Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 5th September 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Salmond is accused of litany of worthless pledges



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 26 June 2008
UP TO 35,000 first-time buyers were told yesterday that the SNP's promise to give each of them a £2,000 grant to help buy a house had been ditched.
The SNP went into last year's election with a clear pledge to provide the grant to help people get on to the property ladder.

But Nicola Sturgeon, the health and wellbeing secretary, performed an embarrassing policy U-turn when she told MSPs this
manifesto pledge has been dropped. Her opponents derided the Scottish Government for breaking "yet another" manifesto commitment, claiming that ministers had already reneged on plans to cut primary school class sizes, provide nursery teachers for every child and write off student debt.

Other key policies, such as introducing a local income tax and creating a Scottish Futures Trust to build schools and hospitals, are in danger because they do not command enough parliamentary support.

Other pledges, such as the SNP's commitment to recruit an extra 1,000 police officers, were implemented only under pressure from other parties, while the likes of the abolition of prescription charges for those with long-term conditions have been changed since they were first announced.

Ms Sturgeon admitted the £2,000 first-time buyers' grant had been dropped when she unveiled the Scottish Government's approach to housing.

She claimed the "current market climate" had been behind her decision to concentrate on other measures.

But, in reality, ministers changed their minds because the first-time grants' policy would have cost £70 million a year to implement and it had been roundly rejected by housing experts when it was put out to consultation.

The Council for Mortgage Lenders and others said a £2,000 grant would be too small to make any real difference to the housing market. It was also pointed out that it would be inflationary and would not target those most in need.

However, that did not stop the SNP's political opponents from drawing attention to this dropped pledge and linking it to other manifesto commitments that have either been ditched or have little chance of success.

Johann Lamont, the Labour Party's communities spokeswoman, said: "The £2,000 grant for first-time buyers is now officially dead.

"Yet again, the SNP have failed to deliver on a manifesto pledge that was either a cynical attempt to win votes or undeliverable.

"The First Minister's repeated reassurances that he would work his way through all the SNP manifesto pledges over four years have again been shown to be hollow."

David McLetchie, the Scottish Tories' chief whip, said: "The day the SNP announced this policy, it was immediately condemned as unworkable, counterproductive and inflationary.

"It is a shame it has taken them this long to bow to the inevitable, and, if they want, we can show them another list of SNP pledges which should similarly be dropped."

Ms Sturgeon insisted the Scottish Government felt it would be better to expand a £250 million scheme for shared equity over the three years – allowing homebuyers to take up part-rent-part-mortgage initiatives with housing associations.

She also said more money had been put into another scheme to help people struggling with their mortgages and facing repossession of their homes.

The minister said: "It is our judgment that, in the current market climate, this approach offers more effective help to first-time buyers than direct grants."

A source close to Ms Sturgeon conceded afterwards that the £2,000 grants scheme was now "in abeyance" and would not be resurrected this side of the next Scottish elections in 2011.

The SNP has been under attack for its "broken promises" for the past year.

Labour claims the Nationalists' litany of broken promises, underfunding and spending cuts amounts to a grand total of £2.7 billion.

Wendy Alexander, the Scottish Labour leader, said: "This has been a year of ditched promises, 12 months of underfunded pledges, and real cuts now beginning to existing programmes.

"The evidence shows the SNP have let down Scotland by over-promising, underfunding and under-delivering."

Labour claimed the SNP had ditched promises worth a total of £656 million from its election manifesto, and it accused the Scottish Government of underfunding other initiatives it had promised – such as drug rehabilitation and the free school meals project – by £953 million.

Labour also argued that the Nationalists had cut existing spending budgets by £1.1 billion over three years.

Ms Alexander said that amounted to £2.7 billion of "ditched spending promises and real-term cuts".

In response, the SNP government published a list of what it said had been achieved in government.

It was a list of "solid achievement", according to the First Minister's spokesman, who said there were more than 100 achievements that the SNP government had delivered, from a slimmed-down government to the launch of a consultation on the climate change bill.

Every decision by a government department has to fit into one or more of the Scottish Government's priorities – a healthier, wealthier, safer, greener, fairer and smarter Scotland.

The spokesman claimed there had been promises delivered in every category, which were making Scotland better and which had been secured by the SNP government.

The £2,000 grant scheme for first-time buyers not only appeared in the SNP manifesto, but the Scottish Government consulted on the policy as well, inviting responses from experts and interested parties.

It was only when this consultation process provoked a hugely negative reaction that it really looked as if ministers would try to drop it quietly.

The Council of Mortgage Lenders, which represents most high-street banks and building societies, said the £2,000 grants would be a waste of taxpayers' money.

It also warned that house prices would artificially rise by the same amount if they were introduced.

Other experts warned that the amount was too small to make any real difference to first-time buyers and would simply provide extra inflationary pressures in the housing market.

In total, more than 74 per cent of respondents to the consultation process rejected the scheme as unworkable.

Sturgeon widens scope of shared-equity schemes

MINISTERS announced a major shift in housing policy yesterday, away from straight grants for first-time buyers and into more gradual ways of getting them on to the housing ladder.

