Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Trump puts himself at head of drive for £1bn golf resort

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 01 May 2008
DONALD Trump is to personally lead his business empire's bid to persuade the Scottish Government to back his controversial plans to turn an environmentally sensitive stretch of coastline into a £1 billion golf resort.
The Trump Organisation yesterday confirmed the tycoon would fly to Scotland in June to give evidence at a public inquiry into his plan for the Menie Estate near Balmedie, Aberdeenshire.

The planning inquiry, ordered by John Swinney, the Scottish f
inance secretary, is scheduled to begin at the Aberdeen exhibition and conference centre on 10 June.

Speaking yesterday from his office in New York's Trump Tower, the billionaire star of American television's The Apprentice said: "This development is currently a top priority for me and the Trump Organisation. The site is very important to me because I just love its natural beauty and because of my connection to Scotland.

"I respect the need for an inquiry and am totally committed to appearing as I really want to see this development come to fruition. I want the public to hear my plans and share my enthusiasm for them.

"I am confident I will be able to demonstrate my passion for this site, on which we want to create a world-class development that works in harmony with the natural environment. The inquiry is also a chance to underline the huge benefits our proposals could secure for Scotland."

He added: "I am looking forward to visiting Aberdeen city and shire again and meeting some of the many people who have been so supportive."

An estimated 30 witnesses, both for and against the massive development are expected to give evidence at the inquiry, scheduled to last three weeks.

Legal representatives of the Trump Organisation told the inquiry's reporter, James McCulloch, that they expected to call up to ten witnesses to give evidence on environmental issues and the economic case for the development, and one possible witness from the Trump Organisation. That witness will now be Mr Trump.

The government intervened after Aberdeenshire Council's planning committee threw out the plans for two championship golf courses, a five-star 450-room hotel, almost 1,000 timeshare apartments, 36 golf villas and 500 homes.

Mr McCulloch, Scotland's top planning appeals official, has made it clear the inquiry will focus on the main issues in dispute in the Trump plan – the proposal to site part of the main golf course on sand dunes designated a site of special scientific interest, the housing element, the financial case for the development and public access.

He told legal representatives at a pre-inquiry hearing that the "identity of a developer" would not be a material consideration.

Mr Swinney has pledged to announce his decision on the development within 28 days of receiving the report on the inquiry from the Directorate for Planning and Environmental Appeals.

Earlier this year Mr Trump expressed surprise over the announcement of a public inquiry into his scheme, but said it could be a positive move provided "it can go quickly".

However, he warned: "If the process takes too long, I'll have no choice but to go some place else."





The full article contains 528 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 30 April 2008 10:33 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Donald Trump
 
1

Arthur X,

01/05/2008 00:16:33
Enough bullying and bluster. Enough bending of the planning system, bought and sold. This beach is Scotland's asset, not for sale. Shoo!
2

Andrew BOD,

Aberdeen/shire 01/05/2008 00:36:29
Arthur

On the contrary, we need to use our assets for economic diversity. Welcome Donald.
3

Alfred E. Neuman,

01/05/2008 01:36:31
2 Andrew BOD

Good intelligent SNP moment there, Scotland has so few Golf Courses let's diversify!
4

Alfred E. Neuman,

01/05/2008 01:37:30
Can we find away to let trump build some 2 bedroom luxury flats next to his gold course?

We have a shortage of those in Scotland in all.
5

overton,

balmedie 01/05/2008 05:59:01
Arthur X,01/05/2008

This isn't about the beach you moron - the Crown owns that.

Donald Trump wants to develop Menie Estate which he in fact owns.
6

Beth Boyle,

NY 01/05/2008 06:07:29
Trump ALWAYS puts himself first. Salmond was playing with fire just entertaining the idea of having such a environmental rapist come to Scotland.
7

overton,

balmedie 01/05/2008 07:05:11
6 Beth Boyle,NY 01/05/2008

Beth,

You not gone in for the electric shock treatment yet?
It will help you slip back into the real world and your gibberish will cease.

Maybe too expensive in the States - have you no got mental health insurance?
8

Richard Taylor,

Aberdeen 01/05/2008 07:12:30
Ignore Alfred, I fear he has nothing of interest to say. A huge, empty vessel.

