Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Monday, 7th July 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Scots give Salmond the thumbs-up



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 27 April 2008
Read the full poll results here (opens as a pdf, size 790KB)
A YEAR after leading the SNP to a historic election victory, Alex Salmond is still enjoying a strong personal standing among Scots, according to an exclusive poll for Scotland on Sunday.

The poll was commissioned to mark the first anniversary of t
he Holyrood elections, and provides a unique insight into what Scotland thinks of Salmond.

Salmond's aides will find much in this poll to encourage them. The SNP leader's critics often characterise him as smug and self-satisfied. Yet only 32% of Scots would describe him as arrogant; 34% as patronising; and 24% as conceited.

Salmond is even making progress on the trust front. Asked by Scottish Opinion last week if they would trust the First Minister with their wallet, three out of 10 Scots said they would be happy to do so.

The 'wallet' question is a useful test of a politician's standing – and while three out of 10 might seem like a low score it is the best Salmond has ever achieved.

In May 1999, during the first Holyrood election, only 27% of Scots said they would trust Salmond with their wallet. In September 2006, that figure had fallen to 18%. Today's poll result is therefore a marked improvement.

But he has a long way to go before he can match the standing of Donald Dewar. In May 1999, 54% of Scots said they would trust the former Scottish Labour leader with their wallet.

Elsewhere in today's poll, there are findings that will cause concern for Salmond and his advisers. Only 43% of voters describe him as 'honest' and only 31% believe he has 'the best ideas for improving people's lives'.

The poll suggests the Scottish public remains to be convinced about the what the SNP administration can actually achieve.

Aspects of the poll will also come as a surprise to SNP strategists, because they contradict some common assumptions about where their support is at its strongest.

The party has traditionally enjoyed its highest popularity among the young, and has also won the backing of less well-off Scots.

No longer, it seems. The biggest Salmond sceptics are those in the 18-24 age group. Less than half think he 'stands up for Scotland' and only 17% believe he has 'the best ideas for improving people's lives'. Only 8% of them would trust him to look after their wallet.

Our poll also reveals the strongest enthusiasm for Salmond comes from high-income ABC1 socioeconomic groups. Poorer Scots have a significantly lower opinion of him.

One possible explanation is that having finally achieved power, the Nationalists are seen in a different light.

The SNP used to be regarded as political rebels standing up to the establishment – a stance that was attractive to the idealistic young and those at the bottom of the economic heap. But these days the Nationalists are the ones in the ministerial limos – the new establishment.

Last night political analysts and image consultants said the results of the survey were, on the whole, favourable for Salmond. Leading publicity and image expert Max Clifford, said: "Overall, this is a very impressive poll for Alex Salmond. Any politician getting more than 40% of people describing him as honest is pretty good going. The issue about the wallet is interesting, because the wallet is so important to people and it touches on the issue of trust.

"This poll suggests to me that people know Alex Salmond the politician but don't feel that they know Alex Salmond the man. I advise appearances on daytime TV shows, for example, so that people can learn more about him as a person."

John Curtice, professor of politics at Strathclyde University, said: "This is a good poll for Alex Salmond and shows that people approve of him. In my view, the questions about the wallet and whether he has the best ideas for Scotland show that while people think he may be doing well as First Minister, they are not yet confident about following him and the SNP to their eventual goal."

• Scottish Opinion contacted 757 Scottish adults by telephone between April 21-25. The representative sample was taken from all Scottish parliamentary constituencies.





The full article contains 709 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 26 April 2008 7:41 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Scottish National Party
 
1

James,

Dundee 26/04/2008 23:43:06
'But these days the Nationalists are the ones in the ministerial limos – the new establishment'.

Labour to be cast aside.....they havent noticed it coming yet.
2

An Beal Bacht,

27/04/2008 00:13:36
What a silly poll. Let's see the results from the real one SoS - fearties.
3

McX,

27/04/2008 00:16:07
"Would trust him to look after my wallet?"

What kind of a question is that? Name one person ither than a close family friend or a member of your family you'd trust with your wallet. It's human instinct to trust nobody with your wallet!


Can we expect to see the results of a similar poll done on the WENDY.


Well done FM Salmond on an excellent first year in power, here's to many more.
4

McX,

27/04/2008 00:19:41
"Not leadership material?"

