Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


One in five Scots children 'abandoned to poverty since 2004'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 29 May 2009
ONE in five Scots children lives in poverty, and efforts to improve their lives stalled five years ago, according to a study today.
The figures show 210,000 children were living in low– income poverty in 2006-7, about 21 per cent of youngsters.

While levels of child deprivation have fallen faster in Scotland than other parts of the UK in the past decade, the downward trend has
stalled since 2004-5, according to the Joseph Rowntree Foundation report.

Barnardo's Scotland said the study should act as a "distress flare" and warned the recession would exacerbate the problem.

The report suggests the UK government's target of eradicating child poverty by 2020 will not be met if progress continues at the current rate.

Measures to reduce deprivation in Scotland are now fairly similar to the rest of the UK, according to the study, which was compiled by staff at Glasgow Caledonian University's Poverty Information Unit.

It called on the Scottish and UK governments to do more to reduce child poverty north of the Border and suggested a broad range of measures.

Dr Stephen Sinclair, the report's joint author, said action was slowing down at a time when economic conditions were much more challenging. He said: "The political opportunities to end child poverty in Scotland are potentially greater than in many parts of the UK. This places a huge responsibility on the Scottish Government to do all it can to achieve the target of eradicating child poverty by 2020."

The report, Child poverty in Scotland: Taking the Next Steps, found the issue of childcare was one of the most significant barriers to employment. It urged the Scottish Government to introduce measures such as encouraging employers to create more flexible jobs and increasing access to affordable, flexible childcare.

The report defines child poverty as those children living in relative low-income poverty – households whose income is below 60 per cent of UK median income – before housing costs.

It has called for serious consideration to be given to the concept of a Scottish living wage and has urged the Scottish Government to commit to paying this to public-sector employees.

It also warned the devolved administration that its policy of targeting the poorest 30 per cent, rather than 20 or 10 per cent, could dilute the resources focused on those experiencing the most severe poverty if there are not enough extra resources to cope with it.

The authors of the report acknowledge that some measures required to reduce child poverty in Scotland are hampered by devolved powers, but said they should be considered.

It suggests the two governments could work more closely to reduce the benefits trap by allowing greater overlap between employment and benefit entitlement, and look at adapting UK government welfare reforms to local labour market conditions.

Martin Crewe, the director of Barnardo's Scotland, said: "This report should be seen as a distress flare for the one in five children in Scotland living in poverty. Child poverty is a moral disgrace and a ball and chain around our future economic development."

Douglas Hamilton, Save the Children's head of Scotland said: "

Over the past five years, the number of children living in poverty in Scotland has remained at a shamefully high level. Today's JRF report shows that current Scottish Government policies are not enough to make any significant progress towards the goal of ending child poverty."

John Dickie, head of the Child Poverty Action Group in Scotland, said: "This is not just about statistics, it's about over 200,000 real children whose lives are too often being damaged, diminished and cut short because their parents, despite their best efforts, have to bring them up on hopelessly inadequate incomes."

Day-by-day struggle to put food on the table

JEAN is a mother of five who lives in Glasgow's Easterhouse area with her 14-year-old daughter and three sons aged 16, 20 and 24.

She receives £129 week in benefits, but spends £90 on gas, electricity, and heating.

Jean often finds herself borrowing and paying back money to friends, family and neighbours, leaving her feeling trapped in what she calls a "cycle of poverty".

Her home has had no carpets for five years; her family often eat only one meal a day.

She said: "I spend about £10 a day on gas and if I don't have enough money, I try to squeeze it out, with my family sitting frozen to keep money for the next morning because it's always cold in the morning.

"My sons also have to share a double bed because I can't afford another bed. My house is in such a bad condition that I find it embarrassing to invite my family round. My daughter doesn't bring any of her friends round for the same reason.

"Sometimes, I don't have any tea or food all day… about four days out of the week, I pretend that I have had my dinner."





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 28 May 2009 11:43 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Scottish child poverty
 
1

,

29/05/2009 01:40:57
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 29/05/2009 01:41:05

I myself was in 'Poor Street' as an older child, it is not a nice place to-be!, but you learn to cope with making the best out of the situation, if there ever is a 'best'!,?.
I am shocked however, that the figure given, is '1 in 5', Children living in Poverty!

My last thought, is in the last paragraph of this article, "JEAN is a mother of five who lives in Glasgow"
She has two Sons that maybe could be working who live with her, if they do not work, do they not get benefit's?, to help their Mother.
I do however see Her point on the Fuel-Bills, Fuel has become extortion money to the poor, price hikes, to-which, are scandalous, and need urgent Government Address!

3

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 29/05/2009 01:46:36

#1

Agreed!, And as is said, "Charity Begins At Home"!

We are all to Quick in Helping others, while our own Live in Squaller and in Poverty!

4

,

29/05/2009 05:14:52
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
5

,

29/05/2009 05:29:51
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
6

Corky,

29/05/2009 05:39:24
#1 - Your post has little to do with the article.
7

sceptic,

livingston 29/05/2009 07:48:38
What rubbish, Brown made Poverty History years ago along with Boom and Bust.
8

,

29/05/2009 08:13:40
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
9

SandyBottoms,

Edinburgh 29/05/2009 09:08:52
As far as I can see it, there are only two ways to "eradicate child poverty": eradicate all poverty or adobt the children out to wealthier homes.
10

FreddieIII,

Scotland 29/05/2009 09:21:19
'JEAN is a mother of five who lives in Glasgow's Easterhouse area with her 14-year-old daughter and three sons aged 16, 20 and 24. She receives £129 week in benefits, but spends £90 on gas, electricity, and heating'

I very much doubt she spends £90 per week on electricity and gas - that equates to just under £5000 per annum - unless she has a massive mansion, and there are none in Easterhouse, mostly tenements. Her 20 and 24 year old sons are both able to claim benefits by themselves, if they are not working, so I doubt the household income is £124 per week. If Jean is a real person, and not made up by this newspaper, then, she needs to get the utility companies to check her meters and get her sons to the Job Centre.
11

Jeff, Surrey,

29/05/2009 09:43:43
Why does the Scotsman use the example of a single mother for a family in poverty?

