Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


'Let the lynx roam free in Scotland again'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 30 October 2008
LYNX should be brought back to Scotland, animals should be given legal rights and a third of the country should be set aside for wildlife, according to the controversial head of a nature organisation.
Roy Dennis, director of the Highland Foundation for Wildlife, thinks action to improve Scotland's wildlife takes too long and is steeped in too much red tape, and he called for some drastic new approaches.

He put across his views at a conference i
n Edinburgh yesterday.

He wants the lynx, a wild cat that was native to Scotland before it was hunted to extinction thousands of years ago, re-introduced as soon as possible.

He asked the Scottish Natural Heritage conference: "So when can the lynx come home? We know there's loads of room. There's lots of food. There's lots of space for a big, viable population to return."

The idea of reintroducing lynx has raised fears, particularly from the farming sector, that the animals would kill large numbers of lambs.

However, proponents of the idea think lynx would help control red deer populations that are growing out of control, and should be returned to Scotland because they were previously part of our natural world.

Mr Dennis, who was made an MBE for his services to nature conservation in Scotland in 1992, does not think human concerns should be a barrier to bringing the animal back.

The professional ornithologist and wildlife consultant told The Scotsman: "I don't think everything we do should be for the benefit of humans. We have a moral responsibility. We killed it off, so we should bring it back."

However, he added that he fears it is such a "sociopolitical" issue that it will take 20 years of debate before anything can happen, because there is a "disproportionate amount of control" on conservation action.

He thinks too much research is carried out, rather than action being taken on the ground.

"Often we just need to get on with something. I think there must be much more thinking on the hoof." And he described it as "absolutely barmy" that it has taken so long to get the programme to reintroduce the beaver up and running.

The animals are due to be released next year in Scotland, in a trial study, after years of lobbying by environmental groups. Mr Dennis also suggested the Scottish Government should create new laws that give legal rights to nature, similar to a system in Ecuador introduced last month, where members of the public can sue on nature's behalf in courts. The country was the first in the world to bring in the measures.

He also told the audience at the conference that he wants 30 per cent of Scotland set aside for wildlife, in order to preserve the natural world.

Colin Galbraith, director of policy at Scottish Natural Heritage, complimented Mr Dennis for "pushing the arguments out" but said it is too early to think about reintroducing the lynx.

"I think lynx is over the horizon," he said. "The people of Scotland have to get used to one mammal reintroduction, with the beaver. Let's see how they do first."

He disagreed that it is best to act, rather than gather evidence. "I think we need a slightly more cautious approach," he said. "Let's not delay things forever but let's do things to minimise the risk in light of the evidence we have got."

And he questioned whether the Ecuadorian system of legal rights could be implemented. "Scotland actually leads the way in Europe in protection of its wildlife," he added.

WHAT NEXT

BEAVERS are to be reintroduced to Scotland 400 years after they were hunted to extinction.

Wildlife experts are in the process of trying to catch three or four families of the animals from rivers in Norway. They will then be put in quarantine for six months, before being set free at Knapdale, Argyll, next spring.

The project is a trial, and if successful the reintroduction programme could be extended to other parts of Scotland.

The Scottish Wildlife Trust was given the go-ahead for the trial in May by the Scottish Government.

Other species that once existed in Scotland include the wolf, lynx and bear.

Sea eagles have already been reintroduced to Scotland.

The second phase of a programme of reintroduction on the east coast was completed last month when 15 of the birds were let into the wild in Fife.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 29 October 2008 9:31 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Boy Wonder,

30/10/2008 01:19:54
Lynx? Yeah why not? Then we can reintroduce, wolves and bears and wild boar and send the neds and chavs in to learn their place in the food chain.
2

Tom in Belmont,

Belmont 30/10/2008 01:31:08
Researchers in North America have unearthed a creature called the short-faced bear, 900 lb and could run like a horse. Some reckon this bear kept humans from crossing Beringia into the New World until its extinction (perhaps due to bands of hunters) thousands of years ago. Thank heaven for that!
Q: If human survival has depended on the extinction of certain microfauna (like the smallpox virus) could not our survival at one time have depended on the extinction of macrofauna, like the short-faced bear, mammoth, or may (in Britain) the lynx?
Just asking....
3

Nellie,

Liverpool 30/10/2008 02:45:50
This is lunacy. Scotland now is not Scotland as it was when the Lynx was around before. The place has changed, the eco-system is entirely different. Bringing back the Lynx would be no different from introducing any NEW species and all that implies - DAMAGE to the eco-system to the detriment of the wildlife and fauna that is now native to the country.
4

