Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

New theory on how Salmon find their way back to their Scottish birthplace



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 02 December 2008
ONE of nature's greatest mysteries may have been solved after scientists revealed a new theory on how salmon find their way home.
Every year, 20 million of them leave Scottish rivers and travel thousands of miles to Norway and Greenland to feed. Remarkably, they then return to Scotland, often to within 100 metres of where they were hatched, in a process that can take more than two years.

How salmon complete such voyages across sea and ocean without getting lost has baffled scientists for generations. But a new theory proposes that the fish use the earth's magnetic field to locate their origins in Scottish rivers.

Scientists believe that, in a process called "natal honing", salmon imprint the magnetic signature of their home once reaching adulthood.

Kenneth Lohmann, professor of biology at the University of North Carolina in the United States, said: "Natal homing can be explained in terms of animals learning the unique magnetic signature of their home area early in life and then retaining that information."

The Earth's magnetic field varies across the globe – each oceanic region has a different magnetic signature. Researchers believe that by remembering the unique "magnetic address" of their birthplace, fish may be able to distinguish that location from all others.

Salmon and sea turtles often bypass suitable breeding grounds on their vast journeys in favour of the places they were born. Scientists believe the fish do this due to previous breeding success at a particular site.

Prof Lohmann said: "For animals that require highly specific environmental conditions to reproduce, assessing the suitability of an unfamiliar area can be difficult and risky.

"In effect, these animals seem to have hit on a strategy that if a natal site was good enough for them, then it will be good enough for their offspring."

He said it might also be possible to magnetic imprinting to help re- establish salmon in rivers where the original population had been wiped out.

Scientists agree the Earth's magnetic field changes over time and probably helps animals arrive only in the general area of their birthplace. Then, once an animal is close to their target, other senses, such as vision or smell, may be used. Salmon are known to use their sense of smell to locate spawning grounds once they are close.

Andrew Wallace, the managing director of the Association of Salmon Fishery Boards and the Rivers and Fisheries Trusts of Scotland, said: "That salmon have some sort of magnetic map is certainly very plausible and would explain how they can travel thousands of miles and then return to the same tributary.

"There have been theories that birds and mammals use the stars to navigate, but obviously fish can't do that.

"Salmon have an extremely strong sense of smell and if they can recognise their magnetic signature, then it would explain how they can return to the right area. From there they can use their sense of smell to find the correct tributary."

The salmon industry brings in around £95 million a year in Scotland.

James Leeming, from FishPal, formerly FishScotland, said: "This is certainly an interesting idea and it sounds like a step in the right direction to discover the reason salmon can return.

"But the important thing is that the fish do return," said Mr Leeming. "The Tweed is one of the best salmon rivers in the world and brings in large amounts of money for the local economy."


The full article contains 582 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 01 December 2008 10:20 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

I-Mac,

02/12/2008 00:08:21
Just how new is this theory?

http://www.gi.alaska.edu/ScienceForum/ASF6/691.html
2

the.ally ,

max. 02/12/2008 00:54:22
Well then, I suppose we're gonna expect quit a few next year at the 'homecoming'.

allymax.
3

the.ally ,

max 02/12/2008 00:55:32
#1, is it true pigs wear lipstick in alaska?

No harm intended; just asking.

allymax.
4

drunken proffet,

Tassy 02/12/2008 01:15:10
This theory has been around for some time. Originating in Australia and New Zealand after they tried to get breeding stocks of salmon to return to their rivers. In this case the theory was that the salmon could not recognise the magnetic fields in the Southern Hemisphere, so maybe it is genetic.
5

Goggsie #,

Fife 02/12/2008 01:33:39
Question directed to any physicists reading.

Water can screen out alpha rays from radiative material placed within it, why does it not similarly block out a magnetic field. After all even a nuclear submarine has to surface to communicate via radio.
6

the.ally ,

max. 02/12/2008 01:41:22
#5, because the 'trace' is a 'decomposition'.

P,s. I'm not a physicist; I'm a nationalist!
7

Goggsie #,

Fife 02/12/2008 01:53:21
#6 Thanks. I too am a nationalist.
8

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 02/12/2008 01:54:28


Gosh! on a glimpse, I thought they were talking about Salmond!

