Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Shutdown fears after grants cut

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 27 November 2008
COMMUNITY groups in north Edinburgh have warned they risk having to close in the wake of council funding cuts.
The warning comes as the first details of how changes to the way Fairer Scotland Fund (FSF) grants are distributed around the city are revealed.

Traditionally worse-off areas, such as the Forth ward, which includes Granton, Muirhouse, Drylaw and P
ilton, are losing out to more affluent areas such as the city centre and nearby Almond ward, which covers Cramond and Silverknowes.

Groups in the Forth ward, including the Pilton Equalities Partnership and Muirhouse Millennium Centre, have seen their awards slashed by £500,000 as the city council tries to spread the grant awards more evenly.

Other areas losing out include the Craigentinny/Duddingston ward, where community groups will get £100,000 less than last year.

Local Labour councillor

Ewan Aitken said: "Because of the cuts by the SNP/Lib Dem administration, jobs have been lost, we have fewer places for those seeking employment, those recovering from drug addictions, support for vulnerable tenants, youth work and much more."

City leaders today said the redistribution of funding will help better tackle "pockets" of poverty and health inequality.

However, Peter Airlie, acting manager of the Muirhouse Millennium Centre, said halving its grant meant it would have enough to heat and insure the building but not employ staff to open it.

He said: "We were expecting cuts, but nothing as severe as this. The whole thing has been totally unfair to north Edinburgh and we have all sorts of groups in here, from young mums to pensioners, who will lose out now."

Last year, the Forth ward received £1.5 million, but that will fall to £1m. Meanwhile, areas like the south-west of the city, which traditionally received virtually nothing, will get around £600,000 per year.

Cammy Day, the new Labour councillor for the Forth ward, said: "

There appears to be no right to appeal or very little consultation on this and no attempt to look at how other sources of funding can be obtained or how we can stop a lot of these organisations from disappearing."

The Capital's £7.5m share of the Government's FSF is handled by the Edinburgh Partnership, made up of key bodies such as the council, NHS and police.


The partnership will only hand out money to organisations that can achieve three key priorities – early intervention in the cycle of deprivation, health improvements and job opportunities.

Councillor Tom Buchanan, the city's community engagement leader, said: "It is 'fairer' precisely because it acknowledges that 'pockets' of poverty and health inequality can exist in even the most affluent of neighbourhoods."





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 27 November 2008 10:22 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

alex paterson,

edinburgh 27/11/2008 12:38:09
Terrible,what will these areas do now,or did they need it in the first place.
2

,

27/11/2008 13:02:04
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
3

malcyh,

27/11/2008 13:03:57
Imagine the SNP/Lib Dems cutting costs - presumably had to after the years of high spending by the Labour controlled council?
4

,

27/11/2008 13:05:07
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
5

capy,

embra 27/11/2008 13:22:34
For too many years, some, not all of these projects have been a cosy job for Nu Labour and there placemen.

Lets tackle the root problem.How many years have labour been running things in Scotland,and we still have poverty. It should be tackled not invested in like a business.
6

ochone,

Sauchie, Clack's 27/11/2008 15:57:09
Any unionist care to explain just how long they have been the worst off areas and how they become so in the first place?

Especially as we have lived for so long in that Utopia known as the union.

Ah those union benifits just keep growing!
7

tertee,

Bingham 27/11/2008 15:58:25
Of course the more affluent areas need funding that previously went to the deprived. Have you seen the state of the hanging baskets and planters, they are ashamed to invite people over for cocktails. The unFairer Scotland Fund means they have the money to do it now.
8

dba,

Haymarket 27/11/2008 16:52:51
Since the first day of the SNP/LibDem coalition it was blindingly obvious that there was a 'secret agenda' in respect of the voluntary and charity sectors in the more dis-advantaged areas of Edinburgh.

There was little or no 'transparency' in the way the changes were decided: there has been even less 'transparency' or right of appeal from the badly mis-named 'Edinburgh Partnership'.

The fact that relatively better off areas are now to receive funding that is desperately needed in blighted areas needs impartial investigation. GIven the SNP Govt. there is little doubt that Empress Dawes and her accolytes are 'slavishly following' Alec and John's dreams...

In the previous draconian budget cuts to the volunrtary and charitable sectors - where funding was slashed with little or nonotice and even less justification - the £10 Million budget deficit was quoted asthe reason.... and yet the Empress Dawes and her accolytes then went on to vote £1.3 MILLION to 'dress up' the centre of the city, and look like blowing £6000+ on sending the Lord and LdayProvost to a BOOK FAIR in India...you really couldn't dream this situation up - unless you were drunk on power!


Take dear Empress and friends - the NEXT elections are NOT THAT FAR OFF and the good citizens of North Edinburgh have LONG memories!

9

Party Goer,

27/11/2008 20:00:45
#9, perhaps you should contact one of th youth organisations in NE. They'd be happy to show you around and you'd see for yourself the valuable work these organisations do.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.