Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Tuesday, 14th October 2008

London from only £11.50 plus, over 50 Other Discounted National Express Train Routes

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Corals at risk – and we're to blame



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 11 July 2008
A THIRD of the world's reef corals are at risk because of climate change and other human activities, scientists have warned.
Carbon dioxide levels, coastal development, sewage discharge and overfishing are all putting coral species at the threat of extinction.

Scientists said urgent conservation measures were needed or there could be mass biodiversity loss, and an impact on the hundreds of millions of people who rely on reef fish for food.

The authors of a study published in the journal Science assessed 845 tropical reef-building species and found that, of the 704 for which sufficient information existed to judge the risks they faced, 231 or 33 per cent, were under threat of extinction.

When this was broadened out to include species that were "near threatened", 407 species – more than half of those assessed by the scientists – were at risk.

The report's authors warned: "Our results emphasise the widespread plight of coral reefs and the urgent need to enact conservation measures."

They said the results showed the extinction risks for corals had increased dramatically over the past decade and now exceeded those for all terrestrial animal groups, apart from amphibians.

The Caribbean has the largest proportion of species in the high extinction risk categories, the study said, while the Coral Triangle in the western Pacific has the highest proportion of species in all categories of extinction risk.

The scientists said the threats were the result of rising levels associated with climate change, as well as local human impacts.

The raised levels of had increased sea surface temperatures, leading to the "bleaching" of corals, and made the oceans more acidic, which harms the coral's ability to build its skeleton.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has predicted increased acidification of the oceans by the end of the century, and Dr Alex Rogers, one of the study's authors, said this presented "disastrous scenarios" for corals.

The research warned destructive fishing, sewage, coastal development and the use of agricultural chemicals were all reducing the ability of corals to withstand the threats caused by climate change and to rebuild reefs.

Dr Rogers, a senior research fellow at the Zoological Society of London's Institute of Zoology, said: "The resilience of corals to bleaching and ability to recover is heavily influenced by other stresses the corals are under, such as overfishing or destructive fishing, declining water quality and nutrient loading from agrochemicals."

While coral reefs cover no more than 0.2 per cent of the earth's surface, they host to up to two million species, with a quarter of all marine fish species found there.

"In terms of humans, they are massively important as a source of food, and globally it is estimated they deliver ecosystem services of £15.2 billion," Dr Rogers said. "They also have major effects on coastal protection from storms and flooding."

The study concluded that whether corals become extinct this century will depend on the severity of climate change, the extent of other environmental disturbances and the ability of corals to adapt.

"If corals cannot adapt, the cascading effects of the functional loss of reef ecosystems will threaten the geologic structure of reefs and their coastal protection function, and have huge effects on food security for hundreds of millions of people dependent on reef fish," it warned.

The full article contains 553 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 10 July 2008 10:39 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

truthsleuth,

11/07/2008 01:16:49
Wait for it.
The petrolheads and motormouths and deniers will propose that sea water lochness be drained and used to produce hydrogen fuel.
By doing so the exhaust from their Vehicles could be used to purify the sea water as the exhuast would be mainly Water which could be returned to the sea.
This would then progressively clean up the oceans.

Please Note
Since this would not require the PHs and MMs to make any sacrifice they will not continually require evidence that it will work


No evidence would be required of the validity of thisclaim.
2

,

11/07/2008 04:07:29
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
3

11+failed,

the pans 11/07/2008 07:45:27
"In terms of humans, they are massively important as a source of food, and globally it is estimated they deliver ecosystem services of £15.2 billion," Dr Rogers said.

Gosh! A global disaster, £15.2bn! Last month the Royal Bank got nearly that from its shareholders. Gordon Brown regularly wastes more than that with just one of his hair-brained schemes.
4

traprain,

11/07/2008 07:57:06
1 truthsleuth,
Nice bit of original thought there. Just a pity it is even more flawed than that other green brigade notion, bio-fuel, which has resulted in starvation for millions.
5

Unimpressed one,

11/07/2008 09:42:35
"The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has predicted increased acidification of the oceans by the end of the century, and Dr Alex Rogers, one of the study's authors, said this presented "disastrous scenarios" for corals."

So all this hand wringing is based on the dodgy playstation models. Probably marine biologists attempting to secure funding to study corals in exotic climes. Funny how corals survived much hotter and cooler climates in the past when, no doubt too, CO2 levels were far higher than now.
6

E300,

11/07/2008 09:59:23
"food security for hundreds of millions of people dependent on reef fish,"
Let's be conservative and call that just 300mn. We seems they are living off £50 per year! Surprising that they have survived so long really.
7

eyeswider,

drowning in lies 11/07/2008 11:12:04
Funding at risk - cold to blame.

A fair amount of coral would have been above the tide line a short (geologically) time back. You can't get more "endangered" than that for a water based life form.
8

Neil,

Glasgow 11/07/2008 14:51:49
Another "scientists say" scare story rewritten from a press release without checking how many of the world's hundreds of thousands of scientists say it.

Like all living creatures there are cyclical fluctuations in corals. We are told we are "all putting coral species at the threat of extinction". Of all the thousands of corals how many of them have actually gobe extinct in the last 50 years. Would that be not quite one?

Just another eco-fascist scare lie.
9

,

11/07/2008 14:56:31
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
10

Spicey,

Glasgow 11/07/2008 16:28:21
E300

Hundreds of millions live off a dollar (ie 50p) a day.

£50 a year would be a step up for them!!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.