9

Dave in the US,

St. Louis 02/12/2008 05:02:04
Question for the scientist:

What is it that makes Hillary return to Washington?
10

chuck,

Idaho, USA 02/12/2008 05:10:05
Could not scientists find a way to reprogram some of the magnetic maps of these salmon, so that they would try new, suitable breeding areas? This, in turn, might increase the total number of salmon considerably, as the reprogrammed fish multiply to fill the new spawning grounds.
Ave atque Vale
11

Observor,

Oz 02/12/2008 05:36:14
They (the salmon) are frequently jumping when near the surface of the water and why? they are taking peeps at the stars for navigational purposes and catching flies at the same time. You dont need to be a professor to work this one out. The late Professor Cappel, of the University of Glasgow studied the life of a salmon over many years and possibly reached the same conclusion as I do, unfortunatly I did not have the opportunity to ask him.
12

Angleland Isover,

02/12/2008 06:45:42
Salmon know everything, just ask Fin Mac cool.
13

L.Scott,

Reno 02/12/2008 07:03:54
#5
Regarding submarines surfacing to use their radio's. They no longer have a need to. Apparently they have newer technology that allows them to even get e-mail via some kind of "burst" technology.I know that sound travels further in water than air so perhaps that is part of the process.
14

drunken proffet,

Tassy 02/12/2008 08:09:53
Well they say that whale's songs can carry hundreds of kilometres through the water. Also the US Navy uses a similar technique of low frequency communication to provide contact with submarines. Could say that most likely they learned it from whales and the whales no doubt are not too happy. Ach they do not have a vote and the Japanese eat them anyway so why worry?
15

ddmc,

02/12/2008 08:52:56
#13 & 14 i think its ELF extremely low frequency, some also say thats the real job the HAARP station in ALaska performs.

Another way of detecting subs is a MAD, magnetic anomaly detector (not mutually assured destruction)which sub hunters like the P3 & Nimrod use
16

Mcsnagpile,

02/12/2008 09:02:47
Everybody knows that Salmon have a Tom Tom on board.
17

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 02/12/2008 09:12:16
#16 Mcsnagpile

Let's hope their is more up to date than mine otherwise they'll be migrating up the Clyde to Buchanan Street!
18

John H,

edinburgh 02/12/2008 09:12:39
I hope Salmond and Sturgeon find theur way home from Holyrood soon and without the use of a limo.
19

Joe,

Linlithgow 02/12/2008 09:29:36
#8..Why not..he currently attends every 'opening'..
20

Embra Don,

02/12/2008 09:41:32
Salmon with a capital "S"?
21

Wynn,

CLYDESDALE 02/12/2008 09:44:24
"The salmon industry brings in around £95 million a year in Scotland."

OK. I got the that, the statutory monetary value without which no Scottish news story is complete....but have I missed the equally obligatory pun , again without which no Scottish newspaper story is complete?

Indeed, another of nature's mysteries.
22

Tweedmouth,

Coldstream 02/12/2008 09:52:00
But magnetic fields vary all the time - true magnetic North wobbles around the pole by several degrees a.Spunds a bit 'iffy' to me. Smell and scent seem more plausible.
23

Langenburger,

02/12/2008 09:54:41
Mr Bailey there is a more immediate salmon headline waiting to be written and it is huge news
How about
SCOTTISH SALMON RUNS UP FIVEFOLD
A good sub headline might be
Salmond predicts Sustainable Salmon Success

That is what would happen if the Scottish and Irish salmon aquaculture industries either did not exist or if they had eradicated their huge sea lice problem (Its actually getting worse as sea lice develop immunity to slice the current medicine)
New robust evidence from both sides of the atlantic proves that salmon and sea trout smolts are being decimated by sea lice all round our island - and if this particular problem was eradicated or managed there would be a benefit within as short a timeframe as 18 months
Huge breaking news but reading The Scotsman you'd never have known.
There is a story to tell and it will run for a long time because the EC will act if the Scottish or British Parliaments choose to continue to ignore what is happening.
24

Riever,

Ayr 02/12/2008 10:09:28
Does this 'new theory' also explain why expat Scots can always point in which direction Scotland is without a compass? Just as great a phenomenon!
Tragic story of the sea lice. It seems that whatever conservation humans get up to trying then mother nature shows she has a greater effect and I do support conservation.
25

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 02/12/2008 11:01:26

#25,

'AHOY THERE MATEY'

Less of the use of the word "idiots" it is not our fault that the Scotsman News decided to use a capital 's' as one poster pointed out to spell "salmon" :)

26

Vincent-W,

02/12/2008 11:18:38
the.ally and Goggsie #,

I didn't realise that being a Nationalist and being a physicist were mutually exclusive!
27

salmondella,

UK 02/12/2008 11:28:50
Home rule for salmon!
28

The wilkman,

Isle of Skye 02/12/2008 12:21:20
"""" 24 Riever Ayr 02/12/2008 10:09:28
Does this 'new theory' also explain why expat Scots can always point in which direction Scotland is without a compass? """"

In New Zealand do they point at the ground?

