Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


'Athens of the North' icon to undergo a Greek revival

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 01 November 2008
IT'S the iconic monument which helped cement Edinburgh's reputation as the "Athens of the North" and looms large over the city's skyline.
Now the National Monument on Calton Hill is to get a Greek revival as part of a £1 million project to breath new life into the Capital's most prized monuments.

Work has begun on restoring the edifice under a joint initiative by charity Edinburgh W
orld Heritage and the city council.

Those behind the project said the biggest challenge is to move one of the enormous stone lintels at the top of the monument, which over time has shifted out of position. The lintel will be lifted back into place using a crane and new lime mortar will be added.

The top of the monument will also be investigated to see if more stonework repairs are needed.

Areas of crumbling mortar on the base of the monument need to be replaced with new lime mortar and weeds and bushes will be cleared away from the base of the stonework.

Adam Wilkinson, director of Edinburgh World Heritage, said: "The National Monument can rightly claim to be among the most talismanic symbols of Scotland and a key to understanding Edinburgh as the 'Athens of the North'.

"Calton Hill is one of the most fantastic landscapes of monuments in Europe and is a principal part of the World Heritage Site."

Begun in August 1822, the monument was designed by renowned architects Charles Cockerell and William Playfair and was modelled on the Parthenon in Athens.

It was intended to commemorate Scottish servicemen who died in the Napoleonic War and funds for its construction were raised by a public appeal.

The monument drew on ideas from the classical world which had been central to the Scottish Enlightenment of the previous century, producing figures such as Adam Smith, David Hume and Sir Walter Scott.

Some of the largest pieces of stone ever taken from the Craigleith Quarry in Blackhall were incorporated in its design, but it later gained the alternative name of "Edinburgh's Disgrace" after the money for construction ran out.

City culture leader Deidre Brock said: "This vital work will restore and safeguard the future of one of Edinburgh's most famous landmarks.

"The stones of the National Monument are so huge that it's hard to imagine that they could move, so it will be a sight worth seeing when the crane comes to carry out the first major repairs to the monument."

The cost of the works is expected to be around £78,000 and will be completed by December.

The so-called Twelve Monuments project has already seen work completed at the Black Watch Memorial on the Mound, the Buccleuch Memorial in Parliament Square, the Melville Monument in St Andrew Square and the Bow Well in the Grassmarket.

Do you think £80,000 should be spent on repairing the National Monument?

Katherine Hegarty , 31, sales designer from Forrester Park Avenue: "When you see such huge sums like that it makes you a bit annoyed that day to day things can't be sorted out."

David Poole, 77, retired engineer, Mayfield Road: "I think they've got to do something with it.There's always the danger of bits falling off."

Sheila Fraser, 46, publican from Dalkeith: "I think it's good to keep these things going."







Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 01 November 2008 12:45 PM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: National Monument
 
1

Buttress,

01/11/2008 12:17:27
Of course it should be repaired - what sort of a nation is it that allows such internationally important structures as this (and the time ball, also being put back into working order by EWH with a Heritage Lottery grant) to fall into disrepair?

There is also funding coming from other sources:

http://www.ewht.org.uk/Restoring-Edinburghs-Partheneon-.aspx

"The work is being funded by Edinburgh World Heritage and the City of Edinburgh Council, with contributions from the Binks Trust and the War Memorials Trust..."


And it is called the Twelve Monuments Project surely -why the 'so-called'?



2

alex paterson,

edinburgh 01/11/2008 12:21:33
And why not,lets not make out we are a nation who dont care about our City and its monuments.
3

Jenny MacArthur,

01/11/2008 12:22:10
The EN asks: "Do you think £80,000 should be spent on repairing the National Monument?" (Well, £78 actually, but why not round up just to make the stupid question even more dramatic?) Is this newspaper seriously suggesting one of our most prominent monuments should be allowed to fall down? Bearing in mind it would cost thousands just to make it safe.

Typical of this rag, that it tries to stir up thicko punters to moan on about how Council money should only be spent in their opinion, who don't have a clue about the real issues. Anything to (a) have a chance of attacking the council; and (b) stir up whining idiots to complain and create 'controversy' (yawn).