Nicola Sturgeon, the health and wellbeing secretary, told MSPs that her focus had shifted to those in most need during the credit crunch.

She said the Scottish Government felt that it would be better to expand £250 million shared-equity schemes over the three years – allowing homebuyers to take up part-loan-part-mortgage initiatives, rather than just giving money to first-time buyers.

The minister said: "It is our judgment that, in the current market climate, this approach offers more effective help to first-time buyers."

The Scottish Government's shared-equity schemes enable people to buy a home in partnership with a registered social landlord. An owner generally pays between 60 and 80 per cent of the price of a home – with the remainder held by a registered landlord using a government grant.

Ms Sturgeon said she would expand the scheme up to £250 million over three years, from the government's £1.5 billion affordable housing budget.

She said the Scottish Government would launch a £25 million Homeowners' Support Fund to provide grants to those facing repossession. But it emerged later that this £25 million investment only amounted to £4.5 million a year of new money for two years.

There is already a mortgage-to-rent scheme available to assist those facing repossession. Their houses are taken over by a social landlord and they pay rent, rather than a mortgage.

Ms Sturgeon's Homeowners' Support Fund is simply an extension of this existing scheme, with a few changes.

The last executive invested £8 million a year in the previous scheme and the current Scottish Government will increase this to £12.5 million a year – or £25 million over two years – an increase of 50 per cent.

The minister further promised additional support and training for financial advisers, so that those facing difficulties with money could get good pointers.

Jonathan Fair, the chief executive of Homes for Scotland, welcomed the shift in emphasis. He said: "It is clear that Ms Sturgeon has recognised that providing support to first-time buyers is now absolutely key to the health of the sector. Therefore we welcome her commitment to investing £250 million over the next three years through the expansion of the government's shared-equity scheme.

"We are also encouraged by her commitment to increasing the level of the Homeowners' Support Fund, through an investment of over £25 million within the government's 'mortgage-to-rent' scheme."

PROMISES KEPT

END THE GRADUATE ENDOWMENT: The SNP made this pledge as part of its package of measures for students and delivered last year, with the help of the Liberal Democrats.

KEEP OPEN A&E UNITS: This was a party commitment relating to Ayr and Monklands hospitals during the election campaign. It was one of the first pledges delivered by Nicola Sturgeon, the health secretary.

A BILL FOR AN INDEPENDENCE REFERENDUM: This was the top-priority pledge for many Nationalists and it was delivered last August when Alex Salmond published the bill and launched his "national conversation" on independence.

CUT FERRY FARES TO THE WESTERN ISLES: The SNP promised help for islanders and is in the process of delivering road-equivalent tariffs which will cut ferry fares for many islands.

BUSINESS RATES RELIEF: The SNP promised to reduce rates for 120,000 small businesses and did so, although the speed of the scheme was accelerated after pressure from the Scottish Tories.

PROMISES BROKEN

FIRST-TIME BUYERS' GRANTS: The SNP promised £2,000 grants for first-time buyers. This was officially dropped yesterday.

CLASS SIZES: The SNP promised maximum class sizes of 18 in P1, P2 and P3 across the board. This was changed to a maximum of 18 in P1 and P2, and there was no timescale set.

NURSERY TEACHERS: The SNP promised to provide access to a fully-qualified nursery teacher for every nursery-age child. There has been no sign of this yet, principally because the Scottish Government is not in charge of hiring nursery teachers.

WRITE OFF STUDENT DEBT: The SNP promised to make loan payments on behalf of graduates as part of a package of support for students. This has been dropped without any sign of it reappearing.

PROMISE TO BE BROKEN?

SCOTTISH FUTURES TRUST: This flagship policy was supposed to replace the public-private partnership model of building schools and hospitals, but has also run into fierce criticism and its future is now in doubt.

SCRAP COUNCIL TAX: This plan, to bring in a local income tax, is out to consultation but has been criticised by a large number of organisations and does not have enough parliamentary support to get passed in its current form.

PROMISES WATERED DOWN

POLICE OFFICERS: The SNP promised 1,000 extra officers. Ministers dropped this to 500 after taking power and only increased it again to 1,000 under pressure from the Tories.

ENDING PRESCRIPTION CHARGES: The SNP said it would end charges completely for those with long-term conditions and phase them out for the rest of the population. What it is doing is reducing the charge year-on-year to an eventual abolition for everyone, including those with long-term conditions.



The full article contains 1911 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 26 June 2008 9:36 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Scottish National Party
 
1

subrosa,

26/06/2008 00:09:05
Ah Hamish. I see Simon Pia popped by the office yesterday with the latest labour press release.

I despair at times with the tone of reporting in this paper. This present government have another 3 years to do their best to bring their manifesto promises to fruition. Why are they pilloried after only a year?

Now, for today's homework, I'm going to research the manifesto promises of the libdems and labour during the previous 8 years. Will make an interesting comparison to see if any came to pass without costing every taxpayer way over the odds.
2

McMadman,

http://scottishreferendum2008.blogspot.com 26/06/2008 00:12:44
Subrosa

Go back a bit further. Labour have beein in power 50 years in scotland and 20 years until last year in embra.

