Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


West coast rail travellers face worst delays in UK

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 10 July 2009
PASSENGERS on the west coast main line have suffered the worst delays on the rail network this year, triggering a major increase in complaints.
Nearly one in four Virgin Trains services which use the Glasgow-London route were late in the first three months of this year, and one in five in the year to March.

The poor performance was caused by disruption from the £9 billion upgrade of the
line and bad weather, forcing Network Rail to agree an additional £50 million recovery plan with rail regulators.

Virgin Trains saw its punctuality slump by nearly 9 per cent to 76.4 per cent between January and March compared to a year ago – significantly below a network average of 90.3 per cent.

Annual performance was also down by almost 3 per cent to 80 per cent, figures published yesterday by the Office of Rail Regulation (ORR) showed.

Virgin said it had encouraged passengers to complain by handing out claim forms during disruption. This contributed to complaints increasing by nearly one quarter between January and March, to 559 per 100,000 passenger journeys – the highest in Britain. The rate also leapt by more than half to 548 in the year to March, compared with the previous year.

Passenger groups will meet Network Rail chiefs today to discuss its improvement plans.

Julie Warburton, a manager with Passenger Focus, the official watchdog, said: "Passengers don't want to play a game of chance when they get on a train as to whether it will arrive on time. Network Rail and train operators must continue to focus on this problematic route to restore passenger faith."

Last month, the ORR rebuked Network Rail for ignoring its call for six-figure bonuses for several senior executives to be slashed after the firm caused "substantial additional disruption" during the final stages of the west coast route upgrade.

Virgin said it had been concerned about the line for a long time, and its approach to the ORR had led to Network Rail's recovery plan, which it would closely monitor.

A Virgin spokesman said: "We actively encouraged passengers to write in to complain by handing out forms on trains. The high figure reflects us being proactive."

He said written responses to passengers included an explanation of the cause of delays, which was also announced on trains during disruption.

The firm is repaid by Network Rail for the extra cost of delays caused by the track firm, such as refunds to passengers, additional staff and replacement buses.

The line, which includes loops to Manchester and Birmingham, is one of Europe's busiest, with sections being used by other cross-Border operators such as Cross Country, TransPennine Express and ScotRail's overnight sleeper trains.

A Network Rail spokesman said: "We accept that particular focus is needed to improve performance for Virgin Trains, where only four out of five services arrive on time.

"Working together with all the train operators on the west coast route we have embarked upon a £50m package of improvements aimed at raising train punctuality to acceptable levels."

ScotRail's punctuality for January-March dipped by nearly 1 per cent to 89.6 per cent because of bad weather and New Year signalling problems in Glasgow.

National Express East Coast, which last week signalled it would abandon the franchise this year because of losses, saw performance improve by 5 per cent to 88.6 per cent.





The full article contains 574 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 10 July 2009 12:20 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: The railways
 
1

Alan B,

10/07/2009 02:00:20
One of the union dividents should be a high speed rail link with london. We can see the contempt westmisnter holds for scotland with the poor and slow trains for scotland. Noticable how london now has a high speed link to the continent funded by the government but they reject anything for scotland.

Labour even cut the proposed 140mile an hour trains that virgin trains promised and cancelled the whole west cost line upgrade only repaining track so trains could run at existing 120 speeds.

2

Rob Royston,

Bishopbriggs 10/07/2009 08:09:49
How much money has been thrown at this line in the last 50 years, and can we really see a lot of difference?

The French have shown that rail can work but only by building new track designed for high speed running. This tweaking away at 18th century designed track is a total waste of time and resources. Leave this line for local services and goods and build long distance passenger track from scratch.

We were told before the Channel Tunnel was started that services would run to all areas including Scotland. After all these years they have only recently reached London. This is one of the biggest government failings ever in the UK's history.
3

Alasdair,

10/07/2009 08:56:44
Yes, Joe.

The problem with that is that you think it's unnecessary because it involves encouraging people and thus investment to head into your hated Glasgow, not because of any particularly sensible reasons.

Still, I'm sure you know far more about the public's keenness to use that route than Richard Branson, who has invested so much in it. He is, after all, known to be inept in business.

Luckily the rest of us aren't as prejudiced as yourself.

btw - you're slipping. Usually whenever rail is mentioned, you fit in a claim that our services here in the East are in a bad state because of the SNP. Come on, Joe, don't forget the format!

4

mr broon,

Edinburgh 10/07/2009 09:03:56
The previous government promised Scotland, and North of Watford, a high-speed link to the Channel Tunnel?

It has never happened.

Only London and the South-East of England have a high-speed link to the Channel Tunnel and Continent.
5

Alasdair,

10/07/2009 09:06:34
Don't expect that to change soon, #5, Mr Broon.

The high-speed link, if ever built, will end in Manchester.
That's my rash prediction for the day.
6

Andrew,

10/07/2009 10:19:37
2) 50 years ago (ie 1959) NO CHANGE SINCE? 1959 saw an unelectrified, slow, dirty, steam-operated, clickety-clack, semaphore/telegraph-signalled WCML!
A "This is the Royal Mail crossing the border" scenario!
The WCML in 2009 has changed beyond ALL recognition AS HAS ALL OF BRITAIN'S RAILWAY!!
7

danbob,

10/07/2009 11:58:05
The only way you will increase journey speed between Glasgow/Edinburgh and London is a complete new line. The ECML and the WCML are no good when fast trains are forced to share space with slower traffic. A pendolino or a 225 because of their speed and time they take to stop are what's called double blocked, This means that they are cautioned or stopped two signal blocks behind the forward train instead of one block that is the normal. The problem with this is that due to the Automatic route setting system that is used, all other trains are double blocked as well, even if there is no need. There are times when I have left Lancaster and been given a double yellow signal just after Hest Bank in preparation for the junction at Carnforth south. This is four miles, I could easily stop a 158 unit within 1 mile even on a damp leaf ridden railhead. Meanwhile two blocks behind is a pendo trailing along behind at 50MPH in a 115MPH zone. As train crew I will tell you we need to get all slower traffic off high speed lines. That means a new line.
8

Southsider71,

Newton Mearns, Glasgow 10/07/2009 13:53:39
Comment 3 states that the WCML is unnecessary north of Carlisle...so by his bizarre logic, commuters who live in places such as Helensburgh and Ayr, either have to get off at Carlisle and get the slow commuter train to Glasgow Central or add a couple of hours on to their journey times......As for the article, a new line is required...
9

Alasdair,

10/07/2009 15:03:04
#9 - bear in mind, dear chap, that comment #3 was bashed into a keyboard by the forehead of an oddball who has become a parody of even himself.
10

Southsider71,

Newlands, Glasgow 10/07/2009 15:22:58
#10 LOL so true
11

Andrew,

10/07/2009 19:16:30
9 & 10. re 3's bizarre comment. Joe seems to forget that the ECML IS electrified from Glasgow (via Carstairs) to Edinburgh and 'England" but serves a totally different
eastern coast "market" altogether!!
Market/bazaar (as in the east & bizarre) get it??

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.