Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Tuesday, 7th October 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Developers warned against destroying capital's heritage



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 19 April 2008
EDINBURGH's economic prosperity will be damaged unless steps are taken to protect its historic heritage and world-famous landscape, the city's council leader claimed yesterday.
Jenny Dawe, who issued the stark warning almost a year after taking the reins of power in the capital, said she was determined not to see the city's World Heritage Status "compromised" by new developments.

As debate over the future direction of t
he capital intensified yesterday, she admitted to a preference for "more modest and people-friendly" architecture and city centre environments.

Speaking at a major conference in the city to mark World Heritage Day, Ms Dawe said Edinburgh had to be careful in what it created in future years, warning: "grandeur can become merely gross."

She echoed many of the concerns voiced by the new head of Edinburgh's most powerful heritage group, Adam Wilkinson, who said the city was in danger of "killing the goose that lays the golden eggs" if it placed too much emphasis on large new hotels, conference centres and office blocks.

Business leaders yesterday warned Mr Wilkinson that he was "heading for a bloody nose" after an outspoken interview in The Scotsman and a series of attacks on the priorities of developers and investors at yesterday's conference.

However Ms Dawe said it was "quite justified" to regard Edinburgh's historic architecture, World Heritage Site status and parks as economic assets in their own right.

"It's vital that while welcoming new development, this must be of high-quality design and must enhance the built environment without compromising the qualities and buildings that won Edinburgh its World Heritage Site status in the first place.

"If we do not protect, where necessary, and also enhance this built environment it will have a serious repercussion on our economic future.

"It is quite justified to regard our high-quality architecture, World Heritage Site status and urban green spaces as economic assets in their own rights."

Ms Dawe added: "It is essential that the vitality of the city centre is enhanced. But we have to be careful what we create. Grandeur can become merely gross.

"Edinburgh has a rich architectural heritage and is proud of its UNESCO status. We do not want to see that compromised. The average isn't good enough. We don't want Edinburgh to become any town, any place, any country. Edinburgh is special and we must keep it that way."

Mr Wilkinson told the conference yesterday that Edinburgh should look to the likes of Geneva and Stockholm to see how cities had developed without harming their historic environments or classic skylines.

But Mr Wilkinson said: "Edinburgh's historic environment is its unique selling point, but the city is in danger of killing the goose that lays the golden eggs. Visitors don't come to the city to look at a conference centre."

Award-winning Edinburgh architect Malcolm Fraser, who was responsible for the Dance Base complex in the city's Grassmarket, the Scottish Storytelling Centre and the Scottish Poetry Library, said the city should leave it to the current generation of architects to shape the future.

RECORD NUMBERS VISIT HISTORIC NATIONAL FAVOURITES

VISITOR attractions run by Historic Scotland attracted record numbers over the last year, The Scotsman can reveal.


But Mr Wilkinson said: "That's never been the case in Edinburgh at all and the fact is we are living in a democracy."





The full article contains 561 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 18 April 2008 10:51 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Seb,

19/04/2008 01:54:36
Where's this interview with new EWH chief?
2

Maisie from Morningside,

morningside 19/04/2008 03:25:34
Geneva?????
Most of it looks like Glasgow on a rainy day....
3

eric,

Lothian 19/04/2008 07:15:34
I agree we must protect the city.Glasgow can get away with Moden buildings.and it looks Good especially Glasgow harbour and the Proposed Building for Charing Cross etc.It would look out of place here.Im afraid we want our cake and eat it,Glasgow already has all this infrastructure in Place.
4

GrahamH,

Edinburgh 19/04/2008 07:50:38
What about the attachment of tram fixings to historic buildings, won't that detract from cities attractiveness?
5

Boy Wonder,

19/04/2008 08:14:02
When you look at what they've built in Holyrood ... the awful Parly building and the Tent that is Dynamic Earth ... the World Heritage status only applies when it suits them!
6

C,

Glasgow 19/04/2008 08:36:16
Open your eyes. Who would trust the local authority with the long term future of the city? Princes Street is an ill matched eyesore and public projects take forever, cost a fortune and the results are minimal. Have a look at the year long project to "improve" Saint Andrew Square. How are victorian era trams with their high cost and intrusive infrastructures to be elegantly shoe-horned into the landscape?
7

iain,

edinburgh 19/04/2008 08:56:28
MONEY ALWAYS WINS IN EDINBURGH
8

Buttress,

19/04/2008 09:52:48
Leave it to the likes of Malcolm Fraser to shape the city?

Look at the lump he's designed for the Caltongate development and weep.

www.eh8.org.uk

He's spreading his ugly lumps wider too - the historic town of Berwick for example...

And in fact wasn't Neil Simpson responsible for the Storytelling Centre, when he worked for Fraser?

Thanks Adam. Let's hope it's the 'business leaders' (unnamed - are we talking that rentagob from the Chamber of Commerce Hewitt here?) who get the bloody nose. Time they were challenged. The city doesn't need a whole heap of new conference centres and hotels which spoil what visitors want to see - which is history, not concrete, glass and steel. Naturally those set to make pots of cash want development - not exactly unbiased are they? Lining their own pockets is the priority.

Glad to see the council leader being outspoken too.

(But where is this interview?)