Pilrig.,

Livingston 30/10/2008 05:54:11
In other words the Scottish people should be barred access from a third of the Scottish countryside.
In his own words - 'absolutely barmy'.
5

yockel,

30/10/2008 07:11:53
30% of Scotland, sounds like the Central Belt to me.
6

drunken proffet,

Tassy 30/10/2008 07:54:55
If you live in a country that supports a lot of wildlife, I must admit more Canada and the USA rather than Tasmania, you would figure out that it is the human species that represents the most dangerous aspect of enjoying the countryside. We have a good selection of magnificent birds of prey and they still manage to poison them with 1080.
7

carrottop,

Dumfries 30/10/2008 07:59:13
"We know there's loads of room. There's lots of food. There's lots of space for a big, viable population to return."

Spoken like a true Englishman Mr Dennis.

8

shawfield,

Glasgow 30/10/2008 08:11:40
Aye an still no toilets on the A9
9

Old Cartha Boy,

Dumbreck 30/10/2008 08:25:36
Roy Dennis is now well past his sell by date. His obsession with re-introductions for re-introductions sake is now getting a little boring and he is actually causing more harm than good.

10

Louis Catorze,

30/10/2008 08:26:07
"...should be returned to Scotland because they were previously part of our natural world."

What's the cut off point then? Go back far enough and we probably had lions in what is now Scotland. Fancy them?
11

munrobagger,

30/10/2008 08:37:29
@10

if you go far enough back in time you had dinosaurs at the place what is now scotland.

12

Strict Ivan Jellicoe,

Renfrew 30/10/2008 08:41:45
Bring back the lynx?
Bring bank the lynch! BRING BACK HANGING!
13

drunken proffet,

Tassy 30/10/2008 08:47:52
Not a lot wrong with dinosaurs, maybe keep the kids off the streets at night.
14

Dave,

Western Isles 30/10/2008 08:55:31
I think this is a good idea. Lynx is a fine smelling product.
15

Ken S.,

Reading 30/10/2008 09:00:49
If they're going to reintroduce every extinct species, it'll be a mammoth undertaking.
16

Nikostratos,

30/10/2008 09:05:39

Why not lions tigers and bears
17

Lianachan,

Highlands 30/10/2008 09:19:46
The Highlands might be a wilderness, but it's not naturally empty - it's a man-made wilderness. Peoples failure to grasp that concept is always annoying. Anyway, regardless of the reasons why - the fact is that the Highlands today are very thinly populated, and the population tends to be clustered into relatively compact areas. There are vast empty swathes of land (largely runied by sheep, but that's another matter). I'm all for the reintroduction of the lynx, and have been a supporter of the reintroduction of wolves for years.
18

Slioch,

Scottish Highlands 30/10/2008 09:38:13
#3 Nellie

Yes, Scotland has changed since the lynx became extinct here (in medieval times, not "thousands of years ago" as the article suggests). Scotland has now far more suitable habitat available for lynx than in medieval times, when it was likely that loss of habitat, rather than hunting, that was mainly responsible for its extinction.

Lynx is a solitary ambush hunter, particularly of roe deer. We now have huge areas of woodland that are over-run with roe deer that cause considerable damage to forestry and natural heritage interests. Lynx would reduce the roe deer population, which would result in woodlands where (particularly) broadleaved trees could regenerate naturally and where flowers would flourish: both are now prevented from an excessive deer population.

We become wearily used to weasel-worded excuses against doing anything that might cause the tiniest controversy from Scottish Natural Heritage, but the pathetic comments from Colin Galbraith just about make me want to throw up. Maybe nothing good will come out of Scottish Natural Heritage until Andrew Thin is removed as its chairman, or maybe it has been so emasculated over the years that there is no-one left there with any integrity or real commitment to the natural world.

The research on lynx re-introduction into Scotland has been done. You can read it here, for example (sorry, abstract only):

http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/bsc/mam/2008/00000038/00000004/art00004

The biggest obstacle to improving Scotland's natural heritage appears to be Scottish Natural Heritage, which has been under the thumb of civil servants in the Scottish Office for years, and has to endure anti-environmentalists like Andrew Thin being imposed upon it.
19

Scars,

Hamilton 30/10/2008 09:43:40
Me thinks some of the folks that post here just like the sound of their own words.

Scotland, like it, or lump it, has a considerable reliance on tourism and out door pursuits! WE have an environment that is truly glorious and mostly unspoilt apart from the encroachment of foreign bodies into the ether and their annoying reverberations around the glens is a total pain in the Trossachs!

