Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Monday, 13th October 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

PE lessons: 'The attitude towards PE has got to change'



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 18 April 2008
Competitiveness is still a dirty word in too many Scottish schools and the way in which children are educated should no longer be dominated by a fear of failure.
Perhaps it is that which lies behind the seeming inability of virtually every school in Edinburgh to provide the minimum recommended amount of physical activity as part of the curriculum.

Of course no-one would deny that teachers and headteachers
have anything other than the well-being of the children at heart, but in a country where health outcomes are in places worse than the Third World, the attitude towards PE in all schools has got to change. It should not be acceptable that PE is avoided because of a fear of exposing less able pupils to ridicule or an assumption that "sporty" kids will find other places to play and train.

How can it be that three very different schools – Lismore, Craigour Park and Currie – can provide the statutory two hours a week while St John's in Portobello, Clovenstone and Stenhouse manage only 45 minutes? When changing is taken into account, the children at these three lowest performers are getting at most only a paltry 35 minutes of physical activity on the curriculum.

Nor can a difficult catchment area be cited as an excuse. Lismore achieves a mighty 186 minutes while the relatively well-heeled pupils of South Morningside only receive 46 minutes a week, while down at Stockbridge the children enjoy 105 minutes a week.

And how can it be that pupils at the Royal Mile Primary, with wonderful Holyrood Park on their doorstep, only have 46 minutes a week?

While the figures are bad, at least there would be some encouragement if they were moving in the right direction , but if anything the situation is deteriorating, despite so much government focus on improving the health of the nation. That a fifth of Edinburgh schools provide less than an hour of PE a week should spark intervention by the education authority.

The resistance to change must be due either to a lack of qualified staff to run the sessions or a lack of will on the part of school management to address the situation – and the former may well be a symptom of the latter. It should not be that difficult for teachers to be trained up to run simple sessions, as do thousands of parents without formal PE qualifications at sports clubs each weekend.

Those parents who opt out of the state system often cite the importance of sport as a core reason for their choice and that should be the clearest signal that council schools are not doing as much as they should. Spending per pupil in state schools is not that much less than in an average private day school so why should the children be short-changed?





The full article contains 482 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 18 April 2008 8:29 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Schools in Edinburgh
 
1

Horrible Cankers at the Cyber Shebeen,

18/04/2008 10:18:48
Why should vulnerable children be forced to participate in an activity that leaves them open to bullying?
2

Stu_R_20,

Edinburgh 18/04/2008 11:31:35
#1
I don't know whether that is sarcasm but if it's not you are a total idiot: By your argument why should a child bother with Maths or English if he/she is poor at it.

P.E is vital and the sooner kids realise that, despite what the insulated world of school tells you, everyone is not equal the better. Kids who are poor academically have a chance to shine on the sports field and for once they may feel like they are worth something. P.E should be compulsory everyday for an hour!
3

SeriouslyAmused,

Ayr 18/04/2008 11:39:49
Hated PE with a passion. I had severe asthma as a child and it was excuriating having to put up with either being seen as lazy, or if I did get off doing it, had to endure the withering sarcasm of teachers and pupils. Two hours of that every week? Not on your life!

Having said that, PE is a vital activity, but I would hope that kids who suffer from physical conditions that make it a nightmare are treated better these days.
4

SeriouslyAmused,

Ayr 18/04/2008 11:40:27
Sorry, the word was 'excrutiating' - tapping too fast!
5

EPS,

Edinburgh 18/04/2008 11:50:41
#3, #4. I agree with what you say.

For the record, the word is "excruciating".
6

Chalky,

Western Australia 18/04/2008 11:54:25
At the primary school I teach at the students/pupils do 15 mins "Fitness" at the start of 4 days per week plus 0ne 50 min session with a phys ed specialist teacher,on staff. Then a 50 min session called "Year level sport", during which the student/pupils play games such as cricket, soccer, Aussie Rules 'footy', volley ball, netball etc. In Third term we do 'athletics' during yr level sport in prep for Faction Carnivals and Inter-school Carnivals... and the 'experts' still say we don't 'do' enough ???
7

Urban Guerrilla,

Edinburgh 18/04/2008 12:08:27
#2, children don't, as a rule, get teased for being bad at Maths or English. But children are often teased - cruelly and relentlessly - for being bad at PE.
8

siomardaz ,

18/04/2008 12:36:52
#7, as a child i hated p.e aswell and know the teasing kids give to each other thats why i said as a parent i make sure my kids are fit and dont rely on the schools,
9

A Friend of Fernando Poo,

, Newington 18/04/2008 14:07:21
#1: Surely they could teach the vulnerable children useful skills like self-defence?

Personally I used to skive off PE and Games and go do some math instead. I'm fat, but I'm wealthy. Kids take note.
10

Horrible Cankers at the Cyber Shebeen,

18/04/2008 19:54:14
2....Not sarcasm and get a job as a PE teacher you arrogant barsteward!

PE should not be compulsary, if kids who have issues with doing it are bullied into it, it will not have a positive impact on their lives...
11

Stu_R_20,

18/04/2008 20:57:58
#9
Your not that huge, fat guy with the beard who drives around causewayside in his 4x4 are you?
12

bingham parent 2,

BINGHAM 25/04/2008 00:42:44
proud of you LISMORE.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.