Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Bail-out for the Fringe 'may top £500,000'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 16 December 2008
THE financial bail-out for the Edinburgh Fringe in the wake of last year's box-office disaster is likely to be more than £500,000, The Scotsman has learned.
Sources say the £250,000 rescue package revealed last week will almost certainly have to be doubled to stave off meltdown over the next few months.

City council officials, who have been in lengthy talks with festival organisers over the cash crisi
s, admitted last week that another bail-out might be needed before the end of the current financial year.

Insiders say it has been revealed privately that at least another £200,000 will be needed to ensure the Fringe is on a firm financial footing by the beginning of April, when the official programme is finalised.

Meanwhile, the Fringe is facing claims that theatre groups will shun the festival this year, because of delays by performers receiving payments for shows.

It is understood several leading venues have been late in paying actors, musicians and dancers, because of the Fringe's cash-flow problems.

City of Edinburgh Council, the Scottish Government and the Scottish Arts Council have agreed to step in to rescue the world's biggest arts festival, after it was brought to the brink of collapse by a series of box-office failures.

Scottish Enterprise has agreed to chair a task force set up to resolve the financial crisis at the Fringe, the true extent of which is not likely to be known until the new year.

Much of the Fringe's income is not expected to start coming into the coffers until April, when the official programme goes to press.

A source close to the Fringe said: "They're still looking at a big black hole, and it'll be some time before they will be out of the woods. The council and the Scottish Government are fully aware that extra resources will almost certainly be required, and talks are still ongoing."

Although the city council has agreed to provide the Fringe with a £250,000 loan, at the moment the local authority's grant is still expected to be around £50,000.

The Scottish Government has not awarded the Fringe any extra funding, but has, instead, agreed to a "one-off" £60,000 advance of a £200,000 grant awarded for a showcase of Scottish work this summer.

The Fringe is expected to start moves to recruit its first-ever chief executive next month. Tim Hawkins, the acting general manager of the Fringe, declined to comment the claims last night.

Meanwhile, the Fringe has insisted that all venues have been paid all box-office revenue that were owed to them from this year's festival.

Festival organisers have been under fire from producer Martin Witts, who brought Joan Rivers to the Fringe this year.

He said that growing numbers of companies were questioning the value of a trip to Edinburgh, because of the problems with the box office last year and the soaring costs involved in staging shows.

Although some companies and performers are understood to be still out of pocket, the Fringe insists all venues were paid in full at the beginning of November.

BACKGROUND

FRINGE officials were under siege from the day sales opened at this year's festival due to a malfunctioning box office.

During three months of chaos, sales had to be suspended several times, the Fringe missed a crucial deadline for sending out pre-booked tickets, and venues had to bring in extra staff to sell tickets. A series of reviews were ordered, one on what went wrong and who was to blame, one to recommend a system to be used next year, one on whether the Fringe should have a director and one on whether the Fringe itself needed an overhaul.





Page 1 of 1

 
1

Guga II,

Rockall 16/12/2008 01:32:45
So, the taxpayer is expected to step in and bail out this mob for their crass incompetence. That is not on. If they can't make it on their own, they should go to the wall.

2

Goggsie #,

Fife 16/12/2008 05:12:13
Hear, hear, but not to the wall, to prison!
3

drunken proffet,

Tassy 16/12/2008 06:54:50
Or even helping to build Scotland's railways. After we have done that then we can spend 25 million resurrecting it to what it should be.
4

dba,

Haymarket 16/12/2008 07:04:06
Could the Council, especially our'Kultural Czar' Steve Cardownie, please explain to the citizens of Edinburgh EXACTLY how much and why the Fringe should be given Rate-payers monies?

Over the past year, Council Leader Dawe and Mr. Cardownie AND the SNP/Liberal coalition, have dramatically slashed funding to a whole spectrum of community and voluntary groups that WERE of vital assistance to the young, the disadvantaged, the sick and the elderly... many organisations have either closed down completely or have had to cut back their activities to dramatic levels.

