Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 19th July 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

To tread more lightly on the planet, our diets must change



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 10 May 2008
AT NO time in history has the pace and scale of change in our diet been faster than the past 50 years. Consumer choice has increased massively, but choice is part of the problem, not part of the solution. Waste, overconsumption and unhealthy diets are rife. We cannot go on like this.
What troubles analysts today is that this time there are at least eight features of the 20th-century food revolution whose fundamentals are now under threat.

The first is the energy crisis. The price of oil has been over $100 per barrel for two
months, having risen steadily for a year. Some 95 per cent of food products are oil-dependent – agricultural productivity gains rely on fertilisers and mechanisation. The first rush to biofuels as substitute oil is now looking thin and if land goes to biofuels, that means less land for food.

Secondly, world food commodity prices are rocketing. Most of this increase is due to rising prices of imported coarse grains and vegetable oils – those which feature most heavily in biofuel production.

Thirdly, world population is rising rapidly – from 6.6 billion in 2007, it will be 9.1 billion by 2050. This raises the fourth problem, labour: with a seemingly unstoppable rise in urbanisation, who will be the rural labour force?

The fifth fundamental is land. Available productive land depends on sea levels, drainage and investment and climate change is likely to change which areas of land can grow most.

But the politics will probably centre on national "footprints". By the 1990s, each US citizen had a notional 1.9 hectares of cropland and pasture land from which to be fed – in China, it was just 0.4ha per person. Land availability has dropped significantly since. And a recent UK study showed consumers actually use food as though they have six times more food-producing land and sea available to them than they do.

The sixth fundamental is water. Globally, of all drinkable freshwater, households use 10 per cent, industry 20 per cent and agriculture 70 per cent. Today, 92 per cent of humanity has a relative sufficiency of drinkable water but by 2025 this will be 62 per cent.

The notion of "embedded water" is likely to be as important as greenhouse gas emissions. There is talk of labelling foods for their water consumption: to produce 1kg of grain-fed beef requires 15 cubic metres (15,000l) of water; a 250ml glass of beer uses 75l of water; a glass of apple juice takes 190l. A 150g hamburger takes a staggering 2,400l.

The seventh threat is already high on the agenda: climate change. The Stern Report on Climate Change found agriculture was responsible for 14 per cent of greenhouse gas emissions. The food and drink sector accounts for 20 per cent to 30 per cent of the various environmental impacts of the most common forms of European consumption; the most significant sectors being meat and dairy.

The eighth fundamental is what is known as "nutrition transition". As people become more affluent, they change their diets, eating more sugars, soft drinks, meat and dairy products. This in turn is associated with a shift in disease patterns – a rise in chronic conditions such as heart disease, cancer, diabetes and obesity. A diet heavy in meat has a far greater impact than a plant-based diet.

Each of these eight fundamentals poses a serious challenge to world food capacity. But the truth is that they are linked. Should humans stop treating the planet as a limitless resource? Definitely yes. But, hooked onto global growth, can we develop a way of consuming which treads lighter on the Earth?

The solutions all depend on whether we want more of the same diet and lifestyle or are prepared to change.



If everyone eats meat and dairy diets like the US or Europe, the world continues walking into a crisis. But if we eat less of these, and farm differently, there is room for manoeuvre. The pressure is thus likely to be on consumers to change.

The Scottish Government is right to be taking a holistic approach to food by considering the economic, environmental and social aspects of food together is essential. But it must not underestimate the scale of the challenges ahead. Food is built into our culture and economy, so there is no short fix – no omelette can be made without breaking eggs!

• Tim Lang is a professor at the Centre for Food Policy, City University, London and a member of the Sustainable Development Commission.





The full article contains 769 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Hmm ...,

10/05/2008 00:39:12
... more Green twaddle. What we have is a growing population in places where food supplies are inadequate.

Perhaps the problem is over-population. But I question whether this academic grasps that.
2

Dileas,

10/05/2008 07:14:52
The author is "a member of the Sustainable Development Commission."

Enough said - just another Green who is making a career from anti-capitalism propaganda!

What is it with these communists who want to attack the Western economy but knows it doesn't have the credibility to do it as a Markist, Trot, or whatever particular shade of chip he has on his shoulder?

Is public money actually paid out to produce this kind of "contribution"?
3

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Federation, not separation 10/05/2008 07:33:32
Unfair comments above. True we are over populated, but the Prof can't do anything about that. He deals with the world as it is. We can't feed ourselves unless we change our eating habits. Each nation should aim to be self reliant in food. Us eating African food when Africans are starving is barmy. Eating veg in season also makes sense. We should import only what we can't grow here (oranges, etc).
4

Dileas,

10/05/2008 07:48:54
Sorry Rules- I appreciate what you are saying but I don't agree. I don't think that the Prof. is looking at the "world as it is" in an era of "fair trade" which provides markets for the produce that third world countries can use to earn hard currency.
5

Boy Wonder,

10/05/2008 08:47:23
#3. We are "overpopulated" ... but only in certain areas of the planet! It really is quite empty in many places!
6

11+failed,

the pans 10/05/2008 09:26:23

"If everyone eats meat and dairy diets like the US or Europe, the world continues walking into a crisis. But if we eat less of these, and farm differently, there is room for manoeuvre. The pressure is thus likely to be on consumers to change."
Do these deluded greens ever come to any conclusion other than that we are "walking into a crisis"?
7

Unimpressed one,

10/05/2008 09:28:45
Instead of wringing his hands and ranting on about climate myths, he should be promoting GM rice and similar staples which will feed the world, not reverting to mass vegetarism. Presumably he is a fully paid up member of the Soil ASSociation too.
8

Alanmar,

10/05/2008 10:59:10
`
Sustainability seems to be becoming more and more about "us", and less and less about "them".
`

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.