Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Hezbollah selects successor to slain commander and vows retaliation

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 17 February 2008
THE militant Hezbollah group has appointed a successor to its top commander, Imad Mughniyeh, who was killed in a car-bomb blast last week in Syria.
A Lebanese security official refused to identify Mughniyeh's successor, but said the heir was selected shortly after the shadowy fugitive's death.

"The Hezbollah command appointed a successor to Mughniyeh shortly after news of his assassination br
oke," the official in southern Lebanon said.

The successor is expected to take charge of Hezbollah's well-trained and armed guerrillas, the official said.

Hezbollah and its Iranian backers have accused Israel of killing Mughniyeh, who was among the United States' most wanted men.

The group's leader, Sheik Hassan Nasrallah, vowed in a eulogy to the slain militant that his Shi'ite guerrilla group would retaliate against Israeli interests anywhere in the world.

Israel has denied any role in the killing, and Syria has not said who it believes was behind the blast.

Mughniyeh was known as Hezbollah's security officer. He is believed to have been the brains behind Islamic Jihad, Hezbollah's strike arm.

He was one of the most elusive and notorious Hezbollah commanders. He is believed to have masterminded suicide bombings in Lebanon during the 1974-1990 civil war that killed hundreds of Americans and French, as well as hostage-takings of Westerners and the 1985 hijacking of a TWA airliner, in which a US Navy diver was killed.

In the 1990s he went into hiding, and Western and Israeli intelligence accused him of planning suicide bombings against the Israeli Embassy and a Jewish cultural centre in Argentina, which killed over 100 people.

Over the past 15 years, he is believed to have moved in secret between Lebanon, Iran and Syria.

Israel has put its embassies on high alert and the FBI installed US anti-terror squads to protect Jewish institutions, after Nasrallah vowed to retaliate anywhere in the world for Mughniyeh's slaying in Damascus.

In the eulogy, Nasrallah claimed Mughniyeh played a major role in the 2006 Israel-Hezbollah war and that he used to train the guerrillas.



The full article contains 350 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 16 February 2008 8:05 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Lebanon , Syria
 
1

Silence of the Yams,

17/02/2008 00:55:38
Why the anger? Surely the raghead is now enjoying rivers of wine and virgins aplenty?!
2

Roberta Burns,

17/02/2008 03:36:29
Well, zionists, if you around starting fights, what do you expect?
3

Roberta Burns,

17/02/2008 03:37:55
Oh, and Lynne, Deathy, Tikun et al. Why waste your time copying and pasting all your old posts - no-one reads them. Same old same old
4

Lynne,

USA 17/02/2008 04:00:52
Evidently you did.
5

Lynne,

USA 17/02/2008 04:03:01
Why should Syria comment...they did it, like they did Hariri and the other murders of Lebanese who wanted them out of their country after 29 years.
6

Dáithí,

San Jose 17/02/2008 06:29:37
What, now the circus needs to elect a new head clown? It would be funny if it wasn't so tragic.

Typical of the Left, they are blaming the US/UK/Israel, sans proof of who killed Mughniyeh - yet they whine, cry and scream when anyone accuses them of anything.

If it wasn't for hypocrisy, the Left wouldn't have any personality at all.
7

Let's have the truth,

Queensland 17/02/2008 06:49:17
#5 Lynne

"Why should Syria comment...they did it"

....If you believe that far-fetched analysis, do you believe Syria has become Israel's ally overnight?

You should be applauding Syria not decrying her.
8

Dáithí,

San Jose 17/02/2008 07:07:53
#7 - let's have a convenient lie

>"You should be applauding Syria not decrying her."

Applauding Syria because they haven't condemned anyone due to lack of proof - in your book this is cause for applause?

Hasn't stopped you, has it?
9

Let's have the truth,

Queensland 17/02/2008 09:27:04
#8

....If you bother to look closely at the post of your compatriot you will discover that it was Lynne who claimed that Syria "Did it".

