Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Boiling 24-mile marathon with water shortages branded shambolic by competitors

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 02 June 2009
RUNNERS have branded the Edinburgh Marathon as "shambolic" because of a shortage of water and a decision to cut short the race.
Sunday's event saw scores of participants treated by medics after the marathon got under way in temperatures of around 22C. Runners said that there was a critical lack of supplies at water stations.

Ten people being take to hospital after collaps
ing, and a further 160 required treatment on the course.

Competitor Doug Steele said: "There was not a single bottle of water remaining at the first water station at Loch Road when I came, about 20 minutes into the race, and I passed a further four stations which had completely run out of water in East Lothian.

"I had to rummage through discarded bottles at the roadside to find one or two with some water in them so I could stay hydrated."

Organisers said there had been adequate supplies and that any shortages had been temporary.

However, Alison Grant, who had travelled from Huddersfield, Yorkshire to compete in her first marathon, said:

"The 'temporary' water shortages were inexcusable and not temporary at all – many water stations were just empty trestle tables and myself and many other runners were relying on the kindness of supporters and local residents."

Ms Grant attacked the decision to cut the race length from the standard 26.2 miles to 24 for hundreds of the slowest runners. She said the move had left her feeling cheated:.

"It is the most shambolic race I have ever had the misfortune to enter."

Race director Neil Kilgour said:

"There was a shortage at stations six and seven but in terms of the rest of the course there was no shortage."

He said that as soon as they were aware of a shortage at the sixth and seventh stations, a supply was taken there by police escort.

On cutting the race short, Mr Kilgour said:

"The reason I did that was purely for their personal safety."





The full article contains 339 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 01 June 2009 11:40 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Edinburgh Marathon
 
1

GrahamR,

Edinburgh 02/06/2009 03:34:15
Mr Kilgour says, "There was a shortage at stations six and seven but in terms of the rest of the course there was no shortage." He is wrong. There was no water at the first water station at Lochend Road. I know because I was looking for some. Fortunately I had taken a bottle to the start which kept me going for a bit.

Stations 6 (Opposite Longniddry Bents) and 7 (Longniddry Bents - Car Park) (descriptions from the Edinburgh Marathon website) were on opposite sites of the road. Just before this, with many others, I found the run up (and then down) Lyars Road in Longniddry particularly arduous. Then to be faced with the prospect of a 2 mile loop around dusty farm track in around Gosford House to return to what was known to be an empty water station was really discouraging. The next expected water station was not until nearly mile 22. I heard one of the marshals on the radio saying that unless something was done about the lack of water "we will have a disaster on our hands". He was not wrong. Most people were struggling at this point and had started walking.

Some of the people collecting discarded bottles at various parts of the route were saving whatever they contained to provide to desperate runners who were willing to ignore questions of hygiene.

Fortunately by the time I had got around Gosford House there were supplies of water (just beyond the 18 mile mark). If there had not been then I doubt if I would have been going anywhere other than perhaps in the ambulance at the gate house.

Later there were many unplanned water supplies, from police handing out water bottles from the top boxes of their motor bikes to locals with buckets at the side of the road. My only problem with later hydration points was that some had little water and only lucozade.

Overall I think that the organisers did react quite well to the water shortage when it became apparent. Presumably any cash and carry in East Lothian was raided for its supplies of water. However
2

GrahamR,

Edinburgh 02/06/2009 03:36:53
.... However, I can't help feeling that the greater than usual demand should have been anticipated given the weather forecast. Maybe they could even have bought some on 'sale or return'.

I can't agree with Kilgour's decision to shorten the course during the race. I quite accept that for the "personal safety" of some of the later runners it might have been sensible to advise runners that they should stop. In fact he could have ordered them to retire from the race. There was supposed to be a bus going at 15:00min/mile pace which runners were expected to get on if it reached them. After that the organisers would be "unable to guarantee that road closures, marshals and drinks stations will be in place".

My sympathies go out to Alison Grant and the others who were "cheated" by the shortened route. I would have loved to have cut the route down to something more manageable (especially that loop around Gosford House, or even the loop from Mussleburgh to Gosford) but then it would not have been my first (and, I hope, only) "marathon".

Best wishes to Alison and the others for their next attempt and let's hope they get better conditions.
3

fife runner,

02/06/2009 06:49:45
I ran this race a few years ago. the problem then was the realy racers reaching water stations first and using up all the energy drinks when they clearly different coloured numbers and should not have been given the drinks. could this have been one of the reason as the shorter distance runners will reach the stations first.
4

fife runner,

02/06/2009 06:50:05
sorry shoud have read relay
5

fife runner,

02/06/2009 06:53:15
I ran a half in Glasgow the next year and it was 30 degrees!! hottest Sept. day on record seemingly in the City.

