Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


McKie case experts win apology

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 07 September 2006
JIM Wallace, the former justice minister, yesterday apologised to four fingerprint experts at the heart of the Shirley McKie case.
The officers from the Scottish Criminal Record Office prepared the discredited forensic report claiming that the former policewoman's fingerprint was found at the scene of a murder.

Giving evidence to the Justice 1 Committee, leading a parliament
ary inquiry into the SCRO, Mr Wallace yesterday accepted that a misidentification had taken place, although he refused to apportion blame.

The admission led MSPs representing the four officers to demand an apology on their behalf, because no party had been blamed.

Mr Wallace said since the four officers had never been found guilty of criminality or incompetence, he was happy to presume innocence.

"I understand it must have been hell and they must have been under considerable pressure and that is a matter for regret," he said.

However, the four officers were disappointed Mr Wallace accepted a misidentification had taken place. Fiona McBride, one of the officers involved, accused Mr Wallace of "ineptitude" for accepting that the fingerprint was misidentified from two international experts against four experts. Instead she said the Executive should accept that the fingerprint is "disputed" in order to restore confidence in the SCRO and fingerprint identification in Scotland.

"The least they could do is to say it is a disputed fingerprint and there was no criminality involved," she said. "If anyone is being incompetent here it is Jim Wallace."

But Ian McKie, who is campaigning on his daughter's behalf, maintained the misidentification was not only criminal in this case but could happen again unless a full public judicial inquiry is carried out.

"I believe there is a case for criminality or incompetence and therefore we need a judicial inquiry," he said.

Ms McKie has just returned from a trip to Australia where she considered moving to escape the publicity over the case. However she has decided not to emigrate. Instead she has returned to Scotland and is pursuing a new career, possibly in the media or communications.



Page 1 of 1

 
1

Sanny,

07/09/2006 08:13:46

At best these so called experts were sloppy in their work at worst they were criminal. In either case they should have been dismissed. Even now they will not admit their error. One wonders how many innocents have been found guilty and vice versa because of this kind of sloppy work.

2

Herb Aishus,

Midlothian 07/09/2006 08:38:10

The 'experts' get it wrong, so the former justice minister apologises to them???? Is that not a bit like a murder victim's family apologising to the accused (presuming there was evidence other than fingerprints) for him/her being at the wrong end of the knife?

3

David Park,

Ayrshire 07/09/2006 08:57:08

Mistakes can be made. Humans are fallible. What is required is a rigorous system of checks to ensure that mistakes are kept to an absolute minimum (and a Scottish Executive that is not prepared to collude in covering up the truth for the sake of a few careerists).

4

Koffindodger,

edinburgh 07/09/2006 10:48:48

If I commit a crime a sincerly hope these guys are the fingerprint "experts" working on it.

I am sure they will find that "Ms McKie did it and ran away".

Its not that thay were incompetents per se but that they were merely using a system that caused them to act with incompetence.

Thats OK then.

5

Paul,

07/09/2006 22:11:32

Jim Wallace thinks the SCRO were wrong.

This isn't news. However he did at least have some concept of the damage he has done.

Mulhern thinks the SCRO officers were wrong.

Okay, how many years fingerprint experience does Mulhern have? Is his boss the Strathclyde Joint Police Board or the same Scottish Executive who want this whole thing to go away?

Mulhern is in a politically appointed post and he answers to politicians, the same ones who beleive in an 'honest mistake'. We all know, no matter what side you are on, that this was a cop-out.

The SCRO officers are still in a job, why? Because there is no wrong doing, there is no mistake.

These people are at their wits end, they have been denied a voice, they have been denied their day in court, they have been trialled by the media with no recourse. The person who should have at least fought their corner has treacherously stabbed them in cold blood, to appease his boss Jack McConnell.

Stumps, if you ever find yourself in bother for something you DID'NT do, then you should count yourself lucky if any of these officers dealt with your case. They are clearly people of the highest integrity who have refused for 7 years to be browbeaten into 'admitting' a mistake that didn't happen.

They have never had anything to gain, anything worth losing they've long since lost, the only reason they haven't given up is because they believe in the truth, they believe in justice.

Time will show that they have been the most faithful servants of the criminal justice system.
Not that this is over, not by a long way.

It sickens me that people have made a fortune from all of this, a murderer is on the loose.

The only thing that Mulhern has clarified is that from now on we can have no faith in an SCRO that operates under his watch, he's destroyed his breif to restore confidence in one fell swoop by showing himself to be the political puppet that Mr. Jack McConnell w

6

Yogi,

08/09/2006 09:35:13

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ!!!!!!!!

7

Yogi,

08/09/2006 09:37:45

Is there anyone outside of BBC Scotland who is interested?
Has Mckee not pocketed enough taxpayers money?

8

Shirley,

Goolagong 08/09/2006 09:41:36

They say that no lie lasts forever, well no Head of Glasgow Bureau does either.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.