Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Monday, 8th September 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Animal activists accuse ministers of snaring deal



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 20 April 2008
ANIMAL rights campaigners have accused ministers of stitching together a back-room deal with Scotland's shooting lobby to allow the controversial practice of snaring to continue.
Environment Minister Mike Russell declared two months ago that snaring was "still necessary" despite demands for it to be banned.

Farmers and land managers use snares to trap foxes and other pests in order to protect lambs and game birds across Sc
otland.

But Advocates for Animals is now claiming shooting estates and farmers were handed "disproportionate influence" by Russell in the run-up to the decision.

E-mails between the Scottish Government and the shooting and farming lobby, obtained by the pressure group, show how they were informed two weeks before Russell's statement that he would reject calls for a ban.

By contrast, when he met Advocates for Animals ahead of the announcement he said he was "considering all the options".

Advocates for Animals says the e-mails show it was frozen out by the Government, with a deal already having been agreed. Russell last night insisted everyone was treated "equally".

Libby Anderson, policy director of Advocates for Animals, said: "The correspondence between the shooting estates and the officials appears to show a concerted effort to work together behind the scenes to devise a system of regulation the industry would accept in order to retain snaring in the face of overwhelming public opinion.

"We feel that the shooting industry has been allowed to have disproportionate influence."

The group says it has "particular concern" over one e-mail sent by an official from Russell's department to the National Farmers Union on February 5, two weeks before the announcement was made public.

In it, the official declares: "I can tell you in confidence that he (Russell] does not propose to ban snaring outright..."

"It appears that the minister and his department have listened only to the views of the minority shooting interest," said Anderson.

Russell said his measures would make a "fundamental" change to the practice of snaring, requiring farmers and land managers to put safety stops on the snares to prevent the noose from closing too far.

Among those who had lobbied him to resist a ban were the British Association for Shooting and Conservation (Scotland), NFU Scotland and the Scottish Countryside Alliance.

Last night, Russell said: "I met Advocates for Animals the Friday before the statement on snaring and told them that I was still considering the options, although was finding it difficult to accept a complete ban.

"I am sorry they don't like the decision that was taken but everyone was treated equally in the build up to February's policy announcement."

The row follows revelations in this newspaper last week that a lobbyist for ScottishPower who used to work for the SNP was allowed access to First Minister Alex Salmond ahead of a statement he made opposing the firms' takeover.



The full article contains 484 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 19 April 2008 7:30 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Shooting & Fishing
 
1

subrosa,

20/04/2008 00:57:22
Another non-news story from weeks ago...
2

McX,

20/04/2008 10:03:27
There's a half eaten, two day old lamb in the field next to our house. Mister Fox has done his rounds during the night.
3

dido-bendigo,

SCOTLAND 20/04/2008 10:19:19
The 'spin-speak' of the Advocates for Animals employee (salary?) shows the methods of a trained psychological manipulator. "Overwhelming public opinion" equals minority percentage of people familiar with the need for and use of snares. "Minority shooting interests and farmers" equals majority percentage of people who have first hand knowledge of the need for the use of snares. It is the same old story, will those 'against' kindly give us a better method and we will stop snaring! Incidentally, I have known a few old poachers who would never use a gun, but they made a lot of use of snares. It is the untrained rogue, using illegal snares, who will be punished severely under the (soon to come) new legislation. Everyone should applaud that fact.
4

nell-from-falkirk,

20/04/2008 18:14:34
#3 NEED for snares? There is NEVER, EVER any "need" for snares.
Snares are a cruel, wicked anachronism, with no place in any society which lays claim to any form of civilisation. They are indiscriminate, trapping domestic animals, protected species and so-called vermin alike, and condemning them to a long, protracted and painful death.

If there was any justice in the world, those who use snares and those who support them (including Michael Russell) would be trapped in one and left there.
Then they would know first hand how agonising a death it is.
I wonder how long they would continue supporting the use of snares then?
5

dido-bendigo,

Scotland 20/04/2008 21:12:13
#4
Nell, you have obviously not had to deal with an infestation of rabbits, used snares humanely as PART of a control programme, released non-target captives unharmed, had to worry about the costs involved in managing a budget on a charitable trust's farm? I have done all of those things and more. I respect your concerns about cruelty to animals. Please respect the considered decision of the minister, he has taken sound advice from experienced people.
6

overton,

balmedie 21/04/2008 07:44:40
4 nell-from-falkirk,

There is a need for snares particularly for the control of rabbits.