I think the Scottish Govt will recognize there is an overwhelming case for this fantastic development.

The views of those objectors are not worth tuppence.

This area needs good news this year...job losses, council cuts & so forth. Thus far 2008 has not been good.
9

Beth Boyle,

NY 01/05/2008 07:33:33
overton you funny!
10

overton,

balmedie 01/05/2008 07:55:40
9 Beth Boyle,NY 01/05/2008

Thanks Beth. Maybe your sense of humour will see you through this bad patch.
11

haggis 10,

The Capital City of Scotland(Not For!) 01/05/2008 09:31:02
Anything that improves job projects in the highlands is welcome, its time for the people of the Central belt to realise the edge of the earth is not located 1 mile beyond Perth !!!!!!!!
12

mobocaster,

Aberdeen 01/05/2008 11:18:56
Haggis. Aberdeen, much of Aberdeenshire & particularly Menie have never been in the part of Scotland considered "Highland". In fact, you'd get your heid to play with for even suggesting it in some parts round there.

Anyway, its not going to do that much for jobs - the size of the staff barracks alone suggests that they are looking to ship much of their staff in.
13

Annoyingboi,

Edinburgh 01/05/2008 13:51:38
Everything goes at a snails pace in Aberdeen. That city is going nowhere and needs to get a grip. When the oil goes, the population is going to plummet. What then?
14

Shawl,

Scotland 01/05/2008 14:15:13
Trumpy. What part of "environmental sensitive coastline" do you not understand? Government. If you even think of entertaining this clown to a meeting then you will not last long in power. The country belongs to the people. The last time the Govt sold out to rich landowners they burned the roofs from our heads and send us packing on ships to the colonies. Don't let that happen again. Maggie would have kicked hus butt. We are not independant yet and the vote could swing back out of your favour if you make ill informed choices. You are a young government afterall. So learn from the experiences of the past as you have no experience yourself. Alba gu brath.
15

Dr Avoido,

Gated Community #221, Wako-coco, HON 01/05/2008 14:18:01

How much £ do you think the local area will receive out of this sham?

How about VERY LITTLE, the multinationals have taken our oil and outside employing those to turn the cogs for them have put nothing back into the local community since the 70's.

How much have Shell, BP, Total et al put into Aberdeen over the years? how many schools, hospitals, libraries, gardens have they built whilst they made their trillions of USD?

All they have done is deprived us of a vast natural resource located in our own backyard because this country is to backward to have siezed upon the upon it and founded ScotiaOil and kept the profits to ourselves.

Trump Links will be the same old same - the rich get richer. Why couldn't the Scottish Govt Council have insisted that a % of turnover be re-invested into the community (akin to planning gain)

Nope, bend over Scotland and get shafted by the Yanks again

I'a awa
16

John Blackley,

Florida 01/05/2008 14:19:24
Quoth The Donald, "The site is very important to me because I just love its natural beauty and because of my connection to Scotland."

When a flim-flam man like The Donald starts pouring out the snake oil, keep your hands on your wallets.

By all means entertain this proposition but be very, very careful.
17

McGinty,

01/05/2008 16:31:42
Alfred E. Neuman,01/05/2008 01:37:30
'Can we find away to let trump build some 2 bedroom luxury flats next to his gold course?' Not on your life.
Can we find a way to let Trump build some 2 bedroom ordinary flats next to his golf course. Not on your life. The only thing he cares about are the exclusive properties in his gated village. He cares not one jot about the local housing needs and shortage thereof. What he does care about is probably too depressing to mention. By all means let him come, but do it on Scotland's terms, on the terms of the law, on the terms of the local authority planning department and the Scottish government, on the terms of the appeals process, on the terms of the economic, social, cultural and environmental needs of the North East and Scotland and with the grace, honesty, humility, respect and decency that any decent manager should possess. If he still has a case left, he's welcome.
18

Legacy,

NE 01/05/2008 17:14:32
To hear some of the comments above, you would think it was a Giant Petrol Refinery or a Nuclear Power Plant that was being built!
It's a **oody Golf Course, and to say that it will not benefit the area, is utter rubbish, assuming that this Golf Course gets the go ahead, do you visualise it surrounded by a high barb fence, watchtowers with spotlights and armed guards along its length to keep the yokels out, get real.
Scotland has stagnated far to long.
Your arguments against this development are tiresome, away and play with your spades and pails in the Sahara, plenty of wide open spaces to accomodate you there.


