Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Labour's target for cutting child poverty under threat

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 11 June 2008
EFFORTS to cut the number of children living below the official breadline in Scotland have stalled, it was revealed yesterday, threatening the UK government's target to halve child poverty by 2010.
However, statistics show there has been a slight drop in the number of impoverished pensioners.

The situation contrasts with the picture across the UK as a whole, where 100,000 more children and 300,000 more pensioners were judged to have fallen i
nto poverty.

This is despite the government having made a key pledge to halve child poverty by 2010 and eradicate it by 2020. Experts say it will have to spend an extra £3 billion on benefits and tax credits if it is to hit the targets.

Figures released by the Office for National Statistics for2006-7 estimated there were 2.9 million children living in the UK below the poverty threshold of £226 a week for household income.

This increased to 3.9 million children when the cost of rent or mortgages on family finances was taken into account.

The number of UK pensioners in poverty increased by 300,000 to 2.5 million, and by 200,000 to 2.1 million once housing costs were deducted.

In Scotland, the number of children in low income families remains unchanged for the third year in a row.

Stewart Maxwell, the SNP's communities minister, said the situation was "morally unacceptable" and urged Westminster to do more to fulfil the 2010 pledge.

Child poverty is worst in inner London, where nearly half of children fall below the official measure, compared to 21 per cent of Scots children.

Former MSP John Swinburne, of the Scottish Senior Citizens Unity Party, said the UK increase in pensioner poverty came as no surprise. "Until such time as the government are paying people a reasonable pension, we will continue to have pensioner poverty."

The rise in the number of pensioners falling into poverty is blamed on three factors – the withdrawal of a £200 council tax rebate in 2005, the failure of pensions to keep pace with average earnings and a tail-off in pensioners claiming tax credits, which can boost their basic £90 pension by around £30 a week. But Mr Swinburne, who said academic research backed his call for a £160-a-week pension, said: "There are many pensioners who refuse to submit to the means-testing process, in which they have got to plead poverty before some civil servant."

Mike O'Brien, the UK pensions minister, said the figures were "disappointing" but said that two million pensioners had been lifted out of absolute poverty since 1997.

Figures show scale of the problem

200,000

The number of children living in poverty in Scotland.

180,000

The number of pensioners living in poverty in Scotland.

£226

The weekly household income amount that defines poverty.

3.4 million

The number of children in poverty in the UK in 1996-7.

2.9 million

The number of UK children in poverty in 2006-7.

100,000

The number of children that fell into poverty last year.

1.7 million

The extra children in poverty if nothing had been done.

300,000

The number of pensioners that fell into poverty last year.

600,000

The number of children the government says it has lifted out of poverty since 1997.

900,000

The number of pensioners the government says it has removed from poverty.

£575 million

The extra cash that is being paid to pensioners this winter.






Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 11 June 2008 8:59 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Scottish child poverty
 
1

English and proud as pop,

11/06/2008 00:57:45
Child poverty in England is at epidemic levels. I hope the Scottish government does better up north than the rubbish that is controlling us.
2

scottish person,

paisley 11/06/2008 08:45:19
#1 I feel sorry for the english,I really do. At least we ghave a chance, where I am afraid you are going to get hammered evem if the toffs get in.
3

bluehead,

edinburgh 11/06/2008 09:18:32
is it any surprise,? with a bunch of clowns running the show
if it wasn't so tragic you wouldn't be able to stop laughing at the pile in charge
4

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 11/06/2008 09:20:52
LIFE, is NO 'Mathematical Equation'!

For those living on the,..'Border-Line' even all the best planing, does not see the unforeseen.!

So lets stop the,..'Class Acting' in these comments.