Being fair, include all the westmonster commitments broken by lab/lib/tories. See how many were simply ignored altogether.
3

,

26/06/2008 00:14:20
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
4

Am Balach,

Isle of Skye 26/06/2008 00:14:43
I'm glad the government has dropped the £2,000 grant scheme. This was a John Swinney idea from the previous election and I was really surprised it was kept in the manifesto.
5

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 26/06/2008 00:15:27

That's 'Politics', 'More Fool Us' if we believe them!

Anyhow they needed the Money for the 'Trams'.

The only 'Wrongs' is US to believe in 'Santa Clause'!

So DONT Moan Now!
6

Andrew BOD,

Aberdeenshire 26/06/2008 00:19:17
RichieSF

Tell me. Who's Governor of California?
7

john z,

edinburgh 26/06/2008 00:19:44
So, here we have a nice piece of modern censorship. The Labour (unionist) leader in Scotland is found guilty of wrongdoing. Accepting unautorised money (effectively money laundering) It is very serious.

BUT, the headline on the Scotsman, more nonsense about the SNP.

Really, are there any journalists left in Scotland??

Or ARE THEY ALL LABOUR YES MEN, LIKE THOSE AT THE SCOTSMAN???????????????????????????????????

Seriously, Do none of you have any self respect left??

Are you all just London puppets????
8

Am Balach,

Isle of Skye 26/06/2008 00:24:07
My Comments:

PROMISES KEPT

END THE GRADUATE ENDOWMENT: The SNP made this pledge as part of its package of measures for students and delivered last year, with the help of the Liberal Democrats.

KEEP OPEN A&E UNITS: This was a party commitment relating to Ayr and Monklands hospitals during the election campaign. It was one of the first pledges delivered by Nicola Sturgeon, the health secretary.

A BILL FOR AN INDEPENDENCE REFERENDUM: This was the top-priority pledge for many Nationalists and it was delivered last August when Alex Salmond published the bill and launched his "national conversation" on independence.

CUT FERRY FARES TO THE WESTERN ISLES: The SNP promised help for islanders and is in the process of delivering road-equivalent tariffs which will cut ferry fares for many islands.

BUSINESS RATES RELIEF: The SNP promised to reduce rates for 120,000 small businesses and did so, although the speed of the scheme was accelerated after pressure from the Scottish Tories. (was always going to be kept. A ruse to get the Tories to support budget)

PROMISES BROKEN??

FIRST-TIME BUYERS' GRANTS: The SNP promised £2,000 grants for first-time buyers. This was officially dropped yesterday.(much better alternative after consulation. Shows the government listens).

CLASS SIZES: The SNP promised maximum class sizes of 18 in P1, P2 and P3 across the board. This was changed to a maximum of 18 in P1 and P2, and there was no timescale set. (Not a broken promise. Will be delivered with the co-operation of councils.)

NURSERY TEACHERS: The SNP promised to provide access to a fully-qualified nursery teacher for every nursery-age child. There has been no sign of this yet, principally because the Scottish Government is not in charge of hiring nursery teachers. (still three years of first term to run).

WRITE OFF STUDENT DEBT: The SNP promised to make loan payments on behalf of graduates as part of a package of support for students. This has been dropped witho
9

MisterN,

26/06/2008 00:25:27
So did I read this right the SNP took expert advice and recomendations and on that basis decided to change a policy which wouldnt have made any difference to anybody according to Hamish and this is being spun as a commitment fraud?
Does he deliberately write this sh*te in order to come on to these blogs himself as a troll and have a go at the nats? Is this what all this is for? I dont see any other value or use for it?
As for the rest well its been done to death the SNP have kept their commitment promise of providing the funding 1000 extra police so thats a lie Hamish.
They are also in the process of pushing through their commitment for smaller classes in spite of opposition,

How about this little gem

"The First Minister's repeated reassurances that he would work his way through all the SNP manifesto pledges over four years have again been shown to be hollow."

AFTER THE FIRST YEAR? they have proven to be hollow promises AFTER THE FIRST YEAR? does that even make sense to anybody else?

This isnt reporting this is Hamish indulging himself in his own little fantasies. Get a job you can do Mcdonnell this one is way above your pay grade.
10

Am Balach,

Isle of Skye 26/06/2008 00:28:13
WRITE OFF STUDENT DEBT: The SNP promised to make loan payments on behalf of graduates as part of a package of support for students. This has been dropped without any sign of it reappearing. (Delayed after trams forced through and tight settlement. Expect it to be intoduced before next ekection).

PROMISE TO BE BROKEN?

SCOTTISH FUTURES TRUST: This flagship policy was supposed to replace the public-private partnership model of building schools and hospitals, but has also run into fierce criticism and its future is now in doubt.( Has wide support in construction indutry. Opposition manufactured by Scotsman, Herald and Labour)

SCRAP COUNCIL TAX: This plan, to bring in a local income tax, is out to consultation but has been criticised by a large number of organisations and does not have enough parliamentary support to get passed in its current form. (Expect SNP, Libs and Greens to do a deal. Promise will be kept.)