9

Fraud Squad,

Edinburgh 19/04/2008 09:56:44
Jenny you are a hypocrite. You pretend to have admirable principles and beliefs but behave otherwise.

You are demolishing Council owned listed buildings to make way for new developments. The listed Canongate Venture, 5 New Street. (formerly North Canongate Infant School) which is a Queen Ann Style Red Sandstone by Robert Wilson 1900-1901 will be completely demolished to make way for a conference centre!!!!!!!!!

Put you own house in order before you preach to developers!
10

Buttress,

19/04/2008 10:03:58
In fairness - Jenny Dawe isn't on the Planning Committee.

But Coun Jim Lowrie leads it and voted for the Caltongate demolitions - and he's also on the Board of Directors of EWHT.

Time he resigned?

Let's hope for a public inquiry over Caltongate. EWHT has consistently opposed that. It was mostly driven through by the previous lot, hand in glove with developer Mountgrange. Let's name and shame the 'masterplanner' architect Allan Murray too - hopefully his days getting the plum jobs in the city are coming to an end, and where new developments are necessary someone world class is brought in to oversea them.

BUT WHERE IS THIS INTERVIEW? Too hard hitting to be published? :-)

11

Buttress,

19/04/2008 10:04:58
Correction - that's oversee!
12

Pilrig.,

Livingston 19/04/2008 10:48:13
Nae comment fae wee Don Anderson ?
13

Buttress,

19/04/2008 10:50:26
Maybe wee Don was reason the interview mysteriously didn't appear?

Conspiracy theories...
14

Erica from East Kilbride,

19/04/2008 11:36:15
#4 You are right in that Glasgow has many God-awful concrete monstrosities ... however you are utterly wrong with your claim that the place "gets away with it" .... doesn't take an architectural expert to figure out that Glasgow took a wrong turn many decades ago, destroying what was once a fine Victorian city. Fortunately Edinburgh is here, the architectural jewel of Scotland, and our showcase to the world.
15

Liam,

19/04/2008 11:42:00
15 - yes, such a pretty place, Glasgow:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IKPggiJEWmI

Thank Goodness for Edinburgh!!
16

Buttress,

19/04/2008 11:43:32
Yes - but it does need protecting, against developers out to make a fast buck, in the name of 'progress' and 'economic development' of course (St James' Centre anyone?), second rate architects ditto who can't respect the city (and whose offerings will blight it until demolished - Allan Murray are you listening?) and 'business leaders' (Ron Hewitt of the Chamber of Commerce? Look at his background...) making silly threats about bloody noses.

Not forgetting politicians of course - wee Donald and Trevor may have gone, but there are always others of similar Philistine bent waiting in the wings.
17

WKKB,

19/04/2008 13:08:27
BANG ON #3
18

Tweedmouth,

Coldstream 19/04/2008 23:58:49
Drove past the appalling bank and insurance ghetto that clusters around Lothian Road and Torphichen Street the other day. What a fine job the developers and architects have made of that section of the capital! An inhuman maze of concrete (mock stone) endless glass walls and cowed looking clerks -a ll in uniform cheap black suits. Orwellian or what?

Malcolm Fraser built the poetry library - in one of the windiest closes in Edinburgh - with no lobby or entrance hall - just a door opening into a room full of books and papers - with the winds howling in for 7 months a year. And he built an utterly useless glass porch - pure tokenism. The sacrifice of function and utility to mere fashion, corner cutting and maximum profit.
When you look around Edinburgh at the architectural giants who bequeathed us Charlotte Square, the National Galleries, the New Town - and then look at the pygmies who we have today - it makes you weep and despair.
19

Buttress,

20/04/2008 12:21:32
He also built Dance City in Newcastle - which is one of the worst examples of sore thumb architecture seen in many a long time.

But he's award winning... Emperor's New Clothes and too many are scared to say it's bad.

There's a cosy little coterie of architects who seem hand in glove with the Chamber of Commerce (property portfolio managed by Chande of Mountgrange of Caltongate fame...) developers and some in the council (or at least the previous lot). They keep getting the jobs and you have to wonder why.

The stuff they spout about it being 'contextual' is banal claptrap, but many seem fooled.

Allan Murray's post-Cowgate fire development proposals - look and weep. So - a bit of windy open space and a few stairs makes it 'fit' the Old Town?

No. It makes another bit of anyplace architecture, yet another hotel and place for a Starbucks.

Then there's his idea floated for a gherkin style tower. Look and despair.

I think the bars of a few cages may have been rattled though. Maybe the gravy train could be de-railed?

20

Guthrie,

Edinburgh 20/04/2008 23:45:50
Deary me, I do believe I agree with Tweedmouth regarding Lothian road.
21

Southsider71,

East Renfrewshire, Glasgow 21/04/2008 10:50:14
#4 Glasgow now has no choice but to go for modern buildings, hence they huge number of glass tower buildings currently being built.

#15 Thankfully, many of those concrete monstrosities are now being bulldozed, not before time...

#16 That vid could be anywhere in the UK, on a wet day including some parts of the capital.

While Edinburgh does need to be protected, I think it needs to be done in such as a manner, as not to hold the city back.
22

Buttress,

21/04/2008 22:06:19
Back from what? Desecration? Being put on the World Heritage at Risk List?


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.