Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The hunt is On.
Sponsored by
Can you track down Scotland's wildest beastie?
 
 
Thursday, 4th December 2008

Haggis Hunt is now on!

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Green light likely for Scots digital channel



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 08 September 2008
THE commission looking at the future of television in Scotland is expected to recommend that a new Scottish Channel is created in its report to be published today.
The Broadcasting Commission was created a few months into Alex Salmond's term of office as First Minister, to look at the shortfall of coverage of Scotland on television.

It was asked to look at the possibility of a Scottish 6 o'Clock news on BBC
1, a long standing item on the Nationalists' wish-list.

It now seems set to conclude that there should be a publicly funded Scottish digital channel, a move that has been widely welcomed by most political parties.

The Scottish Government is known to back the idea but was unwilling to comment until the report was published.

However, Peter Wishart, the SNP's Westminster media spokesman, said: "Indications from the provisional reports have been extremely encouraging. The broadcasting status quo is unacceptable, and I am confident that the Broadcasting Commission's recommendations will take us in the right direction."

There was a guarded response from Labour, which insisted that it "would not dismiss the proposal out of hand". However, the party wanted to see how the proposal would stack up financially and what impact it would have on existing channels.

Lothians Labour MSP Lord George Foulkes, who has been a harsh critic of innovations which "lead to independence creep", has welcomed this proposal.

"It's not a big deal when you look at it," he said. "There are so many providers of channels on digital and satellite for all sorts of interest groups that you could easily see a Scottish channel slotting in.

"I think too many people, especially the SNP, look at this in a 20th century, outdated way as a major move. We are not talking about old fashioned analogue channels here."

However, he insisted that the channel should pay for itself and not be publicly funded.

"There needs to be a market for it," he said. "I don't see a case for a government subsidy."

The Conservatives are claiming the idea as their own, put forward as an alternative to a Scottish 6.

Ted Brocklebank, the Tory Holyrood culture spokesman, said: "I am absolutely delighted to hear the commission has backed this because we grabbed the idea early on."

BACKGROUND

THE Scottish Broadcasting Commission's members are Lord Fraser, the former Lord advocate; Henry McLeish, former First Minister; Baroness Michie of Gallanach, a Gaelic-speaker; Norman Drummond, chairman of the Broadcasting Council for Scotland; actress Elaine C Smith; Professor Seona Reid, director of Glasgow School of Art; Chris Ballance, an award-winning playwright; entrepreneur David Wightman; and writer and film maker Murray Grigor.





The full article contains 450 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 September 2008 10:21 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Guga II,

Rockall 08/09/2008 00:58:31
Forfoulkesake, Lard George thinks Scotland is just an "interest group".

Incidentally Lard George, we can take the money stolen by the EBC as television tax, and use that to subsidise a Scottish channel. That way, too, we can help avoid Union creep as well as Unionist creeps.

2

VoteoutLibLabConTraitors,

New Cumnock 08/09/2008 00:58:44
I think it would be a good idea. We must be one of the few countries around the world who don't have their own news channel to report on national and international stories and how it may affect Scotland.
The majority of the national 6 o'clock and 10 o'clock news doesn't affect us. Health, Justice and sport is mostly non Scottish. Imagine no more cricket stories or English football or royalty stories. I'm not sure why it has to be self funding though as we get a tiny fraction of our licence fee back in Scottish productions.
3

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 08/09/2008 01:49:24
"Is a new dedicated TV channel for Scotland an idea to be welcomed?"

If it is going to be anything like the disaster STV is!, then the answer is a,...

.......BIG FAT NO!!!

BOTH BBC Scotland and STV are a disgrace to Scotland's viewers, no-wonder, they say we have a 'Drink Problem'!

Is it any-wonder,?

People just want out the house at weekends, when there is nothing worth watching on TV, and coverage of local events are 'Appalling'!

A Bunch of 5year olds could do better, giving us local news etc.
4

W U Merchant,

Aberdeen 08/09/2008 07:01:26
Complete waste of money.
5

Watson,

Irvine 08/09/2008 07:13:32
Scotland needs an impartial media who will be fair and unbiased. At present they all have their own political agenda.
6

MacGillicuddy,

08/09/2008 07:30:34
Quote:
"It now seems set to conclude that there should be a PUBLICLY funded Scottish digital channel, a move that has been widely welcomed by most political parties."

If that is to be the case then surely the money collected in Scotland by way of licence fee should just go to the new Scottish Channel and those who still wish to receive the EBC can do so by subscription.

It is very revealing to see that Lord Foulke-all of Numcock sees Scotland as no more than an "interest group" !
7

Joe,

Upper Gray Street 08/09/2008 07:39:48
Scotland needs a TV channel based in it's capital city,
this monotonous Glasgow this, Glasgow that and interminable Old Firm devotion is a total disgrace.
Give Scotland a credible 'Scotland' TV channel in Edinburgh where impartiality can be assured.
8

Linda,

Edinburgh 08/09/2008 08:20:25
All we need is a Scottish opt out of BBC 1 News and Current affairs programmes that reflects news from Scottish perspective. That is more important than a Scottish Digital Channel.

