Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Hamilton & Inches - the difference between

Cigarette firms attack 'unwanted' tobacco displays ban

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 15 September 2009
CIGARETTE firms yesterday insisted that a proposed ban on tobacco displays was "unnecessary, unjustified and unwanted".
Christopher Ogden, the chief executive of the Tobacco Manufacturers' Association, also claimed the display ban – put forward by the Scottish Government – could be exploited by organised crime.

The tobacco boss hit out after the majority of MSPs on
Holyrood's health and sport committee gave their backing to the move.

But Mr Ogden said: "The last thing we need in the midst of recession is further regulation that will facilitate illicit trade in tobacco products and impact adversely on thousands of small retailers and the communities they serve."

The government's Tobacco and Primary Medical Services (Scotland) Bill aims to curb the sale of cigarettes and tobacco to youngsters. The legislation would ban stores from displaying cigarettes and other tobacco products, outlaw cigarette vending machines and introduce a registration system for tobacco retailers.

MSPs on the committee have also urged the Scottish Government to expand the proposals to make it a criminal act for adults to buy tobacco for under-age youngsters.

Committee convener Christine Grahame said: "The majority of our committee believes that cigarettes at the point of sale represent an advertisement and a ban on these displays would have a particularly positive effect in deterring teenagers. Most members also believe that cigarette vending machines should be banned."

However, Mr Ogden claimed MSPs had failed to consider "compelling evidence" provided by manufacturers and retailers that the "ban will not have its intended effect".

He added: "The ban is unnecessary, unjustified and unwanted by many stakeholders."





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 14 September 2009 9:52 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Tobacco
 
1

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 15/09/2009 02:32:02

The, 'proposed ban on tobacco displays', is Absolutely Ludicrous, and one that is beyond comprehension!
Since when did 5year old's, ask Mummy or Daddy, to purchase them cigarettes, while standing at the cigarette counter?, a sweetie bar, or chocolate YES Indeed, but cigarettes NEVER!

2

tomi,

15/09/2009 04:49:28
Governments are such hypocrits!
They are so much anti-tobacco and anti-smoking, yet they are so happy to get all that tax money from cigarettes and tobacco.

Why don't they tax heroin and cocaine as well?
3

Riverkidca,

Swan River 15/09/2009 05:49:19
After displays were hidden in Canada, the government trumpeted that they had cut teen smoking by 10%...statisticaly. However, a survey of butts picked up around schools found that 50% of them were contraband. So now you will have to watch for your children buying their fixes out of car boots - where they don't ask for ID and the prices are a whole heck of a lot lower. Wonderful thing for tobacco control, those statistics.
4

english charlie,

15/09/2009 09:44:34
Neither ASH Scotland nor Trading Standards Scotland were able to produce any evidence, to the health and sports committee, that under 18s were buying cigarettes over the counter or vending machines in any significant numbers.
5

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 15/09/2009 11:03:29
This is just another piece of stupid, nazi-state rubbish.

One day, these idiots are going to get their come-uppance and I hope it hurts them badly.
6

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 15/09/2009 11:12:51
"...a proposed ban on tobacco displays was "unnecessary, unjustified and unwanted"."

Just like the smoking ban then.
7

Clif E,

London 15/09/2009 11:32:39
It is not only cigarette firms that is against this silly ban it is also the majority of shop keepers, customers who buy cigarettes and people who believe in freedom of choice, the people who this foolish ban would effect, but like most polititions they dont listen to these people and rather listen to people who have nothing to do with the use of tobacco product and more to do with robotically programming peoples minds to suit there dictatorship opinions.
8

english charlie,

15/09/2009 13:46:28
ASH UK have been forced to correct another lie:
Correction: Heart attacks plummet after smoking ban, ASH Daily News 14th September 2009
We have heard that the figures reported in the Sunday Times yesterday (and now circulating elsewhere) are not based on any research conducted to date.

The impact of the smokefree legislation on heart attacks is being analysed by Anna Gilmore and team at Bath but they have no final results yet.

Their findings will be available next year in time for the three year review of the legislation
http://www.ash.org.uk/ash_al7qkeuw.htm#7791
9

fife runner,

15/09/2009 16:02:21
at least ASH did it without having to go through the litigation big tabacco had to do before it admitted its product was dangerous.

#2 its great smokers are daft enough to keep paying to keep he NHS going. Keep up the good work.
10

english charlie,

15/09/2009 17:16:48
ASH made the correction because their lie was exposed. This is not the first time that they have lied and it won't be the last.
11

Scottish Eric,

23/09/2009 13:52:29
Channel 4 news with their assessment of the evidence for a display ban.

http://www.channel4.com/news/articles/politics/domestic_politics/factcheck%20tobacco%20ban%20evidence/2879692

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.