This paper is such a waste of newsprint sometimes.
4

Buttress,

01/11/2008 12:23:30
THE BINKS TRUST
The Binks Trust is a private family charitable trust involve in philanthropy for the Arts and other charities

War Memorials Trust:

http://www.warmemorials.org/
5

Buttress,

01/11/2008 12:29:21
3 - it has to be said though, why is there not routine maintenance in place to prevent things getting to the stage where something as important is dangerous?

It's also sad that the time ball hasn't been working for a considerable amount of months.

If Big Ben stopped chiming, I bet cash would be found very quickly - no applications for HLF and long waits!

I believe EWH is now trying to find a future and cash for repairing the Tron Kirk - another in the council's ownership on the Buildings at Risk Register.

http://www.ewht.org.uk/Directors-Notes.aspx

6

,

01/11/2008 13:41:15
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
7

Buttress,

01/11/2008 13:55:24
6 - just a plain silly post...

8

The Squirrel,

Princes Street Gardens 01/11/2008 14:22:43
Reykjavik of the south, I think.

#3 you only post here for a PR company. Everyone says so yet you never defend yourself.

'Council Jenny £5 a post' nice work if you can get it.

9

Buttress,

01/11/2008 14:26:28
8 'Everyone says so'?

Do give us the survey results?

It was a valid post - the EEN must have been very disappointed that it couldn't have headed this 'Waste of cash say residents...'


10

Cynicaltalk,

01/11/2008 14:37:07
#3

"This paper is such a waste of newsprint sometimes."

But it still attracts tubes such as yourself making stupid comments. If its that bad, go away!!
11

,

01/11/2008 14:44:25
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
12

Buttress,

01/11/2008 14:54:25
Not fact at all. You haven't surveyed anyone.

However, you are falling into the trap set.

:-)


13

,

01/11/2008 16:21:14
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
14

Readingjohn,

Innerleithen 01/11/2008 17:29:29
Of couse it must be repaired. Edinburgh is the most beautiful and interesting Capitol I know of, and I have been to a great many. Take a pride in our heritage.
15

,

01/11/2008 19:27:54
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
16

COLINTON.MAINS,

Oakville Ontario 01/11/2008 22:42:51
of.course.it.should.be.its.EDINBURGH,like.the.castle
17

,

02/11/2008 06:49:04
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
18

Friar Tuck,

02/11/2008 20:44:36
I only governments everywhere would realise that preventive maintainance is good, we wouldn't have to spend thousands bringing things up to par.

Just imagine if you didn't change the oil in your car engine, just waited until it broke down and then repaired it.

That's what governments are doing! That's why it costs so much more in the long run!
19

Frobnitz,

EDINBURGH 03/11/2008 10:20:35
Hmm. "Calton Hill is one of the most fantastic landscapes of monuments in Europe and is a principal part of the World Heritage Site."

And this restoration of the "principal part of the World Heritage Site" has nothing to do with the noises the United Nations are making about stripping Edinburgh of its World Heritage Status because of the other work the council is doing. Or am I being too cynical?
20

Buttress,

03/11/2008 12:58:52
I believe the work on the project was planned, along with the funding etc, long before any idea that UNESCO would visit to assess the state of conservation of the WHS - that was decided in July after the international conference. EWH has been carrying out this type of repair and enhancement work as part of its remit for a number of years.

It is highly unlikely that the WHS status will be stripped, and UNESCO has not at this time said it will be. It will be looking at the Caltongate plans, (to which EWH objected strongly) the St James' Centre (I believe that it also has concerns) and the Leith Docks.

www.eh8.org.uk

If it is considered that developments will damage the OUV of the WHS, UNESCO will try to work with the council to resolve the issues. It can in the interim place Edinburgh on the World Heritage In Danger list.

It's pretty bad that a visit is taking place at all of course, but CEC has little real regard for heritage.

While outside the WHS, it voted last week (againts the advice of Historic Scotland) to demolish the all-important listed auditorium of the former Odeon cinema, so a developer (Duddingston House Properties)can make a fat profit from building a hotel instead. It is the only one of its type in Scotland, one of three in the UK.

http://www.queerattitude.com/blogs/viewentry.php?id=3918

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.