Err, isn't that rather a redundant question?
5

Rob - Honest Toun,

27/04/2008 00:20:48
Dae ye think Wendy wad raither thae results applied tae Alex Salmond or tae hersel?
6

Nacho Darcheville,

27/04/2008 00:22:41
Rob - Speak English you halfwit.
7

McX,

27/04/2008 00:30:26
I wonder how much pain it caused Kenny Farquharson and Murdo MacLeod to write 'Scots give Salmond the thumbs-up', and how much grief it will cause our dribbling mentalist Union dependent chumrades.

If only they'd engaged on the issues rather than sniping from the sides..
8

Jimmy the Pie,

27/04/2008 00:32:07
Good on you Alex Salmond. Keep up the good work.
9

Patrick Henry,

Edinburgh 27/04/2008 00:37:29
I trust Alex Salmond. I am not so sure about opinion polls.
10

Jimmy the Pie,

27/04/2008 00:44:17
From the Sunday Herald

A SENIOR Labour peer has been criticised after he claimed nearly £45,000 in overnight expenses to stay in a property he inherited from his late mother.

See if you can guess which Peer this is?????


A night with Red Wendy for the winner
11

,

27/04/2008 00:51:04
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
12

Jimmy the Pie,

27/04/2008 00:52:37
And this from the Sunday Times.


Britain's wealthiest 1,000 people have seen their assets quadruple under Labour, The Sunday Times Rich List reveals

Any comments Red Wendy
13

Rob - Honest Toun,

27/04/2008 00:53:57
Nacho

Sorry. A didnae ken ye warnae bi-lingual. A aye feel sorry for monoglots. Hae a guid nicht.
14

Jimmy the Pie,

27/04/2008 01:07:56
And this from the Independent on Sunday

Senior Blairites believe that Gordon Brown is doomed to fail at the next election, and are urging David Miliband to start organising his leadership campaign now.
15

a proud doonhamer,

Dumfries 27/04/2008 01:07:57
Even though the writers of the article try to appear to be unbiased, thier analysis continues to spin the regular ANTI-SNP line.

They pluck out numbers to support thier spin.

I suggest everyone take a minute to look at the pdf file and compare the postive numbers with the negative numbers discounting the undecided. The writers try to lessen the positive numbers by reporting only figures like 30 percent or 25 percent without also reporting the corresponding negative number. This allows the reader to leap to a false conclusion regarding levels of positive support.

To explain, let us look at their comments regarding whether of not Alex Salmond has the right plans to improve peoples lives. The writers report that only 31% of those responding have a positive view. They try to lead the reader into concluding that 69% have a negative view. The reality is that 31% think he has ther right plans, 34% do not agree and 35% are undecided. Excluding the undecided and counting only those with a concluded opinion, those agreeing that he has a good plan are at 48% with those opposed at 52%, not majority but far better than the 31% claimed by the writers.

A short analysis of the other numbers reflect similar more positive numbers for Salmond than the writers try to convey.
16

Soosider,

Glasgow 27/04/2008 01:15:32
what a silly poll!!!! all about personality and very little about policies, issues.
This is meant to be a serious newspaper, how come then that this is how you assess a year of an SNP government.
Daft just Daft
17

Richardinho,

27/04/2008 01:43:18
I wonder how many people would trust Gordon brown with their wallets?

When you got it back, you'd find half your money missing-then after he promised to put it back you'd find the other half gone as well!
18

Jimmy the Pie,

27/04/2008 01:52:22
And this one from the Mail on Sunday!

Lord Levy: 'I warned Tony Blair about long massages with Carole Caplin'

Not more New Labour sleaze?
19

Willie Macleod,

Wick 27/04/2008 03:21:21
19 Labour sleaze what about the Laidlaw we can not comment on this Tory andparty funding,
20

Alan Reid,

NZ 27/04/2008 03:32:38
Leading from the front, well done Mr Salmond.
21

mesmiths,

fife 27/04/2008 04:06:29
#7 McX-
Well they clearly can't hide their disgust. Just look how they spin it into elaborate but clumsy criticism of Salmond. I can always relay on this title for a good laugh, thanks to the comedic editorial slants and secondary school standard of writting. I doubt the sales figures give much cheer to them in return, however.
22

Bob10,

27/04/2008 04:33:51
Based on the figures given, less than 50% of Scots figure that Salmond is capable of anything asked!!!

