Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


T in the Park

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Sturgeon tells hospitals to cut car park charges within weeks



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 19 January 2008
HOSPITAL car parking charges in Scotland must be cut "without delay", the Scottish health secretary said yesterday.
Nicola Sturgeon said parking should be free unless traffic congestion made charges "unavoidable".

She warned that a £3-a-day maximum charge, announced last month, should be implemented within weeks.

But it remains unclear when charges at the P
FI car parks at Edinburgh Royal Infirmary and Glasgow Royal Infirmary will be brought in line with the cap for NHS-run facilities.

Yesterday a report by an independent review group set out guidance on hospital parking and factors to consider when deciding on charges. It said charges at some commercial sites were regarded as "excessive".

The PFI car park at Glasgow Royal Infirmary charges £1.10 an hour, while the PFI-built Edinburgh Royal Infirmary car park, run by the private firm Consort, has a £7-a-day cap.

The report said: "While we accept that current commercial contracts have to be honoured, charges for parking – whether commercially provided or in-house – must fully comply with the principles of this guidance."

This means that health boards will be expected to consider the guidance when renegotiating parking contracts with commercial companies.

Patients using NHS-run car parks in Glasgow and Edinburgh will benefit most from the £3 cap. Visitors to the Western General in Edinburgh, and Yorkhill, Western Infirmary, Gartnavel and Victoria hospitals in Glasgow have faced a £7 maximum daily charge.

Yesterday's report said that where possible, parking should be free. Health boards have claimed that charges are justified because car parks are used by people not visiting hospitals.

Ms Sturgeon said: "The review group has endorsed the view that in general, car parking at hospitals should be free."

She added: "Evidence from a number of health boards shows that charging high daily rates is not the only way to discourage or control unauthorised parking and I agree with the group's recommendation that all other avenues should be explored before charges are introduced."

The review group said that hospitals charging less than the recommended £3 a day cap should not change prices. Many hospitals charge only £1 to £2.

An NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde spokeswoman said the £3 cap would be in place by the end of February at the latest.

John Jack, director of facilities, said NHS Lothian would implement the guidance as soon as possible.

"This guidance only affects the Western General Hospital at this stage. We have estimated the loss in income will be around £20,000 a year."

A spokeswoman for Consort, which runs the ERI's PFI car park, said: "We have got to look in detail at what the review is saying before we make any comment.

"We have regular discussions with our partners at the ERI. As a result of these discussions, last year the maximum charge for parking at the ERI was reduced from £10 to £7 a day."

Public sector union Unison welcomed the presumption that parking should be free, but said £3 was still a lot for those on low incomes. It called for PFI car parks to be brought in line with guidance as soon as possible.

Tom Waterson, chair of Unison's Scottish health group, said: "Private companies should not be profiteering from staff going to work and relatives visiting patients."

PATIENTS PAY HIGH PRICES
UNIONS and patient groups have long campaigned for a cut in hospital parking charges.

In recent years they have also expressed concern about other fees charged to patients.

Patientline provides bedside TV and phones in eight Scottish hospitals.

Last year the company was forced to cut the price of outgoing calls from 26p a minute back to 10p after increasing them just months earlier.

But the cost for people phoning someone in hospital remains at 26p a minute. The company also charges £2.50 a day to watch TV in hospital.



The full article contains 653 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 18 January 2008 10:38 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

donald,

glasgow 19/01/2008 06:56:02
Take the car parks off of these private sharks and reintroduce free parking.
2

OscarMacApfel,

Dumfries 19/01/2008 09:56:20
Yes AM2 that's right in order to maximise their profits this poor company being vilely bullied by the SNP dicatorship will have to cut back in other areas putting patients lives at risk. I only hope they can make it to April without going bust and laying off their entire workforce. The wee souls.

