Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Tuesday, 14th October 2008

London from only £11.50 plus, over 50 Other Discounted National Express Train Routes

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Anger over delays in giving green light to pedestrian crossing



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 03 March 2008
CITY leaders have come under fire for not making a developer install a pedestrian crossing over a busy road – six months after they said they would take enforcement action.
The crossing was meant to go on Colinton Road as part of an agreement with developer Applecross, which saw 170 flats built on part of sports fields at nearby Meggetland.

Contractors even removed an existing pedestrian island in preparation. But a
wrangle over the position of the crossing, its cost and associated lighting has led to two years of delays.

In August, city transport leader Phil Wheeler told councillors that enforcement action had been instigated on the £100,000 scheme. But officials today admitted that the enforcement notice was only agreed last week at a development management sub-committee and has not been actually served yet.

Applecross said it was keen to fulfil its obligations for the crossing but was not happy to foot all of the cost of the extra lighting and council delays.

But local Tory councillor Gordon Buchan said it was up to the council to get this matter resolved. He said: "I have been on at officials for months on this – it is not only embarrassing but it is downright dangerous for us not to have this crossing in place."

The planning condition was for a staggered pelican crossing to be installed at a suitable location on Colinton Road close to North Meggetland.

Applecross contractors actually started work on the crossing early last year but were told to stop by council chiefs after they realised they had not gone through the correct procedure with regards to neighbour notification.

There were then further complications when council chiefs tied lighting improvements in with the design for the crossing.

Steven Hyde, Applecross commercial manager, said his firm could have built the crossing over two years ago if it had not been for council delays.

He said: "We are looking for the council to make some financial contribution to reflect both the street lighting element to the revised scheme and also the cost of the delay, which has not been of our making."

There is another crossing 100 metres further down Colinton Road, near the junction with Lockharton Gardens.

A council spokeswoman said: "One of the conditions of the planning consent was that they had to include a new crossing on Colinton Road. It is disappointing that this work has not yet been completed and this action is a last resort.

"Members of the council's development management sub-committee agreed last week to take action in regard to a breach of condition."





The full article contains 441 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 03/03/2008 13:09:54
Stop at the kerb
Look left, right then left again
If it is safe to do so, begin to cross
Keep looking and listening whilst you are crossing.

What is wrong with people doing the above?

Whay do we need yet another congestion causing crossing?
2

Ron D,

Enybru 03/03/2008 13:15:55
Pedestrians shouldn't be encouraged to cross the road, they should get a car like everyone else.
3

,

03/03/2008 13:25:59
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
4

Urban Guerrilla,

Edinburgh 03/03/2008 14:05:03
#1, quite right, too - and I'm a pedestrian and don't drive!
5

Jane Plane,

03/03/2008 14:07:19
Whilst it is wrong of the developer to renage on the promise of a new crossing, it is surely surplus to requirements if there is one only 100 meters away.

It wouldn't take more then 30 seconds to utilise what is already there rather than putting in another one. Besides, its the Tesco express that has caused more congestion in that area than the additional housing.
6

Aslan,

Edinburgh 03/03/2008 14:08:21
Even when a road isn't particularly busy, I always make sure and press the crossing button anyway - anything that p*sses off passing car drivers is worth a wee bit extra effort.
7

Heartfelt,

EDINBURGH 03/03/2008 14:29:23
Classic! Council forces builders to construct a crossing as part of their development, then refuse them permission to construct the crossing as they didn't fill in the right form or used the wrong colour ink or something. They should make them knock the flats down until the ink has dried.
8

Hannah359,

edinburgh 03/03/2008 15:06:37
Should use the trams! :|
9

Gastric Antral Vascular Ectasia,

03/03/2008 15:15:31
Follow the speed limit.
Do not use a mobile phone while driving.
Set out on your journey in plenty of time.
Give way to pedestrians.

What is wrong with people doing the above?

Why do we need yet another whingeing motorist?
10

rabmataz,

03/03/2008 16:43:01
Make pavements out of trampolines then we can just bounce over the roads.
11

rs,

on the road 03/03/2008 18:23:04
not if someone is driving over the speed limit
or thinks its safe to use a mobile.

Maybe we should have car crossings, were the pedestrian crossing light for cars is at red

then they will have to stop and press the button, then wait for it to go green.
12

rs,

in ma house 03/03/2008 18:24:14
no 1
not if someone is driving over the speed limit
or thinks its safe to use a mobile.

Maybe we should have car crossings, were the pedestrian crossing light for cars is at red

then they will have to stop and press the button, then wait for it to go green.


must stop repeating myself
13

Hector Goodrich (Dr),

Gillin pronounced 'Gullane'. 03/03/2008 19:57:22
No1 offers dangerous advice in not mentioning that pedestrians should not run whilst crossing a road.
Some of my private patients have a Colinton address and, following after-care home visits, I am often delayed in getting to my bank by pedestrians wandering hither and yon and generally getting in the way.
14

Douglas,

Bathgate 03/03/2008 20:09:23
#10 rabmataz: That's ok till somebody forgets to bend their knees when landing and ends up over a fence. Who'll pay for any damaged flower beds or garden furniture? I don't think you've thought this through.
15

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 03/03/2008 23:17:13
...or of course, you could always do what I saw a bloke do this evening near a junction on Queen Street.

Start texting someone on your phone and then just walk across into a stream of moving traffic. When a car driver blows his horn at you, look up for just long enough to see the said rapidly approaching car and step back almost to the pavement.
16

COLINTON.MAINS,

Oakville Ontario 04/03/2008 02:40:34
FOR GODS SAKE SOMEBODY PLEASE PUT UP A STOP SIGN
17

rs,

in the car 04/03/2008 20:02:05
Best one tonight

Car stops at RED LIGHT, nothing new.
His mate gets out of the car....
Light still at Red....
Then drives through the red light.

Luckily there was no pedestrians using the crossing.

18

Richard Lionheart,

hitting head of taxi roof going over road humps 06/03/2008 22:09:00
In the early 1900’s one had a person with a red flag walking in front of one’s motor vehicle to warn pedestrians of the danger.

Now we need persons with red flags walking in front of pedestrians to warn motorist of the danger!

Jail “j” walkers.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.