Lets see what what the ScotNats can parley that into, walking on water perhaps?
23

Bob10,

27/04/2008 04:38:32
17. Jade the Obscure.

Think different Time Zone!
24

Jardine,

27/04/2008 04:42:05
Scots trusting ANYONE with their wallets?

Shurely shome mishtake?
25

Bob10,

27/04/2008 04:56:33
6. Nacho Darcheville.

You are not bi-lingual then??
26

,

27/04/2008 05:00:33
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
27

Auld Twa,

Edinburgh 27/04/2008 08:03:58
Had a look at the pdf and don't think that this can be taken as a serious poll, an awful lot of wasted effort. There is little correlation between the poll results and the article.
Are they ever going to publish the "real" poll we have been waiting on for three weeks now.
What about Gordon Brown ? Statements on Zimbabwe so far have taken precedence over ones on the fuel problems. Fuel price inflation will probably exceed the level in Zimbabwe here in the next few days.
28

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Federation, not separation 27/04/2008 08:06:24
In the country of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.

Salmond mainly appears good because the rest are so poor.
29

Linda,

Edinburgh 27/04/2008 08:14:27
Where is the Scotland On Sunday poll they promised to publish two weeks ago?

I can only assume the results were too favourable to SNP and Alex Salmond so they commissioned another poll
30

Alfred E. Neuman,

27/04/2008 08:16:59
Salmond gets two thumbs down.

But I guess he is better than Wendy Alexander, who Scotland would also like to vote for. No accounting for taste.
31

Draco Was a Wimp,

Edinburgh 27/04/2008 08:30:37
The poll shows just how stupid the average Scots voter is and is another reason why the franchise should be restricted, particularly in the West of this country. 54% of voters trusted that twisted auld rogue Dewar with their wallets and look at the 400 odd million bargain at Holyrood he saddled us with. All for his own vanity.
32

Bob Christie,

27/04/2008 08:35:05
#31
Of course the results of the SoS poll two weeks were "off-message" as far as the editorial policy of this paper and its Johnston Press masters were concerned.

The thing that the Britnats in the Labtorylib Party cannot stomach is that the SNP IS doing such a great job despite them.

We have thirty years of Thatcherite government at Westminster from the Labour & Tory where individual greed and selfishness the norm. The Liebour Party's current policy of robbbing the most vulnerable to give to the better-off is testimony to that. Broon and Liebour are about to become unstuck in England & Wales this week. It's now only a matter of a little time before the whole wretched union is consigned to history.
33

roughrider,

Glasgow 27/04/2008 08:38:57
Dour Dewar. In May 1999, 54% of Scots said they would trust the former Scottish Labour leader with their wallet.I wouldn't have trusted that London controlled ponce with a my biscuit tin never mind my wallet.
34

brownlie,

27/04/2008 08:56:39
6 Nacho

So those who cannot speak English are half-wits? I'd like to be watching when you tell Carlos Cuellar your opinion! Strange, too, that you adopt a Spanish/French name as your monicker.
35

brownlie,

27/04/2008 08:59:33
30 Rules for seperation

"Salmond mainly appears good because the rest are so poor".

Oh dear, the nats will probably say the rest are so poor because of successive unionist budgets.

According to reports Lord George is not exactly poor!!!
36

BIG EYE,

Paisley 27/04/2008 09:10:01
This poll is one of the most stupid polls I have ever read.

What was it's purpose?

Glad I wasn't one of those polled as the were questioned on the basis of calling the First Minister a series of playground insults.

Where were the serious questions about what Alex Salmond and his government have been doing during the last year?

I think I know the answer as the writers would hate to know the real answers about how Scots view this professional and efficient Government
37

Boy Wonder,

27/04/2008 09:10:18
"The SNP leader's critics often characterise him as smug and self-satisfied."

Espacially the writers of the article. Eating humble pie now, are they?
38

Union is Best,

27/04/2008 09:37:18
I can't pretend these poll results are not a set back for us Unionists. Having invested thousands into probing the biggest ideas of Scottish politics - whether Salmond is 'patronising', 'smug', 'sexist' and 'conceited' and having found he is not, I am now struggling to translate these findings to a negative unionists narrative on local income tax, energy policy, and the constitutional future of Scotland.
39

Calum10,

27/04/2008 09:45:57
This must have been a very painful story for Kenny Farquharson and Murdo MacLeod to write. Every key press must have left the Unionist Dynamic Duo in agony. This pair of Unionist hacks must have been utterly grief stricken when they finally submitted this piece to the SOS editors.