Stunned that UNISON want PFI carparks!
3

mr chips,

19/01/2008 09:58:13
Labour sleaze and corruption party allowed this extortion racket to flourish under their watch.
They wont be happy at nicola feckin it up for the greedy b*astards.
Well done the SNP.
4

JimC,

Kilmarnock 19/01/2008 10:05:57
AM2 you must be half asleep, the story states ""While we accept that current commercial contracts have to be honoured, charges for parking – whether commercially provided or in-house – must fully comply with the principles of this guidance."

This means that health boards will be expected to consider the guidance when renegotiating parking contracts with commercial companies.
5

TSynicto the core,

Bellshill.Saltireland 19/01/2008 10:36:32
Can anyone tell me if I am correct in thinking staff at PFI (Profits for Investors) British hospitals are the only employees in the entire universe to be charged for parking at their workplace?
PFI, which was introduced to Britain by Tory Norman Lamont, should have been scrapped by New Labour on taking over government. It wasn't. In fact it was so warmly embraced by Blair and McConnell that when McConnell exited he left the Nationalists with a £billions black hole to somehow fill in.
6

TSynicto the core,

Bellshill.Saltireland 19/01/2008 10:36:33
Can anyone tell me if I am correct in thinking staff at PFI (Profits for Investors) British hospitals are the only employees in the entire universe to be charged for parking at their workplace?
PFI, which was introduced to Britain by Tory Norman Lamont, should have been scrapped by New Labour on taking over government. It wasn't. In fact it was so warmly embraced by Blair and McConnell that when McConnell exited he left the Nationalists with a £billions black hole to somehow fill in.
7

,

19/01/2008 10:47:29
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
8

Publius,

Girvan for the weekend 19/01/2008 12:58:08
#8, 9 Tsynicto

Sorry but you are incorrect. Most Universities in England charge their staff for parking on site. Several colleges do too.
9

Rob - Honest Toun,

19/01/2008 13:18:38
#11

Ay but they've got a Labour government in England.
10

TSynicto the core,

Bellshill.Saltireland 19/01/2008 14:10:00
On the subject of hospitals a media source today costs Glasgow's projected largest new one at a staggering £800,000. As we were semantically led up the garden path by Labour regarding the true costs of the ERI, Wishaw General and Hairmyres - not a word about our having to pay thirty years rental - I think this question needs answered. 'Is this the sum we taxpayers will pay to own the hospital outright or is it the cost to rip-off PFI contractor/financier consortiums to build then rent out for decades at a cost to us of billions?'
11

Sanny,

Glasgow. 19/01/2008 21:41:51
13 TSynicto the core

I stand open to correction but I understood that for PPP's and PFI's; whilst the taxpayer will pay an exorbitant rent for thirty years or so, at the end of this period the taxpayer still doesn't own the property and ownership reverts back to the investors.

I do believe the individual who signed these contracts on our behalf should be held to account.

The SNP has floated an alternative proposal for funding Hospitals and Schools etc., using some form of government bond. Sounds like a more sensible approach.

I would favour bonds to cover each specific Hospital or School, then those that will benefit can subscribe to a bond with a decent but reasonable return, perhaps associated with a tax benefit to the holder. Better the return is to the local community than the greedy financiers from god knows where.
12

TSynicto the core,

Bellshill. Saltire 21/01/2008 16:34:19
Aye,Sanny #14. I should imagine it was Blair's Scottish poodle Jack McConnell who signed us up to this crippling debt.
The succession of Holyrood Health Ministers - beginning with Susan Deacon telling viewers to a Sunday political broadcast "We have given you the ERI for one hundred and eighty four million pounds" - who knowingly semantically covered up the truth should also be called to account.
13

TSynicto the core,

Bellshill. Saltire 21/01/2008 16:34:20
Aye,Sanny #14. I should imagine it was Blair's Scottish poodle Jack McConnell who signed us up to this crippling debt.
The succession of Holyrood Health Ministers - beginning with Susan Deacon telling viewers to a Sunday political broadcast "We have given you the ERI for one hundred and eighty four million pounds" - who knowingly semantically covered up the truth should also be called to account.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.