29

Gdgy,

02/12/2008 13:37:44
Misread the headline and thought that they had radio tracked Alex Salmond on his way back from Westminster.....
30

Lianachan,

Highlands 02/12/2008 14:17:10
#5 Alpha radiation is particulate, so doesn't penetrate very far (a sheet of paper can stop it). Magnetic fields are something different entirely.
31

yolanda,

02/12/2008 15:03:17

Don't they just look for the sign that says "Mr & Mrs Salmon's house this way"?

Or maybe there just shouldn't be a capital "S" in the headline...
32

zigzag,

Canada 02/12/2008 15:36:19
I heard that salmon owners of auld trained thefish at a very early age by saying "Here fishy fishy". Now we know it worked. Thank you anchient friends.

Now if only some one could learn how to do the same with loaves we will be in good shape.
33

Yok Finney,

Ross-shire 02/12/2008 16:07:51
Having found their homecoming these salmon, once usefully harvested by coastal netsmen, now suffer the ecological disaster of salmon cages.
34

Harry Carnie,

British Columbia Canada. 02/12/2008 19:20:09


This is interesting.

We ,in Canada, are working hard to eliminate our wild salmon (Pacific)on our West coast through environmental mismanagement.

This was accomplished very successful on our East coast,(Atlantic salmon) .
We also eliminated our vast stocks of cod by grossly overfishing.

Cheers!
35

Angus,

Alexandria 02/12/2008 21:44:35
Being cynical of scientific theories I just wonder how much evidence is there that this is "science" at all rather than speculation with little or no foundation.

Anyone can propose theories that can not be proved or disproved.

36

Yankee girl,

California 02/12/2008 22:12:29
#8, it caught me the same way, Charles! Here, I thought the Scotsman was trying to incite another political disucssion. Naw, it's just about fish (albeit delicious ones).
37

Angus,

Alexandria 02/12/2008 22:39:38
As an un-eminent non-scientist I have a theory about scientists.

They may, might, possibly, or seem to look for revenue generating possibilities among issues that cannot be proven or disproven so that they might, may, possibly, or seem to convince gullible politicians to part with taxpayers’ money to fund their research that might, may, possibly, or seem to draw a conclusion that might, may, possibly or seem to convince the general public of the worth of their endeavours.

Apologies for the "scientific" qualifiers above, which makes my theory as dubious as those of scientists.
38

Expat1,

Alexandria 03/12/2008 02:52:55
Pigs and Pit Bulls in Alaska I believe have good self esteem and do not need to wear lipstick or fancy clothes.........only Palin needs to do that. Thank goodness for the promise of change, it is about time!
39

DavyLadd,

Ardgay 03/12/2008 06:42:24
No23 & 34, at the start of this story I knew it was only a matter of time before someone attacked fishermen (as opposed to anglers) and fish farms. I have been a fisherman and due to the ignorance of politicians decimating this industry, have now become a fish farmer. No23, a large study in Loch Torridon recently put live smolts into suspended creels at different depths all around fish farms. No lice at all were discovered on any of the smolts. This continued sustained ignorant assault on fish farming is damaging the industry. Ignorance ruined the fishing also. Seals anyone?
40

Angus,

Alexandria 03/12/2008 17:25:30
40 DavyLadd

I think it's the fishermen that damaged their own industry by overfishing.

I the fish industry hadn't expanded through their greed for more and more fish it would still be a viable industry.

41

TheFife,

Beverly Hills 06/12/2008 05:47:01
I am a Physicist and can say a little about this water problem.

Bottom line about a radio wave is that it constantly passes the energy of the radiation between electrical energy and magnetic energy. That's why it's called electromagnet radiation. There is a property of materials called permittivity; the higher the permittivity, the more it attenuates the energy of the radiation. Salt water has a rather high permittivity.

Now, ignoring some details, the real problem with radio is that the permittivity is much more effective at absorbing electrical energy than magnetic. The radio waves are killed by the water mostly on the electrical half of the propagation. The magnetic half is only mildly weakened, but it is still weakened overall because of the loss while it is in the electrical half.

So magnetic fields do pass through the water whereas its cousin, the radio wave, has problems.

I have read that research is continuing to point to most animals having some sort of sensitivity to magnetic fields. The common theory to-day is that birds fly in a circle to sense the magnetic field and once they sense the direction of the field, they know where to go and take off on that bearing.

Have you ever calibrated a compass in a car by driving in a circle? Or a GPS by slowly spinning the device? It's the same idea.
42

Billy Boy,

Sherman Oaks 08/12/2008 18:47:51
Andrew Wallace says that fish "obviously" cannot use the sky for orientation, can someone ask him, Why NOT? Obviously he knows less than the fish!
43

Hickory,

US 08/12/2008 20:49:55
Magnetic signature? Nooooo, it's the peat flavour in the good wiskey.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.