Another example of your reactive personality.
10

oder,

Scotland 17/02/2008 09:38:04
2 Roberta Burns,

We`ll haters if you play with fire, do you expect to be "Burned"? copy and paste? cant be bothered! if you dont understand the first time very little point doing it a second.
11

oder,

Scotland 17/02/2008 10:17:03
9 Let's have the truth,Queensland

If Syria doesn't know who did it, who would know?Hezbollah? they are not immune to in fighting and knocking off their opponents political as well as Israelis. the Israeli have nothing to fear to admitting if its them that carried it out, they would be blamed anyway! the situation is no better or worse for Israel.

you said

"If you believe that far-fetched analysis,do you believe Syria has become Israel's ally overnight?


these words imply you know? would you not like to say?
obviously you have the Syrian`s innocent, as Lynne has them guilty, why is it more wrong for Lynne, than for you?




12

Let's have the truth,

Queensland 17/02/2008 11:21:47
# 11 Oder

These are the words used by Lynne in post No.5.

"Why should Syria comment...they did it"

....Do you feel that comprehensive analysis uncovers evidence of the fact that Syria is responsible for the killing of Mughniyeh?

If you do, I would suggest a career as a detective, as far as you're concerned, should be avoided as enough innocent people are already convicted on flimsy evidence.

Do you not recognize a degree of sarcasm in the following?

"If you believe that far-fetched analysis,do you believe Syria has become Israel's ally overnight?

Of course I don't know who is responsible. But ask Lynne, she knows. She has first hand information.

13

Let's have the truth,

Queensland 17/02/2008 12:26:26
Oder:

FYI

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article3382343.ece
14

,

17/02/2008 13:45:41
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
15

57Nomad,

california 17/02/2008 15:09:23
#14 B2

b2 said:

"I'm shocked Lynne has not deleted any ostes yet."


I'm shocked it has taken 14 posts before Bill has accused anyone being responsible for offing the posts he has deleted.

16

57Nomad,

california 17/02/2008 15:12:48
#13 LHTT

LHTT, I went to the link you supplied and the article says nothing about Israel being responsible for the humanitarian act that someone performed by ridding the earth of this vile hyena. The headline writer said the Israel's were responsible but the article doesn't. So the headline is nothing more than biased speculation.
17

57Nomad,

california 17/02/2008 15:18:02
#2 Burnsie

Well, burnsie, if you around posting non sequiturs, what do you expect?
18

57Nomad,

california 17/02/2008 15:20:03
I don't think it's appropriate to guess who's to blame. It would make more sense to identify the responsible party and give them a medal. The Nobel Peace Prize?
19

Dáithí,

San Jose 17/02/2008 16:37:15
#3 - rb

>"Same old same old..."

Rob, this is post #3 and you also posted #2. WE made NO statements before that!

Are you now so shell-shocked that you anticipate being whipped before you actually are?
20

,

17/02/2008 18:06:48
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
21

Dáithí,

San Jose 17/02/2008 19:19:38
#20 - Rabbi Burns

>"Can't quite grasp your logic, but I give you the benefit of the doubt, being a yank AND a jew."

Uh, no, I'm not Jewish.

Shouldn't you have called me 'Zionist' instead of 'Jewish' - since you lot pretend to be anti-Zionist, not anti-Jewish?

Once again, you guys drop your thin veil of 'anti-Zionist' and show yourselves as merely 'anti-Jewish' thru your own statements.

We don't really need to comment, you show us the truth every time - hate is hard to hide for too long.

Time for another cyber-name change, Rabbi Burns, then you can pretend to be merely 'anti-Zionist' until you blow it again.

It's a sad, short, circular life-span to which you sentence your Cyber-personalities.
22

Lynne,

USA 17/02/2008 20:03:58
Dáithí,San Jose ..thank you, I've been working hard at the office, the past few days..and I need this laugh.
Actually, almost all these posts have givenme the giggles..or I am tired!! One or the other. But thanks.. we needed a little laugh!!
23

Mine's an 80 bob,

no fakey hoose 17/02/2008 21:43:53
15 Nonads,california

bill rarely posts here anymore because of trolls like Lynne, he has found a much better place at the FH.
24

57Nomad,

california 17/02/2008 23:36:49
#23 bob

I thought a troll was a person who posted under another's name. I think it would help if there were some definitions. Are you saying Lynne is a troll because she disagrees with Bill? Okay, if that's what a troll is, so be it. One thing I know for sure. Posters on this forum were deleting their own posts and blaming it on me and others.