Never mind guys, tomorrow you can go back to your old job of sniping at the SNP. Why deal in the painful truth when the lies are a lot more fun.

40

happy english,

London 27/04/2008 09:48:39
#41 Mr Salmond is a coward where is he while this fuel dispute is on. This is making Scotland look very weak, how could Scotland have Independence they could not afford millions of pounds every day it would cripple you, the rest of Britain are having to pay for those greedy men and even if they had the Oil it would not pay for it, Europe and England are now producing more fuel to keep the flow going, caused by greedy Scottish workers, All this is not made in Westminister it is home grown Scottish.
41

McX,

27/04/2008 09:50:54
#41 'Union is Best', I feel your pain.

Never mind old Etonians Cameron and Johnson might put up a better defence of the union than the WENDY and Broon.
42

brownlie,

27/04/2008 09:52:42
41 Union is Blessed

Nonsense - this is not a set-back for us unionists. The article is a prime example of how to put a negative spin on a poll which is favourable to the nats and we should take lessons from that. Negativity is what we do best and will be our saviour under Jackie and Wendy. HM will be along shortly with our favoured 23% which is the only poll we recognise. Alfred E is stuck in the jacket again so its all hands to the pump until he frees himself.
43

GM,

27/04/2008 09:54:27
Only here could such a positive poll be reported as -


"Yet only 32% of Scots would describe him as arrogant; 34% as patronising; and 24% as conceited."

"and while three out of 10 might seem like a low score it is the best Salmond has ever achieved."

"But he has a long way to go before he can match the standing of Donald Dewar."

"Only 43% of voters describe him as 'honest' and only 31% believe he has 'the best ideas for improving people's lives'"


This article is a total lesson in how to take something positive and spin it to appear negative... something that Labout et al in Scotland have been trying to do for over a year now, but most people it seems see straight through it.

Why do they persist?

The answer is, its their own arrogance. They think the public are some great unwashed non-thinking body of people who will believe any drivvle printed by the unionistas because they are the ones who *deserve* to be in power!

Its truly laughable - they haven't learned their lesson in over a year now.




44

McX,

27/04/2008 09:56:20
#43 Happy, are you sure you're truly happy?

You don't appear to actually know anything about what's happening in Scotland, what the dispute is about, how the opposition in Scotland are leading the way in asking probing questions about hungry caterpillars with access to powerful corriders...

I put it to you sir, that you are in fact a dolt, a dunderheid, a dobber a throwback to the halcyon days of Thatcher, a nyaff nay a posturing mountebank.

Begone with your idiocy and return to the Mail on Sunday whence you came.
45

happy english,

27/04/2008 10:02:48
#47 The rest of the UK are keeping you going, if you were Independent you would fold no doubt about it. Happy of course I am happy, I am happy because your reply was just insults no substance, most probaly a bit like yourself.
46

The west awake,

Argyll 27/04/2008 10:03:24
"But he has a long way to go before he can match the standing of Donald Dewar. In May 1999, 54% of Scots said they would trust the former Scottish Labour leader with their wallet."

I would have trusted Dewar with my wallet - but not my country.

While head of the "fighting 50" Labour MPs entrusted by the Scottish people to defend us against the out-of-control Tories under Thatcher in the 80s, he and the other 49 did - absolutely nothing! Instead of standing up for us,he and his fellow useless Labour cowards stood and watch as Scotland was torn to pieces by Thatchers brownshirts.
47

brownlie,

27/04/2008 10:08:19
43 Happy English

Quite right, sir, these greedy scots should forfeit their pensions - the part that's left after Gordon plundered them - in order that their employer can improve on his already high position on the very rich list.
48

Union is Best,

27/04/2008 10:09:35
48. Happy English! Well said, Scots are subsidised hand-out junkies who produce nothing of economic worth! We should cling on to Lodnon for all we are worth, which is not much!
49

Mike555,

27/04/2008 10:09:42
It's not surprising that Alex Salmond is on a high since he is up against the worst Labour opposition ever, both in Westminster and Holyrood.

