Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Shake-up means 20% of pupils sit no exams

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 12 June 2009
ONE in five pupils will leave school without having to sit any exams under a radical overhaul of qualifications in Scotland unveiled yesterday.
As part of a move to scrap Standard Grades, new qualifications known as Nationals will be introduced from 2013. But significantly, the new two-tier system will mean pupils in S3 will only be assessed internally.

Teachers have warned only the brigh
test students will be permitted to take exams in S4.

Peter Wright, president of trade union the Scottish Secondary Teachers' Association (SSTA), said the key success of Standard Grade was that it provided every child with access to national exams.

He said: "The proposed new exams will restrict externally graded national certification to the most able cohort of pupils.

"The SSTA fears this will lead to pressure on secondary schools and teachers

… from parents who seek to have their children placed in 'certificate' classes which they will perceive to be the only assured route to the 'gold standard' Higher

… (and from] headteachers seeking improved achievement for their schools in league tables."

Ann Ballinger, SSTA general secretary, said employers would not have the same faith in qualifications which were only internally assessed.

From 2013, Standard and Intermediate grades will be replaced by National qualifications at levels 4 and 5.

National 5 will be an externally assessed exam taken at the end of S4 and graded by letter. National 4 will be taken in S3 and assessed internally by teachers. Pupils will not receive a grade.

Students will sit the first of the raft of new compulsory qualifications, which include tests for numeracy and literacy, in 2014.

Critics have warned testing pupils at this stage in their schooling was too late, and would simply be a badge of failure with no time to help them improve before they left school.

Highers and Advanced Highers have survived the shake-up, but the current Intermediate exam has been scrapped along with Standard Grades.

Government statistics show that, at present, 20 per cent of pupils leave school with a Standard Grade at general level – the equivalent to the new National level 4 qualification. That suggests the same percentage would probably not go on to sit the National level 5 and therefore leave school without sitting an externally marked formal exam.

With compulsory literacy and numeracy tests also being only internally assessed, that means those who do not take a level 5 qualification would leave school without sitting a single exam.

Ms Hyslop said the moves would give teachers more autonomy.

And Tony Finn, chief executive of the teaching profession's watchdog, the General Teaching Council for Scotland, said: "Scottish teachers are thoroughly professional and their skills and expertise make them well-placed to assess the standards which their pupils have attained.

"In addition, less reliance on external testing should allow schools to allocate more time for teaching."

Children going into primary seven in August will be the first group to experience the system.

Making the grade – what the changes mean

UNDER the current system, pupils sit Standard Grade exams in fourth year (S4) at three different levels: credit, general and foundation, depending on their ability.

Credit level grade 1 is the highest achievable, with a grade 7, the lowest.

Although the system means 99 per cent of pupils who sit Standard Grades leave with a certificate, the foundation levels (5 and 6) and general grade 4 are generally considered the equivalent of a fail.

The system was introduced in the 1980s and was hailed as a move towards a truly comprehensive system.

However, the fact that so many pupils gained a certificate led to criticisms that it was too easy and did not reflect the talents of the able. The new system will see teachers decide whether S3 pupils have achieved National 4 level, for which they will award a pass or fail rather than a grade.

Able S4 pupils will sit National 5 exams at the end of compulsory schooling which will be graded, but with the confusing 1-7 grading of the Standard Grade replaced by an A-C system.







The full article contains 689 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 11 June 2009 9:27 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Teaching
 
1

Thelma,

Australia 12/06/2009 07:29:54
That certainly sounds like a plan! Maybe they should take it further and just send them out to work at 12. Oh, I forgot, there aren't any jobs are there. While it's true that the bottom levels were counted as a "fail" at least they still had a chance, at the final hurdle, of maybe getting just over the line. Now they will be told that they are complete failures without getting a chance to prove otherwise. So will they be put in separate classes just like in the old selective shool days or will they try to pretend that they are all equal (but some are more equal than others)?
2

paulr,

edinburgh 12/06/2009 08:05:03
This will simply solidify the situation into a two tier education system, some pupils will leave with certificates and have the opportunity to go on to university or FE college, the rest will leave with nothing except directions to the nearest job center
3

The Tin Man,

12/06/2009 08:20:56
Shouldn't all pupils be allowed to sit the same exams in S4? Or would that impinge on teacher's 'autonomy'? Then again, perhaps Hyslop is a waste of space.
4

Graeme,

Guangzhou 12/06/2009 08:24:35
Well it will certainly make the Public Schools even more popular, which greatly reduces overall costs to the Local Authority Education System. Part of the plan? However there is one payback and that this further dumbing down will make the elite even more elite. Keeps the little people in their place I suppose?