This may fool some of the newer readers or posters. Those who have been around a while know that I am absolutely opposed to anyone having their freedom of expression curtailed under any circumstances, no matter what point of view they express.

I don't know Bill personally. But in my regular day to day life I have friends that are much more left in their political views than Bill will ever be. I couldn't care less. Consequently, where ever and who ever Bill is, I sincerely hope that he is happy and comfortable.

This devolves into personalities and that's unfortunate. But an exchange of insults is preferable to an exchange of gunfire. As long as you and Bill and I are able to exchange our views without fear of a knock on the door in the middle of the night, things aren't all that bad.
25

Roberta Burns,

18/02/2008 00:02:26
21# Deathy - 'Shouldn't you have called me 'Zionist' instead of 'Jewish' - since you lot pretend to be anti-Zionist, not anti-Jewish?'

Show me a zionist who is not a jew - they are one and the same - interchangeable. It's the cloak you hide behind. You confuse hatred - like that of the jew for the arab - for distaste and pity. Tell me, Deathy, why is that all other nazi victims have managed to get over it and integrate with humanity. They also must have the 'never again' attitude, but they have one other trait missing in israel, dignity. Jewish whining about the war - any old war - appears to be their raison d'etre. Prove me wrong, by showing compassion for the zionist-jew war victims.
26

,

18/02/2008 01:16:40
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
27

Let's have the truth,

Queensland 18/02/2008 04:38:32
Oder:

FYI - again

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article3382343.ece

If you regard my tactics precisely the same as hers, (Lynne) I imagine you regard her tactics as reprehensible as mine.
28

Dáithí,

San Jose 18/02/2008 04:50:19
#25 - whomever

>"Show me a zionist who is not a jew - they are one and the same - interchangeable.

Pathetic.

Now we see your sad effort to try to explain away your screw-up.

There are Zionists that aren't Jews, there are Jews that aren't Zionists.

There are people that support Palestine that are not Arabs, there are Arabs that don't support it either.

You can't grasp the difference. You merely hate Jews, and pretending to be merely 'anti-Zionist' is your flag of convenience.
29

Dáithí,

San Jose 18/02/2008 04:58:42
#25 - Rabbi Burns

>"Tell me, Deathy, why is that all other nazi victims have managed to get over it and integrate with humanity"

1. Jews haven't integrated with 'humanity'?

To you Jews don't appear as part of 'humanity'?

That says far more than any retort I could come up with.

To Lielayer, LOTC, Walleye, lhtt and "The Scotsman" comments section readers:

Here's the thoughts of poster 'Roberta Burns' ilk - Jews aren't part of 'humanity'.

OK, please explain to us Americans - why do you people despise Jews so?

And don't give me this 'Israel' v Palestine cr@p.
30

Dáithí,

San Jose 18/02/2008 05:02:40
#25 - Rabbi Burns

>"Tell me, Deathy, why is that all other nazi victims have managed to get over it and integrate with humanity"

Jews have integrated, to the point that your ilk claim that they run the US and the UN. Certainly that qualifies as 'integration' to people like you?

It's just harder for them to forget when there are still quite a few of them that wake up to see the numbers tattooed on their skin as reminders.
31

Let's have the truth,

Queensland 18/02/2008 09:14:17
#16 57 Nomad

Here is a snippet from the article you say only the headline indicates Israel was responsible for the killing.

"Yet before the night was over he was dead in the twisted wreckage of his car and the inevitable assumption was that Mossad, the Israeli foreign intelligence service, had killed him with an ingeniously planted bomb".

Admittedly, it is only an assumption but even if Israel were responsible it would never be known.

Based on the odds of probability I would suggest 99 to 1 Mossad did it.

32

Let's have the truth,

Queensland 18/02/2008 09:36:30
"Based on the odds of probability I would suggest 99 to 1 Mossad did it".

....however, that's only my opinion.
33

oder,

Scotland 18/02/2008 18:59:25
Let's have the truth,

If you regard my tactics precisely the same as hers, (Lynne) I imagine you regard her tactics as reprehensible as mine.


not reprehensible, just wrong! and unhelpful.






34

Let's have the truth,

Queensland 18/02/2008 23:54:59
#34 Oder

"If you regard my tactics precisely the same as hers, (Lynne) I imagine you regard her tactics as reprehensible as mine.


not reprehensible, just wrong! and unhelpful".

