Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Clyde shipyard grabs share of £150m contract

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 10 March 2009
A Scots shipyard has secured a share of a £150 million order for three offshore patrol vessels, it was announced today.
BVT's Scotstoun yard will build one vessel and carry out a "considerable" amount of work on the second.

The third vessel is being built at BVT's yard in Portsmouth.
The vessel being switched to Glasgow was to have been built at Portsmouth too.
But the south coast yard has seen a "significant" increase in work on two giant aircraft carriers for the Royal Navy, the firm said.

The carrier order has also led to extra work for BVT's shipbuilding complex on the Clyde.

The patrol vessels have been ordered by the Trinidad and Tobago government and the contract includes training and long-term maintenance.

The 90-metre vessels can accommodate 50 fully-equipped troops and have the ability to conduct boardings at sea and carry out helicopter operations.

BVT said switching construction of the second ship to the Clyde, where work has already begun on the vessel, helped balance workloads across
its sites.

Scott Jamieson, BVT's Trinidad and Tobago programme director, said "This move shows BVT's ability and commitment to use its scale and scope to ensure delivery of future naval capability to its customers and to ensure the long term sustainability of the maritime industry in the UK".

Work on the first ship is already "well progressed" in Portsmouth, and the second ship will be launched at Scotstoun later this year for delivery in 2010.

The delivery strategy for the third and final ship remains under review, said BVT.



The full article contains 268 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 10 March 2009 3:00 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Shipbuilding
 
1

Tartan Viking,

10/03/2009 15:19:21
Surprised Roof*rse is not on crowing about the benefit of the union.

However, seems Glasgow only got this because Portsmouth is too full at the moment.
2

fiferjohn,

10/03/2009 15:43:09
#1
excatly glasgow would not have a look in and just watch gordon brown will take credit for the clyde getting the work no mention that porstmouth could have lost the conract as they can not do it in time.
keep in mind if there is that much work fo the dockyards why is the clyde and rosyth not getting it first tims round?
3

tinyurl.com/dk73mb,

10/03/2009 15:50:55
#2 Crumbs of the table.

The Clyde should still be buzzing as a shipbuilding centre of excellence. Since the 60s Glasgow has been discriminated against by The Scottish Office, that is a matter of record. A union dividend. Clydeside had become to powerfull and had to be taken down a peg or two.

Industry was allowed to die and communities were shattered and scattered to the New Towns.

Unionist gloat and sneer at the small nations and the Arc of Prosperity. It is now returining to haunt them as the pound plunges and the Icelandic Kroner rises.

Small free independent nations such as Finland have built and maintained there ship building heritage and as such are one of the worlds leaders in large vessel now.

Clydeside is the Unionist's shame.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.