Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Tuesday, 7th October 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Developer told there's no room for hotel's carbon footprint



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 31 January 2008
A MULTI-MILLION pound hotel scheme has been put on ice after developers were told to reduce the building's carbon footprint.
Leith Walk Developments, who want to build the 175-room hotel in Haddington Place, have been told by councillors to increase the amount of renewable energy it will generate.

The move is one of the first to be made under the city council's sustaina
ble buildings policy, which was introduced last February.

Under the legislation, developers are graded on recycling facilities, ensuring ten per cent of energy is from on-site renewable sources, and minimising CO2 emissions from construction.

Although Leith Walk Developments achieved the minimum overall total of 41 out of 80, they failed to match the council's target for renewable energy.

City officials had recommended approval as the £15 million hotel would use a ground source heat pump, and said that any additional "externally-mounted" technology would be out of place in a conservation area.

But the planning committee threw out the recommendations and agreed to postpone its decision until more renewable energy sources were included.

Green councillor Steve Burgess, who proposed the motion to continue the application, said he did not accept there could not be further additions.

He said: "There is no point in having a policy like this if we do not enforce it. They must be able to include a few solar panels without making it look out of place."

Local councillor Maggie Chapman said she was pleased the developers were being told to make the building more environmentally-friendly.

She said: "I generally welcome the development of the site but we need to ensure that the impact on climate change of all new buildings in the city is minimised."

The hotel, which would feature a bar-restaurant and two shops, would be built on the site of a former petrol station and garages on Haddington Place.

No-one from Leith Walk Developments could be contacted to comment. However, a spokeswoman for architects CPMG, who drew up the plans, said they would be meeting with the developers to decide how to proceed.

Jim Lowrie, the city's planning leader said: "Although we were happy with the overall design, the committee continued this application to enable the applicant to meet our standards for sustainable building policy by increasing the level of renewable energy for the building."

WEB LINKS

www.edinburgh.gov.uk

www.edinburgh.gov.uk/internet/environment/planning_buildings_i_i_/planning/planning_policies/CEC_edinburgh_standards_for_sustainable_buildings">Edinburgh Standards for Sustainable Building




The full article contains 431 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 31/01/2008 12:15:13
Once again, we have the use of stupid, meaningless sayings.

The phrase "carbon footprint" is meaningless. Either use the correct terminology of shut up!
2

joppa jock,

Huntingdon 31/01/2008 12:22:01
#1 Absolutely right. Bull**** baffles brains as always. Have you noticed that councils have developed their own industry and terminology on anything that's supposed to affect global warming. But what about the great clouds of hot air that come from their meetings, do they have to plant a forest every week to compensate.
3

Iain fae Elgin,

London 31/01/2008 12:49:25
"Leith Walk Developments, who want to build the 175-room hotel in Haddington Place, have been told by councillors to increase the amount of renewable energy it will generate."

Bloody councillors. Switch off the lights on public buildings at night before you compel people to reduce their 'carbon footprint', whatever the h@ll that is.


4

passmeanaspirin,

31/01/2008 12:56:07
Carbon footprint = buzzword cack.

It neither impresses nor convinces anyone but fellow morons.
5

alex paterson,

embra 31/01/2008 12:57:17
I would love to meet the clown who first used the Words,Carbon Footprint,and i would stick my number 9 carbon boot up their carbon backside.
6

Unimpressed one,

31/01/2008 12:58:07
'She said: "I generally welcome the development of the site but we need to ensure that the impact on climate change of all new buildings in the city is minimised."'

This rubbish on 'carbon footprints' seems to have unhinged a great many people. Time for a dose of common sense. This woman should be suspended from council duties forthwith. She is spouting unsubstantiated junk science sound bites on which to base council planning policy.
7

Johnny Yen,

31/01/2008 13:54:48
Leith Walk Developments, .....have been told by councillors to increase the amount of money in brown paper bags.

funny how this issue never arose there.
8

Colin G,

Edinburgh 31/01/2008 13:54:52
Wasn't this the hotel which was only going to be economically feasible because of the tram line?

Doesn't their payment to the tram line fund give them a couple of 'carbon credits' to set against their 'carbon footprint'? After all it is important that Edinburgh grows and welcomes in more tourists from the airport in order to avoid global warming.
9

Johnny Yen,

31/01/2008 13:55:25
oops, in Carltongate
10

Foresight,

By the Water of Leith 31/01/2008 16:38:27
The City Council's sustainable building policy should first be applied to the City Chambers which suffers from far too much hot air!!!
11

Arrow,

edinburgh 31/01/2008 16:58:21


"... rejection of these assumptions about Carbon generation include:

That other causes, such as methane emissions, are more important.
That human activity is not as significant a cause as natural processes such as vulcanism.
That many emissions cannot reasonably be attributed to any individual. E.g. should emissions from commuting be attributed to commuters or consumers of what they produce?
That market forces or political action will correct human activity in sufficient time.
That population growth invalidates the calculations,
That one cannot limit everyone to equal emissions, for example those in urbanized societies may be unable to avoid some emissions, while less-developed countries may not have the technology to mitigate others.
In particular, many climate change deniers and some skeptics maintain that human contributions to global warming are negligible, in opposition to the near-consensus of scientific opinion on the causes. Therefore, they argue, it is useless or even harmful to concentrate on individual contributions."

clearly if you want someone to speak shi*e ask a councillor.
12

Rv3!,

Edinburgh 31/01/2008 19:27:01
While I think they should have tried harder to get a better building, they did achieve the required levels for approval. Why were they then rejected the approval?

If the council/government want higher specification them impose them in the correct legal way, don't just change your mind on a whim. Totally stupid ruling.
13

Marie1,

Haddington Place, speaking to a gypsy woman. 31/01/2008 21:58:28
I met an old gypsy woman.
She said give me all your money.
I will put it in a brown paper bag and give it to the council.
In return, you will receive from the council a sprig of the lucky white heather.
14

Hector Goodrich (Dr),

Gillin pronounced 'Gullane'. 31/01/2008 22:30:25
I see the time soon arriving when municipal authorities will employ armies of Carbon Footprint Enforcement Wardens to join the armies of other interfering busybodies and jobworths.
I often wonder how much carbon is released in providing the meal ingredients for triple-chinned councillors, MPs and MSPs. A pox on them all!
15

COLINTON.MAINS,

Oakville Ontario 01/02/2008 02:10:45
what.in.gods.name.is.a.carbon.footprint
16

Heartfelt,

EDINBURGH 01/02/2008 11:56:40
carbon footprint = Briton ton of crap !
17

Richard Lionheart,

06/02/2008 16:00:17
Note. Don't plan a dairy farm within Edinburgh Council Area! They would make the coo's wear solar panels to offset their greenhouse gas emissions
18

is it me?,

06/02/2008 20:11:23
I'm sick of all you people saying that Carbon Footprints don't exist.
I made one on our living room carpet during a barbecue last summer.
I haven't been allowed to forget it.(I can't say by whom)
The Insurance Company says it's not covered because it's "accidental damage"
I could go on, but I'll leave it there.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Do you support plans to introduce food waste recycling in Edinburgh?
Yes, I want to do more to help the planet.
No, the rotting food will stink out my home.
No, those who do no recycling should be targeted.

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.