Then I saw runners actually fainting but that was because they had tried to run fast in the heat ( I ran personal worst for a reason). What made it manageable was people bringing out garden hoses and showering the runners.
6

Athletic Jon,

Edinburgh 02/06/2009 08:07:34
I think it is time the organisers of the Edinburgh Marathon faced up to the fact that Edinburgh now has a major event on its hands and needs to start getting it right.
I hydrated well before the race on Sunday, which was just as well as there was no water left at the first station on Lochend Road.
I passed a further three stations en route which were also out of water.
The root of the problem was that the volunteers at the water stations had not been instructed to issue one bottle per runner as in the London Marathon. Had this been done, there would have been plenty for all.
I appreciate that an event of this size is tough to organise, but the water supply is fundamental to the success of the event and needs to be properly managed.
Finally, the organisers need to know, you cannot cut a Marathon short, because then it is not a Marathon. Runners enter at their own risk, and should be stopped individually by the marshalls if they appear to be in trouble. Do not rob entrants of what may be their only chance to complete a Marathon.
My thanks to all the kind people who brought water out from their homes, and to the police who went beyond the call of duty and helped get some water to those who needed it.
Next year, for once Edinburgh, try and get it right. This sort of thing can only harm the city's public image.
7

Davy,

02/06/2009 09:13:54
Nay water in jockland, no way hosie plenty water. This was actually an attempted cull on freaky people.
8

Ray Barnett,

Tyneside 02/06/2009 10:27:28
Yes it was hot. But don't forget that there was upwards of 1000 volunteers behind the crew purple shirts. The commentator at the start emphasised the need to hydrate so of course more than one bottle was picked up by each runner. Although the water did run out there were supplies available quite quickly. The expected temperatures are normally only around 14 Celsius and with money tight costs have to be controlled carefully(remember the organisers nearly went bust 3 years ago.) This was my fourth Edinburgh Marathon and it will definitely not be my last. The spirit of the supporters made the day special there may be larger events but none with a larger heart.
9

Horrible Cankers @Cyber Shebeen,

02/06/2009 10:27:43
Portable showers for people to run through...they did that for one half marathon in Glasgow..fan bliddy tastic!...lack of water there too...fortunatly many of Glasgow's soosiders came out in force and had water on hand...
10

bluehead,

edinburgh 02/06/2009 10:41:42
it is not only the marathon that is shambolic the whole city of Edinburgh is in a terrible state,I have never seen this city in such a mess,it is time to clear out the people who run the city,and replace them with others who have more imagination,
the diabolic tram system is a nightmare that from which we will never wake up,it will not be forgotten
that all those millions of pounds have went down the drain during the course of this madness, the trams have taken over as the curse of Scotland!!!!!!
11

GrahamR,

Edinburgh 02/06/2009 11:15:53
#6 "The root of the problem was that the volunteers at the water stations had not been instructed to issue one bottle per runner as in the London Marathon. Had this been done, there would have been plenty for all."

No, there would not have been plenty for all. Despite being well hydrated at the start there is no way I could have got round that course with only one bottle at each water station.
12

Athletic Jon,

Edinburgh 02/06/2009 11:47:09
#11 No, there would not have been plenty for all. Despite being well hydrated at the start there is no way I could have got round that course with only one bottle at each water station.

You are probably right, given that the bottles were small. Maybe 2 bottles max then. Either way my point is management. Make sure there is ample water, or limit the supply. Dont care which way it goes.....just dont ever make me have to run a further 3 miles to get some !!
13

Gie's a break,

Edinburgh 02/06/2009 12:36:52
I ran the marathon last year and couldn't fault the organisation.

This year is quite a different story. Not only did the water run out, with thousands still to come, but there were also problems with getting buses to take the relay runners from Cockenzie to Musselburgh.

Many runners who had travelled to take part were complaining bitterly about the organisation. I felt shame and could only apologise for putting them through such an ordeal after paying good money for an "organised" event.

On a more positive note, the actions of many locals in providing much needed water to struggling particpants was a credit to the East lothian community.
14

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 02/06/2009 14:46:33
I bet I could have got round the course without the need for any water at all...

