only now are the rest of the population catching on to just how disastrous a situation we're already in.

But these utter NUMPTIES sound off as if they know better, on the basis of tiny out-of-context factoids that have been discredited years ago. Just shut your stupid ignorant mouths you utter idiots. It's too serious for your juvenile denial.
11

Ian down under,

Kawerau 07/07/2008 21:53:55
Global warming manmade or natural? I don't know and frankly this is missing the real points.
1. Fossil fuels are going to run low, especially now China and India are ramping up their usage. Getting the Yanks out of their ridiculous SUVs will be another mission.
2. There is genuine unhealthy pollution from burning fossil or other carbonaceous fuels even if it does not alter the climate. If you are not convinced then a plane to Los Angeles that lands in daytime. The yellow smog that hangs around that temple to the car is unbelievable. Go back to the late 1950s early 60s and the smogs in Britain. I am just old enough to remember buses between Musselburgh and Edinburgh via Danderhall being stopped because the smog was so bad the drivers could not proceed and that was mainly due to coal fires.
What we don't need is emissions trading or carbon taxes because they are just a scam to make money for politicians and 'traders. Remember the Euro has reduced the ability of money traders to fleece us so they are loking for other scams.
The answers are simple: as much renewable electricity as possible: less car use and have smaller engines: decent public transport run by electricity: better insulation in houses:solar panels for water heating: big jumpers:exercise more:eat deep fried Mars bars [oops not that one, sorry]
12

Maisie from Morningside,

20/08/2008 22:47:50
No7 .. Scotland produces less than one seventh of one percent (0,016%) of the planet's CO2.

We REALLY can make a difference-in your peer reviewed dreams!!!!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.