Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 6th July 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Risky eight-year nuclear clear-out complete



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 20 March 2008
ONE of the most hazardous tasks in shutting down the Dounreay nuclear plant has been completed after a painstaking eight years.
All 1,500 tonnes of liquid metal have been drained from the 250 megawatt Prototype Fast Reactor (PFR), once the hub of Britain's fast breeder research and development programme.

It operated between 1974 and 1994, when it produced electricity for
the national grid. The liquid sodium metal was used as the coolant to transfer heat from the reactor core through three secondary circuits to a steam-generating plant for electricity production.

After the plant closed, the nuclear fuel was removed from the reactor. The last batch of hazardous sodium has now been transferred from the base of the reactor vessel and is being destroyed in a £17 million purpose-built chemical treatment plant that extracts the radioactivity and converts the sodium to common salt that can be discharged into the sea. The radioactivity in the sodium is isolated for specialist disposal.

James McCafferty, the PFR decommissioning manager, said: "The team behind this achievement is drawn from several different companies but all had one thing in common – to deliver the removal of this hazard from the reactor to the highest standards of personal and environmental safety."

Staff were able to see the last remaining few tonnes being removed from the bottom of the reactor by attaching a camera to a purpose-built pump that was lowered into the "heel" of the reactor vessel.

This was the most difficult part of the sodium to reach and required innovative design work and extensive testing by the reactor clean-up team to develop a system that would clear the final pools of metal. It was the first time anyone had seen inside the vessel since its construction 40 years ago.

Attached to a steel hose, the camera assembly manoeuvred through the complex reactor to reach the bottom. Operating in an extreme radiation environment, with temperatures in excess of 200C, it filmed the pump removing the final 20 tonnes of the pool of sodium.

Billy Husband, who was in charge of removing alkali metal residues, said: "Achieving this project is a major step forward in our programme to decommission PFR. We have worked on this particular stage of the project for two years and it has, without doubt, been a success due to the dedicated team of UKAEA (UK Atomic Energy Authority] and contractor staff working together."

Evan Park, the lead operations engineer, who worked at PFR in its infancy and watched the sodium being loaded into the reactor in 1974, said: "When I worked here during the construction of PFR, I never thought I would be standing here today, overseeing such a major phase of its decommissioning."

Decommissioning the entire Dounreay complex, which has been built up over more than 50 years, is due to end in 25 years, at a total cost of £2.9 billion.





The full article contains 491 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 19 March 2008 10:11 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Nuclear energy
 
1

Saoghal Beag,

20/03/2008 07:04:40
only 2.9 billion and the rest. nuclear is an unaffordable option for energy generation.
2

David MacVicar,

web 20/03/2008 07:55:48
"Decommissioning the entire Dounreay complex, which has been built up over more than 50 years, is due to end in 25 years, at a total cost of £2.9 billion"

Total, complete and utter misinformation or indeed a plain old Lie.

Dounreay will not be completely cleaned up for 300 years, 200 years longer than ANY other UK site.
Even this report from the NDA in 2007 states that phase 5 wont be complete until 2333
http://www.nda.gov.uk/documents/upload/Dounreay_Site_Summary_2006_07_Life_Time_Plan.pdf

There are much more recent documents that state the same thing from 2008. Theyt also state that decommissioning costs have increased by about 27%, iirc.

This article is Propaganda.
Press complaints commision perhaps....
3

Dounreay,

Dounreay 20/03/2008 08:16:26

Indeed you are right Mr MacVicar, Dounreay will not be decommissioned by 2033. The site has now put forward proposals to have it complete by 2025 instead, at a discounted cost of less than £3 billion.

This is the point at which all the redundant facilities have been cleared and all the wastes have been converted to a form that is safe for long-term storage or disposal. Some of the waste will have been disposed of but the more hazardous intermediate-level waste will be held in stores at the site, with its final resting place to be determined by the policy of the Scottish Government. Parts of the site where the ground is contaminated will be restricted beyond 2025.

So decommissioning of the facilities will be complete by 2025 but conditioned waste will be stored at the site beyond this date pending a national policy for its long-term management.

Colin Punler
Dounreay Communications
4

Alan Reid,

NZ 20/03/2008 09:24:48
"Risky eight-year nuclear clear-out complete"
I always thought it was suppoesed to be safe, thats what they always said anyway!!!
They would'nt lie to us would they???
5

David MacVicar,

web 20/03/2008 13:48:24
#3Dounreay,Dounreay

Thank you for your response. Though I did not say '2033', I said '2333'.

You state "Parts of the site where the ground is contaminated will be restricted beyond 2025."

Yes, 300 years 'beyond':
The National Audit Office report from 30/01/2008, available at : http://www.nao.org.uk/publications/nao_reports/07-08/0708238.pdf

It states on Page 41:

"For Dounreay, it is planned that all facilities and waste will be removed by 2032 with the exception of waste awaiting for an intermediate waste repository.
From this interim end point, it is assumed that it will be another 300 years before the site is closed in 2333. This period will allow for the radionuclides
– atoms with an unstable nucleus – in any residual contamination in the ground to decay to insignificant levels."


Nota Bene: My critiscism is of the Scotsmans article which gives a false impression to the public that the site will essentially be cleaned up and safe in few decades when in reality the site will be closed in approx 3 centuries.
6

David MacVicar,

web 20/03/2008 13:54:14
Decommissioning the entire Dounreay complex will not cost 2.9 Billion as stated in the artice.

In the audit offices report above it stated that the future lifetime costs for Dounreay is:
3.7 Billion (listed on page 39)

It should be noted that this is an estimated and that same estimate increased by 27% between 2005 and 2007.
So its a safe bet that the estimates will incease as time goes on.
7

Saoghal Beag,

20/03/2008 20:55:52
and it clearly shows that nuclear energy not only leaves toxic waste with no suitable long term solution for disposal, but also a financial legacy. nuclear is not a solution for secure and long term affordable power. Makes you wonder why tony blair and broon couldn't up the basic sums and work that out?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.