Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Wind farm threat looms over ancient Lewis stones

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 05 April 2009
THE most controversial wind farm project in Scotland is set to get the green light from ministers, sparking a massive clash between environmentalists and the government.
In what has been dubbed a rerun of the Trump golf course row, plans for 53 wind turbines on Lewis – within sight of 'Scotland's Stonehenge', the Callanish Stones – seems certain to be approved.

The wind farm has been masterminded by city financier
Nicholas Oppenheim, who says many locals strongly support the project and the 100 jobs it will create.

But opponents, including the influential John Muir Trust, predicted there would be an "enormous backlash" to the decision, which would open the floodgates for development all over Scotland's countryside.

Oppenheim wants the windfarm built on his private estate, Eisgein, which is in an official National Scenic Area, meaning the landscape should be conserved as part of the country's natural heritage. The 455ft turbines will also overlook the Callanish Stones, a stone circle dating from around 2900BC.

The public inquiry has yet to reveal its verdict, but a source close to the inquiry told Scotland on Sunday the wind farm would get the go-ahead.

The source said the farm would get the green light when energy minister Jim Mather visits Lewis later this month to discuss economic issues. The scheme will be given planning permission, the source suggested, even if the public inquiry found against it. He told Scotland on Sunday: "The decision is going to be made shortly and find in favour. Because of the financial downturn everyone is keen to boost the economy. The minister is going across on April 16 to talk about energy and the economy, and it's a fair bet that's when it will be announced."

Helen McDade, of conservation organisation the John Muir Trust, which campaigned against the wind farm, said: "We are extremely concerned by this if it is true. I believe that Ministers would have severely misjudged the public mood and there would be enormous backlash.

"Yet again, we would be seeing business taking precedence over environmental protection instead of lessons being learned.

"This is a test case for wild land. It is absolutely clear cut that this major development should not go here as the land is protected and the impact would be disastrous for the beauty of the area."

Alice Starmore, who lives near the estate and leads tours in the area, described the wind farm as "an ecological and environmental disaster".

She said: "In spite of everything that's happening to the world, politicians are still in thrall to big business and vast developments. This developer is a big hedge funder and they are choosing to take his money rather than protect the wild land."

Archeologist Ian McHardy said the site was too significant to be built on.

"Eisgein is a wild and beautiful place, full of golden eagles and rare wildlife, and the Callanish Stones give it a spectacular theatrical backdrop," he said.

"It would be disappointing to have to show visitors this amazing place, and then say, please try to ignore the turbines we have built on top of it. There are other ways of rejuvenating the area economically."

Highlands and Islands Enterprise estimated the scheme would create 109 jobs on the island, in the construction of turbines and associated roads and buildings and maintenance of the farm.

But Andrew Bain, a retired professor of economics from the Universities of Stirling, Strathclyde and Glasgow, said the figures were misleading.

"Some see this as a way of getting jobs, but it is greatly exaggerated. The effect on employment adds up to 0.5% of the employment of the Western Isles, and many of the jobs are short-term in building the thing," he said. "The cost of generating energy on wind farms in the Western Isles is also 20% to 30% higher than on the mainland because of the cost of transmitting it to where it is needed.

"In fact, almost all of the benefit goes to the financial investors of the scheme: Mr Oppenheim. And once he's got planning permission the land will be worth a lot more."

But Oppenheim said the farm would be a boost for locals. He told Scotland on Sunday: "This area is one of the 10 poorest communities in Scotland. There are people living in this community who don't have mains electricity.

"Of 600 people, 350 signed up supporting the wind farm through the Muaitheavhal Community Wind Farm Trust. That is hardly a community dramatically opposed."

Iain Maciver, a founding member of the Community Trust, added: "I think it's a groundbreaking deal where the community will own 18 megawatts of the energy, which will bring in £1m annually."

The application received 1,448 objections and only two letters of support, which led to a public inquiry on the issue in May last year.

Oppenheim scaled back plans to just 53 turbines, and offered locals space to erect six of their own turbines at the farm and sell the energy on through a community group called the Muaitheavhal Wind Farm Trust. It claimed the scheme would also create 109 jobs.

The wind farm can only go ahead if economic benefits outweigh the environmental importance of the site.

