Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Could crazy conspiracy theory really be true?

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 28 October 2008
INSIDE THE JUSTICE SYSTEM

TWENTY years on from the Lockerbie disaster, students at Syracuse University in New York State will hold a ceremony in December to remember the 270 people who died when Pan Am Flight 103 was blown up.

It will be a sombre and deeply poignant occas
ion, as 32 of its students were among the passengers on that ill-fated flight on 21 December, 1988.

Even today, doubts over who was behind the attack remain. Confidence in the safety of the conviction of Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi has been shaken by not one but two criminal appeals. The second is due to begin next year after a ruling by the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission that the verdict may have been a miscarriage of justice.

Now it has emerged that Megrahi may not survive that appeal, after being diagnosed with prostate cancer.

Alternative theories surrounding Lockerbie have been given fresh impetus by the revelation that a man thought by many to be responsible may have been a US agent.

The former Labour MP Tam Dalyell and Edinburgh law professor Robert Black have long believed that Abu Nidal and his Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine General Command co-ordinated the attack.

Robert Fisk, the foreign correspondent, reported that secret documents from Iraq claim Nidal engaged in "collusion" with US intelligence services around the time of the Gulf war. Mr Dalyell spoke to Fisk over the weekend and is convinced the report is true. If Nidal – once the world's most feared terrorist leader – was working for the Americans in 1991, could the US government have been aware of a plot to commit the Lockerbie atrocity three years earlier?

Conspiracy theorists believe links between Nidal and the US would explain why leading diplomatic figures were hauled off the flight at the last minute (their places were taken by those Syracuse students).

The theory leads to the incredible conclusion that the US government had advance knowledge of the bomb plot, ordered by Iran and carried out by Nidal, who committed suicide in 2002.

But it is a theory Mr Dalyell believes may hold water. He said: "The Iranian interior minister said ten airliners would fall out of the sky, in retaliation at the US downing an Iranian passenger airliner in 1988. Could Lockerbie have been a damage-limitation exercise?"

Mr Dalyell now intends to press the Scottish Government and the Foreign Office to seek answers from the White House.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 28 October 2008 10:38 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Lockerbie
 
1

Covert Action,

28/10/2008 09:29:12
"Could crazy conspiracy theory really be true?"

Honestly who writes headlines like this garbage. A Scottish journalist ? Anyone working in journalism in the UK so ignorant of the not-at-all crazy permutations regarding Lockerbie should be sacked on the spot.

2

Proximaking,

Aberdeen 28/10/2008 13:25:11
Independent Scottish courts ........ don't make me laugh. Half of the coppers still running around the Borders couyld tell them what really happened that night when "the men in black" were taking things off the crash site, the largest murder site in British history. Until every one of those men and women is banged up in a Scottish jail for at least as long as the innocent dupe they pinned it on I won't believe we have a legal system in this country but we have a damn good bunch of jokers pretending they are part of one. Should we really be paying such craven cowards the salaries we do? Contempt of the court? Of course it is but just who is in contempt of it? Me or those who oversaw this ongoing travesty of Scottish justice.
3

,

28/10/2008 13:43:25
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
4

WKKB,

28/10/2008 16:07:57
#3 making general accusations about Americans is really stupid. Because the scottish government makes stupid blunders does that mean YOU (if you are Scottish) and ALL Scots are Stupid? Because some fanatic muslims blew up the twin towers killing thousands does that mean ALL muslims are killing machines? Be very careful how you generalize.

My cousin faught in the viet nam war and came across hundreds of women and children trained to kill. Some women and children even layed down in the middle of the road to stop convoys so they could be ambushed while others carried grenades on their bodies, pretended to be sick or injured and when American soldiers went to their aid they pulled the pin. Please don't be spouting off about things you have no first hand knowledge of. It's bad enough this newspaper reports irresponsibly.
5

,

28/10/2008 18:29:48
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
6

,

29/10/2008 14:36:43
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
7

John McM,

Glasgow 31/10/2008 12:51:21
post# no 3 I'm sure its just an error but it was on July 3, 1988, that USS Vinceness shot down Iran Air Flight 655 (IR655) killing 290 innocent civilian from six nations including 66 children. This was just six months before the bomb which exploded over Lockerbie in December 1988, leading to the deaths of 270 people. So the Scotsman thinks this a crazy conspiracy, that the Iranian back Hizbollah and Abu Nidal could possible be behind a revenge attack on the US massacare of 290 civilians, where is the world outcry on that attack, where is US compensation for their families. Where is the justice. Headlines like this show a pathetic pondering to the injustice inflicted on Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi, shame on you.

8

John McM,

Glasgow 31/10/2008 13:15:19
sorry that should read pathetic pandering

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.