The vast majority of families in poverty are 2 parent families where there only real chance of raising their income under this governments policies, is to separate.

Single parents incomes are higher than many 2 parent families because of the benefit and tax credits that single mothers can access.

Because of the handouts given to single parents, the growth in these dysfunctional families that harm children generally has been huge over the last decade or so.

85 per cent of youth in prison are fatherless;

71 per cent of high school dropouts grew up without fathers, as did 90 per cent of runaway children.

Fatherless youth are also more prone to depression, suicide, delinquency, promiscuity, drug abuse, behavioural problems and teen pregnancy

http://www.thespec.com/article/542365

Labour's tax policies have directly led to a 160 per cent increase in single mothers, with all the attendant social problems

The prestigious Journal of Economics has published "The Effect of In-Work Benefit Reform in Britain on Couples: Theory and Evidence". It is a technical paper, with the usual quota of equations and graphs so beloved of economists, but its collection and analysis of the data is very thorough and its conclusion is very clear: the introduction of the Working Families Tax Credit has increased the divorce or separation rate by a staggering 160 per cent among women married to or living with a partner who either does not work, or who earns very little because he works part-time.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/5105675/The-benefit-that-became-an-incentive-to-divorce.html

"Welfare ‘rewards single mothers

THE benefits system is acting as a perverse incentive for single women to become lone parents, according to a report.

The study shows that women who split from their childs father to create a one-parent family are rewarded with higher levels of state b
12

Jeff, Surrey,

29/05/2009 09:44:11
The study shows that women who split from their childs father to create a one-parent family are rewarded with higher levels of state benefits.

The research by Civitas, the think tank, found that while Britain gives incentives that encourage lone parenthood, benefit systems in France and Germany favour parents who bring up their children together. "

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article527698.ece

"More important, however, is the fact that in the UK it is financially advantageous for

couples with children – where either both parents work receiving the minimum wage, or both parents are unemployed – to part, since the interaction of taxes and benefits results in a higher standard of living for the newly-formed one-parent family."

http://tinyurl.com/3oa96g

13

Bruce's spider,

29/05/2009 09:45:30
I think that the Joseph Rowntree Foundation do a valuable job but where they fall down is that they are like a Phyiscian who diagnoses the illness without treating it. Look around you and if your High Street is anything like mine you will see obese young girls pushing prams around while having a fag while their partners stand beside them mouthing away into their mobile phones while clad in their white trainers and leisure suits. These people don't work, have no ambition and an aimless hedonistic attitude to life. The vicious circle is that they bring children into the world who end up becoming carbon copies of themselves and it doesn't matter what the Government/Council/Joseph Rowntree Foundation say or do because they aren't going to change a thing. This country long ago lost the work ethic and if it wasn't for the immigrants you wouldn't get served in pubs or restaurants and crops wouldn't be harvested from the field. Self-responsibility is something that everyone should be taught but in 21st Century Britain the phrase is meaningless.
14

Scottyboy007,

Glasgow 29/05/2009 11:14:07
You will never ever eradicate Child Poverty without tackling POVERTY for everyone. The working man/woman is now officially the most worse off in our society. Our Society WILL never eradicate poverty with the present social security system. Until there is radical changes towards dependence on Massive handouts without people taking responsibility nothing will change. Billions of pounds in this country is fraudulently stolen from the poor by our own systems in place. We are also the Lowest paid workers in western Europe that are the Highest Taxed in the World. No wonder their is so much poverty.
15

Tartan Viking,

29/05/2009 12:35:17
The gap between rich and poor in Britain has grown substantially under the guidance of Nu Lyebour over the past 12 years. There was a time when Lyebour had policies aimed at dealing with poverty.

Not now. Four-houses Bliar and his greedy wife started it by only mingling with the bourgeois classes.
16

,

29/05/2009 14:21:34
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
17

Darien,

Panama 29/05/2009 14:44:55
"ONE in five Scots children lives in poverty"

New Labour is clearly working its magic for British families. And JK Rowling thinks Brown has these families in mind? What a diddy she is.

#3 Charles: "We are all to Quick in Helping others, while our own Live in Squaller and in Poverty!"

Aye, just think about all that Scottish oil money that's gone to fill the bottom of Britains big black hole of debt. And energy prices at a high. Oh for a Scottish 'StatOil'!

Oh for the power of Scotland to be in the hands of the Scots, and not given away to a bunch of perfidious sleazebag spivs on the make. I see 50+ NewLab MP's have requested a seat in the House of Lards beside the great and glorious Lard Foulksake! More gravy in the trough for them, while only poverty beckons for many in a bust economy and society (abortion and homosexuality becoming the norm). Still, there's always the Union Dividend, eh Duggie/Wendy! There's always Trident, and aircraft carriers, and the London Olympics, and high speed trains etc etc (if there is any money left, which is very doubtful now).
18

,

29/05/2009 15:47:11
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
19

,

29/05/2009 16:08:10
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
20

Geomac 1,

Scotland 29/05/2009 19:01:05
using the current definition of poverty, it is surely impossible to eradicate it? The median will always be the median despite the earnings of others and there will always be some folks below the median - by definition!!
21

Iainbroch,

30/05/2009 00:21:36
Och another great Union Dividend!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.