PROMISES WATERED DOWN

POLICE OFFICERS: The SNP promised 1,000 extra officers. Ministers dropped this to 500 after taking power and only increased it again to 1,000 under pressure from the Tories.(Ruse to get Tories o support budget. was always going to be kept).

ENDING PRESCRIPTION CHARGES: The SNP said it would end charges completely for those with long-term conditions and phase them out for the rest of the population. What it is doing is reducing the charge year-on-year to an eventual abolition for everyone, including those with long-term conditions. (All prescriptions abolished before next election. Promise kept)
11

Nikostratos,

26/06/2008 00:38:00
That's the Unfortunate aspect of being in power. People expect you to do what you said would do. Its the same for all political parties in any era . And now its the snps turn no good the drones whinging the snp and Alex made thier promises freely to get elected and now with the reality of governance they find they are unable to deliver thier manifesto.

Their is always a contradiction between what a politician said to get elected and what they actually do when in power.And its the same with snp no more no less no different from the labour, liberal and conservatives.

12

Soosider,

Glasgow 26/06/2008 00:40:38
On the advice of experts it dropped a manifesto commitment, it stated it honestly and openly.
At the same time Nicola Sturgeon announces increased support for those about to have their homes repossesed, announces the ending of right to but for new build councils houses and moves forward the Glasgow Housing Association moves to smaller more local housing associations. Yet this is portrayed as a massive failing of government. What they have done is taken advice, engaged with those who know about these things and produced a package that will reduce people losing their homes, encourage councils to build homes for social rent, and make local housing a more locally accountable matter. how come this is presented as a failure.
If you want to read a fuller and more accurate account go to the Herald at http://tiny.cc/EcI6e
13

Copper,

Falkirk 26/06/2008 00:43:28

Latest SLAB / wee slab corruption

By the casting vote of the chairman they propose to sell a prime riverside site to ING a Dutch multinational company for peanuts.
In return ING assure - not contract - assure the people of Bo'ness they will refurbish the Harbour

Who in their right mind would accept that except for personel gain

The Newspapers have of course never covered this

14

Matt there,

somewhere 26/06/2008 00:48:12
Well done, Hamish! You remembered to delete the words: "Labour News Release" from your 'article.'
15

McMadman,

http://scottishreferendum2008.blogspot.com 26/06/2008 00:50:02
Sorry - remind me.

How many manifesto promises broken by newliebour, sameauldch'te holyrood 1999 - 2007 (and the fib dems too).

How many broken by liebore 1997 - 2007 westmonster, tories any time you like uk wide, liebour in scotland over the last 50 years ?

Hundred of times as many.
16

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 26/06/2008 00:51:21

Why the 'Shock'? Why the 'Horror'?

It was your 'Vote' Afterall!

The only 'Wrongs'! were for us to believe in,,..

'Santa Clause' In the First Place!

17

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 26/06/2008 00:52:05

Or can no-one Face The Truth,?
18

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 26/06/2008 00:53:37

DONT BLAME,.."Salmond" BLAME YOURSELF'S!
19

Nikostratos,

26/06/2008 00:58:58
#15 McMadman,

so what you are saying is labour broke hundreds of promises so its OK for the snp to break a few. Very inspiring and i suppose if they need to they can break a few more and so on so on until the difference between the snp and labour is Uh..zero.


Yes everbody will vote for that....
20

Conan the Librarian™,

26/06/2008 01:00:39
11
Niko

After four years in government, THEN, you can talk about broken promises.
21

Guga II,

Rockall 26/06/2008 01:01:17
Not only is this article yet another New Labour Sleaze and Corruption Party press release, but I don't recall the Hootsmon going through the previous Labour government's policies in such detail (no doubt under orders).

The Hootsmon are allowing comments on this article, but they removed and blocked any further comments on yesterday's article on the Mouth of the South and her breaking of the law. Then again, yesterday's article showed Labour in a bad light, and this article (press release) is an attempt to show the SNP in a bad light. Not that the Hootsmon are biased, it's just that most of their staff are card carrying Party members of the New Labour Sleaze and Corruption Party (North British Branch).

In any event, when we are independent, and control our own money, we won't have a hostile Westminster either stealing our money or our resources, or limiting what we have to spend on Scotland.

22

Conan the Librarian™,

26/06/2008 01:05:57
19
Niko...Niko.

Sometimes I detect a glimmer of intelligence and humour in your posts...

...Is the Labour brainwashing that strong...?

Break free Niko; you can do it, THINK POSITIVE THOUGHTS!

Or slump back into Unionist despair...
23

Jock MacSprog,

26/06/2008 01:07:39
its easy to get votes by promising Christmas morning every day. The idiots will queue up to get their free stuff not realising that its being paid for with their own money. But eventually the promises will fade into the cold hard reality of being in power and having to deliver. No wonder Salmond wants to delay the independence vote indefinitely, he needs time for people to forget.
24

bring them on,

26/06/2008 01:23:12
Why are punters surprised when politicians break promises.