The Scottish digital channel should be for arts culture etc along lines of Radio 4.
9

Pontificatus Maximus of Avignon,

08/09/2008 08:30:06
#8
Aye, too true we need the White Heather Club, One o' clock Gang, Andy Stewart , Jimmy Shand etc ad nauseam to augment your arts and culture!!
10

connaughtboy,

stonehaven 08/09/2008 08:34:35
I assume that the Calman Commission will be taking the SBC Report on board and acting on its recommendations.
11

connaughtboy,

stonehaven 08/09/2008 08:36:19
#7 Joe

I agree that the new channel should not be based in Glasgow, however, I also believe that it should not be based in Edinburgh either. Somewhere outside of the central belt might be better.
12

eric,

Lothian 08/09/2008 08:39:49
If it does happen it will Be Glasgow simply because they have been doing it for yrs and more Pro .Lots of Folk from Edinburgh work at the Glasgow studios !So what makes you think it would be better.Things happen in Glasgow all year around bad and good,Because its Scotlands largest city.And most folk chose to live in the west.
13

HughB,

Edinburgh 08/09/2008 08:40:01
And a Scottish digital channel needs to be broadcast across the UK, for as long as we are part of the UK.

We are force fed news from a London perspective.

London needs also to be able to see what's going on from a Scottish perspective.

Maybe this would lead to a greater understanding, and less of the English unrest that Westminster is constantly harping on about.
14

The Spook in Leith,

08/09/2008 09:51:59
Lothians Labour MSP George Foulkes, who has been a harsh critic of innovations which "lead to independence creep", has welcomed this proposal.

Did you notice that i took out the (Lord) in this creeps title?, i totally dispute to why a person like this should be made a lord, never a fu#king lord in my books by a country mile.

Now it appears Scotland will have a better coverage over local Scottish programs, that has to be another tick in the Independence box.
15

gus1940,

Edinburgh 08/09/2008 09:53:26
#7

Well said Joe.
16

Alan B,

08/09/2008 09:55:52
Do not really think a scottish channel is a good idea now that we have digital mutli channels.

It would be far more important to have scottish news within the current structure ie BBC and ITV, rathter than the poor output we have at the moment which is largely irrelevent and completely misleading.

Ensuring that the BBC is devolved with a form of fiscal autonomy should be the way ahead.

What i have noticed about the traditional channels terrestrial channels now with multi digital channels is you seldom watch them beyond the political outputs.
17

DAVID,

Edinburgh 08/09/2008 11:11:00
Great..........endless repeats of River City, a return of Thungummyjig, Machar and an insular Scottish perspective on global events. Fantastic.
18

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 08/09/2008 11:36:43
Let's think, what would they put on a purely "Scottish" channel?

Football, football, more football, discussions about football, Gaelic programs that no-one can understand, a football round-up, a soap opera with a heavy bias on football... and so on, ad-nausium.

Yes, I know there's more to Scotland than that, but you can bet your bottom dollar that I am not far wrong with my prediction.
19

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 08/09/2008 11:39:50
(cont)

Oh! I nearly forgot... Incessant political propaganda shows telling us all that we drink too much, smoke too much, drive too fast and eat too many chippies.

No thanks. I can do without it. I'll tune in to Dave and watch a few re-runs of Top Gear instead.
20

Corrennie,

08/09/2008 12:09:54
~~ 18 & 19~~

You are spot on.

Just add some:

--Tartan-tat stuff/'Scottish culture'/White Heather Club/
--What Grannie saw oot the kitchen windae
--another soap opera about a hard-done-by (but feisty) family living in some appalling housing scheme in Glasgow
--gripes about how hard it is living in the Western Isles
--(more football)

Yawn........I'd rather watch paint dry.




21

European Scot,

08/09/2008 12:39:33
16 Alan B

" Do not really think a 'scottish' channel is a good idea now that we have digital mutli channels."

"It would be far more important to have scottish news within the current structure ie BBC and ITV, 'rathter' than the poor output we have at the moment ......"
Ensuring that the BBC is devolved with a form of fiscal autonomy should be the way ahead."