If a snare is set correctly the rabbit is inevitably dead.

Snares need to be looked every 12 hours and I must say there is nothing more exiting than looking snares and taking a good kill of rabbits back home.

Laterly there has been some disappointment in the results with a lot of snared rabbits having been eaten in the snares by foxes so it looks like the foxes are going to get a leathering next - that's me looking out the fox snares now.
7

,

21/04/2008 08:11:29
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
8

dido-bendigo,

Scotland 21/04/2008 09:40:25
#6 Overton

That's where it all goes topsy turvey. The new legislation will ensure that the animal is 'secured' not 'killed' by the snare. So forget putting 'hangs' up in fences, drags on logs and nooses on bridges. Pegged down securely, with a stop to prevent the snare closing entirely on the captive (or the leg of large animals). Tagged to show who set it. It will all be there in the published rules, which will be obeyed by the trained and licenced trapper, Or Else!
9

Biker,

Ayr 21/04/2008 18:09:57
Snares. the most singularly innapropriate and savage weapons a farmer can use to control "vermin".
A few old poachers would not use a gun anyway for fear of raising the alarm as to his whereabouts. Having lived in the Bortders for many years I am aware of the use and missuse of these implements. They were NEVER checked every 12 hours, in fact I can personally attest to seeing animals which had been held for many days.
It is iniquitus that in this day and age we still revert to this kind of barbarity. And that goes for foxhunting as well.
10

Anthony Dacko,

Northumberland UK 21/04/2008 18:19:12
Hi,

I find it very odd how some people say snares only target the ones they are after apart from being total rubbish in what they say no matter how many Laws you have on snares, snares will all way catch protected wildlife as well.

What is the point of wildlife laws if the politicians make new laws to protect wildlife and help end suffering if they still allow snares which are out dated and very cruel. One way you can look at it is how a snare works there is no way on this earth you can set a snare to catch only target wildlife.

All snares Close when pressure is on them no matter what Animal is court in the snare be it non protected or protected the snare can not tell the diffrents. The second problem is the Animal court in a snare will not just sit there they will jump around and this will course more suffering to the Animal.

I my self have worked on a Farm my self and know for a fact foxes are not a problem never have been never will be domestic dogs are a bigger problem to new born lambs can see more on my web site www.anthony-dacko.net

Regards Anthony.
11

Angus,

Alexandria 21/04/2008 20:54:56
There is no case for snaring whatsoever and I am appalled that Mike Russel seems to have made up his mind whilst pretending he hadn't.

But recently this type of double dealing is what we have come to expect from politicians.

Little wonder they are becoming despised by the general public.

12

Galwyn,

Cental Scotlans 22/04/2008 16:26:52
So a sensible state has been reached allowing a control method to continue. But to quote
“Overwhelming public opinion” equals minority percentage of people familiar with the need for and use of snares

Yes apparently 8,000 people in Scotland were so concerned they signed a petition for it to be banned. How many people live in Scotland, how many people participate in country activities. How many birds have been saved by control these control methods.
I believe that if the farmers and those interested in country life the petition they would raise would be significantly higher in number than the 8000 or so. Of course their petition would not be full of double speak as the other is, just simple truths.

I believe that all of us should be grateful to Mike Russell for reaching such a sensible compromise. If Advocates for Animals can not accept it then one has to question their motives as a self seeking group of !!!!!.
13

overton,

balmedie 25/04/2008 06:45:12
10 Anthony Dacko

Please be aware that you can set snares to catch specific species especially if they are set at the correct height on the run.

It is illegal to set (hang) snares on fences as this is a rather indiscriminate method of control and hedgehogs and domestic (wildlife killer) cats were often caught this way.
If a fox or a roe deer is caught in a rabbit snare then it will break it and there is no way that a hare could be caught in a rabbit snare because of the set differential which is around 2.5" (or the length of a thumb).

Fox snare are obviously set much higher than the necessary height for a hare and the wire is much heavier so catching hares in fodx snares is avery uncommon occurrance.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.