...riding the motorbike with the camerman on it facing backwards.
15

Espy D,

Cockenzie 02/06/2009 17:51:42
I watched a double amputee struggle around the course,I passed what can only be described as a grossly obese person fighting his way across the finishline I must have seen them 7 or 8 times , everytime they had a smile on there faces. I always thought that this was the spirit these things were ment to have? I also read report about how over £3.5m has been raised for charity, yet there appears to be a snowball off feeling that the who thing was a joke. Water got stolen, road are closed, what exactly were the organisers ment to do. I am sure they made the best of a bad situation, but some off the comments are beyond a joke, about live's being put at risk ect etc, not enought area's to streatch off. Do you thing the hero on crutches that finished in 8 hours has done nothing but complain about the lack of water at some stations.... This man is a hero and the constant moaning from many able bodies runners is embarrassing. I am sure lesson's will be learned but could we please not lose the acheivement of the many that finished by running down the event at every opertunity.
Next year I may enter myself as watching the event inspired me greatly although I did hope the competators would be more fun>
16

Tired Runner of Yorkshire,

Leeds 02/06/2009 20:07:21
This was my first marathon and I must say I was disappointed - I have been training for months, working out exactly when I needed water etc to be let down by the water shortage. I understand they could not help the water being stolen later in the course however this should have been obvious early on - 3 full pallets were missing! However I think the fact that they claim that there was no other shortage is outrageous!

And not only this but to shorten the course was soul destroying - having got so far to not complete a "full marathon" left me feeling cheated. At the 4 hour point I was approached by a "official" who took down my number and told me if I wished to carry on I was not insured - when I asked what this actually meant she replied "im not sure". It was a shambles, it seemed that none of the officials knew what was going on, and when we asked those in charge they claimed that the course had not been shortened - leaving me not knowing if I would even get an official time, it was very upsetting.

It seemed disorganised even before the day - I did not get my number until 3 days before the race - this really did not help the nerves!

As for some of the comments above saying able bodied runners being embarrassing for complaining?? I really believe a full marathon is a challenging ordeal for each person in a very individual way - just because someone appears able bodied, does this really mean it is less of a personal challenge for them? Or indeed they may have a hidden disability meaning it is just as much as a struggle for someone on crutches.

I say - Well done to all who finished despite the heat and the obvious lack of organisation!
17

Andy Greenhalgh,

Droylsden, Manchester 02/06/2009 22:34:04
Hi,

Mr. Barnett I think your comments are ridiculous. You should be able to provide water (and back up plans) FULL STOP. !!

I think a lot of runners would be more forgiving if you had the balls to say "we got it wrong, sorry. we won't let this happen again" - instead you blame lack of funding, runners taking 2 bottles instead of one and unexpected temperatures ... ?? - Where were you the days prior to the race, on Mars!

Instead of nursing your ego and blaming everything else instead of yourselves for what was flimsy management and amateur organisation, just take it on the chin and admit you were at fault. Or is that too much to ask?

I enjoyed the race on account of the locals great support and I would wholeheartedly thank them - especially the hose pipe guys, life savers!

I would not do Edinburgh again with the same organisers, they give marathons a bad name.

Kind Regards
Andy
18

Tommy Gooner,

England 08/06/2009 12:44:13
I entered after missing out on a place in the London Marathon. Can you imagine the uproar there would be if they had come up with an excuse of running low on water or cutting the course short. There would be a national outcry. I had paid for flights, hotel, entrance money and also had sponsorship of nearly £1000 so there was no way I was going to take a short cut. At about 8 miles I was told I was not going at the required pace and from that point on I felt as though I was an inconvienience. I had seen the weather forcast the week before and having been in Edinburgh for a few days, I knew I was only going to do the distance if I took it really easy. Finishing was my only aim. For the more commited runners it was really hard. When you plan for a marathon you are told to plan your drinks and nutrition intake along the route based on the feeding stations and that was the one thing they would expect to be in place for them. I got to Mussleburgh on the way out at the same time as the first wave of serious runners were finishing and some looked in a bad way. I did have to rummage around for half empty bottles by the side of the road at one point of the race and my wife was one of the few people waiting at the end when I finaly finished but I did it. I would like to praise the St Johns who did keep an eye on me from time to time and all the people who clapped and encouraged on the route especially the person at Haven who gave me an ice cold bottle of water and also the little girl and her family who lived close to the end of the race. She was waving some glittery pom poms and cheering me on as if I was the first person in the race. She made me think of my daughter who was at home and not there to see me and I must admit it nearly brought me to tears.

I was just slow, not in any danger as far as I could tell. If I do the marathon again unfortunately it will not be in Edinburgh.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.