Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Monday, 8th September 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Red squirrel find may halt Cairngorms housing plan



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 12 February 2008
A MAJOR housing development in a Highland village could be halted, by red squirrels.
Planners at the Cairngorms National Park Authority pulled out of a meeting with the developer behind proposals for 117 houses at Carrbridge, near Aviemore, after learning of a significant number of red squirrel dreys on the site.

Aviemore & Highla
nd Developments was granted outline planning permission for the development, despite strong local opposition.

An environmental survey submitted as part of the company's planning application failed to find a squirrel drey.

However, the site has since been acquired by Tulloch Homes, which carried out its own survey and found a "large number" of dreys, which it brought to the attention of the national park.

The situation has put the development in doubt, with the park authority now seeking a QC's opinion on whether or not it can go ahead.

A spokesperson for the park authority said: "We are currently waiting for the results of a natural heritage survey on the proposed site at Carrbridge, which was a condition of outline planning permission being granted.

"We are also taking legal advice about what balance we should aim to achieve between planning laws and the Nature Conservation (Scotland) Act 2004.

"Once this has been determined and after any other outstanding matters have been discussed with the developer, we shall make a recommendation for the planning committee of the Cairngorms National Park Authority to take."

A spokesman for Tulloch Homes said last night: "We want to work with Cairngorm National Park to make this much-needed housing development acceptable, while meeting the interests of the wildlife and habitat of the area."

Local conservationists believe there might be 46 dreys on the site. Dr Gus Jones, the convener of the Badenoch and Strathspey conservation group, said: "This is probably the first big test of the duties the 2004 act imposes on planning authorities. The legislation is tough and developers must learn to work with it."

He continued: "Dreys are dome shaped and made of twigs and lined with moss. Typically, they're the size of a small football and quite distinctive. You'd have to be blind to miss so many."

Red squirrels are legally protected and classed by the World Conservation Union as "near threatened".

They are also an official Scottish biodiversity list species. They have been wiped out in most of England, but they continue to thrive in the Highlands.

Dr Kate Adamson, the secretary of Carrbridge Community Council, said she was "keeping her fingers crossed" the squirrels would stop the development.





The full article contains 428 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 11 February 2008 10:57 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Squirrels
 
1

Nell,

The Preservation Hall 12/02/2008 07:50:49
Are the squirrels going to demonstrate with placards or will their halting of this project be more like vandalising of plant and materials?
2

Nomada,

12/02/2008 08:07:31
If, as should happen, the outline permission is withdrawn, I hope Tulloch sue Aviemore & Highland Developments for their laxity. The dreys were by no means the only things of relevance that they missed.

Sadly, with the promise of big bucks and a rash of low-quality 'environmental consultants' doing EIAs, it is routine to see reports that miss even the commonest and most obvious plants and animals, while those of conservation significance seem to go on holiday while the surveyors are on site. The wildlife report on the 'Trumptown' development was another in similar vein.
3

Slioch,

Scottish Highlands 12/02/2008 09:00:02
#2 Nomada

Good comment, Nomada.

The environmental survey that did not report ANY squirrel dreys on this site was conducted and signed by Dr Philip R Ratcliffe, who is paid handsomely for doing these sort of surveys.

Locals report that you would have to be blind, or totally incompetent, not to see the squirrel dreys, there are so many of them on the site.

Perhaps Dr Ratcliffe should have gone to Specsavers first.


4

The Diplomat,

EDINBURGH 12/02/2008 09:46:58
A quick Google on Dr Radcliffe shows he contributed to a book called "Talking to Trees" - says it all!
5

,

12/02/2008 10:19:42
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
6

Neil,

Glasgow 12/02/2008 10:53:25
Let nobody suggest that there is any real housing problem. The only problem is an over-government problem which prevents building houses.
7

Calum Crubag,

12/02/2008 11:04:46
#5 Who said the Yanks were backward?
8

Saoghal Beag,

12/02/2008 12:21:26
Nomada, sadly what you say is all too true. There is a lack of reigour and procedure in too many EA and there is a massive inconsistency in what different LAs ask for and accept. Incomplete or the verbiose and excssive ESs whould be thrown out for not foccusing on the significnat issues. A lot of that is down to no baseine reports to start with....could go on but it's another argument.