The Callanish Stones are the site of a lunar phenomenon every 18.6 years, when as the moon rises, viewed from the stones, it skims a mountain range known in Gaelic as "old woman of the mountains". The event is thought to celebrate childbirth, and it still attracts hundreds of visitors.

A Scottish Government spokesman said: "The detailed report compiled by the Inquiry Reporter is currently with the Scottish Government for consideration. A decision and an announcement will be made in due course."

Limitless power

Scotland's wind farms have a total capacity of 1,550 megawatts, which is enough to supply 465,000 homes, and wind power is the country's fastest growing renewable energy technology.

There are 64 wind farms in Scotland, the largest being Black Law in Lanarkshire, Braes of Doune near Stirling, Farr near Inverness, and Hadyard Hill in South Ayrshire, which was the first UK wind farm able to generate more than 100 megawatts of energy.

There are also farms under construction in Whitelee, south of Glasgow, and Clyde in South Lanarkshire.

The world's largest wind turbine is currently being developed 15 miles off the east coast of Scotland, and the single turbine will be able to produce enough energy to supply 1,500 homes with energy.

The western and northern coasts of Scotland are especially popular for wind farms because there is more wind and more consistent wind, meaning turbines produce maximum energy for up to 40% of the time, well above the average of 25%.

Wind farms are often owned by private companies or Scottish and Southern Energy, but Scotland also has several community-owned wind farms to allow locals to benefit financially from the farms, which are frequently built in relatively poor areas.

Because of the obvious need for wind, the farms are often sited in rural landscapes of great natural beauty, which causes controversy among environmentalists.

For this reason there are currently dozens of wind farm proposals before the Scottish Government, who will decide whether the environmental significance of the site outweighs the benefits brought by the wind farm.

It is estimated that 11,500 megawatts of onshore wind potential exists globally, and more than double this amount exists on offshore sites where wind speeds are greater. If a fifth of this energy could be harnessed, it would be enough for the entire world's energy needs.The total global revenue over the next five years is estimated at £35bn and it is continued growth forecast until at least 2025.





Page 1 of 1

 
1

Fifi la Bonbon,

05/04/2009 00:10:44
If some of these objectors had their way they'd put a stop to peat cutting as a "scar on the landscape".

2

Curley Bill,

05/04/2009 00:27:52
Does Miss Gray ever do any research?
There is no way any wind turbines can 'threaten' the Callanish Stones, due to the circle's location in an area of fairly low-lying land. To the north and to the west is sea-loch, to the east are dwellings, a school and a road, to the south are more dwellings.
3

Marac,

Central Scotland 05/04/2009 00:52:50
Yeah, Eishken Estate is a good bit away from the Callanish stones, so to say the turbines will "overlook" the stones is a major exageration.
4

nabodican,

Rural Scotland 05/04/2009 07:25:10
If this is true, the tartan taliban should hang their heads in shame.
No matter how many wind power stations are built, not a single conventional power station can be closed due to the need for back up.
All that will happen is that our electricity bills will rise even more due to the subsidies that the developer will get, currently over £50/MWh
These turbines will be seen 20 miles away and certainlt will be an eyesore.
The real issue is that they can only ever be an expensive "as well as" and not "instead of" conventional means of generating power.
As for jobs - there will be no permanent jobs. The power station will be up and running in 18 months using Danish or German turbines with Danish or German construction crews.
It is time that the people of Scotland said "Enough" and put a stop to this wind madness.
ps - interesting article in this months Offshore Engineer exposing the folly of wind power.
5

calum,

05/04/2009 08:32:22
The biggest lie in this cheme is the whopper about the creation of 109 jobs - maybe in the construction phase and after that, nil. Specialists maintain and service these monstrosities just as they do in the Lammermuirs. Local jobs, just 2.
6

Yok Finney,

Ross-shire 05/04/2009 08:54:34
When you own scottish land you can pretty much do what you like on it. So it's commendable that the propriator has been open about his plans and directly consulted local organisations. I reckon that most islanders support some wind farms but don't want to be overwhelmed and intimidated by them. 53, I think, could fit into landscape, 150 would be too many and one on its own would look very forlorn. Only my opinion.