Having siad that, anyone who believed this one in the first place probably still watch the Magic Roundabout, and eat baked beans with every meal.
25

Huntly loon,

Aberdeenshire 26/06/2008 01:28:10
The £2000 for first time buyers really was a non-starter. The intention was good - helping people on the housing ladder - but the suggested method would only have meant that the house buyers would have gone £2000 further with their offers. It would have added needlessly to house inflation.

Far better the proposals to protect public sector houses by removing the right-to-buy for new council houses and the scheme for shared equity. I am relieved we have a government that can see the folly of an unworkable idea and used commonsense to tackle a problem with fresh thought. The SNP instinctively seek to find the best value for the taxpayer yet endeavour to find a solution that is effective and can stand the test of time.

Pledges that appear in manifestos must always be re-evaluated in the light of changed circumstances. We are now in a climate of falling house prices and a credit crunch, with rising food and fuel costs. These were not envisaged as being the problems when all parties wrote their manifestos for last May.
26

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 26/06/2008 01:28:10

bring them on ~24,

Exactly My Point!

'Fools and Horses'

But 'HEY' we will still get over 400 comments from the moaners, that DONT understand This!
27

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 26/06/2008 01:31:18


BUT THEN, NO-ONE WANTS TO ADMIT, THEY WERE 'FOOLED'!
28

Edward,

26/06/2008 01:33:50
Its really funny, I had a feeling when I saw the headline, that Hamis MacDonnell would be shown as the journalist. Obviously yet another breifing from Simon Pia
Simon Pia should really just move into the Scotsman offices, perhaps he already has and shares a desk with Hamish
29

Edward,

26/06/2008 01:36:44
So Hamish, did Simon Pia not give you a breifing about Wendy Alexander being found Guilty yesterday....hmmm must have forgot to tell you!
30

JohnBowes,

Glasgow 26/06/2008 01:39:39
The very idea of giving 2000 quid to first time buyers was disgusting. How many of such buyers would have been very well off people? It was a hand out to the middle class. So young middle class first time buyers were to get 2000 whilst young poorer families who moved into rented accommodation got ZERO?

The SNP ought scrap the care for the elderly funding as well. That is also a hand out to the middle class - poorer people got it before that legislation was passed. Millionaire pensioners can get money for care? Eh? Beyond belief. That is money that could be directed at the needy. OR at the likes of hospices and so on.
31

bring them on,

26/06/2008 01:45:23
SNP=SWP

Scottish Worthless Pledges.

I was going to post another couple of versions, but I would have got a red card....

Leave it to the readers to work them out for themselves.
32

Nikostratos,

26/06/2008 01:55:42
#22 Conan

it is very very strong and it starts from the day you are born......and i'm just off to slump into me bed of comfy despair yawn..yawn zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Glimmer..glimmer what to do
33

bring them on,

26/06/2008 02:05:20
#33

Bob

Not the oldest joke in the world, but fecking close.
34

Neil Waugh,

Old Strathcona 26/06/2008 02:06:01
Unless Scotland restores its sovereign right to our natural resources the budget is in control of the English parliament. And we know who runs that quango. Doling out mortgage subsidies is a nice gimmick which was doomed to fail. But allowing the Scottish people to grow and flourish without a limey horse collar around our necks will eliminate the need for real estate top ups.
35

bring them on,

26/06/2008 02:12:04
#35

Neil

You're on the wrong thread.

Try the Celtic signings one. The're having a discussion about how 15 pints affects you.

You could contribute.
36

Otis Boone,

Sacramento 26/06/2008 02:59:23
an old saying: How can you tell if a politician is lying? Check if his lips are moving.

They say anything to get and stay in power. That's why the debate for your constitutional status should not be retreads of talking points of SNP or Labour or any other party. The debate should be discussed amongst the public in pubs and coffee shops, and decided based on the personal feelings of the populace that will have to deal with the repercussions of voting for these liars.

#6 - regarding the governor of California, the man who got in because we recalled the previous one for using our surplus to pay for electricity after a disastrous deregulation scheme that was cause celebre for his predecessor that resulted in a multi-billion deficit that still has not been fixed; it sounds like you have a problem with how the Fuhrer is governing this state. do you?
37

bring them on,

26/06/2008 03:34:22
Bob

You really do have Tintin's Joke Book, 1998 edition, at home don't you.
38

bring them on,

26/06/2008 03:41:05
#42

Naw, I was looking to a wee swap for the 1999 edition.
39

Just an opinion,

USA 26/06/2008 04:04:36
Don't you just love it?
#1, go back over 50 years, #6 and others of that ilk, spot on!
#3, I seem to remember the last guy, McConnell, enjoying rubbing shoulders with big money partners and trading shots at expensive golf courses that were not really in the Socialist mould.
But as someone wrote over here, Politics is a game like football and golf, only the prizes are offices and patronage.
So when they promise the world BEFORE they are elected, they conceal their hard edge and ruthless ambition underneath an umbrella of public congeniality.
None of which has anything to do with the welfare of the masses or the good of the country.
And in another quote, the problems of Salmond and others that they promise to solve, is problems they were party to in the first place.
Now I expect some rabid Labour, SNP and Tory's will dispute this, but all politicians are conmen/women at best, and, well, let's leave what they are at worst.
A long time ago, I listened as a little boy to Clement Atlee delivering a Party Political Broadcast on the 'wireless'.
What he said, and I have never forgotten it, was that a vote for him, was a vote to make the world so much better for "your children, and their children".
I turned to my elders, and said, "Does that mean I won't have to work when I grow up?"
Almost 65 years further on, I have heard that line like an old gramophone record stuck in the groove - and lo and behold, they are using it again here in the USA this year.
Salmond, NcConnell, Thatcher, forget 'em. They are the scum of the earth - or at least next to it!!
40