Great idea Neil lets build houses everywhere and anywhere, desicrate our countryside and destroy our greatest tourism asset, we could build turbines alongside all these new houses though.
9

Steve,

Bo'ness 12/02/2008 12:44:50
'Mon the red squirrells!
10

overton,

Balmedie 12/02/2008 12:46:26
2 Nomada,

No red squirrels on Menie nor any other threatened wildlife or plants although I know of areas less than 5 miles from Menie where there are Red Squirrels which do need protection due to encroachment of Greys and threatened tree felling or a combination of both.
11

Neil,

Glasgow 12/02/2008 13:43:00
"Great idea Neil lets build houses everywhere and anywhere, desicrate our countryside and destroy our greatest tourism asset, we could build turbines alongside all these new houses though"

God not turbines. Since you can see a 300 ft turbine so much further away nobody who remotely objects to "desicrating" the environment could support putting them up. Houses are a different matter, both because they are more useful & because they are far less intrusive.
12

Nomada,

12/02/2008 14:20:17
#10 Overton - What you don't know about wildlife, threatened or otherwise, would fill more space than you are allowed on this forum in an entire decade.

I never suggested that there were Red Squirrels on Menie. I do know that there are species listed on the Scottish Government's Scottish Biodiversity List which were not noted by the Trumptown consultants, and curiously at least one which they did list but did not recognise (or make known) its significance. There are also many common species which are there but which their experts failed to find in a comprehensive (their words) survey of the application site.
13

Saoghal Beag,

12/02/2008 16:11:49
we wouldn't need 300ft turbines, 20 ft 10 or 15 kW would be more than sufficient, not dramatically bigger than a house and visually less intrusive.
14

Neil,

Glasgow 12/02/2008 16:37:36
I take it then that you are against the "environmentalists" who want to power the country on windmills & are merely proposing windmills large enough to power houses? even so the fact that a house's own windmill will be "not dramaticly bigger" than the house puts perspective on exactly how silly they are (particularly since they need 100% backup.

Alternately we could have twice as many houses, 100% nuclear backup & twice as many people housed all with inexpensive reliable power & no 300 ft windlills anywhere. The eco-fascists would just hate that.
15

Saoghal Beag,

12/02/2008 18:28:32
No i'm not one of your environmental fascists, i believe in a balanced generation, disperessed through the built environment, but no need for unreliable, unaffordable and carbon bankrupt nuclear. Pumped hydro works asa a great back up with a quicker response time than nuclear and more reliable.

the domestic turbines you talk of are the smallest ones, less than 5 kW. Once you get over 5 kW they output is more reliable and the average domestic property will be well served with a 10 to 15 kW turbine. These are mounted on their on poles of less than 50m tall. If they feed excess into the grid and we have pumped hydro to act as batteries then why would we need nuclear? Oh and before you start, this is one aspect of a disperssed and integrated generation system, certainly not the whole answer.

Your absolute dismissal of all tehnologies apart from nuclear continually ewxposes you as being completely lacking in any ability to think strategically.

Neil you have to recognise that there is a major difference in the environmental spectrum from the hardline vegan who think all should follow their path through those of us who believe that humans are as much part of the environment as any ecological component and consider that balance and compromise is necessary to the likes of you at the oppposite end of the spectrum, nuclear or nowt petrol heads. Ooooops i've just compared you to a militant vegan, tee hee.
16

Neanderthal75,

Rocky Mountains USA 12/02/2008 20:33:18
Hello All,

Firstly, I stand by more original post: eat the squirrels and build the homes: quality food and jobs, legitimate tax revenues, homes for those that need/want them, and everybody wins (even the larger grey squirrel population).