Brown never listens, robs the poor by giving their hard earned cash to the well off and Wendy I'm afraid is a total waste of space. It's wake up time or that other lot will march in by a landslide.
50

brownlie,

27/04/2008 10:10:35
48 happy

Great post - full of substance and free of insult - that will put the scots in their place.
51

donald,

glasgow 27/04/2008 10:15:46
The Herald pulled the real pol on the grounds of the SNP answering back.
52

Grant,

Scotland 27/04/2008 10:16:16
#48 Given the recent revelations that £25m per day of tax revenue goes through Grangemouth from the Forties fields, equating to £9.1bn per year (and that is only half the amount generated from the North Sea)

Happy English, next time you meet a Scot in the deep south of England - stop him and thank him.

Either we Scots are the most charitable and giving nation in the world, sponsoring the UK Treasury with our resources.

Or we've been taken for a bunch of mugs.
53

McX,

27/04/2008 10:18:18
#48

" Mr Salmond is a coward

( what evidence is there of this slur and insult?)

where is he while this fuel dispute is on.

(He's in Hollyrood running the country)

This is making Scotland look very weak,

(if anything it's reminding the people of Scotland just how much money flows through our country into your country)

how could Scotland have Independence they could not afford millions of pounds every day it would cripple you,

( are you sure you don't want to rephrase that question it makes you come across a bit special)

the rest of Britain are having to pay for those greedy men

(do you have any evidence to support this compellingly stupid statement?)

and even if they had the Oil it would not pay for it,

(Ditto you're coming across a bit confused here, are you still drunk?)

Europe and England are now producing more fuel to keep the flow going

(Where exactly in England are you producing oil? The oil being transported has already been stored in large tanks which are called reserves)

, caused by greedy Scottish workers,

(When does it become greed to defend the rights and conditions you're entitled to according to your employment contract?)

All this is not made in Westminister it is home grown Scottish.

(Is English your first language old crocus? You appear to have a particularly bad habit of mangling syntax and spelling.)

There you go light on insults, I still contend you're not Happy about being English, admit it you'd rather be Scottish. Go on.
54

Grant,

Scotland 27/04/2008 10:19:10
It's good to see that Prime Minister Salmond enjoys a high rating in Scotland. There's a good article in The Observer:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/apr/27/scotland.scotland

Times certainly are changing.
55

happy english,

London 27/04/2008 10:24:44
#55 I do not doubt that Scotland gives generously to the UK budget, but Scotland could not survive it would go broke, but why should I shake a Scotsman's hand, do you shake an Englishman's man hand in Scotland.
56

Union is Best,

27/04/2008 10:27:17
There is some good news. From the Sunday Times Rich List "A decade of Labour government has been better for the super rich than even a Tory government would have been. They have neutered politicians of the left".

Good thing too.
57

antifa,

27/04/2008 10:27:28
A powerful moral case for intellectual honesty is made in this this essay by George Orwell:

http://www.george-orwell.org/Notes_on_Nationalism/0.html

It is focused on various types of "nationalism" but is not really a criticism of nationalism, more a critique of a certain habit of mind.

Posters of both nationalist and unionist persuasion could learn from it.

Now, let's be honest with ourselves. Is it a source of concern that Salmond is popular with richer people, and unpopular with the poor, and more popular with the old than the young?

The source of these trends might just be ignorance of what the SNP is trying to do (older and richer folk might be better informed) but I still think it's worth reflecting on.

On the first point, if we look at the major policies of the SNP, many are about making universally free what was previously free only for the poor. Where are the policies that directly target the poor?

The only one I can think of is the new grants for council housing, but 240 new properties is not going to make much difference - at most it will only affect around 1000 people.

On the second point, it is possible to see a bias in SNP policies in favour of the old. The LIT, for example, will benefit older, asset-rich households at the expense of young couples.
58

Union is Best,

27/04/2008 10:28:26
58. Happy English - as one Brit Nat Unionist to another, the phrase "I do not doubt that Scotland gives generously to the UK budget" seems to undermine our case!
59

McX,

27/04/2008 10:32:47
#60 Antifafa

"Now, let's be honest with ourselves. Is it a source of concern that Salmond is popular with richer people, and unpopular with the poor, and more popular with the old than the young?"