KampungHighlander,

Jakarta 26/06/2008 04:11:39
They have also broken Labours promise of a Five Thousand Pound tax bill.
41

somerferg,

perth 26/06/2008 04:29:09

Ah Hambo - you never fail to surprise !!
Would it be too much to ask that you might just once give Alex Salmond and the SNP government vredit for the good work they have done so far in working for Scotland. No I suppose not because like the monkeys with red rosettes (or blue ones or whatever the h@ll Fib Dems wear) you and your ilk haven't yet got used to the idea of a party that puts Scotland first without doffing the cap to the great unwashed in the Southeast of Engerland or lining their own pockets at the expense of the Scottish population. Many of the posts on this thread attest to that
42

Kingston,

Singapore 26/06/2008 05:27:13
There seems to be the notion in Scotland that everyone has the right to buy property. They don't!

To put it simply if you don't have the money you can't afford it.

If there were debtor's prisons it might waken people up to the fact that economic reality is unforgiving and applies worldwide.





43

Phil C,

26/06/2008 05:31:53
#16,17,18....Charles Killjoy (and others of that ilk)

Open your eyes. The SNP has done more good in their few months of minority government than any previous administration. Try adopting a positive attitude to what Salmond says. He can't change everything overnight, but he's getting there. The intentions are clear.

If you doubters would just believe in, and support, your country we could be on the road to a very rosy future. It will probably happen without you anyway, so why not come onside and stop your daily petty jibes.
44

bluehead,

edinburgh 26/06/2008 05:39:41
we must not forget one of the commandments that politicians must obey, where it says-----
all promises,no matter how solemly the are given,are there to be broken
45

Just an opinion,

USA 26/06/2008 05:49:05
#47, Bob 10, naw Bob, not bitter, just enlightened, if that is even the word.
To quote my friend over here yet again, I have an extremely low opinion of politicians because they have taken a once great country full of great people, English, Scottish, Welsh and Irish, and have run it into the ground to the point that it requires a lot of optimism to even see a bleak future despite the current inhabitants of Edinburgh;s Parliament or Kirkcaldy High School finest statements to the contrary.
Yep, if the ballot box contained the words 'none of the above'that cross in the box would probably win by a landslide.
Bitter????? Naw, disillusioned by several times around the world might be a better description, but he reads my disgust of politicions very well.
46

LEAL,

26/06/2008 05:52:52
The difference between the SNP and the English parties is that the SNP are trying to make Scotland a better place.It is succeeding,despite opposition from the English parties and the media.Broken promises?301 years of them.The Scotsman will look very silly come the landslide.
47

Grahamski,

Falkirk 26/06/2008 06:06:09
54
I think you'll find the difference between the SNP and the other parties is that the other parties wouldn't tolerate nauseating little racists like you peddling filth in their support.
English parties? Grow up, Adolph.
48

yockel,

26/06/2008 06:07:03
And how about doing a U turn on that useless piece of NuBlab social engineering the HOMEBUERS PACK, due to arrive in December even though the trial run was a disaster.
It will cost sellers £500 up front before their house go on the market and before any advertising, it will throw up matters that will cost money to rectify without any prospect of a sale, all at a time when a lot of people are going to be selling because they have no money to pay for these kind of things let alone food or fuel.
Good thinking Batperson.
49

,

26/06/2008 06:44:38
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
50

,

26/06/2008 07:16:59
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
51

John Jamieson,

Edinburgh 26/06/2008 07:24:13
As a minority government they have managed to bring in more changes in a year than Labour did in half a century.
Well done, let us hope that Scotland has the sense to give them an overall majority at the next election, then they won't be restricted by the voting antics of Labour and LibDems.
52

Colkitto,

River Clyde 26/06/2008 07:24:29
Another dreadful headline by the Scotsman newspaper that typifies just how scared they are of the break up of the union.
The Scotsman has made a conscious decision to back a failing Labour governement, a Prime Minister with the worst poll rating since records began and a Labour leader in Wendy Alexander who has been caught breaking the Law.
The SNP are in power here in Scotland with high poll ratings both for the party and leader Alex Salmond.
But still the Scotsman has negative headlines day after day hoping to sway the electorate back to the unpopular Labour party. A party that voters are leaving in their droves.
I find this incerdible from a mainstream popular newspaper in a modern democracy
53

donald,

glasgow 26/06/2008 07:29:25
Heard Labour's pet Hamster, H McD, and all the other Labour hacks on EBC2's North British political programmes, all interviewing and back slapping each other ans sniping at the Scottish Government. Then I saw the late night papers review the Hamster's dummy headline above.
54

mr angry,

ayrshire 26/06/2008 07:30:10
Another great , practical, decision by the SNP. They have altered policy to meet the new conditions, something Labour could never have done. In any case this would have been wasted money , now it will help the people who really need it.
55

Louis Catorze,

26/06/2008 07:32:25
So, the SNP have announced a Manifesto pledge, consulted on the matter and, finding that experts think it is not a good idea, decide against it.