The lynx is a natural attraction, its presence is in no way detrimental to man or beast and lets face it, they will never be out of control and infestious like the non native invaders of present. They certainly wont be heard on every corner of the land screeching their lungs out, like said incomers !

We have to realise that our nation is one that is precious, that is relatively unspoiled and that these majestic creatures are to the benefit of our culture and country.

I understand the arguments of its gone so leave it. But so was a kilt and bagpipes once, try taking them away from our national identity, or international recognition. Twee some of it may be, but we must play on our strengths and see beyond the end of our nose.

Those that don't think there is space for them clearly have no concept of the lands of Scotland, I am sure you could let 100 off these beasts go tomorrow in Argyle and probably never catch a glance again ! How many folks here have seen a wild cat ? At best a few, I have trailed the hills and remote parts of our lands for years and only ever had fleeting glances.

Tourism makes this land a lot of money, these things attract tourists and the fact that the land can claim such species, is a testimony to the people of the land, ergo...... respect and understanding for our nature, our ecology and our country ! This is attractive, especially in this climate (sic).

Bears and wolves are a different kettle of halibut, these truly present a danger and this will be unlikely or impossible, but beaver and lynx are no threat.

If we maybe thought a bit mo
20

Scars,

Hamilton. 30/10/2008 09:46:50
CONT :



If we maybe thought a bit more about the whole rather than our segmented view from afar, we may see the many benefits we can glean from all of this! Think a bit bigger.

The world is changing around you as you sleep, the air travel of tomorrow wont be so prolific as it is today! There are something like 1 billion people within a 2 day train ride of our outlying corner of Europe. Think about what we can be, think about where we will be in 10-20 years.

These things are our forte, nature, beauty, drama, wilderness, these are the attraction to our we bit hill and glen ....Don't shoot it down before it can fly ! And this is not an invite to tell the world Lynx cant fly, but it is a precuser for some impending stupidity !

I love beaver, cant get enough of them, and with the Lynx effect, it can only get better !

Tres Bon … :>)
21

Tweedmouth,

Coldstream 30/10/2008 09:58:47
There seems to be a huge amount of anxiety over reintroducing the lynx - which is largely uncalled for.

Take a look: http://lynx.uio.no/jon/lynx/eulynx1.htm

"In northern Europe (Finland, Norway, Sweden, north-eastern Poland and the European region of the former USSR), the population is stable and connected to the larger Siberian population. In central Europe, a relatively large but isolated population is found in the Carpathian mountains (Slovakia, Poland, Romania, Ukraine). Small populations are found in the French Pyrenees and Vosges mountains; the Jura mountains (France, Switzerland); the Alps (Austria, France, Italy, Switzerland); the Balkans (Albania, Croatia and Slovenia); and the Bohemian forest (Czech Republic) (Breitenmoser 1991). "

In many countries they overwhelmingly eat hares and rabbits. They are remote forest-mountain animals so unlikely to encounter sheep unless they live in forested mountains.

The obvious thing is to try an experiment; find a really big remote forest and release a couple with tracking collars - see how it goes. They are beautiful and very intelligent animals - great tourist attraction.
22

Pony express,

West Linton 30/10/2008 10:26:42
Yes, re-introduce them, then wait until some bambi- lover spots them killing and eating the deer. The screams of protest will be deafening!

I would advise caution. Many plants and animals introduced by design and/or accident are now polluting Scotland, the mink, rhododendrons, Japanese Knot weed to name a few, but speaking as a gardener, if they eat fluffy bunnies, :)
23

blackley,

Edinburgh 30/10/2008 10:29:39
Has anyone thought to ask the lynx if it wants to come and live in Scotland? No I thought not. And what of the rights of all the little furry animals who will suffer at the paws of the lynx? Didn't consult them either eh? Typical.
24

Crivvens,

Edinburgh 30/10/2008 10:33:48
What will be the next creature we will need to intoduce to keep the Lynx population down?
25

Ken S.,

Reading 30/10/2008 10:42:21
#23 Pony express,
" but speaking as a gardener, if they eat fluffy bunnies,"

Herons, that's what you need:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1064669/Pictured-The-moment-grey-heron-catches-baby-rabbit-ears-drowns-swallows-thing-whole.html


26

Westfield Bairns,

falkirk 30/10/2008 10:52:21
I think this is a great idea and surprised this has not already happened
27

Guga II,

Rockall 30/10/2008 10:53:00
Who is this Roy Dennis? Where is he from? Is he even Scottish?

When will people like him realise that Scotland is not a playpark, a hunting/shooting playground, or a wildlife sanctuary for the benefit of the tourists, the landed "gentry" and the idle rich. If he wants to set aside one third of a country for wildlife, let him try suggesting that one third of England be set aside - and see what sort of reaction he gets.