Per se it won't solve our future energy requirements. A national strategy is required. Is it prudent to have our electricity owned by spanish conquistadors. Large multinationals can get over-extended and limit future investments only to the minimum UK statuary regulations. Grids themselves can go down from solar storms that would take out the big transformers too. Have we considered this?

We were very busy 6000 years ago. The Britons at Callanish certainly didn't speak English. But to go with flow and federation we're all pritons, pretons, priti, picti as you prefer to spell it. Like all intelligent races we organised as a confederation. We're inherently anti-imperialists! So how did we get co-erced into the one-time british empire?

Calanish was designed by astronomers. How do you know it wasn't built by Martians? Should they return, they will detected the turbines and fly round them.
7

Pilrig,

Livingston 05/04/2009 09:44:30
6 - except they didna'r call themselves Britons. In all probablity they were what the majority of the inhabitants of the British Isles are - Celts !
8

Unimpressed one,

05/04/2009 09:46:32
Here's take on just how expensive this rubbish will be:

http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/dominic-lawson/dominic-lawson-the-staggering-cost-of-renewable-energy-813350.html

Strange how the luddites Dixon and McLaren haven't been canvassed on their reaction to this. No doubt they will be amongst the environmentalists who support such tripe.
9

Pilrig,

Livingston 05/04/2009 09:47:20
8 - how did we get coerced into the establishment of the British Empire ? I'd suggest deference by the populace to the ruling classes, and no small amount of forelock-tugging.
10

The Tin Man,

05/04/2009 10:09:37
Would windmills spoil the view from the stones any more than the existing council houses?
11

Iain Mac,

05/04/2009 10:20:51
#1 - Fifi - some of these 'objectors' like Lewis group 'Mointeach gun Mhuileann' are local crofters who do cut peat.

I don't see a problem with small scale farms controlled by local communities. Surplus power can then be sold to the grid. Large-scale projects with no local control or benefit - other than one or two 'jobs' - are almost invasive.

Calanais stones are great and shouldn't be touched but i've got no problem viewing windmills from the site. If i can see council houses or the factory at Breascleit then why not a few wind turbines?

Siuthad, ach thoir an cumhachd dhan choimhearsnachd.
12

Iain Mac,

05/04/2009 10:25:18
#6 - amaideas. There were no Britons in Lewis 6000 years ago. The people who built Calanais were probably related to present day Basques and were probably pre-Indo-European.

The Britons form a P-Celtic side of the present day Celtic tongues.

Rulesbutnotrulers' ideas are as mental as those who say Calanais is a spaceship station!

Cumaibh na tursachan saor bho amadain a' chac!
13

Yok Finney,

Ross-shire 05/04/2009 11:21:23
I like the Basque eskudai-scotia hypothesis.

Maybe they did come from outer-space?
14

Mikko,

Drumnadrochit 05/04/2009 11:23:13
What is the point of wind power - when it's the coldest is exactly when there isn't any wind. Nuclear is the way forward.
15

Pilrig,

Livingston 05/04/2009 11:37:01
16 - for England.
16

Climate change is real,

05/04/2009 12:20:12
Poster number 4 claims, "No matter how many wind power stations are built, not a single conventional power station can be closed due to the need for back up."

The answer to that is, "100% 'back up' for individual renewable sources is unnecessary; extra capacity will be needed to keep supplies secure, but will be modest and a small part of the total cost of renewables. It is possible to work out what is needed and plan accordingly"

http://www.ukerc.ac.uk/ResearchProgrammes/TechnologyandPolicyAssessment/TPAIntermittencyReport.aspx

Poster number 4 also claims, "All that will happen is that our electricity bills will rise even more due to the subsidies that the developer will get, currently over £50/MWh"

The answer to that is that in 2007 the Renewables Obligation added an average of £9.00 per year to electricity bills to help pay for renewable electricity schemes at the moment.

http://www.sd-commission.org.uk/publications.php?id=768




17

El Franko,

05/04/2009 12:40:06
Carefree subsidising of the wealthy for the sake of sick-greenie brownie points. I think it would have been cheaper and more beneficial for Scotland if each of the 600 in the community association were awarded pensions of £4,000 each per annum. And Mr Maciver is in for a severe disappointment re that '£1m annually'!! In brief, a shocking waste of money. Scotland is not wealthy enough for this sort of indulgence. It is merely that the government is stupid enough.
18

Mikko,

Drumnadrochit 05/04/2009 13:23:31
#17 and #19 I can see a huge windfarm on the mountain from my window. When we were at -8 - -12 degrees with thick snow and obvious maximum heating demand, the air was still (that's why the cold spell lasted so long) and the wind farm was dormant for two weeks. Some help that is!