Child Poverty Exists.
5

Edward,

11/06/2008 09:39:35
When Labour were elected for the UK Government in 1997
a commitment was made to reduce poverty. This was re-iterated in a speech by Tony Blair in 1999 when he pledged to reduce child poverty 'within a generation'
When Labour were in power in the Scottish Parliament in 1999 there manifesto included cutting child poverty in Scotland, and repeated again in 2003
Yet neither the Labour UK Government nor the Labour administration in Scotland were capable of reducing, cutting poverty!
At least with the new Scottish Government, they stand a better chance as they will not be ham strung by taking orders from London
6

,

11/06/2008 10:38:28
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
7

,

11/06/2008 11:27:46
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
8

Jock MacTamson 2,

Highlands 11/06/2008 13:16:23
We know we have provided the government with lots of money via Taxes. We know the government waste a lot of money talking about what they are going to achieve but rarely actually achieve anything other than the basic’s. Is it a surprise children living in families on less money a week than an MP can claim in expenses without showing invoices per day. Socialists they are certainly not. Scandalous they certainly are.

We waste BILLIONS policing the lawless middle east while our young men from the military are killed by a backward tribal population that hates them. We deployed our military but now the government that has no idea what it is trying to achieve, no mission, no objectives no direction.

We waste BILLIONS feeding, housing, educating, jailing, attempting to deport desperate peoples from all over the world with no link to our country except the shared wish to collect welfare benefits at best and destroy our country and culture at worst.

We waste BILLIONS throwing money into the EU so our political muppets can feel like big men at the EU talking shop. Grandstanding and gesture politics while achieving very little expect more rules, laws, treaties. Its like a massive local council. Over priced and under performing all at your expense while avoiding accountability.

We also want to waste BILLIONS building a nuclear defence that all members of the government are morally opposed to ever using as a deterrent against an enemy that no longer exists for a war that has been over for 20 years. Instead of dealing with the real Islamic threat.

We waste BILLIONS fighting war on drugs and on the population and using up the majority of the resources of the judiciary, police, customs and intelligence services to stop drugs entering our country while spending BILLIONS using our military to aid the very same drug traffickers to secure their poppy fields and transport links in the middle east.

If the idiot politicians stopped wasting all the money on moral crusade
9

Jock MacTamson 2,

Highlands 11/06/2008 13:17:15
If the idiot politicians stopped wasting all the money on moral crusades and high profile posturing, sound bites and my most hated phrase “BEING SEEN TO BE DOING SOMETHING” they would have plenty of money and time to deal with important issues like starving children and old people and the could ACTUALLY DO SOMETHING.

We help people who we owe nothing too while ignoring our children and old people who we owe the world and our future too.

New Labour…Same Old Sh!te
10

,

11/06/2008 15:12:24
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
11

,

11/06/2008 15:12:41
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
12

Jock MacTamson 2,

Highlands 11/06/2008 16:41:13
#10 & #11 - Great posts.

Do you ever notice how positive the pro nationalist posts are compared to the scared wee unionist lap dogs who peddle fear and inferiority as the main reason to stay in a sh1tty union the people have rejected for 300 years.

It unionist argument often reminds me of the reasons a battered wife makes to stay with an abusive husband.

13

LEAL,

11/06/2008 18:30:18
11
Can you tell me how much is the daily tax take on North Sea oil?At $130 plus per barrel it must be huge but I cant seem to find out approximately how huge.
14

,

11/06/2008 20:24:50
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
15

The Federalist (the poster formerly know as NAUON),

11/06/2008 20:44:51
Let's get one thing clear - the level of absolute poverty is negligible in this country - when they are talking about poverty they mean relative poverty.
16

Paula,

11/06/2008 22:41:41
Does the government really have a target? Because if it is increasing child poverty then they win and have done an outstanding job in not only doing that but also widening the gap between rich and poor to the point that there is no hope to get out of a tough situation. And for once the gap is between working poor and the rich, they have spent so much on ensuring those on benefits/incapacity are surviving they have sacrificed normal working parents/singles/couples/old folk.

Yet Brown keeps waffling on about how many people he has taken out of poverty - who is giving him this information, does he actually have even the faintest grasp of reality?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.