If he, or fools like him, evr manage to get permission to release animals like the Lynx, or wolves, into the wild in Scotland, the reaction he will get from the majority of farmers/crofters, will be to shoot them on sight. I would also suggest that anyone who suffered any loss from, or were attacked by such animals should be given full legal right to sue him and any responsible government officials, and the government for vast amounts of money.

This is reminiscent of the Whig government who, in the late 1920's wanted to remove the whole population from the Western Isles, and turn it into a hunting and shooting playground for themselves and their idle rich supporters.
28

Tim C,

Spain 30/10/2008 10:55:30
I saw a lince (lynx) cross the road last year, in an area of Spain where officially they don´t exist. Scotland would be ideal. Man is the destructive predator in Britain, not this shy and solitary animal. What is curious is that few newpapers give much coverage to the police assasination of a man near London, yesterday. Did they do this, Mafia style, as a warning to the jury in the menezes inquest in London? He was "suspected" of carrying a firearm. Perhaps now that journalists have been threatened with death in Glenrothes, they are a wee bit timid about reporting any public sector misdemeanour?
29

Bemused and above it all,

30/10/2008 10:59:59
Personally, as a direct descendent of the man who shot the last wolf in lochaber I am all for it!
Bring back the wolf as well, just so I may have a chance of following in his footsteps!
30

Lianachan,

Highlands 30/10/2008 11:00:08
#29 A guy died in police custody in Dingwall a few days ago, and I didn't even see that mentioned in the "Scot"sman. Obviously, since it happened in the Highlands it doesn't matter.
31

Lianachan,

Highlands 30/10/2008 11:01:59
#30

I feel really sorry for all of the "last wolf shot in" animals, as they must have spent their entire lives travelling around in order to have been shot by the number of people who claim to have shot them.
32

Bemused and above it all,

30/10/2008 11:04:46
#29
If you have ever had experience of armed police the rules are simple, do what they say & you are ok, if your innocent they are very apologetic and you get a lot of support to deal with the trauma.
If you dont then you have the very real possibility of being shot, the largest area is the torso & Heckler & Koch MP5's, which are the prefered weapon due to their veratility, accuracy & reliability do a lot of damage. It is very difficult to hit someone in the torso with one of these weapons and for them not to then die.
Much as the De Menezes situation, why did the guy not do as he was told?
33

Bemused and above it all,

30/10/2008 11:06:08
#32
Aye but I could get the actual gear he was wearing and gun for a true re-enactment!
34

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 30/10/2008 11:11:42
Lets release wild-cats into the country-side of Scotland. What an excellent idea! There will be no shortage of food for them. Just think of all the sheep, cattle, deer and game birds they will be able to feast upon---not to mention the chickens, ducks and geese.
35

Lianachan,

Highlands 30/10/2008 11:13:45
#35 There are already wild cats in the wild in Scotland. I've not seen one for a few years, admittedly. Gamekeepers are fond of killing them, even though that's against the law.
36

Saoghal Beag,

30/10/2008 11:24:56
why waste money reintroducing an animal when we should be trying to maintain those that we already have. i assume that this hair brained scheme to reintroduce a species extinct for hundreds of years, to a ecosystem so funadamentally different from when it last walked scottish soil, is evidence of defeat in maintaining the scottish wild cat population?
37

Neil Waugh,

Old Strathcona 30/10/2008 12:31:56
And how was Scotland's multi-million pound grouse shooting industry this year?
Most moors didn't shoot, did they.
So let's add another predator to the mix and there won't be any grouse left.
And who says deer populations are "growing out of control."
Jenny does. But who else.
Alistair Robertson's going to have fun with this one.
38

Stop buy Scotsman,

30/10/2008 13:53:00
The real reason for deer populations that are growing out of control is because the landowners want keep them to themselves for blood sport. Why not sent in armies to shoot them and put down landmine this will keep deer under control.
39

Lianachan,

Highlands 30/10/2008 14:09:27
#39 Hmm. As somebody who regularly finds himself out in the middle of nowhere, tramping cross country to get to remote archaeological sites I must say I would argue against the use of landmines in the strongest possible terms!
40

Mcsnagpile,

30/10/2008 14:21:52
I can just picture it --Laird o' Coocaden's highland national park wae trams frae Princes st tae Ben Nevis circular tour. Watch oot fur the Woolie Mammoths taes.
41

Iain's,

Barcelona 30/10/2008 15:13:43
The lynx will compete with the wild cat and ensure the extinction of the latter.