Now let's be honest you made that up didn't you, you pesky minx you?
60

brownlie,

27/04/2008 10:35:46
60 antifa

Great post - the negativity is precisely what us unionists must emphasis in order to damp down the "feel-good" factor and optimism about Scotland's future engendered by the SNP. We know that it is quite wrong to state that the LIT will benefit older, asset-rich, househols but we must keep on saying it, and similar untruths, regardless.
61

happy english,

London 27/04/2008 10:39:23
#56 Is that the best you can do pick up on a spelling mistake, again no substance in your reply just insults, we can all write one line quip's and me being Scottish why should I, I live in a Mews House I have two car's I have a good job and I live a comfortable life, have what I want in life, not bad I think for a single parent, me be Scottish I do not think so.
62

Alfred E. Neuman,

27/04/2008 10:41:24
I do find the nat-wits comments amusing. I think half of them actually fancy Alex Salmond, they are hanging around here and worshipping like a cult leader.

Imagine a newspaper ran an article that was bias and critical of any other party leader. Do you think those who vote for that party would log on and worship him?

I can only conclude one of two things. That there are people paid to come on here and campaign for the SNP or that there are a few SNP worshippers who have lost sense of reality.
63

Union is Best,

27/04/2008 10:47:47
65. ALfred, good thing you did not log on to comment on a Salmond story, as those who do are obsessed with the fiend!
64

McX,

27/04/2008 10:50:58
#64 Now do listen old fruit, you're tying yourself up in riddles, spelling appears to be the least of your problems. I'd say you're quite proficient in mangling grammar but seem to appear a tad confused as to what constitutes debate.

Take a deep breath and think long and hard about what it is you're trying to say, perhaps peel an orange or chant for a few moments, and only then commit your thoughts to the keyboard, and please read aloud what you're trying to post before pressing the 'post comment' button. Remember grammar is a courtesy to your reader.

I'm delighted that you live in a Mews house, drive two cars and have a job. I live in a castle, drive a car, a motorbike, a motorhome, a boat and a paraglider.

I employ three former Polish prostitutes to keep them and the castle clean. I have numerous children and several ex wives. I'm always looking to add to my collection. Wink wink.
65

happy english,

London 27/04/2008 10:56:09
#64 Yet again more Insults, you are trying to hard McX to be witty and cover your failings, and may I say well done for all you have achieved.


66

McX,

27/04/2008 11:00:56
#68 err you posted #64. As I say sweetpea do try and read before posting. Right I'm off out to enjoy the day, the sun is shining and Independence is ever closer. Toodles
67

Union is Best,

27/04/2008 11:03:11
69. Ciderman is currently undergoing treatment for his undescended testes, he will be along shortly, along with Highland Mighty. They may be put off by the headline, depressing as it is for us Unionists - honestly, you would think a year of negativity and mud slinging would have more effect?
68

Richard Taylor,

Aberdeen 27/04/2008 11:03:20
Sadly Happy English, oil is a matter still devolved to Westmincester.

Independence from you lot? BRING IT ON.
69

brownlie,

27/04/2008 11:05:22
69 Col.

Good morning, Colonel, my colleague Union is busy briefing HM on polls. Ciderman is currently trying to get Alfred out of the jacket and will be along shortly.
70

brownlie,

27/04/2008 11:07:33
71 Union
Sorry union and colonel - Jackie's mixed up the briefing papers again!
71

happy english,

London 27/04/2008 11:10:22
#72 BRING IT ON, bring what on, at the moment you have got Scottish fuel workers holding your Country to Ransom, it is costing the UK millions of pounds, Europe and the rest of the UK are keeping the flow going and even if you had the oil Scotland could not afford a major strike. At the end of the day this is making Scotland look weak. Yeah bring it on, it will be cheaper for the rest of us. Mr Salmond come out come out wherever you are.
72

Union is Best,

27/04/2008 11:15:06
75. Erm, Happy English - we Unionists who oppose the SNP prefer to play down the economic contribution of North Sea Oil, now you are saying it has a massive impact! You are not helping us!
73

Sideshow Bob 2,

27/04/2008 11:22:35
What does this say about modern British politics! It's all about having a voter friendly personality: no-one can stand politics after all or care to look into the broken promises and unpopular separation agenda (or even the recent Trump sleaze!) As long as you're something new and you have popular appeal, that'll see you through for a few years (until the next best thing comes along, which in this case will be undoubtedly be a return to Labour!)
74

Alfred E. Neuman,

27/04/2008 11:25:27
76 Union is Best

Wow! Do you know about "oil"? You sound really clever.