5

DanishBird,

Fife 12/06/2009 09:25:53
maybe it is time to stop playing musical chairs with the education system and instead aim for some stability and continuity. The aim should be to increase the qualifications of our children and giving them a foundation for the future rather than just throwing the less able or indeed motivated pupils aside at such a young age. Internal assessment is really not a good idea as there is always room for bias and subjectivity - except in a perfect world anyway. I am disappointed by this.
6

,

12/06/2009 09:26:48
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
7

Louis Catorze,

12/06/2009 09:41:11
All should sit the same exams....if you're to thick, you fail. Tough.

Children should realise that one option in life is to fail. Anyone with a bit of spirit will use this as a spur to greater things.


8

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 12/06/2009 09:46:43
Standards of education dropping? Well why not all change again and just not examine! You couldn't make this up unless you're some poncy idiot coming up with dross like this.

Why not just have done with it and get back the old "O-level"? At least it had some clout with employers unlike the Standard Grade which seems to come pre-printed with an acceptable mark no matter what happens.

The fact that 25% or so of primary pupils arrive at secondary with less than acceptable literacy and numeracy skills has you standing back and asking the dumb question - what the hell have they been doing for seven years? Then if 20% still come out of the next sausage factory with nothing at all - again what was the next 4-5 years for? I fail to believe that such a large percentage of pupils cannot be taught to at least the derisory Standard Grade level and come out clutching a cert of some sort.
9

Auld Twa,

Edinburgh 12/06/2009 10:14:56
For the first time we are going to have compulsory testing in literacy and numeracy.
Maybe it is late in their schooling but at least it is a start. We would expect to see feedback from these assessments, resulting in action being taken in primary schooling if a pattern of underachievement emerged.
10

Faultserver,

Arran Ferry 12/06/2009 10:16:21
As suspected this is an uneccessary pile of mince. Everybody passes internally assessed exams so they are devalued right away. What is the point of this change, the less able and socially deprived will still do badly and the more able do not need yet another change.
Quality vocational training should be an option like Holland's system.

What qualifications are the Private Schools going to do? I will have to save my pennies as my Daughter is one of the Guinea Pigs.
11

mr broon,

Edinburgh 12/06/2009 10:23:04
Someone suggested that Scotland should adopt the "universally accepted English GCSEs"?

However, when you look at the pass rate in England and Wales, and Northern Ireland, it is beyond belief?

In 2004, in Wales, the overall pass rate was given as 98 per cent with almost 61 percent receiving A - C Grades? England and Northern Ireland had slightly lower pass rates? This pattern of high GCSE results has continued in recent years.

Wales has replaced some of these apparently easy GCSE exams with its own alternative national Baccalaureate examination which is proving a much tougher exam to pass.

In the past several years both Scotland AND England have had to dismiss outside private companies which were responsible for exam marking and grading.

In 2000, this problem beset Scotland and last year it again proved a disaster in England when ETS Europe, awarded a £156 million, 5 year contract, and responsible for marking and grading the English SATS tests, failed in its duties and was sacked. Guess who saved the Government's embarrassment: the English teaching profession.

Could it be the case that arguments about national exams has less to do with an already excellent system, and more to do with private companies lobbying in an attempt to get a foot in the State education door, than anything to do with attainment.
12

Alathea,

12/06/2009 10:27:10
If they want to simplify things then go back to the old system of exams after 4th year and exams after 5 year. There should have been continual assessment during those first 4 years anyway to pick up on those failing their schooling so I certainly don't think the teachers should start complaining.

#2 is obviously hallucinating
13

Louis Catorze,

12/06/2009 11:48:59
yep...#2 is a wee bit off track.

You can use the word national (small n ) without it meaning National, and all the worries it obviously conjours up for you.

Remember the labour party in scotland is the Scottish labour party. Are they proud of being scots or just Nationalists as well?

Exactly...
14

Iain Mac,

12/06/2009 12:49:22
#7 Have to agree Vincent. Why should kids who are not able get a certificate that isn't worth anything? Presumably the o-grades are gone because employers don't see any value in a teenager having one or two and nothing else.
15

Tris,

12/06/2009 13:33:02
It's worth taking into consideration that most of the exam qualifications at present are laughed at by employers.

I saw an application form recently informing me that its owner had a qualification in "Inglush", and another applicant who had a top grade in French was perplexed when I asked him how he was in that language.