19

John Blackley,

Florida 01/05/2008 18:26:16
#19 Legacy. Your uncivil comments aside, you may be closer to the truth than you imagine.

Given Trump's other ventures, I'm guessing the yokels actually will be kept out - as Trump won't be able to up his prices on the exclusivity factor otherwise. (However I trust Aberdeenshire council will not permit actual watchtowers and guards with guns. I'm sure The Donald will have to content himself with alligator-filled moats.)

As for "only a .......golf course", I'm afraid you're misinformed. There will be more than one golf course and those golf courses - given the need for massive amounts of phosphate-based treatments to keep the grass green-enough for Americans - will pollute surrounding watercourses. There will also, as Nomada has pointed out, be a new 'gated community' where the 'yokels' will be about as welcome as they are at Balmoral when my Auntie Liz is in residence - except Trump's security will probably be more effective.

As I said before, The Donald's a slippery character and anytime a slippery character comes a-calling and waxing lyrical about huge amounts of money, sensible folk keep their hands on their wallets and their eyes hard on the character.
20

fgreed,

01/05/2008 18:29:28
#19 Legacy
"Scotland has stagnated far to long."
On what are you basing this statement? I'm sorry but it really doesn't make much sense to me-are we talking economic stagnation? Cultural stagnation? Societal stagnation?

In fact I find it rather offensive whatever your meaning. Scotland is a vibrant Country, with rich national heritage, high employment, and more importantly some of the most stunning scenery in the world. Why do you think Trump is so desperate to develop here? You're talking as if he us here to 'save us,' like some sort of philanthropist.

This development is a highly lucrative business and will be run as such with profits running straight back to the states-despite what the local press would have us believe. Otherwise there would be no need to build so many houses, holiday homes, a hotel and staff baracks-the golf course itself would suffice.

We are not a struggling third world country. We don't need this development, we can boost tourism in Aberdeenshire on out own terms!

fgreed.org
Join the Debate
21

Beth Boyle,

NY 01/05/2008 20:57:51
I don't understand why anyone would want our garbage. Donald Trump is the worst we have to export and many Scots are standing with their tongues out waiting to lap up his ----.
22

mobocaster,

Aberdeen. 01/05/2008 22:02:15
Less is more Dave, Less is more! ;-)
23

Beth Boyle,

New York 01/05/2008 22:05:13
Let's have more nature and less Trump!
24

fgreed,

01/05/2008 22:14:02
#28 Jock Wilson

Alright, if thats the case then why do we need a new golf course? Scotland is the home of golf-we already have some of the best courses in the world, why do we need someone to come over, with no regard for our planning procedures, environment, or democracy, and build another one?

"Tourism is based on demand and knowing the market."

This is true, however you are once again talking like Scotland is a backward country and needs help in that department.

Scotland has a thriving tourist industry, based on its natural beauty and the warm nature of its people. If anything this golf course will detract from that-it will promote a polished and Americanised version of Scotland, aimed at the rich. They will fly in, put thousands of pounds into Trumps already bulging pockets, and then leave. Please, I urge you, look beyond the marketing.

The one thing that we have is our beautiful scenery that is why there will always be a demand for tourists in Scotland. As I said before, we are NOT a third world country-we don't NEED this development, our environment is worth much more in the long term.
25

dianne12,

Aberdeenshire 01/05/2008 22:18:09
Golf originated from the Dutch game 'Kolf' - it's not even Scottish!

Permission to alter SSSI will have to be sought through SNH - if no agreement is reached it will ultimately go through the Scottish Land Court. I hope permission will never be given!

26

mobocaster,

Aberdeen. 01/05/2008 22:23:48
Yes. For income, golf comes a poor second to that generated by our wild lands. By some considerable margin.

However, for golf & its associated services, more of the income suitable for corporate consolidation. Which probably partly explains the lure to Trump & his ilk.


