Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Scotland's scientists out-think rest of world (except Switzerland)

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 04 February 2008
THEIR predecessors made discoveries that helped change the world. From penicillin, the telephone and even the bicycle, Scottish scientists have long been at the forefront of innovation.
Now a new study has concluded that the current crop of Scottish scientists are among the most influential in the world, bettered only by the Swiss.

The survey has found that, in recent papers, Scottish scientists are cited more often than big-hi
tting scientific nations – the US, Germany and China – relative to their numbers.

Scientists in Scotland are world-leaders in highly specialised areas of research, with the impact of their work coming top for health-related sciences, second in clinical sciences and third in biological sciences.

Among the most mentioned research was breakthroughs in the treatment of neurodevelopment disorder Rett's syndrome by Edinburgh and Glasgow universities, and the development of fuel cells by chemists at St Andrews University.

The report measures the average number of citations per paper over ten years. It looked at the performance of Scottish scientific research against 26 other nations from 1995 to 2005.

It measured factors including the amount of money spent on research, the number of researchers employed, and the number of citations of research papers. Fiona Hyslop, the education and lifelong learning secretary, praised Scotland's long-standing reputation as a world leader in science.

She said: "This report is deserved recognition of a continued commitment to furthering our knowledge and understanding of the world."

"Science is a growth industry and the quality and diversity of our research base means we can take advantage of the many opportunities for research and development in the future, as we strive to build a smarter and wealthier nation."

Professor Anne Glover, the chief scientific officer for Scotland, said scientists could be very proud of their international impact and would inspire young Scots. She added: "The strength of our research base attracts leading scientists from around the world to Scotland.

"This report confirms the quality of science carried out here, and the potential it has to shape Scotland's future.

"Science will underpin our future economic success, helping us to win new investments and opportunities for the people of Scotland."

Research is seen as so crucial to the nation that when rules changed allowing new universities to be created in England without research, the change was rejected north of the Border where university status is dependent on research capacity.

Dr Mark Matfield, scientific co-ordinator of the Scottish-based Association for International Cancer Research, said: "This is a real accolade for Scottish scientists. We have always known that Scotland pulled its weight in the world of science, but this shows it is pulling above its weight."



The full article contains 454 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 03 February 2008 11:37 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Roberta Burns,

04/02/2008 00:34:41
They'll be off to Amercia then any time soon.
2

Lanna,

SCalif 04/02/2008 04:01:40
#1 Roberta,
Well, your loss, is our gain...however, I much prefer the word share. ;)

Let's hope this will inspire more children to pursue this excellence.
3

Royster,

04/02/2008 05:28:42
Scottish brains + English capital.
4

Southsider once upon a time,

04/02/2008 08:13:57
Not sure about the claim for Scottish scientists. Many of the researchers in Scottish research groups are not native; as happens in most countries in the world of science.
Scottish science maybe; Scottish scientists - possibly.
It does, however, mran that Scotland is a good place to do good science and the majority of these resaerchers will be from Scotland.
5

Unimpressed one,

04/02/2008 08:18:12
If this is true how come we're still a backwater country with aspirations of independence? Perhaps what we lack are the likes of Gates or Jobs, individuals that have the capacity and drive to make world-beating products, as opposed to ideas which are then exploited by others.
6

Mallory,

Edinburgh 04/02/2008 08:32:10
Do Scottish Financial institutions invest enough in Scotland's scientists? If so a world beating computer hard drive company from Fife might have survived.
7

donald,

glasgow 04/02/2008 08:53:18
Scottish brains + English capital. + English exploitation.
8

Fairfax,

04/02/2008 09:45:28
donald (8): "Scottish brains + English capital. + English exploitation."

There are English brains too. Good though Edinburgh and Glasgow are, I find it hard to believe that they're really producing more science and technology than Cambridge, Oxford and Imperial College, London.
9

Fairfax,

04/02/2008 09:52:02
Article: "From penicillin, . . ."

Alexander Fleming was Scottish, but his penicillin research was undertaken in St Mary's, London, now part of Imperial College, London. The brilliant discoveries that made penicillin a useful drug, rather than a curious observation, were completed in Oxford, by Florey (an Australian) and Chain (a German-Jewish refugee scientist). Anyone interested in the history of science, rather than Scottish intellectual chauvinism, can begin with the following article:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penicillin#Discovery
10

Jeeemy,

St Andrews 04/02/2008 09:56:01
I have to agree it should have read Scottish based scientist’s, it just so happens that many of the Worlds top Scientist’ find that here in Scotland they find the kind of atmosphere that they and their family’s wish to stay.
As with any nucleus the rest will follow.
Regarding the crazy assumption that a volume production, should or would follow, suggests that that contributor lives in “cloud cuckoo land” Glenrothes?.
The days of this country being able to economically provide such volume production are long gone; we are now back where we were during the Napoleonic Times a Nation of Workshop keepers providing ground breaking and specialist high value items that the world wants.
11

,

04/02/2008 11:32:20
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
12

Janis *,

london 04/02/2008 11:58:57
Post 12

Not Joanne this time, A voice from Scotland, just another "Hun". My usual comment to Posts such as yours. This www we are all using - developed by an Englishman (still alive too). And if you wish to go back to the days of old, when most of the Scots on your tea-towel were alive,Charles Babbage (English)developed the first programmable computer.! Lucky for us posters eh?