Secondly, what the Anti-Turbine Naysayers won't admit, is that BATTERIES are part and parcel of a 'backup' system for Home Turbines, because when you place a turbine up in the first place, you and/or your builder, will have done the homework to properly place the turbine and choose the right height for the pole.

Solar panels are also a part of the Energy Equation, which you are also refusing to address.

The bottom line is that Home Turbines are a real world answer to a real world problem: all we have to do is to table the emotionalism so many put into the fray and pay attention to the FACTS.

I've done my research on the issue, how about you?

Cheers from the Rockies

PS. "Yank" was a derogatory term in my family, as I was raised as a Southerner. It would be rather like calling any Scot of Independence Mind, an Englishman. You wouldn't mind that, now would you?

Cheers again.
17

Saoghal Beag,

12/02/2008 21:41:55
neanderthal, with a good pumped hydro resource we can dispense with the batteries in most place, grid allowing.

For solar, solar water heating is ok but solar pv is not worth the investment in Scotland. It's about realistic options and hard choices.
18

Shellfishfarmer,

Inverness 13/02/2008 00:44:27
This development should never have been allowed in the first place. Although it was the Highland Council who were the planning authority at the time, it was in fact a reporter from the Planning Inspectorate who gave it the nod with conditions. Anybody with a modicum of wildlife knowledge knew that it would be extremely difficult if not impossible for the developer to meet those conditions.

However the more important point is that the National Park Authority is shirking its responsibility to protect the natural heritage assets of the Park by reneging on its duty to control the amount of open market housing which is being built in Badenoch and Strathspey; this in a situation where nearly half of it goes to the second home market and is mostly unaffordable to locals. Developers will continue to push the boundaries by putting in speculative applications which don't respect the valued heritage and the losers will be all of us except for the likes of Tulloch.
19

Neanderthal75,

Rocky Mountains USA 13/02/2008 05:51:08
Hey there Saoghal Beag,

Thanks for the input; it's nice to have a reasoned response, rather than the usual ad hominem attacks from the anti-turbine crowds.

PV's are indeed a problem as far North as you folks are, but that has been somewhat ameliorated, by the new Gens of PV's (I'm rather thrilled at the single layer PV's, which look like one long and wide version of a 70mm film-like the films shown in theatres, except that these 'sheets' are about 20in or so wide), which are keenly sensitive compared to the old Gens, more durable, more readily applied (just like shingling no less), and at the end of the day, MUCH cheaper in Full Run volumes.

I'm keenly fascinated by Oceanic Current Turbines, particularly those projected for placement (within the next two years-they're that close) in the Gulf of Mexico (where there are superb currents, which will provide nearly 90% operational levels 24/7/365: which remains to be seen, as everything that is on paper, works gloriously on paper, but when put into Real World Applications, can all too often disappoint).

I've not done any specific Oceanic Current research for Scotland, but considering the lay of the Sub-Oceanic 'Land', it would seem ripe for a similar energy producing levels as in the Gulf of Mexico.

I'm doing my best to get my waterfowl all in a row, so that after I sell my current house, I will be able to move out into the County, and be completely Off Grid.

That's my goal, along with running my Sammy or Sidekick (selling the Sammy and buying a Sidekick) Zook, on WVO/SVO, using a VW 1.9L tdi.

Cheers from the Rockies
20

Neanderthal75,

Rocky Mountains USA 13/02/2008 05:54:15
Hey again Saoghal Beag,

I wanted to also ask you about your Cognomen: I do not speak, read, or write, Gaelic (but I listened to Gaelic radio most often when I stayed in Oban for a couple weeks), so wanted to ask you to how you pronounce your cognomen phoenetically.

Cheers from the Rockies
21

Saoghal Beag,

13/02/2008 11:27:02
hi neanderthal,

certainly don't disagree with you there on oceanic currents as a future source. my concern with pv is the doping agents, though in small quantities some are real nasties and disposal in the future might be a bit of an albatross. can't slag nuclear for having no waste solution when pvs dont.

approximate pronunciation is say'ul peg, means small world.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.