.......So, what would be your opinion on doing it right?
35

57Nomad,

california 19/02/2008 00:01:45
#32 LHTT

I was pointing out that the headline and the story were inconsistent. I wasn't drawing conclusions from that, only pointing it out. The story doesn't state that the Israelis were responsible but the headline is absolute. It is disingenuous.

As to who did it, I agree, it was probably the Mossad. If it was, good for them. The earth is rid of a vile and loathsome hyena. If it wasn't the Mossad, then it was the Syrian secret service. The Syrians would have had a much easier time of it because, after all, it was in the capitol of Syria. Why they would do it is not knowable. Many of these squabbles are personal and have nothing to do with politics. That the deed is done is good enough.
36

britfree,

the south bank of the litani river 19/02/2008 00:18:04
his time at the helm is past,we salute him . another of the worlds 1.5 billion muslims will no doubt replace him .
37

oder,

Scotland 19/02/2008 00:27:53
35 Let's have the truth,Queensland

wild speculative assumptions only aggravate the situation's if you debate/discuss an issue should one not do so from accurate information to find a fair honest solution/answer?

"Based on the odds of probability I would suggest 99 to 1 Mossad did it."

well based on your method of probability I would suggest
99 to 1 that he deserved it.
38

Let's have the truth,

Queensland 19/02/2008 01:51:40
# 38 Oder

You posted:

"wild speculative assumptions only aggravate the situation's if you debate/discuss an issue should one not do so from accurate information to find a fair honest solution/answer?"

....Surely even you can recognise that debating an issue with the likes of Lynne, someone who cannot admit that America, Israel, Zionists or Jews have ever done anything whatsoever wrong, is pointless.

There is only one way to talk to these people and that is to give them what they give you.
39

Let's have the truth,

Queensland 19/02/2008 03:45:08
Oder:

I would also suggest that Lynne and her compatriots are not serving Israel's best interests by their attitude here.
40

57Nomad,

california 19/02/2008 10:58:55
#39 LHTT

LHTT said:

"There is only one way to talk to these people and that is to give them what they give you."

Hey, I like the sound of that. Forget talk, forget negotiation, forget reason. I agree with you that the time for chit chat is long past. When this is all over one side will survive and the other side will join the Nervii.

Here's your problem. The people that you support are a pack of low life, backstabbing, camel humping, incompetent, carrion scouring hyenas. When the real fighting starts and the mere bombing of pet markets and burning down girl's schools won't do and they have to face off against real soldiers instead of unarmed women and children, they will do like they always do. They will run. They will run with their turbans under their arms. They will run dressed in burqas like the women they abuse, but they will run.
41

britfree,

what a nice rug ! 19/02/2008 11:03:29
as long as iran holds to anti-zionism,i will hold to iran. i may disagree with irans domestic policies,but her foreign policies. mean any criticism will remain muted
42

Let's have the truth,

Queensland 19/02/2008 12:28:02
# 41 57Nomad

"Hey, I like the sound of that".

....It seems you don't like the sound of this else you would have attempted to ridicule it:

"....Surely even you can recognise that debating an issue with the likes of Lynne, someone who cannot admit that America, Israel, Zionists or Jews have ever done anything whatsoever wrong, is pointless".
43

,

19/02/2008 12:35:55
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
44

,

19/02/2008 14:42:35
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
45

britfree,

with a song in my hear....t 19/02/2008 15:13:41
its not havah nagilah though,the deleters are on, so anyone who attempts to ridicule their patently absurd claims to steal someone elses country . will recieve short shrift from the spineless moderators
46

57Nomad,

california 19/02/2008 20:09:34
#43

"...It seems you don't like the sound of this else you would have attempted to ridicule it:"

You and I were talking about two different things but thats okay. You see I didn't have to attempt to ridicule it. That would have been like taking dry to the desert. You still have not grasped the essential quality necessary to score. You must, and I can't say this strongly enough, you must refer to a point or a position that the other fellow has made and then, logically and dispassionately, rebut it. Try to remember, first the logical and cool headed rebuttal and THEN come the insults. The vacuous ad hominem assaults do nothing to further your point. It's tedious. Once again, first the reasoned response, then the gratuitous insults.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.