Does this matter?

I think that it does. We should protect what we still have before messing about.

We should protect red squirrels by killing the greys and wipe out those hedgehogs in the islands before introducing anything else.

42

Banana Heid,

Ayrshire 30/10/2008 17:21:14
#17 Lions and tigers and bears Oh My! I reckon they should bring back the shetland tree frog! Not spotted one of those for some time...
43

Saoghal Beag,

30/10/2008 17:50:45
42 iain i doubt that the lynx will compete with the wildcat but the later's extinction is almost ruberstamped through the waste of money and resources on some individuals only personal agenda devoid of any reason and science.
44

Slioch,

Scottish Highlands 30/10/2008 20:15:40
Extracts from the abstract of "A potential habitat network for the Eurasian lynx in Scotland" Mammal Review, Volume 38, Number 4, October 2008 , pp. 285-303(19), available here:
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/bsc/mam/2008/00000038/00000004/art00004

"The severe and early destruction and fragmentation of woodland habitats due to human activities is thought to have been a leading factor in the extirpation from Britain of several large, forest-dependent mammal species, such as the Eurasian lynx. However, during the 20th century, Scotland in particular has experienced rapid, large-scale reafforestation." ...
...
"Scotland has over 20,000?km2 of suitable lynx habitat split into two main networks of interconnected patches: the Highlands (c. 15,?000?km2) and the Southern Uplands (c. 5,000?km2). A further 800?km2 of potential habitat, contiguous with the Southern Uplands lynx habitat network, lies across the border in England." ...

"Based on the availability of prey resources, Scotland could support around 400 adult and subadult lynx in the Highlands and around 50 in the Southern Uplands. A Scottish population of this size would be the fourth largest lynx population in Europe considering current population estimates."
45

Saoghal Beag,

30/10/2008 20:58:55
slioch, and how much suitable habitat does scotland have for siberian tigers, tagu, ibex......?

having suitable habitat is not justification in its own right.

how do the populations distributions of prey species match those of when the lynx last walked scottish soil? I mean distribution in the most complete of ecological definitions.
46

Slioch,

Scottish Highlands 30/10/2008 22:38:32
#47 Saoghal Beag

What relevance is the amount of habitat of the species you mention to the question of the introduction of lynx?

The point that the paper I've pointed to makes is that there is an abundance of suitable habitat for lynx and it is full of suitable prey species, particularly roe deer. The fact that roe deer cause damage to forestry (thrashing young trees) and prevent tree regeneration and also significantly reduce the population of many woodland plants, including woodland orchids like creeping ladies tresses, means that a reduction in roe deer population as a result of lynx reinstatement would itself have intrinsic benefits.

As far as "how do the populations distributions of prey species match those of when the lynx last walked scottish soil?" The answer is that they are greatly increased: there is now more woodland (particularly dense plantation woodland) and (almost certainly) more roe deer than when lynx became extinct in medieval times.
47

Thorson ,

Perborough , Canada 31/10/2008 00:02:06

How do these romantic re-wilders imagine that sheep will be safe if lynx are allowed to roam free in Scotland. Foals and young calves will also be at their dispoal as well as domestic cats and dogs. Time to think again !
48

dave Shaw,

Turin italy 01/11/2008 17:37:49
I think we should go for reintroduction and not try to attack the integrity of environmentalists on the basis of their nationality.
The Uk has a terribly impoverished flora and fauna with some species, like red and roe deer becoming environmemtal problems because there are no longer natural controls on their numbers.
Lynx would be no danger to people - you'd be very lucky to see a lynx - though they might prey on sheep.
Experience in other parts of Europe has shown how losses of sheep can be minimised, and as others have said studies demonstrate that there is more than enough suitable habitat in Scotland.
Incidentally some of that habitat owes its survival to government agencies and many conservation organisations that have invested large sums of money in planting trees and protecting land from development. In doing so they have given future generations of Scots, sassenachs and other visitors the chance to walk in beautiful country rich in wildlife.
To see how pitifully poor most of the Uk is in terms of nature (and that includes very large areas of national parks where overstocking of deer and sheep has cropped the vegetation to the ground and caused erosion and other problems), you need only travel a few kilometres outside of Turin where the foothills are alive with wild flowers, butterfies, birds and mammals. Or you can simply think back 40 years before the UK uplands were grip-drained and there were fewer sheep and deer.

We need bold leadership and investement now, so that large areas can be created for nature and peaceful recreation and not just in Scotland. In England various bodies have the vision to plan large wetlands - we need these plans to come to fruition and many more like them.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.