It hurts to say (as one you trained at St Mary's Paddington), but Fairfax is correct re. Fleming, the Nobel prize was awarded to him in conjuction with Chain & Florey.

cheers :-)
13

Neil,

Glasgow 04/02/2008 12:22:58
Some of the scientists may not be scots born but Scotish born scientists have had an enormous influence elsewhere in the world & are not included in the scots achievements listing. I might guess that if a survey was done of by place of birth we would come ahead of the Swiss (natural English speakers finding it easier to move). The survey is fair. You can always critcise any survey for what it hasn't asked.

We should, as a nation, be extremely proud of this.

We should also be wondering what is wrong with our political & economic system when we do not covert this into development. If Ireland can get 7% growth, with a poor standard of scientific achievement then 9% should be easily achievable here. Alex has no excuse whatsoever for not achieving his "Celtic Lion" economy.
14

Ard Righ,

The Rock Of Edinburgh 04/02/2008 13:54:39

Royster,
04/02/2008 05:28:42
Scottish brains + English capital= disenfranchised Scots, and Scotland
15

Ard Righ,

The Rock Of Edinburgh 04/02/2008 13:56:02
It is interesting to see a Swiss and Scots parallel again.
16

,

04/02/2008 15:52:11
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
17

,

04/02/2008 15:53:02
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
18

,

04/02/2008 16:01:32
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
19

Dr. James Wilkie,

Vienna 04/02/2008 16:11:37
Almost all scientific research nowadays is international in nature, to a greater or lesser extent. Nobody can afford not to keep up with the latest findings through the specialist journals and other publications. International conferences are another means of developing links and exchanging ideas.

However, much also depends on government support for and encouragement of research and development, and national membership of international R&D organisations. Considerable spin-off can result from activities like pure research, high technology, nuclear and space research, etc. The COST series of intergovernmental projects open to members of the European Economic Area is a good way of involving national industry within a European perspective. There are many others like the European Organisation for Nuclear Research (CERN) in Geneva, the European Space Agency (ESA) in Strasbourg, or the worldwide International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) in Laxenburg, amongst others.

I myself have recently collaborated on ESA projects, which can have quite a lot of high-tech spin-off, as well as working directly for IIASA. At IIASA's recent Conference '07, attended by around 700 of the world's leading scientists to discuss the major global problems, I was dismayed to find that my son (an assistant professor) and myself were the only Scots present, and we were not even representing Scotland. I know that the Scottish Government have quite a lot on their plate at the moment, but this is something that will have to be attended to in due course. Maybe the Royal Society of Edinburgh can help to channel Scotland's research links with the relevant international institutions.

20

Iain fae Elgin,

London 04/02/2008 17:22:03
Given the cutbacks in funding, I don't think we'll be having this discussion on the 2005-2015 figures.
21

Janis *,

04/02/2008 18:48:00

There you go A Voice from Scotland, (17 ) cutting & pasting. Just the sort of thing "AJ from Fife" (aha!) would accuse AM2 of ?

" Fleming synonymous with penicillin, the whole world knows that" Na ... just Scots self promoting, almost as good at it as the folks from Yorkshire. (Sorry Royster)
22

,

04/02/2008 22:08:44
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
23

Liberal for life,

Dunblane 04/02/2008 23:08:18
And all this against the backdrop of recommended closure, sorry merger, of the Macauley Inst in Aberdeen and the combination with Scottish Crop in Dundee. Also the shortfall in University funding, and the failure of this governement to plan for the future of a nation with very little manufacturing left shows a real lack of foresight. Happy to encourage low paid jobs serving golfers but not inclined to display a desire to ensure the quality jobs in scientific research are valued in a way they should be. Just a lot of philistines really, all said and done.
24

Here Today HBOS Tomorrow,

05/02/2008 13:08:36
#14 and others...

I think Scottish in this context is a bit wide open, and as many point out a lot of the scientists in Scotland are from England - its more important the talent is in Scotland it should not matter where it is from.

As for scientists, I am one but left Scotland due to lack of options and the many faces of Scottish Enterprise etc who seem more capable of creating new schemes, programmes and confusion than anything else. The sad thing about Scotland is that moving ideas from the lab to industry is very difficult. The banks (unlike the US) simply wont invest or lend, followed by the desire that everything has to be sold on the cheap to third parties - all in the spirit of private capital. The result is the scientists see their ideas sold cheaply to foreign companies and end up with little or no profit from it, and for that matter all the money we have invested ends up in the hands of the mega rich and not the country as whole who funded the research in the first place.
25

Liberal for life,

Dunblane 06/02/2008 22:10:41
The majority of this research was conducted following initiatives from the last administration so for the SNP to claim anything is an insult to our intelligence. After all its they who are now cutting investment in an industry that is one of Scotlands best hopes if we are to become an international player to survive the challenges of the 21st century. naturally narrow monded nationalist are more likely to swallow Salmonds aim to become the global peace broker - whatever that means. For that job one requires diplomacy not a bullying approach as displayed in Holyrood today.
26

fred bloggs,

Edinburgh 07/02/2008 09:18:03
Penicillin was discovered by a Frenchman.
27

Fairfax,

09/02/2008 11:47:31
Voice from Scotland (23): "Your views on Fleming just flag up your inherent insecurity trying to make of with the Scots ideas."

Instead it is your insecurity that is displayed here: Fleming discovered penicillin in 1928 (at St Mary's, London), whilst Florey and Chain (at Oxford) discovered the means to turn this into a medicine. All three were awarded the Nobel Prize for Medicine in 1945; see the Nobel Foundation's site:

http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/1945/index.html

Being proud of Fleming is patriotism; denigrating the contributions of Chain and Florey is silly chauvinism.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.