Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Thursday, 20th November 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

All rookie cops face drugs tests



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 21 September 2008
ROOKIE police officers will be randomly tested for drugs and alcohol in a bid to root out addicts and heavy drinkers before they can cause harm.
Scotland's biggest force, Strathclyde, will carry out compulsory testing on all new recruits, and random tests during their first two years on the job. Anyone who fails will be automatically dismissed.

But the force has stopped short of imposing t
ests on all 7,000 police following stiff resistance from the Scottish Police Federation, which represents rank-and-file officers.

The scheme, which has been approved by force chiefs, will involve a private firm doing tests on hair samples from all recruits and random urine samples from probationers.

The tests are intended to kill off any last remnants of the once-thriving culture of "boozing coppers" portrayed in television shows such as The Sweeney and Ashes To Ashes.

The plan now has to be approved by the force's ruling police board.

Chairman Paul Rooney said: "The public rightly expect police officers more than anyone to uphold the law. Random drug testing is a means of ensuring officers are not engaging in this illegal activity."

Until now the force has only tested officers already suspected of being under the influence of illegal drugs.

The Army and several other bodies, including train companies and airlines, have enforced random testing regimes for illegal drugs on all staff.

Scores of soldiers and officers have been drummed out in the past few years for abusing hard and soft drugs.

Other Scottish forces are also rolling out policies on random drug and alcohol tests over the next few months after the Association of Chief Police Officers issued guidance on the issue earlier this year. Grampian introduced blanket drug testing of all its officers more than a decade ago under controversial chief constable Ian Oliver, who went on to propose that all parliamentarians should have their urine checked too.

The north-east force has so far tested more than 300 officers, but none has proved positive for illegal substances.

Most Scottish police forces, however, look set to shy away from such blanket testing of all officers.

A spokesman for the federation yesterday warned against any further expansion of testing to include Strathclyde officers who had already seen out their probationary period.

He said: "We don't see any requirement for an extension of random drug tests beyond probationers."

At least one Strathclyde officer, believed to have been from Ayrshire, has been caught out by a test in recent years after tip-offs that she was keeping "bad company".

Strathclyde, like other forces, is currently recruiting heavily. It will take on more than 900 trainees this year alone.

After approval by the force's board, each new recruit will have a hair taken for detailed study during their routine fitness test.

Hair retains toxins from many drugs far longer than urine does.

Recruits and probationers do not enjoy normal employee rights. They can be dismissed, without any being reason given, at the discretion of the chief constable. Those who are found to have taken drugs – or to be over the drink driving alcohol limit during office hours – are very unlikely to be retained.

Some academics have argued that random urine tests can encourage drug abusers to graduate from cannabis to harder substances because cannabis stays in the system longer than, say, cocaine or heroin.

Many politicians, however, have come round to the view that officers must be whiter than white.

Bill Aitken, the Conservative justice spokesman in the Scottish Parliament, said: "This, I am afraid, is a sign of the times. While it's regrettable, I think Strathclyde have no choice."

Strathclyde's new recruits – and officers transferring from other forces – are also set to undergo new and sophisticated attitude tests to ensure they don't hold any racist beliefs or prejudices.



The full article contains 640 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 20 September 2008 11:07 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
 
1

Joe-kerr,

21/09/2008 01:50:24
All cops used to face random drug tests, however they got rid of that for fear of loosing lots of cops who liked to declare 10 ounces of confiscated weed instead of 20!

Funny that!
2

Guga II,

Rockall 21/09/2008 02:45:35
Why should any of them, be exempt from random drugs tests? What's the objection, unless they have something to hide?

#1 Joe-kerr.

That's been going on for years, and not just with drugs.
3

2Right,

On Location 21/09/2008 03:47:15
But the force has stopped short of imposing tADVERTISEMENTests on all 7,000 police following stiff resistance from the Scottish Police Federation, which represents rank-and-file officers.

Why not test every cop?

What are they afraid they will find ?

Every cop should be tested not just rookies.
4

2Right,

On Location 21/09/2008 03:48:40
Decades not years Guga
5

kamiddler,

Glasgow 21/09/2008 07:19:23
300 random drug tests in Grampian and no positive results - a waste of public funds? One reported targetted test in Kilmarnock and a positive result - sounds like the better way forward to me. Random tests for recruits and those in training are appropriate but subjecting experienced cops to such intrusion for no reason would merely pander to the pc (excuse the pun) nanny state. Use public money where it's needed, ie getting a grip on the drug dealers who scar our communities.
6

rozzerwatch2 ,

21/09/2008 08:40:00
It is common in industry where safety and security is paramount to have random drug/alcohol tests, which includes people and positions right to the top of the organisation. So it should be with the police, including Federated members, ASPS and ACPO(S) members. No debate.
7

Anonym,

21/09/2008 10:29:17
People should take responsibility for themselves when they are not working, i.e. off duty. It is sad that people are not allowed to do this.