Go and do a wee "oil is ours, independents now!" shout for us? There's a good laddy.

Do you know how to get it out the ground or process it by the way? Seems only a few Scots people do, imagine they had the same selfish outlook as you? Well, the country could be held to ransom every other week for their personal gain.

Now, back to University with you, an independent Scotland cannot flourish just with workers who know how to answer a telephone and write short stories.
75

karinxxx,

27/04/2008 11:29:55
well the results of that were interesting and very good for alex salmond but you wouldnt think it to read the way the sos spun the story.

69 percent of those polled think alex stands up for scotland.

53 percent think he is likeable.

68 percent think he is intelligent

43 percent think he is honest

and 45 percent obviously think he is in touch with peoples concerns.

Great results.

However sos if you think this poll is going to make us forget about the one you wouldnt publish then think again.
76

karinxxx,

27/04/2008 11:31:52
and by the way your the poll is also flawed because to be valid every adult in scotland has to have an equal chance of being chosen and if the numbers are pulled from the telephone book then all those who are ex directory dont have a chance so your poll is automatically invalid. so there.
77

shivago8,

livingston 27/04/2008 11:36:10
Well done Alex and your party,you have achieved more for Scotland than the LLLLLLLLaaaaaaBBBBBBooooouuuuurrrr party have done in 10 years.
Keep Bendy Wendy sweet,as we want her to remain in office as every time she opens her north and south she puts her foot in it
78

Richard Taylor,

Aberdeen 27/04/2008 11:38:09
Tut tut Happy Slappy English, you know as well as I that English MPs have the noses in the trough whilst our oil & taxes flood south to the Treasury.

By the way you can keep the turncoats Brown, Darling et al. You deserve each other.
79

brownlie,

27/04/2008 11:41:18
79 Alfred

Congratulations on two front. Firstly, for getting out of the jacket and, secondly, for posting your sensible and well-reasoned - heavily reliant on facts - contribution.
80

Alfred E. Neuman,

27/04/2008 11:41:40
I think that Methalions better invent a new moniker character that blasts the Scotsman for bias against Labour.

It is rather telling that there are two stories running today on Brown and Salmond and only people are chipping in to defend Salmond.

The SNP are worshippers not voters. The minority pressure group has more in common with scientology than you could possibly know.

Anyone who disagrees with the SNP will be "fair gamed" on this site.

Shameful.
81

It wassnae me,

Glasgow 27/04/2008 11:48:17
Polls mean nothing. Assume 100% of Scots polled want independence, and as such, the next day it arrives. Then what? We have voted in a new regime which purports to be completely financially self-sufficient and able to function without any support from the fourth largest economy in the world. The SNP to date have never clearly laid out how Scotland will fund its schools, health service, social security, etc. How much does Scotland pay in taxes to Westminster and how much does it receive back in public funding from Westminster? Furthermore, the argument that we can rely on North Sea oil revenue is weak. Everyone knows there is only 20-30 years left. Not enough for my children and grand children to rely on, that's for sure. If and when we vote for independence it cannot be reversed if things go bad. The current arrangement with Westminster may not be ideal but going down the independence route could be a hell of a lot worse. I trust Salmond as First Minister, but he has a long way to go to prove he has the ability to manage Scotland on its own. If someone presents a robust case of how Scotland is going to be able to look after itself, then I would vote for independence. I believe the majority of Scots feel the same, and are sitting on the fence. Its a bit like a company saying to its shareholders 'we believe we can move the company in a better direction for everyone's benefit - we do not have a business plan or agreements with other stakeholders - but vote this through anyway'
82

Union is Best,

27/04/2008 11:50:40
85. ALfred - you don't get paid per post for repeating the same post on different threads! Jackie is docking you for that one. Otherwise great work!
83