I'm surprised that you cannot see the importance of a country having its own State broadcaster.
The British government has a different view to your own, it is all too well aware of the power and significance of broadcasting, which is why it has made this a 'reserved' matter for so many years, for very obvious reasons.
If the smallest countries in Europe have their own State television stations, then surely Scotland should at least equal them.
It's very important that a nation has a means of expressing itself, and of presenting programming, and news, tailor made to its own needs and attitudes.
We have moved on a ways from 'The White Heather Club', etc. which predictably, negative Unionist posters, throw up as the kind of offerings a Scottish channel would provide.
A Scottish State broadcaster, thanks to digital delivery will be able to provide a contemporary fresh look to its programming, and the amount of creative talent north of the border, is more than capable of delivering good quality television from a world wide source of material, as well as news more pertinent to Scotland.
You appear to be a bit of a federalist at heart, and keen to hang on to your 'BBC.
A 'BBC Scotland' representing Scotland ? I would rather have a fully independent Scottish broadcaster. The digital age should actually give us both a choice.
22

notanactivist,

The Borders 08/09/2008 15:40:41
I hope it focusses on Scotland in a global context and resists the urge to be parochial. And please, no pandering to the Gaelic lobby.
23

Masterpiece,

08/09/2008 15:55:50
22
How sad to see comments about the Gaelic lobby, especially as the rest of the Scottish population simply sit back and do next to nothing. Had the rest of the Scottish population been so active as the Gaelic lobby. Scotland would not be in such a poor state, especially when it comes to fighting the Angliscisation of our country which so many Scots seem to want.

Knowing just how Angliscised so many Scots have become in the last 30 years the question has to be asked. Will this be another English Channel broadcasting from Scotland rather than England?
24

Alan B,

08/09/2008 16:16:54
#European Scot

No I am not a federalist. I think Scotland is better off running its own affairs.

I just am sceptical in this new multi channel age whether the audience would support such a new channel. I just myself watching less and less of the traditional terrestorial channels, with the exception of the political programs. (i do not have sallelite).
As such i would say will there be an audience for a new channel.

I think the uk tv news is dreadful and think that it would be better to have much more devolution of the BBC with a scottish news (scottish 6 but for all news not just 6pm but 9 or 10pm aswell). I agree labour pulled devolution of broadcasting for political reasons as it felt that inevitably many westminster issues irrelevent to scotland would be demoted while scottish issues reported. This would make westmisnter seem much more remote.

I think it would be better for devolution of broadcasting to take over control of scottish tv and that would mean devolution of the bbc. At the moment scotland gets a smaller share of revenues spent than population share.

Do you not think it would be better for the scottish parliament to boost STV and improve the quality of BBC scotland than trying to spead too thinly with another channel.

I would be more interested in trying to boost scottish production output and pushing finance that direction rather than a new channel.

I am not against a new channel in principle just question the practicality.

Would this new channel be via the tax system? Would it be supported (partially ) by advertising. Should the licence fee not finance public sector broadcasting in scotland.


25

European Scot,

08/09/2008 18:24:14
24 Alan B

" Do you not think it would be better for the scottish parliament to boost STV and improve the quality of BBC scotland than trying to spead too thinly with another channel."

No not really, I would prefer to see a totally Scottish Broadcaster, possibly using Scotland's share of licence fees currently paid to the BBC, and also partly by advertising, but more along the lines of the sponsorship of an individual programme, a series, or events, whatever. I don't think viewers would wear constant interruption of programmes with adverts, on top of paying a licence fee.
What is important is getting away from the idea that the BBC has got to be the Scottish broadcaster, that just isn't so.
As there are a variety of programmes to choose from these days, be it from cable or satellite, viewers have far more choices, and many combinations of channels are available.
Those who wish to continue watching BBC documentaries, costume dramas, or even heaven forbid cricket, could still do so, that would be their choice.
The presence of a Scottish State broadcaster isn't going to change that.
The cost of introducing a digital service would be less than that of the old analogue systems of years ago. Introducing a high definition service would actually be feasible.
A fully Scottish broadcaster, with production of material aimed at Scottish viewers is preferable, rather than trying to modify the BBC, which isn't going to forget its first 'B', very much its raison d'etre.
There are obviously political reasons closely linked to a country having its own broadcaster.
In an Independent Scotland, a Scottish State broadcaster offering wider coverage of events in Europe, or around the World, as an alternative to BBC coverage of more London centric news, wouldn't be a bad thing.
26

stracathro,

08/09/2008 21:26:06
speaking as an snp voter -
the idea doesn't do much for me - a lot depends on the content of the channel.

it would be good if we could get a programme on what's happening in europe for example.

also good if there's a good news channel - instead of getting the usual propaganda from london.
27

The Tin Man,

09/09/2008 09:07:09
Channel #96? Yaaaaaawn.
28

notanactivist,

The Borders 09/09/2008 11:28:26
#23 Define "anglicised?"

I would say both Scotland and England have become more Americanised if anything, especially where television is concerned. Do you mean that you want a return to the days of the White Heather Club?

"Had the rest of the Scottish population been so active as the Gaelic lobby. Scotland would not be in such a poor state"

Gaelic is a dying language being kept alive by state subsidies. If the rest of Scotland had behaved as you indicate what else would be kept artificially alive?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.