Lets examine a couple of statements:

"Random drug testing is a means of ensuring officers are not engaging in this illegal activity."

This cannot be true. Random testing cannot 'ensure' anything. Even 100% testing may be prone to error.

"ROOKIE police officers will be randomly tested for drugs and alcohol in a bid to root out addicts and heavy drinkers before they can cause harm."

How often does a rookie have to take cocaine to become an addict? Once? Twice a year? At what point does a rookie become a heavy drinker? Three pints the night before? Four?

The authorities attitudes towards drugs are lame.
8

Douglas,

Bathgate 21/09/2008 11:07:00
Rookie cops eh? Who will respond to the 211 in progress on the corner of third and Main if they're all in the ME's office down at 1PP?

PP is about right.
9

A Regular,

21/09/2008 12:20:09
They could just remove all their body hair, that would snooker the testers!!!!!!!
10

bong_jamesbong2001,

21/09/2008 14:26:11
You want to smile when you read this if you consume cannabis, but to be honest, its not any nicer to drug test cops that it is to drug test anyone else. Cops, unlikely as it seems, are humans and citizens, and have rights. The problem with the cops` union's stand is that they believe that cops have rights which the rest of the country doesn't, the right to be drug-test free. I believe that everyone has the right to be drug-test free. Drug tests prove nothing except that someone has done drugs. Cannabis consumption, at least off duty, does not reflect on anyone's effectiveness as cops or bakers or whatever, EXCEPT if taking cannabis is defined as a crime per se. The only purpose of a drug test for cannabis is to incriminate someone. And for a crime which is victimless, and not a crime at all except in the minds of those who make the laws. mad.gif
Cops have been drug test free in the U.K. for 150 years. During about half of that time, cannabis was perfectly legal, and the Queen herself was using it as medicine. One can hardly see a reason to incriminate a cop or anyone else for using it now.
So we get the brave new world. But not so quick there, lad. I saw if cops get drug tested, the armed forces high command and officers corps gets drug tested, the Parliament, the Law Lords and other judges, the so-called business leaders, and yes, the Queen and her whole family (already proven criminals-eh Harry?) and right on down the line. Any rationale that would apply to cop drug testing would apply to the rest of these rascals as well, and in spades. They're making these bloody assinine laws and they should be subject to them as well. Otherwise, we just legalize criminality at the top, and make the rest of the country drug-tested crime victims. What a sick pile of puke!
11

JayDeeTee,

21/09/2008 15:00:24
Drug test our politicians. Some of them must be on something.
12

Conan the Librarian™,

21/09/2008 15:58:25
They are on £61820 per annum JayDeeTee.

That can buy an awful lot of tangerines.

And stuff.
13

Mallory,

Edinburgh 21/09/2008 18:46:54
Not to mention buckies Conan™
14

wakeupscotland,

The Deen 29/09/2008 21:21:01
Why not test everyone no matter what job they are in? Make it law for all employers to test new employees for all commonly used illegal drugs and have blanket drugs tests at least 4 times a year at random intervals. Especially coppers - test them for everything that's illegal, especially if they have been in the job for a while as they may get complacent. I expect them to be perfect representations of legality and near perfect human beings. After all, doesn't every member of society have a responsibility for the H&S of others? It's obvious that all humans can't be trusted to act in a safe manner and it should be a requirement that humans should be scrutinised to the maximum possible degree. In order to make society safer for everyone, the whole world should become a police 'state' (and what a state that would be) run by bureaucrat officals who want to impose their retarded perceptions on society and how it should operate.

From,

Eye Neadalife.
Planet Zog
Zogland
15

wakeupscotland,

Still in The Deen 29/09/2008 21:46:04
I find it amusing that a copper doesn't get tested for steriods which has the potential to make anyone into complete agro-maniacs capable of abusing their status when they do get tested for weed. It gives me the impression that the authorities prefer the jacked-up steroid nut to the calm and complacent occassional smoker. Who is more likely to resolve a situation when a calm an collected conversation is required? Or the bereavement message ("Your F*cking mother's dead. get over it.") And does society really want nut-jobs to go around town arresting your average p*ss head on a friday?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.