Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Of poetry and politics: MacDiarmid's vision of Scotland

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the scotsman.com site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 14 August 2006
THESE lines, from Hugh MacDiarmid's epic poem of 1926, A Drunk Man Looks at the Thistle, appear on the poet's tombstone in the cemetery of Langholm, the small Borders town where he was born Christopher Murray Grieve in 1892. They describe a poetic persona, the drunk man, who, as an extremist and an elitist, is unconcerned with the couthy opinions of the majority of folk – an image that the iconoclastic MacDiarmid, as spiky as any thistle, keenly cultivated.

MacDiarmid described himself as the greatest of modern Scottish poets, to be ranked alongside Robert Burns and William Dunbar. Yet he challenged the adulation given to Burns, reckoning that this held back the development of new writers in Scotland. With his collections Sangschaw and Penny Wheep he wrote poetry that reinvigorated the language of Braid Scots, or Lallans (Lowlands), that Burns had used to such great effect but which had fallen into disrepute through its misuse by Kailyard (literally, cabbage-patch) poets.

MacDiarmid despised these Kailyard writers, most notably the novelist and playwright JM Barrie, whose sentimental depictions of small-town life he thought had little connection with the realities of modern Scotland and present-day experience. In Contemporary Scottish Studies MacDiarmid sought to establish a new cultural reality in Scotland, one that replaced what he regarded as outmoded figures such as Barrie, author of the massively popular Peter Pan, with writers whom he promoted as part of the Scottish renaissance. Through this, MacDiarmid envisaged cultural life in Scotland being established once more on a specifically Scottish footing – what he called "the axis of our own mentality" – yet firmly in the vanguard of international developments.

MacDiarmid's Scots poems brought Scotland to the forefront of modern concerns, whether in relation to Albert Einstein's scientific Theories of Relativity or the avant-garde culture of the Modernist movement. In a poem such as The Bonnie Broukit Bairn, for instance, the Earth seems to spin in a godless universe, a space brilliantly filled by MacDiarmid with a uniquely Scots atmosphere:

Mars is braw in crammasy,
Venus in a green silk goun,
The auld mune shak's her gowden feathers,
Their starry talk's a wheen o' blethers,
Nane for thee a thochtie sparin',
Earth, thou bonnie broukit bairn!


His vision of a new Scotland was no less ambitiously universal than his poetry. MacDiarmid was central to the foundation of the National Party of Scotland in 1928, predecessor of the modern Scottish National Party. Influenced by the 1916 Easter Rising in Ireland, MacDiarmid wanted to see Scotland freed from the United Kingdom and London-based government. In barracks in England at the time of the Rising during the First World War, MacDiarmid said later that if he could have left the British Army and joined the Irish rebels he would have done so. But he also wished to see Scotland freed from capitalist control and had been interested in Communism since the Russian Revolutions of 1917.

MacDiarmid wrote Hymns to Lenin in the 1930s during the Depression, but he was keenly aware of Lenin when he lectured to the Montrose branch of the Independent Labour Party on the Russian's significance back in 1920. He was thrown out of the National Party of Scotland for his beliefs, but when he joined the Communist Party of Great Britain in 1934, whilst living in the tiny island of Whalsay in Shetland, he would later be stripped of his Communist membership for being a Scottish Nationalist. MacDiarmid's politics were so controversial that the British state, in the form of MI5, even investigated him during the Second World War.

However complicated and, on the surface, contradictory MacDiarmid's politics may have been, his influence on contemporary Scotland remains a powerful one. That Scotland now has the cultural confidence to teach its own literature in schools and universities is some acknowledgement of MacDiarmid's desire for full Scottish self-expression and, however much he may have despaired of the current devolved Parliament with its limited powers, his has been the loudest voice for Scottish self-determination in the modern era.

Although he died in 1978, his voice deserves to continue being heard.

Dr Scott Lyall is the author of
Hugh MacDiarmid's Poetry and Politics of Place: Imagining a Scottish Republic, the only book on MacDiarmid currently in print, published in August 2006 by and available through Edinburgh University Press and Columbia University Press. He was educated at the Universities of Edinburgh and St Andrews, before going on to become a Research Fellow in the Centre for Irish-Scottish Studies at Trinity College, Dublin. His research interests include Scottish and Irish literature, modernism and nationalism studies.




The full article contains 808 words and appears in scotsman.com newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 11 August 2006 9:49 AM
  • Source: scotsman.com
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Scots language
 
1

Carmen,

Scotland 13/08/2006 01:08:48

'MacDiarmid - An Illustrated Biography' by Gordon Wright, publisher and photographer from Edinburgh makes great reading for anyone with an interest in MacDiarmid. Meticulously researched and illustrated with a profusion of photographs, worth reprinting, essential reference. A superb book.