Methalions,

27/04/2008 11:53:36
85 Alfred

I haven't posted on this article. Why the ref to my moniker?
84

Union is Best,

27/04/2008 11:55:51
--------A Labour MP told the London Evening Standard that Brown had "recently got through three mobile phones in one week by hurling them against the wall in anger".
Right now there is a mini boom in rumours about the PM's psychological condition. He's variously said to have taken a wobbly after the election-that-never-was, plunged into depression over Christmas, and brought in the New Year by kicking chairs across the room.
-------------------
Why did SoS not include a question on whether people perceive Salmond to be psychologically unstable and prone to tantrums - it seems unfair and one-sided to just let people think this is an issue that only affects our Unionist leader Brown!
85

happy english,

London 27/04/2008 11:56:17
#83 Is that your answer. Pathetic.
86

Alfred E. Neuman,

27/04/2008 12:05:45
88 Methalions

You are also brownlie and McX and what have you?
87

Alfred E. Neuman,

27/04/2008 12:09:18
Actually, it's not winter any more so can make better use of this afternoon.

If someone would be kind enough to log on and fake me a couple times in my absence I would grateful.

"Salmond gets two thumbs down", "the cult of the SNP have worshippers not voters", "they will fair game you like scientologists" and so on, you now the stuff.
88

Methalions,

27/04/2008 12:10:36
91 Alfie

See other article. Sorry to disappoint, but I'm not McX or brownlie. Ask somebody else.
89

John S,

27/04/2008 12:23:56
#86 - It wassnae me -An independent Scotland would set up an oil fund.
The Petroleum Fund of Norway is owned by the people of Norway.
On January 2008 it was worth $384 billion - The fund, created in 1990, invests Norway's oil and gas wealth in foreign stocks and bonds to save for future generations when the oil runs out and to shield the Norwegian economy and currency from the threat of overheating through huge oil income.
It is Europe's biggest sovereign wealth fund and worth about $81,000 per capita of Norway's nearly 4.74 million population.
90

antifa,

27/04/2008 12:27:58
62 - "Now let's be honest you made that up didn't you, you pesky minx you?"

No, I didn't make it up. It's from the article:

"The biggest Salmond sceptics are those in the 18-24 age group...Our poll also reveals the strongest enthusiasm for Salmond comes from high-income ABC1 socioeconomic groups. Poorer Scots have a significantly lower opinion of him."

63 - LIT will favour older households (who are more likely to be asset-rich and income poor) over the young (who are likely to be the opposite): that is an objective fact.

I mention it not because I am against LIT (I'm not sure either way) but because the article fails to provide any reason why support for the SNP might be more popular among the old than the young.

91

Conan the Librarian™,

27/04/2008 12:36:26
91
Faking you? Maybe it's your Body Thetans?
92

Union is Best,

27/04/2008 12:38:36
96. Please do not mock Alfie. He is having a parnoid episode, seeing Meths everywhere and whinging, whining and dribbling all ways in his obsession about it.
93

Conan the Librarian™,

27/04/2008 12:47:59
97
Perhaps he's drinking meths.Would that explain it you think?
94

James,

Dundee 27/04/2008 13:06:59
#24 Dundee is not a different time zone.
There are a few 'back doors' to the website where you can access earlier.
95

Freedom for Scotland,

27/04/2008 13:30:50
O blessed day!

The sun is shining, God is in his heaven, the SNP are in power in Scotland, Eck is First Minister extraordinaire, the Natbrit unionists are whinging and whining that we are too wee or too feart to be independent but recognise that independence is coming anyway. Wendy has been been sussed as being equally useless as Dewar, McCliche and Joke McConnell.

O blessed day!
96

Robert Mason,

Larkhall 27/04/2008 13:43:01
It is time we Scots put more water in our whisky.
97

Eve,

Scotland bonnie Scotland 27/04/2008 13:53:59
#14 Jimmy the Pie: Whos he I thought it was Edd Balls that was next in line to be PM (if the Labour party was still to be in power)
98

brownlie,

27/04/2008 13:55:06
91 Alfred

I only post as brownlie which happens to be my name. Ask ciderman/highland Am2,UiB or even yourself in your more rational moments. Don't forget it's four of the red tablets, four of the white and four of the blue - colour coded so you won't forget.
99

Eve,

Scotland Bonnie Scotland 27/04/2008 13:57:06
#102 Robert Mason: Eh!!!! AND yer point is?

You apling that the guid people of Scotland drink more Whisky than water!!!

You may have a point about Scots having to drink more water.

BUT adding more of it to the whisky just seems pure warped.