Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 29th August 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Target for nurseries too costly to be met



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 01 July 2008
EDUCATION bosses have admitted they won't be able to meet the costs of increasing nursery provision in Edinburgh to bring the city in line with national targets.
The Scottish Government has pledged to increase nursery education from 475 hours per child each year to 570 hours by 2010.

But education leaders say this would cost around £800,000 – which the council won't be able to find without additional funding.

The admission over nursery hours comes amid controversy over the quality of school meals in the pre-school sector.

The council has recently axed hot meals in 14 of its 18 stand-alone nurseries, and replaced them with packed lunches of processed cheese sandwiches, jelly, cake and crisps.

It also comes as education leaders admit not having enough money to cut P1, 2 and 3 class sizes to 18 pupils to meet Scottish Government targets. New figures show that just 15 per cent of this year's 152 P1 classes had fewer than 18 children in them.

In P2, just ten per cent of 129 classes had 18 or fewer pupils, while eight per cent of the 131 P3 classes met the 2007-08 target. The council says it would cost £7.7 million to pay for more teachers to achieve a reduction of class sizes. Adapting and extending schools to accommodate more classes would cost around £16m.

Labour group leader Andrew Burns asked education leader Marilyne MacLaren directly whether the city was in a position to provide increased nursery hours and to reduce class sizes, to which she replied "No".

He says Cllr MacLaren's admission exposes "yet another completely shallow commitment".

He said: "We should not be signing up to these commitments when we don't have the money to see them through. It is a perfectly laudable goal but every goal has a potentially big cost."

Ninety six per cent of children in council nurseries presently receive the maximum 475 hours per year provision in Edinburgh.

Tina Woolnough, chair of Parents In Partnership, says that while many parents would welcome a rise in the number of hours, she fears it would lead to a reduction in provision.

She thinks Edinburgh's education chiefs should focus on filling places in city nurseries, saying: "Where there's space in the pre-school nursery sector they should offer more places for working parents and vulnerable children."

But Ms Woolnough added that she wouldn't accept the council's reasons for not cutting class sizes in P1 to 3. She said: "They're dragging their heels. In the light of school closures, clearly there's spare capacity in the city. They can reduce class sizes by getting extra teachers in classrooms – they do not necessarily need to increase classroom provision."

A Scottish Government spokeswoman said local councils had "significant flexibility" in how to spend their settlement. She said: "

The Government has increased funding to them by more than 13 per cent over the next three years, providing £34.9 billion."


The full article contains 497 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 01 July 2008 11:11 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Schools in Edinburgh
 
1

Cheradenine,

Edinburgh 01/07/2008 12:15:17
Ahh the concordat, the historic buck has been well and truly passed.
2

Scotish Exile,

01/07/2008 13:01:34
make the parents pay, they are your kids after all!
3

R Ascal,

01/07/2008 13:21:37
Can you believe a word they say??!!

The Government promises to reduce class sizes to 18 and to increase nursery provision, and the Council says it won’t. If this is the ‘historic’ concordat in action, I know where you can stick it.

A ‘new relationship’ with local government, shouldn’t mean that promises are broken left, right and centre.

#2 stay exiled!
4

Randan,

01/07/2008 13:42:17
Edinburgh truly is fecked! I feel sorry for everyone left in the city. Me, I saw this coming. Didnt think it would be such a sharp drop though.

#2 is a tube, you can chcek the comments left elsewhere.
5

Scotish Exile,

01/07/2008 15:01:22
#4

So I am a tube for talking sense, what does that make you. If you can't afford to look after YOUR sprogs, then you should not be allowed to have them!
6

,

01/07/2008 15:02:10
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
7

You can take the boy out of Lanarkshire...,

Edinburgh 01/07/2008 16:22:14
Guys, why not post about something you know about?

Nursery provision is EDUCATION, not childcare.. or do you think only parents should have to pay for schools?

Oh, and #6, my kids were in both private and council nurseries, and the council one was far superior. I wanted to pay for extra hours for my daughter at the council one but they couldn't give her any more hours because they were full. Which says a lot about the lack of entrepreneurial sense at the council, but even more about the standards at the private nursery....
8

,

01/07/2008 16:25:33
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
9

The_Doctor,

02/07/2008 11:47:59
How predictable - as usual a story on the EEN website about children provokes the usual rants from hate-filled sociopaths who insist on referring to all children as "brats" or "sprogs" or the like. Pathetic.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.