2

Joe M.,

Inverness 14/08/2006 11:48:31

http://www.scottishindependence.com has some interesting articles about Scottish poets and culture.

3

Highlander,

Everett, Washington 15/08/2006 00:29:17

Yes, but ...
One must ask the question: How could a man who demanded such greatness be accrued to himself as to compare with the likes of Burns, yet coequally proclaim that communism – the slavery of all at the hands of state, be the beall for everyone, everywhere in Scotland, be anything other than a charlatan?

How can one propose freedom (wine) while at the same time espousing communism (sewage)?

You simply cannot propose individual liberty, and embrace communism at the same time, as they are antithetically extreme opposites.

Poetry is one thing; poitics is quite another.
The former lampoons the latter, whereas the latter only barely tolerates the former – in the best of times, while outlawing it in the worst.

I've a feeling that Lenin likely considered MacDiarmid to be none other than a 'useful idiot.'

I say that in all honesty, as MacDiarmid was free to propagate his ideas in a relatively free community – not subject to the smothering oppression suffered by those under Lenin's power.

MacDiarmid was essentially a hypocrite: He espoused for all that which he himself would =NOT= suffer to tolerate by going to live where his politics were most suited – the USSR.
Either you practice what you preach, or you don't.

4

Aesop,

Leith 15/08/2006 08:25:28

Edward - it is unlikely that Lenin considered MacDiarmid as anything. Lenin died in 1924 and the persona of Hugh MacDairmid had only been created by Chris Grieve little more than a year before then.

MacDairmid was no hypocrite. He was a man of his time. Its easy to attack Russian style communism from 2006 as the murderous dictatorship that it was. But in the 1930s such was the ugly diseased state of European capitalism - mass unemployment, unmitigated poverty, and facism were its 1930s hallmarks - that even intelligent folk like George Orwell initially looked to Russia as an alternative.

Things change. There are many who now would consider the American Empire as the sewage of world politics.

5

Varlet,

USA 15/08/2006 20:11:58

It has long been fashionable to profess astonishment at the fact that so many brilliant people were drawn to Marxist ideology in the late 1800s during the rise of the mass socialist parties and, after the Russian Revolution, the worldwide appearance of mass Communist parties. In fact, the reason so many were won over to socialist ideas then and now, is that socialist philosophy as espoused and practised by Marx, Engels, Lenin and Trotsky is so very far superior to the "ideology" of capitalist "philosophy" (if such a thing there be); really, it's a wonder that so many dull-witted people today marvel at the phenomenon. Socialism promises an end to war, poverty, starvation, and ignorance; it espouses the equality and brotherhood of all the world's working people. It is positive, progressive, driven by and embracing technological achievement and advancement. It is anti-racist. It is anti-fascist. It promotes sexual equality. Why wouldn't so many brilliant writers, actors, philosophers, intellectuals, and decent working people proudly gather under the banners of socialism? Only those who are utterly ignorant of the writings of the great Marxist thinkers can make such foolish remarks as are made by Edward J., and to a lesser extent, Kevin, above.
Hugh MacDiarmid was most likely unknown to Lenin during Lenin's lifetime. Lenin had his hands full and was working without pause to create and defend the first workers government in history against the savage attacks being launched against the "socialist experiment" by the entire capitalist world. There are few great men whose legacies have suffered as brutally at the hands of their enemies as Lenin's has, and whose tremendous achievements in the service of humanity have been scandalously traduced and slandered by people who either know absolutely nothing about this great working class leader, or who will tell any lie they can conjure up to cast him in the worst possible light. Len

6

famie,

australia 15/08/2006 23:14:26

You made my morning Varlet. I am no Marxist or Lenin scholar but it seems to me in my limited knowledge that most of the progressive ideas in the contemporary world come from the Left. I think it is a shame that so few Scots know so little about their literary history in particular MacDiarmid. I don't know how often I have asked Scots of my era if they know of John MacLean and the response is more often than not negative. I think it is great that there is a Scottish component to the the education of our young and maybe they will do better than their forebearers who I understand frustrated the h... out of Hugh. As far as the lack of individualism in the Socialist model goes this is a Furphy (an Australian idiom) and they need to read Oscar Wilde's eloquent essay on Individualism and Socialism. In fact under a socialist system where people don't have to kill and grovel for the basic needs of life there is a much greater opportunity for creating strong and independent individuals I would guess. The Scots have in some ways been an unfortunate race having their masters right on their doorsteps but they have also produced some of the finest thinkers in the dare I say English speaking world and MacDiarmid is one of our best.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.