And this is a bad idea how?

Better than Brown down south thinking he knows better on every subject known to man.
56

spiderman,

argyll 26/06/2008 07:37:26
More idiotic reporting. MINORITY GOVERNMENT - You can only do what the other parties agree to. This policy did not have cross-party support. The fact it can't be done is the fault of the other parties' inertia. Manifestos relate to promises if MAJORITY GOVERNMENT is achieved. Running a MINORITY GOVERNMENT is consensual. So far, the SNP has performed miracles considering the need to get the other dismal unionist parties in tow on each issue.
57

GrahamH,

Edinburgh 26/06/2008 07:37:30
Edinburgh trams appears to be missing from much comment. Many in City Centre, well Edinburgh in total said voted SNP only on basis of scrapping trams and after other parties votyed in favour, the SNP executive rubber stamped when could still have blocked, per manifesto.
58

Evan Owen,

Snowdonia 26/06/2008 07:41:03
What benefit would the £2,000 grant bring to the populace? It would cost more than that to administer it!!
59

Conan the Librarian™,

26/06/2008 07:54:06
66
It's been reported, but it's under an anti-SNP headline!
Something about Foulkes and Kerr needing a psychiatrist.
60

Gdgy,

dundy 26/06/2008 07:59:40
The SNPites are in full denial mode.....

But everyone can see that the SNP have failed to deliver on another election promise....
What is their purpose?
To blame anyone else for their failure to deliver....
61

bring them on,

26/06/2008 08:00:13
Well, la di da. The Scottish Numpty Party has finally done it. It has taken them forever, but it seems that a large amount of people believe their "Snow White" tales.

Oh, but their better than the other crowd...

What about the all that oil....

Yes, the punters have got it all sussed out, and everyone will live happily ever after it pretty houses with roses in the garden, and an apple tree.

62

Fifi la Bonbon,

26/06/2008 08:02:39
Spin, spin, spin - well spun, Cybernats!

It is still a promise disposed of.
63

Indy Evolution,

Edinburgh 26/06/2008 08:09:01
The whole of the 'scottish' media really seem to have been increasing the negative stories about Scotland as whole recently. You might say 'well there is a lot of bad things to write about'. But when you look at some of the things they are writing/reporting about they really seem to be designed to make Scots feel bad and have a feeling of doom. For example, story on Radio Scotland this morning about many of the 5500 grocery shops in Scotland thinking about selling up because of the SNPs proposals to raise the alcohol buying age. I'm sorry, but I just don't believe many will - IF the SCottish Government do this - its only being talked about at the moment. The shop owner they interviewed said they are increasing it to 25 !
64

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Federation, not separation 26/06/2008 08:09:48
#61 Scottish and proud.

I find nationalism offensive; and divisive; and irrational. That applies to any party or person (or internet poster) predicating policies (or net names) on nationalism.
65

Conan the Librarian™,

26/06/2008 08:16:30
75
Aren't you a proud Briton?

That would make you a British Nationalist then wouldn't it?
66

HughB,

Edinburgh 26/06/2008 08:30:53
What's the breaking news this morning - Wendy Alexander broke the rules, and will no doubt be severely punished.

What does the Scotsman front page contain - a story about how good a job the opposition is doing in preventing the Government achieving all its manifesto pledges.

The Scotsman truly is the Labour Party Press.

Never to be trusted. It should be stripped of the name because it does not represent Scotland in any shape or form.
67

Mr. Lachie Todd,

Edinburgh 26/06/2008 08:37:56
Strange? No mention of the 3 year freeze on Council Tax?
68

LEAL,

26/06/2008 08:40:54
55 Grahamski

I am sorry you misunderstood my comment as being racist.It certainly wasnt my intention.Perhaps in future I should refer to the London,England parties to avoid any confusion.They are,I believe,headquartered in London.
I find being told Scots arent capable of self-government to be racist.
69

,

26/06/2008 08:47:25
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
70

D Napier,

26/06/2008 08:50:09
The sooner that the voters of Scotland realise that Mr Salmond and his cronies are a complete bunch of wasters.

Yet again we have another broken promise - what a surprise.

Even those promises that have been kept are not exactly shining examples of good policy - removal of bridge tolls has resulted in massive costs to the taxpayer and a large number of redundancies at the Forth and Tay Road Bridges. And, at the end of the day, congestion at the Forth is still as bad as ever, as some of predicted it would be. What a total waste of money.
71

Boy Wonder,

26/06/2008 08:51:19
I don't believe anything this paper writes about the SNP. Its bias towards New Labour is completely ridiculous in the face of all their stunning let-downs, turn-arounds and outright lies.

