Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Royal Mile pipers: 'Police need a new sense of perspective'

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 20 June 2008
ONE of the things police officers attending relatively minor incidents appear to despise is being quizzed by the public over whether they have nothing better to do with their time.
But as far as the unnecessary crackdown on pipers on the Royal Mile is concerned it is a perfectly justifiable question.

It is easy to understand the irritation of local residents at the constant sound of daytime music, especially the dreadful
canned din that blares out from some souvenir shops. But they have chosen to live in the heart of a city that relies heavily on tourism and it is unrealistic of them to object to the associated noise and bustle.

The over-reaction by the police to complaints about pipers is difficult to comprehend, especially as licensed performers are allowed in areas of the Royal Mile during the Festivals. Issuing Asbos to pipers, arresting those who breach the agreements and confiscating instruments is an astonishing way to treat performers in an area swamped by tourists. A more sensible approach would have been to seek some compromise with the musicians over numbers and duration and let council environmental wardens administer the scheme.

It is ironic that this should happen at a time when the police are enjoying some real success in tackling city-centre crime, which has fallen by nine per cent over the past year. Council funding of extra city-centre night patrols has seen the number of offences fall from almost 13,000 to just over 11,500 in the past year. And in the past week or so they have announced they will be stepping up mounted patrols in the Meadows, where an already unsavoury reputation for muggings and attacks seems to have worsened.

Such well-measured initiatives are to be applauded and will help maintain confidence from locals and visitors alike that Edinburgh is a relatively safe place in which to move about. But if beat officers now have enough time to harass street musicians then it suggests that either there is a lot more real crime going undetected or they should be re-deployed elsewhere.

This campaign is a Draconian measure against otherwise law-abiding citizens based on an overreaction to the complaints of a few individuals. But after this week's announcement of anti-drinking proposals, how typical it is of the authorities to deal with the problems of a few by attacking the enjoyment of many.

And how can the Chief Constable legitimately complain that his force is not being adequately funded to meet the special needs of policing a capital city when his officers are persecuting traditional Scottish musicians doing nothing more criminal than entertaining passers-by? A new sense of priorities and perspective is needed.







The full article contains 463 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 20 June 2008 8:31 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Royal Mile
 
1

Curious Yellow,

Edinburgh 20/06/2008 15:21:49
The words 'easy' and 'target' come to mind.....
2

James (1),

21/06/2008 03:25:57
The thing with bagpipes is they are able to be carried whilst being played. What causes grief is that the player is stationary and playing for hours on end. Now if the playing is bad then they are playing for hours on end badly.
Would the author of this article be willing to have someone play outside their home for hours at a time?
The sentence "But they have chosen to live in the heart of a city that relies heavily on tourism and it is unrealistic of them to object to the associated noise and bustle." Yes they have and it is very likely they were there before the pipers. So the point is what exactly? The inference being they should just put up with it? So if you stay anywhere longer than someone else does that mean you have more say in what happens in your area than them? Of course not!
3

The west awake,

Argyll 21/06/2008 11:23:50
I don't know whether the pipers concerned are members of bands, but regardless, I'd just like to remind everyone that pipe bands are fantastic organisations of people who voluntarily carry forward a great musical and cultural tradition, which is (mostly) appreciated by our own people as well as tourists.
Pipe bands normally receive little or no public funding and rely on the financial contributions, hard work and dedication of players and band supporters.
If these pipers are trying to make a buck by bringing pleasure to tourists and locals alike good luck to them. If a few po-faced shopkeepers don't like it,... tough.
4

Diana,

Edinburgh 21/06/2008 13:25:34
I would rather the police concentrated on tackling the CRIME problems - which is what they're there for.

They may not like the pipers playing outside their door, but it doesn't make it a crime.

I can't believe the waste of money this city is.
5

Mark Fae Partick,

Glasgow 21/06/2008 17:23:18
Red faces, cheeks puffed up, blowing big bags o' wind and wailin' away all day - is that the pipers or is that just the po-faced shopkeepers and their fellow moaners who choose to live in that part of the city?

Come on, at least it drowns out the braying Home Counties set and the Yanks.

Mair power to their chanters!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.