Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 19th July 2008

Free Monet Print with The Scotsman

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Crofting body 'should be scrapped' after half a century, says professor



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 13 May 2008
THE body set up to oversee and develop crofting should be wound up after more than 50 years, a radical report published yesterday recommends.
An inquiry under rural policy expert Professor Mark Shucksmith says the regulation and development functions of the Crofters' Commission should be given to a federation of crofting boards and Highlands and Islands Enterprise.

The 98-page report, s
een as the most important for crofting in half a century, aims to ensure that all crofts are occupied by an active, resident crofter.

It proposes tightening and simplifying legislation to crack down on absenteeism and the sale of crofts on the open market, while improving grants to make it easier for people to get into crofting and access affordable housing.

The changes would cost an extra £1 million a year, with a one-off cost of £3 million to set up the first register of crofts. The proposals will be debated in Parliament on Thursday.

Michael Russell, the environment minister, yesterday said crofting makes a unique and significant contribution to remote rural areas and action must ensure it offers a viable way of life for future generations.

During interviews with over 2,500 people, the committee heard the Crofters' Commission, set up in 1955, should be more accountable and enforce regulations more effectively.

It now suggests regulation be carried out by a Federation of Crofting Boards, a single body made up of seven to ten local boards each with a majority of elected crofters.

There are presently 17,725 crofts and an estimated 11,500 crofters. Most crofts are handed down among families, but recently it has become common to sell to the highest bidder.

The committee was told if this continues, crofting could disappear within 20 years.

It now recommends tying all crofts to residency, even after they are sold or assigned. It also wants a crackdown on absenteeism – with nearly 1,800 registered tenants classified as absentees – to free up more land.

The committee says crofters' rights of security of tenure and fair rents will continue, but argues they should only be enjoyed by those who want to use the land.

The report also highlights difficulties in accessing affordable housing with property prices rising by 58-85 per cent between 2001 and 2005.

Currently, crofters can obtain grants of just £11,000-£22,000, but usually need an extra commercial loan.



The committee proposes offering means-tested grants of up to £30,000 and non means-tested loans.

Neil MacLeod, the chairman of the Scottish Crofting Foundation, said that he was pleased the committee had recognised the social, economic and environmental importance of crofting.

However, Rob Gibson, a Highlands and Islands Nationalist MSP, said that scrapping the commission was a blow for local democracy.

John Farquhar Munro, the Liberal Democrat MSP for Ross, Skye and Inverness West, questioned whether the commission's functions should be split.





The full article contains 490 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 12 May 2008 9:44 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Land reform
 
1

Ard Righ,

The Rock Of Edinburgh 13/05/2008 11:48:22
Mark Shucksmith - English - in a Scottish Job.

lookout the institutional improvers are out again.
2

Upbeat,

13/05/2008 14:56:12
Thank goodness someone has had the courage to point out that the Crofters Commission is no longer fit for purpose or relevant to day to day crofters . . An organisation that is charged with the task to oversee crofts and crofting tenure, but " is not a Map based organisation ", in these days of GPS coordinates etc., is daft !

Did anyone pause to ask;

1) How many of these supposed 11,500 Crofts today are actually viable in commercial terms. ( this particularly in view of the ongoing -30% and rising - increase in fuel this past year ?

2.)Did anybody ascertain how many people actually wish to be defined as a crofter of a non viable croft ?


It's all very well having a rose-tinted idealistic view of Crofts and Crofting. How many of those busy pontificating now within the crofters commmission and other associated bodies, have any experience personally of working a croft? Does the government have any concept of the complexities they have imposed in recent years by blindly imposing bureaucratic standards and compliance on this whole section of agriculture . ?

Arguably the greatest treat to the crofting areas are the regional planning boards. All too frequently...in order to generate Council taxation ?? ...planning bodies appear to sanction any development plan however invasive. They permit freshbuilding of new houses on decrofted pasture land throughout the highlands. This makes some crofters rich, but this is hardly an income that is sustainable as the crofts that are left get ever smaller.


3

I should be studying,

Edinburgh 13/05/2008 15:10:27
#1. Why relevance is it that he is English? Can only Scots be professors in Scotland? By your logic that means every Scottish professor who has ever lived and worked outwith Scotland should not have left!

A Scotland only for Scots, is that what you aspire to?

You, sir, are an embarrassment for the cause of Scottish Independence by your pathetic anti-English jibes.

So, in an Independent Scotland you'd want all English people to leave. That's 10% of the population. Perhaps you'd better learn to live with your English neighbours, as in an Independent Scotland I'm sure many will be staying on. In fact, perhaps you should try and win them around to your cause, instead of living in the 1300's.
4

Ard Righ,

The Rock Of Edinburgh 13/05/2008 17:54:38
3 Yes you should be studying, then again you'll never get it, as you have demonstrated you cannot read.

So you advocate Anti-Scottish behavior in Scotland, my, my, you are the weird one. I suppose you probably consider the track record of the english in Britain and Scotland as wholly positive?

There are none so blind as will not see.
5

I should be studying,

Edinburgh 13/05/2008 19:49:22
#4 You really are tiresome. Why are you talking about "anti-Scottish" behaviour? The track record of Scots isn't perfect, so if you want to start quoting proverbs at me, take the plank out of your own eye first.

Do you mind if I ignore you later? I'm a bit busy right now.
6

Ard Righ,

The Rock Of Edinburgh 13/05/2008 21:12:21
5 Awww little flower.

You cannot side step your Anti-Scottish behavior here, this is Scotland.

What is tiresome, is the english attitude getting media attention over native opinion, of course any imperialist would agree with that and every humanist would see something wrong with that.

Why should a Russian have an institutional public opinion within Lithuania for example?

You do not have a leg to stand on, bigoted imperialist.
7

I should be studying,

Edinburgh 13/05/2008 22:58:21
Russians? Lithuania? Anti-Scottish behaviour?Imperialism? I thought the article was about crofting. But then your postings do seem to excel in the irrelevance. I think I've learnt my lesson well enough now.

"High King" indeed. High Horse more like.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.