Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Renewables head urges Alistair Darling to release green-energy cash

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 12 November 2009
THE head of a renewables group will today call on Chancellor Alistair Darling to hand over £174 million of unspent money for Scottish green energy projects.
Scottish Renewables is wading into a row between the SNP and Westminster over fossil fuel levy cash set aside for renewables and now languishing in a pot controlled by Ofgem.

Under Treasury's rules, if the SNP asks for the money the same sum will
then be deducted from Scotland's overall budget.

Niall Stuart, chief executive of Scottish Renewables, will today reveal at a marine energy conference in Inverness that he has written to Mr Darling asking him to release the money.

He said: "It is unacceptable for the Scottish fossil fuel levy to remain unspent at this critical time in the development of the renewable energy industry.

"We want to see the fund allocated to support renewable energy – as it is intended to do – without impacting on other public spending in Scotland."

The fossil fuel levy is paid by non-renewable electricity suppliers to support low-carbon generation.

Finance secretary John Swinney, who has argued since 2007 for the fund to be made available on top of the Scottish budget, supported Mr Stuart's call.

"This is £174m of Scotland's money that should be invested in developing renewable energy in Scotland right now," he said.

A government spokesman said: "Representations have been received from the Scottish Executive on this matter. The government is continuing to keep this under review.

"The government has made clear that it has no objection to the Scottish Executive drawing down funds from the Ofgem account into the Scottish Consolidated Fund."





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 11 November 2009 9:53 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Group Captain Lionel Mandrake,

11/11/2009 22:04:43

Yawn. This again?

This is not "Scottish money".

It is money raised from electricity consumers throughout the UK - i.e. 91.5% of it from outside Scotland.

Under the terms of the relevant legislation, it can only be spent on assisting renewables projects in Scotland, however.

So all this proves it that despite their pro-renewables huffing and puffing, His Immensity and "Hapless" aren't all that keen on it after all. Otherwise they could be spending all this dosh already, boosting their so-called fave projects.
2

The Real Rufus T Firefly,

11/11/2009 22:32:15
Good to see the SNP Begging Bowl getting an airing again.
3

polls,

Scotland 11/11/2009 22:42:18
I'm not at all sure what point the first two posters are making but I would have thought that all Scots would consider Niall Stuart's request as sensible.

I suppose if it takes begging in order to help Scotland then I'll beg (we shouldn't have to of course) - but, whatever it takes to secure these funds.
4

,

12/11/2009 00:21:59
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
5

Eduardinho,

12/11/2009 02:26:53
Just to remind the unionist idiots that if Westminster spends an amount in England on renewables it is supposed to top up the Scottish budget in proportion for spending on renewables.
Its a disgrace that Scotland has to beg for money that its supposed to get anyway!
6

Group Captain Lionel Mandrake,

12/11/2009 07:36:55
5

"Just to remind the unionist idiots that if Westminster spends an amount in England on renewables it is supposed to top up the Scottish budget"

No, it's not.

Spending under the E&W and Scottish Renewables Orders has to be directed to its specific jurisdiction. However since the revenue is actually raised from electricity consumers on a pan-UK basis, that spending counts as "UK money" so correctly counts against Barnett totals.

Blame the idiots who wrote and voted for the legislation, and the morons who keep setting stupidly high "targets" without realising that they are ripping off more "green" subsidy from the electricity consumer than can physically be spent in Scotland.

That may well include all the main parties - frankly I don't care.

7

Melly,

Dunblane 12/11/2009 09:44:59
Another union dividend.
8

El Franko,

12/11/2009 10:29:03
The request for releasing funds has considerable urgency. How would you feel if the foundation of your particular scam was disintegrating before your eyes, as is the case for AGW and renewable energy?

The publicity for the clowns and crooks gathering in Copenhagen next month will encourage even more people to look a little deeper into this area, and they will be appalled by what they come across. Malicious and irresponsible are two words that come to my mind whenever greenie initiatives appear. And that's my polite version.

Here is a recent open letter trying to get one of the Australian clowns, a chap called Kevin Rudd, to see the light: http://sciencespeak.com/DearGullibleKevin.pdf

9

Joe McT,

12/11/2009 13:09:56
Just wondering - but if this "green energy" is so wonderful - why does it need huge sums of money from the Taxpayer?

This is just another rip-off of Taxpayers money.

But still, never let it be said that New Labour would bypass any "idea" that would let them increase or introduce another new tax.
10

The west awake,

Argyll 12/11/2009 16:22:29
I remember that wee Unionist creep Brian Wilson on TV, yabbering about how he would give John Swinney the phone number of who could release this money.
- Neglecting of of course to point out that it would be utterly pointless to do so, since in crazy Union-land it would go into one pocket and out the other.

Independance - we make money, we spend money. How difficult does it have to be?
11

Handsome Scotsman,

12/11/2009 17:14:55
He who controls the purse strings, appears to be a thief.

Oi, Darling, hand back the Swag Bag...!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.