Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Borders rail link back on track

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 03 March 2008
THE Scottish Government is this week expected to give its full backing to the stalled Borders rail link.
Plans to reopen the Waverley line from Edinburgh to Tweedbank were thrown into doubt last summer when Transport Minister Stewart Stevenson said the project was going to be more expensive than first thought.

The funding gap was identified as part o
f a Transport Scotland review of the project, estimated to cost at least £175 million.

This review was passed to ministers in January and Mr Stevenson is now set to give the project his blessing in an announcement on Wednesday. Further details on how the unspecified funding gap will be met are also expected.

Mr Stevenson had previously said it was up to the local authorities involved to meet the shortfall though it is thought the Government's new Scottish Futures Trust bond scheme may play some role in funding the project.

A completion date of 2011 is now highly unlikely but project insiders are hopeful that the delay may only add an extra year on to the delivery date. Opposition politicians today called on the Scottish Government to foot the bill for the extra costs associated with the delay.

Christine Grahame, SNP MSP for South of Scotland, said: "I am absolutely delighted with this. We have taken a long time to get to this stage but the new Government was absolutely right to go through the due diligence process."

The first Waverley line, which closed in 1969, ran from the city through the Borders to Carlisle.

Jeremy Purvis, Lib Dem MSP for Tweeddale, Ettrick and Lauderdale, said: "I understand that the 'due diligence' process that has been carried out by the Scottish Government has shown that the business case is robust. Clarity is needed on the funding package and the Government's commitment to fund any gap."

The Scottish Government is contributing around £154m, with the remaining £21m from local authorities, including £2m from Edinburgh, and developers.

Transport Scotland is set to take over the Waverley line project from the local authorities. A Scottish Government spokesman would not be drawn on the future of the project ahead of Wednesday's ministerial statement.

Midlothian Labour MSP Rhona Brankin said: "I'll be very disappointed if there's any backsliding on the previous Scottish Executive's support."

www.waverleyrailwayproject.co.uk




The full article contains 389 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

,

03/03/2008 14:04:37
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

Toast,

borders 03/03/2008 15:21:21
This money would be far better spent improving the existing road links and subsidising more buses,it takes me as long to get to Gala as it does Edinburgh.I can see the point in running a line to Gorebridge for commuters but beyond that is crazy,it is a single line remember with a journey time longer than by car and looking at existing railfares a blooming sight more expensive.
3

Iain Bhern,

03/03/2008 15:26:18
#4 hear, hear. The whole project is a shocking waste of money. It will never be profitable so the taxpayer will end up subsidising it forever.
4

Andrew,

03/03/2008 17:17:46
Beyond Dalkeith/Gorebridge the line misses the only other 'centres of population' between Edinburgh & Gala'/Tweedbank, namely (albeit off the beaten track to the west of the Borders Line) Loanhead/Penicuik, Peebles & Innerleithen. They all lost their rail services in the very early (ie pre-Beeching) 1960s!
5

Why can't I use my usual name?,

Glasgow 03/03/2008 17:58:33
#4, #5, the irony is that business case for this line relies on building lots more houses in the Borders, most of whose occupants won't use the train but will add to congestion.
6

The Ghost of Sir William Arrol,

The Forthy Bridge 03/03/2008 19:55:52
It will be profitable! Peak oil and declining oil supplies in the coming years will kill off affordable private motoring sooner than most people would like.
£100 a gallon for petrol is not unreasonable to assume when you see how fast supplies are going to decline!
At least a railway to Tweedbank is the start of sustainable transport into the Borders. Hopefully, in time it will be electrified and extended to Carlile.
7

Andrew,

03/03/2008 20:23:41
9) Sir William's ghost for First Minister!
4) Toast! One side buttered or two? With TWO, you'll have a CHOICE!! Drive if you wish but wait until you reach the so-called Edinburgh 'by-pass'!!

8

Saoghal Beag,

03/03/2008 20:57:11
toast, the rail link will bring the multitude of benefits that Berwickshire's rail link from Berwick brings that area. Dinnae haud yir brathe.

like you say a complete waste of money that could be spent to the benefit of those folk that laready live in the area.
9

Euan,

Edinburgh 03/03/2008 21:29:55
I actually think the re-opening of the Borders rail link would be a good thing.

Far better than pissing what will surely amount to £1 billion against the wall with an un-needed and unwanted tram LINE for Edinburgh.

The World does indeed work in very strange ways sometimes..
10

Rampant Warrior,

Castle Grayskill 04/03/2008 10:11:40
Euan

I couldn't agree with you more.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.