Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


T in the Park

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Move to 'fast-track' energy-saving home improvements



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 05 March 2008
HOUSEHOLDERS across Scotland may soon be able to improve their homes with solar panels, wind turbines and other renewable energy devices without going through the costly and time consuming planning process.
The Scottish Government has unveiled the plans to encourage green energy generation and cut emissions, and they have the backing of conservation groups.

Announcing the proposals, climate change and infrastructure minister Stewart Stevenson admitt
ed, "the cost and time required to get planning consent can often be a disincentive to householders seeking to install microgeneration technologies".

Under the proposals – currently out for consultation – permission could be granted automatically under permitted development rights, provided that strict criteria are met.

The exceptions to the planning regime are very specific and a government spokesman yesterday insisted they would not lead to wind turbines being thrown up on every house as satellite dishes had been.

Environmental groups welcomed the announcement, claiming the plans could "help tackle climate change, reduce fuel poverty and encourage greater energy conservation".

Mr Stevenson said the proposals were part of the government's plan to reduce Scotland's emissions by 80 per cent by 2050 as part of the Climate Change Bill.

"We are seeking to strike the right balance between planning considerations and the wider environmental benefits of reducing carbon emissions," he said.

"Low carbon technologies in our renewable energy mix, including microgeneration and combined heat and power, will make a significant contribution to Scotland's future prosperity and help build increased, sustainable economic growth."

Under the proposals, solar panels would be allowed if they covered up to 60 per cent of a pitched roof or wall and protruded by less than 150mm.

But these would not be allowed on flats and there would be additional safeguards for conservation areas or world heritage sites.

Ground and water source heat pumps would be permitted in all areas, as once installed they are invisible.

Wind turbines would only be allowed on homes which are at least 100m from the nearest property and again prohibited in conservation areas or world heritage sites.

Plans which do not fall under the scope of permitted developments would still need local authority permission.

Elizabeth Leighton, WWF Scotland's Footprint Policy Officer said it is "important the public is enabled to play a role in helping to reduce emissions" to meet the climate change target set by the government.

Helen McDade, policy officer for the John Muir Trust, said the organisation hoped the announcement was backed up by funding for the schemes.

Mike Thornton, Director Scotland of the Energy Saving Trust, said the trust would "welcome a relaxation of the planning regulations to make it easier for householders to install microrenewables and thereby help people reduce their own carbon footprint".

OPERA PLAN HITS SOUR NOTE
BUILDING a 230ft wind turbine to supply energy to the Glyndebourne Opera House could spoil the tranquility of the South Downs, conservationists said yesterday.

Plans to build the 850kw turbine in East Sussex are being discussed at a public inquiry in Lewes. Officials at Glyndebourne – famous for itsMozart operas – say the turbine forms part of their vision to cut carbon emissions by 71 per cent and make the venue more environmentally sustainable. But campaigners, including representatives from the Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE), who are due to give evidence to the inquiry today, insist such an addition could harm the protected landscape.

Tom Oliver, the CPRE's head of rural policy, said:

"Its rotating, spiky blades would disrupt the magnificence of the broad horizon of the Downs and distract anyone seeking to find inspiration from the harmonious landscape."



The full article contains 600 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 04 March 2008 11:18 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Federation, not separation 05/03/2008 06:48:28
Green homes must be the standard, not the exception. Why is Britain so many years behind the leaders in such simple money saving technology?
2

nabodican,

Rural Scotland 05/03/2008 07:35:03
#1 - Because all our cash has gone to the wind industry so that Amec et al can have guaranteed profits.
3

Unimpressed one,

05/03/2008 08:10:19
"Elizabeth Leighton, WWF Scotland's Footprint Policy Officer"

Christ, you couldn't make up this pi*sh even if you tried very hard in a drunken stupor.
4

danielrober,

05/03/2008 09:05:06
Environmental groups welcomed the announcement, claiming the plans could "help tackle climate change, reduce fuel poverty and encourage greater energy conservation".


Simply improvements in insulation, new windows, new doors and improved drainage would be far more usefull. Urban area do not have suitable wind or solar resources.

Some areas will benefit from this program, i just wonder where all the equipment will come from? Let me guess Germany, Denmark etc. Is the SNP buying recognition when they declare independence. They must be because this cerainly has nothing to do with engineering or the environment.

Bring in SWEDISH building regulations.
5

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 05/03/2008 10:45:21
#3:

If you were in a drunken stupor, you probably wouldn't be bothered making something like that up.

I see that once again, this article goes on about "low-carbon energy" etc.

What a load of rubbish. Is it any wonder that people like me ignore them? For christs sake, USE THE CORRECT TERMINOLOGY.
6

Geomac 1,

Kinross 05/03/2008 13:25:18
This article is a load of codswallop. The REAL and prohibitive cost of installing solar panels and windmills etc is NOT associated with planning,it's the installation of the panels and windmills - and all for a piddly little environmentalbenefit at huge cost.
I wish that the ill informed would stop writing about this nonsense. There's not a day passes when we are not preached at about climate change. If climate change is as serious as politicians would have us believe (and I don't!) then get on with actually doing something to mitigate the potential consequences rather than try to persuade us that we can change the weather and climate!
7

Neil,

Glasgow 05/03/2008 15:35:16
People are not going to put these in because they are allowed, they will do it only because the taxpeyer is paying them too. This is what is meant by saying that windmillery should be "supported".
8

John Blackley,

Winter Garden, FL 05/03/2008 18:10:24
Could someone tell me what percentage of Scotland's housing stock is not flats and not in conservation areas and not in a world heritage site? I'd like to figure out just how many people would be eligible to install solar panels.

While we're at it, could somebody tell me how many homes in Scotland are more than 100m from the nearest property? I'd like to know how many windmills we can expect to see going up.

Once I've totted all of that up, can somebody tell me - to echo #4's comment - how many homes in Scotland don't currently have the best insulation, windows and drainage available?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.