Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 20th July 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Wind farm would be 'catalyst for change'



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 17 May 2008
A PLANNED 53-turbine wind farm in Lewis would be the catalyst for regenerating one of the most disadvantaged areas in the Western Isles, an inquiry was told yesterday.
Six of the turbines have been signed over to the community and will bring in more than £1 million a year. The development will also create up to 100 direct and indirect jobs and could help establish a new sub-sea connector to the mainland.

The £1
20 million plan by Beinn Mhor Power was originally for 133 turbines at Muaitheabhal but has been reduced to 53, of which 27 would be within a National Scenic Area (NSA).

David Stewart, a planning consultant who is giving evidence on behalf of Beinn Mhor Power, told the inquiry in Stornoway yesterday it was a balancing exercise between national planning guidance and rebuilding the social and economic structure of the islands, not through grant money and national funding exercises, but through a development that had the capacity to create long-lasting change.

He said the major community fund benefits, which are separate from the economic boost from construction, should not be sidelined because they are discretionary.

But Catriona Campbell, a protester against the development, said it was senseless to destroy the NSA to provide green energy: "You violate one green thing to achieve another green thing. In principle, I support renewable energy but I think this scheme is wrong."

Ms Campbell accepted that building a subsea power cable to Lewis to export energy was nationally important but said it should not be reliant on large wind farms.

The inquiry is due to end next Thursday.





The full article contains 277 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 16 May 2008 10:28 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

W Smith,

Middle East 17/05/2008 04:09:03
Cutting the corporation tax to Irish levels could also be a "catalyst for change".

So how come we have to be brainwashed almost daily about the advantages of windmills?
2

Robbierunciman,

Romney Marsh 17/05/2008 09:46:54
Brainwashing is when someone replaces a fact based view with a lie. I think you mean, why am I hearing an uncomfortable truth?
Oil's diminishing, it's increasing CO2 levels and nano particles from diesel are making people ill, and most importantly, no one's found an alternative source of power without a serious downside!

3

Neanderthal75,

Rocky Mountains USA 17/05/2008 10:15:30
Hello Robb,

My dear fellow, oil isn't 'diminishing' as you put it, we haven't actually reached as yet, a confirmed 'peak' of production; CO2 Extraction technology is now able to pull out 20%-35% of oil that was heretofore, classified as 'non-extractable' because we didn't have the technology to get it out of the EXISTING wells!!!!

Further yet, we've not even properly mapped Continental Shelf oil deposits, owing to a lack of, once again, heretofore unavailable technology. Ground radars/sonars (as just one example) have reached a level to which we may now use them in more articulate methodology for oil exploration.

Further yet again, Coal to Oil Technology has expanded and we can convert Coal to Oil for $55 a barrel. Look at that number again will you? For about 60% LESS than what oil is currently selling, we can take EXISTING coal deposits and turn them into oil. South Africa is doing that even as we write these posts.

We've yet to explore and map both the Arctic and Antarctic for oil deposits-and since the Paleontologists tell us that BOTH polar caps used to be rife with Dinosaurs, Forests, and all sorts of other organic materials, which today we call 'petroleum', saying that 'oil's done' is more than a stretch.

Oh yes, concerning those vaunted CO2 levels which far too many GW (Global Warming) hucksters keep spouting (and please understand that I am NOT calling you a 'huckster', I am using the term for Al Gore and his acolyte ilk, Eco-Fascists); just one Volcanic Eruption, pumps the equivalent CO2 into our atmosphere, of the ENTIRE OUTPUT for ALL CARS in the USA, for ONE FULL YEAR!!!!

2005 saw appx. 67 volcanic eruptions, so dwell on that fact for a moment, will you?

Cheers from the Rockies
4

Toast,

17/05/2008 10:47:09
What is wrong with wave power much more reliable and tourist friendly
5

Ard Righ,

The Rock Of Edinburgh 17/05/2008 11:53:02
ANY from of power generation based on an intermittent power source is stupid. Wind, Waves and Sun.

Hydro is an intelligent use of constant flow.

To use "job creation" as part of the argument is nonsense, besides the jobs will all go to the firms building it, which are not even from Britain, Ireland or Scotland.
6

Guga II,

Rockall 17/05/2008 12:29:59
Here we go again.

Why do they persist in these blatant lies about job creation? There will be work for some company, and workers, from the mainland or, more likely, some foreign company and foreign workers while the turbines are being erected. After that, a scheme of 53 turbines will probably provide full time employment for one man and, perhaps, part time employment for one other. Both these jobs are likely to go to foreigners.

If they can't make a case for turbines without lying, then they haven't got a case.

This is yet another scheme that will be a blight on the landscape. It will provide no real benefits for the islanders, including cheaper electricity. The only beneficiary will be the foreign company that owns it, and profits from exporting energy to England.

Scotland already produces more energy than it needs. If the English need more energy, then let them build wind turbines on the South Downs, or across London. Why should Scotland be used as an effective dumping ground for these eyesores?

As for "discretionary" community funds, I presume that the discretionary aspect will not apply to any brown envelopes that happen to be floating around?



7

Unimpressed one,

17/05/2008 19:20:33
Let's just take out the middleman here - the windmills. Why don't taxpayers just send cheques directly to all the western isles inhabitants. It would probably be cheaper and at least it would save their scenery.
8

Douglas,

Bathgate 17/05/2008 20:51:53
Toast #4: All well and good my friend but we can't wave to tourists all day.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.