19

nabodican,

Rural Scotland 05/04/2009 13:24:10
#18 is completely missing the point and dodging the issue.
For the purpose of generating electricity, wind turbines are useless, erratic and unreliable.
The fact is that the developers are in it for the subsididies.
On top of this they have nothing to do with any change in the climate.
The visual impact is only one of the issues although quite major if you are in the tourism business.
Dumping 2000 tonnes of reinforced concrete in the ground for every turbine base is not environmentally friendly.
If they do not need back up where did our electricity come from over Christmas when it was freezing.
Wind turbines are a scam full stop.
20

Mikko,

Drumnadrochit 05/04/2009 13:25:10
#20 You obviously didn't listen to or understand his whole speech. He wants a world free of nuclear weapons but clearly said all countries had a right to peaceful nuclear power and he will propose a "nuclear bank" giving them the right to it. Watch the whole speech again and learn something.

YES YOU CAN
21

redcliffe62,

05/04/2009 14:45:02
the terms celtic and britons were linked, and covered both brythonic and bretonic peoples.
until the 18th century the term briton actually meant ancient peoples who had been marginalised to the peripheral lands around the edge of britain.

google "marcus tanner" and his history on how and why britons are in fact not BRITISH in the gordon brown sense. great read. from a very personal and not simply a nationalistic position.
22

redcliffe62,

05/04/2009 14:47:13
rules but not rulers, please read celtic history before blurting out drivel, as your knowledge on geography and "anglia" makes the now departed goody look like a mensa member.
23

Haston,

Western Isles 05/04/2009 16:02:59
What is constantly overlooked is that the site for this windfarm is the densest golden eagle population in the UK. The wider area on which this, and the neighboring Pairc windfarm is proposed (SSE project)is also in the top three areas in the UK for the White-tailed sea eagle which has only recently been brought back from extinction at vast expense.

The impact of large windfarms on both species is well documented, the most tragic example being at Smola where probably the most important population of Sea eagles has been decimated by a windfarm, with deaths of the remaining birds continuing.

However despite the importance of this area, the SNP refused to allow ornithological issues to be included in the Muaitheabhal Windfarm public inquiry. They also seem willing to allow the developers to get away with with an environmental impact assessment which is of worrying poor quality. The indications are that nextdoor SSE PLC are to be afforded the same leniency. Having had to downsize their application,(which was so appalling that it was even too much for the windfarm obsessed council), they have submitted an application in which bird data is only partial and effectively 5 years out of date.

As to Mr Oppenheim's claims of public support. The Trust may well have 350 members but to suggest that this is out of a local population of 600 is just nonsense. Of 12 measures of public opinion which included local community council ballots undertaken around the time of the consultations not one came out in favour. The breadth of opposition was also evident at the public inquiry.

To claim that we are so deprived that people are off-mains does nothing more than show the very low calibre of hedge fund managers. As far as I am aware the only household off-grid is on his estate, the rest of us, in the main, enjoy central heating, double glazing, car ownership (sometimes 2), internet access and our children even attend rather nice local schools. In any case, as the publi
24

David Ban,

04620 Vera 05/04/2009 16:25:59
I like the comment that the "community is one of the poorest and some crofts do not have mains electricity"- where I was born in Sutherland shire (Cantaibh)and after the war when dad bought the Kinlochewe Hotel in Rosshire there was no mains electricity at the time.

It did not seem to restrict us culturally; of course there were no electricity bills to pay! There's a thought.
25

ThePeter,

Glasgae 05/04/2009 22:31:36
# 18 , why don't u subscribe to some engineering magazines written by engineers and scientists at some point you monkey???

You will note that just about all of them totally condemn wind-farms.

#4 raised a good point, but u have to be "rightous" and come up with some crappy articles of the level of Prince Charles's intellect to try to prove your non-existant beliefs. Get real

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.