NOW WE HEAR that the 'LUVVIES' of the Fringe need up to £500,000to keep going!

I call upon Audit Scotland and the Scottish Government to step in immediately and specificially PREVENT a penny of Council funds being given to an organisation that (a) seems to be unaccountable and (b) ran itself into this financial black hole.

Thousands of Edinburgh Citizens are facing fiancial disaster: jobs are being lost, houses repossessed and the Fringe EXPECTS a 'bail out' for disparate groups of 'artists' who are in the city for but three short weeks a year...ONLY IN EDINBURGH could this fiasco arise!

Given that the entire board of the Fringe are responsible - they should resign, the company trading as the 'Fringe' should petition for liquidation (as with any commercial enterprise that screws up BIG TIME.)

There is always the opportunity to start agaain with Fringe 2009 Ltd. With an entireoly NEW BOARD of Directors conversant with best possible commercial practice and a working knowledge of the Companies Act (Scotland) as ammended - especially the chapters dealing with insolvently trading!

The Fringe WAS ALWAYS SUPPOSED TO BE A commercial undertaking - in commerce if you work professionally you make money - if you don't YOU GO OUT OF BUSINESS!

I call upon Audit Scotland and the Department of Trade to mount an immediate audit of the Company's accounts and,thereafter produce their findings. The Council
5

Peekay,

16/12/2008 07:43:44
#1. Personally, I would prefer my tax money to go to the Fringe than to HBOS and RBS. "If they can't make it on their own, they should go to the wall".
6

Fecker,

16/12/2008 07:46:47
I would rather that the money was in our pockets so that we could do with it what we liked, rather than incompetent bankers and luvvies
7

Tweedmouth,

Coldstream 16/12/2008 08:55:59
The Fringe is just a money making machine for a few vested interests these days. Let it collapse and then the citizens of Edinburgh can start all over again and have amateur productions from all over the UK and the world come once again to produce genuine innovatory work. At present the Fringe is just a large commercial comedy event with huge profits for the likes of Coutts and Co. - while all the debts are left with the pb taxpayer.

PRIVATE PROFIT - PUBLIC DEBT - clever system isnt it? Funny how the same rules seem to work in banking, finance, housing, mortgages, NHS, dentistry , , , ,
8

Son of Gramsci,

Edina 16/12/2008 10:04:22
#7 follow you up to your last point. I don't think that the fringe makes much money for anyone (except perhaps stand up comics, who get high fees and have low costs).

The problem is that all was simply left to the market, the tendency towards a crass commedy festival would probably become stronger, not weaker. It is only the central fringe organisation that keeps the smaller, innovative theatre groups on the radar.

The fringe festival has always been very much the poor sibling compared to the public funds devoted to the international festival. However, the fringe provides most of the shows and atmosphere of "the festival". Edinburgh would be poorer in every way without it.
9

Brodric,

16/12/2008 10:23:27
I love the fact that Edinburgh has such a diverse festival of arts and culture. And I agree that it is the Fringe that lends the atmosphere to the city during the Festival.

However, I don't feel all that comfortable with the Fringe being bailed out unless there is some real prospect of the money being paid back. The atmosphere is not worth 500k of taxpayers money being put down the drain especially as, if you ask your average Edinburgh citizen, you will hear from most of them that the Fringe has nothing to do with them, it is for tourists and students.

Its a great pity that their new system had not been thoroughly put to some rigorous testing before it was put into operation.

They should be forced to work out how they are going to repay the bail-out.

10

The Trossachs Hasher,

16/12/2008 13:29:37
Don't think it is acceptable in the current climate that we have to bail out a bunch of luvvies.

Maybe some of the luvvies more affluent supporters would want to put their hands in their pockets.

If it can't stand on it's own, the government should not be obliged to step in.
11

Newton_Invented_Gravity,

16/12/2008 19:45:52
The only thing that makes the horrendous 'festival' remotely tolerable is the fact that in the past it's supposedly made a lot of money. If it's not doing that, then I'd be happy to bin it.
12

,

16/12/2008 20:42:12
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.