Some people who spend years studying to get their "Inglush" qualification, might be better employed at school getting practical experience rather than "academic" qualification.

I don't know if this is the answer, but the current situation most certainly isn't.

16

Overthescore,

12/06/2009 16:26:12
Classes where pupils who are not following a rigid exam preparation course will allow teachers to be far more creative with their curriculum making it less stressful, more relevant and thus far more engaging for young people who would otherwise become disillusioned and switched off from education.
Maybe this will bring an end to the moan "what's the point of this there's nay jobs any way".
17

Eve,

Scotland 12/06/2009 16:39:02
Is this really whats going to happen or is it just an idea. I hope it's the latter cause it's plain stupid.

The lower General mark and the two foundy marks might have been originally fails marks before Standard Grades BUT up they are grades that gives the student something to work on.

You take away that and give a fail mark the person has nothing to work with. Failure can never be worked with cause some of us need to see the steps in the progress of learning. This is even more important to someone who is struggling.

Personally As someone who passed most of their Standard Grades at General and few at Foundation marks because of ignored dyslexia. To which I still look back and think I did really well considering that the school thought I would only get foundation marks.

Any way to cut along story short my sense of achievement in my standard grade results, I felt the need to progress and started to enjoy learning which lead to me successfully achieving a BSc degree. Which is a lot higher than credit level in the standard grade exams.
18

Eve,

Scotland 12/06/2009 16:53:18
#16 Tris: You do realise that this system would discriminate against Academical Minded Dyslexics. And yes we do exist.

It's completely and utterly stupid to have teachers force a child in to academia or particle class work. Cause I can assure you that you'll have some unhappy children at both sides.

Streaming children for employment at high school is something that should stay in the past.

Giving children at high school choices is essential part of education and allowing them to have choice of what industry they'd like to work in is essential of happiness.
19

Media at One,

12/06/2009 17:14:12
British schools are a mess, serious change is required.

Drastic measures are needed.
Kids need to be polite, failure to do so and you're out after strike 3 - The parents can deal with the problem, not society.

Late arrivals at school, 3 strikes and you're out - Again, society is not there to wait for lazy little barstrds.

Talkin back to a teacher - 3 strikes and you're expelled

Dirty shoes and unwashed clothing - Suspended until you can present your self in a manner that is suitable.

If kids fail an exam, to bad, the rest go forward the failures stay behind,just like real life.

Compulsory sport, no questions - One sport must be done.

Time for change, Britain is falling apart.
20

,

12/06/2009 17:34:50
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
21

,

12/06/2009 17:46:39
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
22

bus user,

edinburgh 12/06/2009 18:35:24
Outcome:
Universities and FE Colleges will keep their entry levels based on Highers, Advanced Highers and non-Scottish qualifications.
FE Colleges with a Community focus will be able to make their own judgements on the ability of potential students to take particular courses and some of the non-examined school leavers will be accepted for courses. The drop out rate will, inevitably, continue to rise.
Employers will either recruit on the basis of known qualifications - including Degrees, National Diplomas Certificates, City & Guilds, Vocational Qualifications and the like, or, they will devise their own 'entry exam' as many companies did in the old, old days of the 'Qualie'.
I don't know if there are more people unable to be examined independently today than there used to be, but there is, at the very least, circumstantial and anecdotal evidence that 11 years of free education is valued less and less by more and more people - parents and pupils.
We are well on the way to being the low-skill/no-skill labour pool for the rest of the world. Other countries in Europe used to export low-skilled workers. Now, it may be all that's open to the unexamined.

23

Number 6,

Germany 12/06/2009 19:49:36
The head of the CBI in Scotland has also welcomed the news. That, according to the Daily Record.
24

radge dug,

12/06/2009 21:37:35
#20 - the sooner backward Britain falls apart the better.
25

Tris,

12/06/2009 22:22:27
#20. You can get treatment for depression, you know.
26

Dylan fan,

Planet earth 13/06/2009 14:22:27
I think tests and exams throughout primary and secondary education serve as data regarding the types of lessions/subjects learned ..who is learning best, etc.,where/what schools..But I do not believe it is an interpreter of genius, talent,ability to learn.
As humans we all learn at different times in different ways, and we deserve a system that allows us to continue to learn throughout our lives and change careers and interests.. to always have higher education as an alternative...
Learning has changed so much in our brave new world.. we all must run to keep up... We should keep no one down..They may just have the key we all need...

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Should school history lessons focus more on Scottish history?
Yes
No

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.