I go to other papers for a more level playing field in the reporting of political matters.
72

bring them on,

26/06/2008 08:57:31
#83

Boy WOnder

"I go to other papers.."

Aye, right. The ones yet get your chips and three pickled onions wrapped in....
73

jdships,

26/06/2008 09:05:49
83 Boy Wonder


Why buy/read this newspaper then ?
It is so patently obvious that as soon as anything remotely criticising the SNP there is an outcry from the sheep .

I did not vote SNP but as they were democratically elected to power then I am prepared to give them the full four years to prove to me they are the "full shilling"

Surely you as an SNP voter/supporter must realise there will be always criticsm of your party or any party in power- that's democracy .
Think about it as you are coming accross as "Boy Blunder"
74

Senga Jean,

26/06/2008 09:06:07
The SNP Government is the best thing to happen to Scotland in years. You can't win all the time but 95% is good going. Wait till they get into their stride. A win.win for Scotland
75

brownlie,

26/06/2008 09:07:59
What a relief to find this paper firmly on our unionist side in daily producing anti-SNP headings which usually have no relation to the actual subject being discussed.

Also, relieved to find that as a bye-election approaches we can expect more criticism of the country falling into oblivion under the SNP in marked contrast to the paradise enjoyed by Scots during the previous Lib/Lab administration.

For instance, we could have enjoyed more council tax increases without any local authority improvement in performance.
76

Embra Don,

26/06/2008 09:10:01
I almost bought the "Scotsman" [sic] this morning as it was the only paper which had been delivered to the petrol station I was using. It would have been the first time for about 10 years that I had done so.
Fortunately I glanced at the headline before paying for it and was reminded what a scurrilous parcel of rags it has become.
77

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 26/06/2008 09:16:42
It's a pity they can't make "U-Turns" on some of their other "policies"... The more oppressive ones... like increasing the age to buy alcohol... like increasing the age to buy tobacco... like the introduction of stupid nanny-state measures regarding the sale of alcohol...

Also, it's a pity they couldn't have carried out one of their main pledges and scrapped this daft toy train set scheme.

It seems that all they can do is grind the people of Scotland into the dirt.
78

Wynn,

CLYDESDALE 26/06/2008 09:17:00
Have I picked this up aright?

New Labour is castigating the SNP for not keeping its promises?..

.New Labour?

Come ON!
79

Wynn,

CLYDESDALE 26/06/2008 09:17:01
Have I picked this up aright?

New Labour is castigating the SNP for not keeping its promises?..

.New Labour?

Come ON!
80

Chris.J,

Edinburgh 26/06/2008 09:17:24
Funny conincidence that the Scotsman runs this piece of biased drivel on the same day that Wendy is due to get censured for breaking Holyrood rules...
I think the editor has been taking lessons in fair and balanced reporting from the Herald ... the Zimbabwe Herald that is!!

81

Embra Don,

26/06/2008 09:17:42
Anyone care to speculate as to whether the Scotsman will still be in business when the referendum is held?
82

Skyrat,

Edinburgh 26/06/2008 09:18:01
#72 Scottish Nationalism is based on the belief that we, as a nation, would be better off governing ourselves as opposed to allowing someone else to do it for us. It is inclusive in that all people are welcome in this country, regardless of race, colour or creed. If you find that offensive, irrational and divisive I suggest that there is more wrong with your beliefs than the nationalist ideal.
83

Wynn,

26/06/2008 09:18:06
Sorry for the hiccup. Must do better.
84

,

26/06/2008 09:20:03
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
85

Resolutions,

26/06/2008 09:22:41
Funny that there seems to be no mention at all of he credit crunch and the global (USA) mess up of mortgages and no link to the mad lending by the Northern Rock mess. Did anyone have a crsytal ball re that? When SNP came to power £2000 may have helped 1st time buyers but........ things have kinda changed.

Did no one hear the measures to try to keep as many folk caught up in a mess which was none of their fault, in their homes? I would much rather, under the present climate, that this was addressed and folk found homes, than giving £2000 to get more into the financial morass over which Holyrood has little or no control.

It seems a case of trying to help the Scottish residents as much as possible to keep their homes. In the next 3 years, the finncial climate may improve again and it is possible this promise may come back. Under the present financial climate, it is of no help to anyone, but keeping a roof over heads, most certainly is!
86

brownlie,

26/06/2008 09:26:00
93 107

In your criticism of Salmond you forgot to add that he is a Heart's supporter.
87

Alastair the First,

26/06/2008 09:28:55
It doesn't really matter how badly the SNP perform (and so far they are performing pretty well). They could never beat the appalling incompetence of the previous LabLib administrations. Does anyone REALLY want to return to the days of LabLib? No, thought not.
88

The Tin Man,

26/06/2008 09:29:08
Very sensible of the SNP to drop this.

Not very sensible of them to included it as policy in the first place. Were they serious, or was it a make-believe carrot?

However, I do appprove of the exec's general policy of doing as little as possible - it certainly worked for Hong Kong.
89

Alasdair,

26/06/2008 09:29:30
So let me see if I