27

Beth Boyle,

Trumped in Old New York 01/05/2008 22:30:44
Golf as not invented in the highands its a sport of the Borders am I not corrent? Does Scotland not already have the best courses in the world? Is Scotland so desperate it would invite in a exploitive looser like Trump who throws temper tantrums like a five year old to develop its coast line? Scotland has plenty of home grown talent. For certain Caledonia is better off with out the man with the bad hair!
28

Beth Boyle,

New York 01/05/2008 22:34:31
From what I have read Golf as we know it today originated from a game played on the eastern coast of Scotland in the Kingdom of Fife during the 15th century. Players would hit a pebble around a natural course of sand dunes, rabbit runs and tracks using a stick or primitive club. The East Neuk and Saint Andrews can claim it but not Aberdeenshire.
29

mobocaster,

Aberdeen 01/05/2008 22:39:05
Again I agree. Scoland is renowned for its fine courses & many of them are still in mutual or local hands & return a large portion of income to the local community.

Even St Andrews has most of its courses in public ownership, with access for the various clubs, hotel guests & public of all status managed by the Links Trust. A more satisfactory sustem by far for this country - People like Trump can still invest but the core attraction remains accountable here.
30

Shire Hobbit, ,

nr Aberdeen 03/05/2008 00:03:12
You wrote:
"Especially at meetings to gauge the views of local people, where the local people were not allowed to speak. The press was banned and Ford (not the representative for the area) hijacked the meeting from the audience and talked for over two hours".

This is just pure fantasy, sorry, but no such thing happened.
31

Andrew BOD,

Aberdeen/shire 04/05/2008 23:15:24
Shire Hobbit

What did happen then? Do elaborate. No 'fantasy' please.
32

Objective Comment,

NE Scotland 05/05/2008 05:13:17
I have followed these developments over the months and would like to raise a few questions and comments in regard to all this:

1. If the development gets the go ahead, surely the government must ensure 'Ramblers' rights of access are protected? This is indeed a beautiful piece of links land and access should not be denied to those who wish to visit.
2. No one has commented thus far regarding the associated devpt [I am fearful when I hear some of the proposals] but when Norman Foster designed Stansted Airport all those years ago, planning permission was given on the grounds that the height of the terminal building was such that it did not impair the view and remained low enough to be hidden by surrounding woodland. Ingenious engineering adjustments were made but the plan was successful.
3. Perhaps if our American 'cousins' flock to this development, they will stay away from other, better links championship courses where they seem to think that a 5 hour round of golf is the norm - much to the irritation of us locals!
4. Someone mentioned St Andrews - Perhaps their regulations regarding fess paid for a round there should apply here and locals registered and living within an agreed distance should be entitled to greatly reduced green fees. This may encourage development of the area around the courses and genuinely boost the income of the area.
5. I agree with comments that golf courses are great places for protecting environment and encouraging wildlife to exist in a 'natural' habitat.

In principal I am behind the scheme but agree with comments above that we should not be bullied into anything and that the plans for development and indeed running this 'commercial business' are fair to Trump and his boys but equally, must ensure that the rights of common people in Scotland are protected.

May common sense prevail!
33

mobocaster,

Aberdeen 08/05/2008 00:22:57
#49

1 - Golf courses are amongst the property types exempt from public access legislation. A voluntary agreement would have to be sought & TBH, neither Trump nor the whole system of agreements in Scotland has a particularly good history here.

2 - No chance. Trump's proposal dominates the surrounding landscape like nothing else in Aberdeenshire. It is totally out of scale & will be visible for miles in all directions.

3 - I share that concern. Other US-in-a-box tourist operations here seem determined to ensure that the customers do as little off-site as possible.

4 - The St Andrews Links Trust is a public body, formed & backed by legislation, managing courses in public ownership for the benifit of both business & the local community - A very different situation to the entirely private scheme proposed here.

Trump has promised "local rates" but has been short on specifics so far.

5 - Some courses, in some circumstances can be benificial for local environments. At Menie however, the fragility & dynamics of the more sensitive parts of the landscape make it unlikely that this would be the case.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.